SunTimes: after questioning the offense from Bulls starters, Gordon now to start?
If Vinny Del Negro makes a change in his starting lineup and/or his offense tonight when the Bulls host the Phoenix Suns, he said it won't be because of strong statements by Ben Gordon and Luol Deng after a 107-93 loss Wednesday at Cleveland.
Gordon, who figures to start in place of Thabo Sefolosha alongside Derrick Rose given the Bulls' early struggles on offense, dropped his guard after he scored 31 points off the bench against the Cavaliers.
''Starters have to get off to a good start; that's their responsibility,'' Gordon said after Sefolosha went scoreless and starting forward Tyrus Thomas had one point. ''They have to step it up. Maybe Coach needs to mix something up a little bit.''
Deng, who scored 18 points at Cleveland but has struggled to contribute consistently on offense during the team's 2-3 start, said: ''I still don't feel I'm playing how I want to play. We have to find sets that we're productive from and try to give teams different looks. We stayed with similar sets, especially in the fourth quarter. We have to switch it up a little bit.''
Del Negro dismissed the idea he would take such suggestions to heart.
''No, no, no; they're the players, I'm the coach,''
These aren't especially inflammatory comments by Gordon and Deng, but a bit surprising considering they're part of the John Paxson "good, team guys" crew that he claims he assembled. KC Johnson lets us know it was more just them answering questions.
They have their points but I'd prefer they didn't go through the media to make them. Especially Deng, who's been incredibly bad for a majority of the games this season. But not just that, he's questioning the offensive sets when it looks like the team isn't running the sets they're given. They're standing in their spots, sure, but it looks to me like things are breaking down because of over-dribbling and being stagnant off-the-ball, not because of the particular sets.
If this is just a veiled way for Deng to say he should be getting the ball more in the 4th, I can't say he's shown he's earned that, regardless of his bump in pay.
Good on Vinny if he changed things up, I won't consider it bending to the will of his pseudo-stars. And the lineups aren't the most pressing problem, Sefolosha's playing poorly but so is Deng, Thomas, and Noah. But I do think it'll help. Starting Aaron Gray to foul defend Shaq tonight though....
0 recs |
98
comments
Comments
gah!
(fanshot deleted)
I kinda have problem with this. As the article pointed out, it’s not like Gordon or Deng just blurted these things out, totally unsolicited. I’d feel better if Vinny just said something like “well they’re the ones out on the floor, so maybe they see things that I don’t…we won’t make kneejerk decisions, but we’ll take everything into account.” Instead he just spews some line about how he’s the coach and he’s in charge.
Later in the article he mentions how “good teams stick together”. Well wouldn’t that include listening to your veteran players and taking their suggestions into account?
He also is very quick to point out that “Sometimes it’s not the system; sometimes it is. Sometimes it’s the familiarity of everything.” In other words, don’t you dare blame my system or my coaching style.
This team is gonna cave in. It’s 07-08 all over again.
I don’t have anything against what Gordon or Deng said, and the medium they used to state it. Again, they were asked, and they responded.
Maybe Vinny is right. I would just feel better if he at least ACTED like he valued his players input instead of putting on the ol’ “I’m the coach dammit” hat and skipping around the locker room.
by NormVanBeer on Nov 7, 2008 8:44 AM CST 0 recs
I'm guessing
That Vinny’s taking that “hard” line, especially early in the season, in order to dispell the notion that his coaching inexperience will lead to players running all over him. I don’t think it’s necessary, and I agree with you, NormVanBeer, that he could go about it in a better way – especially after the Skiles years of admonishment through the media. But I understand where Vinny’s coming from.
by kig on
Nov 7, 2008 8:53 AM CST
up
0 recs
I agree
I have no problem with what Vinny said. He includes the talk about “my door being open”, so there’s no harm in also saying who’s in charge.
I also disagree that these ‘veterans’ really deserve much input. They have not attained that status in my eyes.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 9:37 AM CST
up
0 recs
4th or 5th year players
don’t deserve any input? I guess there’s a process for that too…blah
I also don’t have a problem with Vinny saying that he’s in charge, but you can listen to your players and still be in charge at the same time. Why not say “I’m the coach, so ultimately I make the decisions, but we do like to hear when our players have input..”?
The whole “be seen but not heard” stuff doesn’t play out well. Skiles treated the guys the same way and we see where it got them.
by NormVanBeer on
Nov 7, 2008 9:57 AM CST
up
0 recs
Derrick Rose gets input
everyone else can suck an egg.
(I wouldn’t last long as the coach, I admit)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 10:12 AM CST
up
0 recs
ha!
Neither would I…
…well maybe Rose can suggest to VDN to start Ben tonight :-)
by NormVanBeer on
Nov 7, 2008 10:17 AM CST
up
0 recs
lmao @ suck an egg
classic..i might need to use that someday
"You’re caught up in basketball. Get caught up in life" - Starbury "The Great"
by Belize on
Nov 7, 2008 10:57 AM CST
up
0 recs
co siggity
They haven’’t even earned double cups of high quality h20….apart from rose of course
"You’re caught up in basketball. Get caught up in life" - Starbury "The Great"
by Belize on
Nov 7, 2008 10:56 AM CST
up
0 recs
I think you are overreacting
Vinny said:
I don’t take [their comments] into account. I talk to all the players all the time.
I think Vinny meant that he doesn’t take their comments to the press into account because he talks to the players frequently. In other words, he knows how they really feel and not how the press thinks they feel.
Calling Vinny a bust, is premature. He deserves more than 5 games into the season. We’ve given Thomas 3 years to develop, at least give Vinny 20 games.
by Jamaicanpi on
Nov 7, 2008 8:57 AM CST
up
0 recs
who called him a bust?
I’m definitely not saying that at all. Of course he has to be given time.
But drawing lines in the sand 5 games into the season isn’t the best way to get off on the right foot.
The players’ complaints with Skiles was that they did not feel they could approach him or talk to him. The coach/player communication was horrible.
It’s already been proved that players on this team have sensitive egos and personalities. Saying that “I’m the coach, they’re the players” has the possibility to make them go into a shell, feeling like they can’t or shouldn’t give input.
by NormVanBeer on
Nov 7, 2008 9:05 AM CST
up
0 recs
I'm calling him a BUST!!!
haha - I should point out that I’m overreacting and will likely “take it back” in the future.
by tyger1147 on
Nov 7, 2008 11:50 AM CST
up
0 recs
at least
till the all star break
"You’re caught up in basketball. Get caught up in life" - Starbury "The Great"
by Belize on
Nov 7, 2008 10:58 AM CST
up
0 recs
Ben wants to play 40 minutes a night
And he’s showing us that he should play 40 minutes a night. The only thing that should limit him to below 40 minutes is if he is in foul trouble and you have to sit him.
I think Ben Gordon has demonstrated thus far that he has improved defensively and therefore should be starting along side Derrick Rose.
Starting Sefalosha hasn’t killed us, but it’s only been effective in victories against poor teams and ineffective in losses to good teams. Heh. Actually this is a lot like killing us.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on
Nov 7, 2008 9:41 AM CST
up
0 recs
I'd settle for 35 :)
but I also think Ben’s been looking good on defense. It’s key since I do not want them to use Rose against the SG. Just take your lumps with Gordon, hopefully he doesn’t foul too much.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 9:51 AM CST
up
0 recs
BG still is in trouble defending Pick-and-Rolls
Several times I’ve seen him go underneath the pick and leave his man wide open fo a jump shot or go over the screen and follow his man all the way to the basket.
by hlac on
Nov 7, 2008 10:09 AM CST
up
0 recs
So what
Kirk’s the better defender and I think he’s been pretty poor in defending the pick and roll. He’s been very good in the man to man defense even showing he could guard 6’10 Turkoglu.
Kirk was going under the Varejao screens set for Mo Williams and Delonte West and they were stepping back to hit their shots.
Against the Suns, are they going to run ball screens with Raja bell handling the rock? Rose will be guarding Steve Nash. When Kirk enters he’ll guard Nash.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on
Nov 7, 2008 10:19 AM CST
up
0 recs
Some coaches want the player to go under and it's up to the 'big' defender....
…to push the dribbler further out, no?
by tyger1147 on
Nov 7, 2008 11:51 AM CST
up
0 recs
Yep
Noc and Thomas have been particularly poor in this area so far this season. Noc I can understand because he’s tyring to correct for slower feet so he lags near the paint, but Thomas as the athleticism to step out and stay with the guards if they penetrate.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on
Nov 7, 2008 12:21 PM CST
up
0 recs
Screen rolls are generally hard to defend by nature
which is why so many teams like to run it since it creates favorable mismatches. The ways to defend it all have serious downside exposure. The Bulls will probably employ more double-switches to defend the screen roll should Ben keep having difficulty. When Ben bellies-up on the ball-handler he seems to get into foul trouble.
by messwiththebull on
Nov 7, 2008 12:46 PM CST
up
0 recs
Sure, why not
start the guy and let’s see what happens. Anything that makes what I’m watching easier on the eyes. I’m obviously alluding to everything not named Derrick Rose, whom I am in love with like only one man can love another man.
by messwiththebull on
Nov 7, 2008 12:42 PM CST
up
0 recs
But if Vinny
Caves, he wouldn’t be much better than Boylan.
This team was a complete joke last year. Vinny has to do what he has to do, and he likely is basing rotations off of some direction from Jerry and Paxson to feature guys in trade talks.
I do agree though that Thabo’s starting days need to be a thing of the past….
Unfortunately though while Tyrus is crapping it up on there, I want him to get a guaranteed 15-20 MPG burn at a minimum, so even if we lose, I’d like him on the floor, and it’s probably easiest to have him on the floor at the start of the game rather the end, unless he’s having a Tyrus game.
Deng needs to stop blaming the offensive sets, and learn his role in the new offense. He has had chances to attack or at least try to move away from a defender, but he’s been jacking up bad shots or shots outside of his range far too often.
by majoyenrac on
Nov 7, 2008 10:56 AM CST
up
0 recs
Different than with B______
In this case we’ve clearly been doing the wrong thing and a change would be to the right direction. If that intel came from the coach or the players it would still be the right choice. And at least the players in question now is a productive guy like Gordon and a “team” guy like Deng. With B____ it was a bad situation that led to caving in to noncontributors like Wallace and Griffin that lead clearly to a worse situation.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on
Nov 7, 2008 12:04 PM CST
up
0 recs
Agree
And Like the B_____ AS THE he who must not be named.
I do think Gordon should start, I think a major reason he isn’t is because of the preseason, but enough’s enough already.
I just don’t want VDN to start to find sets for Luol. Luol the player needs to learn how to play his game in the new coaching philosophy….that’s why he’s a pro and paid to be our best player.
by majoyenrac on
Nov 7, 2008 12:25 PM CST
up
0 recs
totally disagree
luol deserves to have some sets they can run for him. as you said, he’s paid to be our best player. most team’s best players have sets for them. it doesn’t even have to be many sets, but he does need to get involved with the offense and running a few plays for him could really help. i appreciate rose’s talent and yes, i want deng to adapt his game, but to say vinny shouldn’t find sets for luol is a bit crazy.
by Jaina on
Nov 7, 2008 12:35 PM CST
up
0 recs
Deng's problem
is that without any other shooters on the team the lane is pretty clogged and that takes half of his game away. If Gordon was out there the defense would be spread out and Deng would have more options for him. I think they do run things for Deng, but how the defense plays us (because of the lack of shooters) makes the game close up around him.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on
Nov 7, 2008 12:43 PM CST
up
0 recs
my response was only that majoyenrac
said he didn’t want vdn finding sets for luol.
i also agree that having ben out there with luol will help, i know i brought up that point in a different thread, where i said having sefolosha out there with him makes no sense because they are both somewhat “slasher” types (if sefolosha even does anything) whereas if luol was paired with ben, and sef with noc, you get a little of each in both the first team and second.
by Jaina on
Nov 7, 2008 12:47 PM CST
up
0 recs
Ah, I gottcha.
Gordon/Deng and Thabo/Noc makes some sense to me too.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on
Nov 7, 2008 12:49 PM CST
up
0 recs
i think most of us are on the same page here
but we all get caught up in semantics. :)
by Jaina on
Nov 7, 2008 1:01 PM CST
up
0 recs
How do we reach Vinny though?
If I don’t see BG start tonight I am making plans to go the UC on Saturday early and sit by the parking lot with my signs saying “START BEN GORDON”. I’ll pick up a cheapy ticket too and sneak down the courtside and yell at Vinny until they throw me out.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on
Nov 7, 2008 1:05 PM CST
up
0 recs
i'm hoping he's come to the same conclusion we all have
and it won’t come to you protesting in the parking lot. :)
if not you should organize a BaB mass rally for the chicago folks and you can all go down there and protest… :D
by Jaina on
Nov 7, 2008 1:09 PM CST
up
0 recs
As much as I want Gordon to start
what kind of a message is it to start a guy immediately after he mouths off? Vinnie could lose control of this thing really, really quick if he’s not careful.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on Nov 7, 2008 8:54 AM CST 0 recs
you think
he mouthed off? It sounded like he was only answering the question of what changes could be made to help the team. He was even more PC with his comment than he could’ve been. To me, “mouthing off” is saying something like “well, I’ve got to get my minutes and if that means starting me, then so be it…”
I understand that Vinny doesn’t want to be run over…and he does have that right. But at the same time, you have to value your core guys and veteran guys and take into consideration what they say.
by NormVanBeer on
Nov 7, 2008 9:01 AM CST
up
0 recs
I judge mouthing off by what I'd want to hear from my teammates
If I’m a starter, even if I’m struggling, I’d be pissed if the guy behind me is telling the media I need to step up, and maybe the coaches need to change things. That’s the kind of statement that ought to be made in house.
Sure, the reporters asked, but a PC comment would have been something to the effect of “Hey, those guys are good players and they’ll get through it”. It might be a boring and generic comment from us, but Ben (and Lou and previously Kirk) ought to be talking to what their teammates are going to hear, not what you and I are going to hear.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on
Nov 7, 2008 1:02 PM CST
up
0 recs
good point
maybe Ben is using reverse psychology or something…maybe Thabo and Tyrus will both score 30 tonight :-)
by NormVanBeer on
Nov 7, 2008 1:36 PM CST
up
0 recs
let them talk!
let them talk. offensively TT and Thabo have imploded! Why are they starters? They look lost on the court!
someone needs to start a fire.
by chicago-homesick-blues on Nov 7, 2008 9:09 AM CST 0 recs
I think Vinny is just using
Thabo until Hughes comes back next week.
by sue369 on
Nov 7, 2008 11:31 AM CST
up
0 recs
Hopefully, Gordon and Hinrich show enough that it would be stupid to do so...
…or if Hughes does start, he’s so bad w/ the Gorrich doing well that the plans immediately scrapped.
by tyger1147 on
Nov 7, 2008 11:52 AM CST
up
0 recs
Being zen... but it is not easy
I am not excited about the Bulls start and I too find that too many players underachieve right now. I was a strong advocate of starting Sefolosha and it is becoming more and more painful to see that he does not use the opportunity…
So even if I would favour to start Gordon at SG, I want to remind that you cannot judge players’ development in a few games (even if it is already obvious for Rose that he will be very good). We should also remember that for a rookie coach, one important issue is to assert himself and ensure the players respect him. It was, in my opinion, very inappropriate for both Deng and Gordon (especially Deng with his big contract and poor play) to voice concerns about coaching in that context.
We need to give more time to everybody, which does not forbid from having a feeling, mine being quite pessimistic right now not really about the year but about the ways to get out of the messy contracts signed: Deng, Hinrich, Nocioni + the probability to lose Bull’s top scorer for nothing. With so much money spent on reserves, how can you pay your first team? That worries me a lot more especially considering Paxson has not proved being a top negotiator or talent discoverer (or anything except a lucky dude landing the top pick).
by nitrate on Nov 7, 2008 9:11 AM CST 0 recs
"you cannot judge players' development in a few games"
watch Gordon lay a huge egg tonight :)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 9:40 AM CST
up
0 recs
To be fair
Hanley doesn’t say starting Gray, ratherusing him. And this is one of the few matchups I don’t mind seeing him a bit.
by JeffD on Nov 7, 2008 9:14 AM CST 0 recs
I quoted McGraw when mentioning Gray
Bulls coach Vinny Del Negro admitted he was contemplating lineup changes for tonight’s game against Phoenix. The Suns are very big inside, with Shaquille O’Neal, and small at guard.
So the Bulls could consider several changes, from using Aaron Gray against Shaq to starting Ben Gordon at guard to jolt the first-quarter offense.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 9:39 AM CST
up
0 recs
It's a great opportunity to start Ben tonight;
it’s not like we need Thabo to keep Raja Bell in check.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on
Nov 7, 2008 9:49 AM CST
up
1 recs
I meant McGraw
It may just be semantics, but he does say using. Whatever, I’ll just be happy if BG starts. Although if I’m sure Gray starting means TT on the bench. Bah… just once can we start with the best lineup.
by JeffD on
Nov 7, 2008 10:34 AM CST
up
0 recs
yeah, you're correct
if he meant starting he would’ve used it instead of ‘used’, considering he used ‘starting’ right afterwards with Gordon.
I’m just too eager to take a shot at the big man.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 11:05 AM CST
up
0 recs
At least you admit it.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on
Nov 7, 2008 12:23 PM CST
up
0 recs
though it's not because I don't like him
it’s because I honestly think he’s terrible at basketball.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 1:10 PM CST
up
0 recs
When you're struggling
Comments like this and overall general frustration spills into the media. Ben might be right that he should start, but he’s getting playing time, and he probably was going to be moved into the starting lineup anyways. I would hope that the veterans would understand the situation better, instead of overreacting.
by RogersPark Kris on Nov 7, 2008 9:19 AM CST 0 recs
where exactly
did Ben say that he should start? It looked like he said that it’s the starters responsibility to get off on the right foot and that they have to step it up. I guess you can read between the lines and say that’s what he meant..but he still never said that he should be starting.
I don’t think anyone on the team or anyone here would have a problem with Thabo starting if he could score over let’s say 10 points.
Is it too much to ask that our starters play quality minutes? When did the standards get set so low?
by NormVanBeer on
Nov 7, 2008 9:25 AM CST
up
0 recs
Yeah, probably reading too much into it
Players are mostly just venting, combined with the Sun-times trying to create a story.
by RogersPark Kris on
Nov 7, 2008 9:44 AM CST
up
0 recs
With Thabo starting
I have to see him forcing turnovers in order to keep him in the starting lineup. that’s what a defensive specialist does. If you want to start them they have to shorten possession for the opponent and create fast break opportunities.
The only other way Thabo can start and be effective early is if he gets 3 shots early and two of them go in. That’s unlkely unless it’s on a fast break.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on
Nov 7, 2008 9:50 AM CST
up
0 recs
He didn't say it
But doesn’t mean the implication is not correct. Gordon is our 2nd best player, he should get the 2nd most time. If we want to be stupid and keep starting a tall lineup, I say start the game by moving Deng to the 2 spot, just to give Tyrus his starting burn at the 3.
Of course I wrote this on the starting thread…../fanpost.
But it is beyond ridiculous that Gordon’s been at best our best player and at worst our 2nd best player since he’s been on this team and yet he still doesn’t start.
And I agree with everyone else, Gordon has shown improvement defensively (mostly he seems focused on D this year)…..
I know Kirk’s a better defender, but Gordon is leap years better on offense-esp if Kirk’s a 2, so I vote go BG.
If we can develop and win at the same time (At least win enough) that would be nice. We have so much youth on this team, I’m less inclined to shoot for the lottery again, since we won’t be bad enough (cough OKC) to get the #1 pick, and getting a #1 on a 1.7% chance likely can’t happen 2 years in a row.
by majoyenrac on
Nov 7, 2008 11:06 AM CST
up
0 recs
i don't think either player's comments
were particularly inflammatory, especially taken out of context (they were answering questions). plus, luol specifically said he didn’t like how HE was playing, in addition to feeling the team didn’t adapt at the end of the game. and ben’s right; 2/5 of our starting lineup accounting for 1 pt and 7 rebounds. he feels the role of the starters is to try to get ahead early (which obviously is the point in putting your best guys out there first), and if he were starting he knows the burden’s on his shoulders. he’s not blind and neither are the fans. we too realize we are digging ourselves into a hole each game. it’s not unusual for the starting lineup to change if a team’s struggling (and with the skiles shuffle this shouldn’t be unexpected by the bulls :P), ben was just being honest. yeah his comments could be seen as saying he should start, but that’s not even what it was.
and vinny’s allowed to take a hard stance, he has to get the guys to respect him (unlike a certain interim coach). i think he talks to them often enough that that’s why he feels he’s not going to listen to their comments in the press (echoing jamaicanpi above). ultimately, as he points out, it is his decision. he’s not ignoring them, i’m sure he hears all they have to say, in practice, in the media, but he gets final say.
by Jaina on Nov 7, 2008 9:23 AM CST 1 recs
Most importanly
it is the responsibility of starters to start well. It’s like him saying “shooting guards should be good at shooting”, and everyone perceives it as a knock against Thabo. Why do they perceive it in this way? Not because Ben’s a jerk, but because Thabo can’t shoot.
This isn’t an example of Ben being selfish. It’s an example of how absurd the Bulls have become, of how management’s vision departs from the reality that the fans and apparently players share.
When saying a simple and obvious truth becomes inflammatory, something’s wrong.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 7, 2008 9:47 AM CST 2 recs
Yes
While I pointed out I don’t condone Gordon’s statements above, I completely agree that the Bulls invite dissension when they create such a ridiculous situation.
De gustibus non est disputandum
by Sports2 on
Nov 7, 2008 1:06 PM CST
up
0 recs
I think Ben should have started against the Cavs
The Cavs starting front court is Mo Williams and Delonte West, ie no tall guys and no solid defenders. I was disappointed not to see Ben in the starting lineup on Wednesday, so I take these post game comments to be a reactive jab at the earliest time Ben could convey the message, after the game.
Ben should start tonight. If Thabo starts then the Suns will man Raja Bell on Rose when we could have Nash guarding Rose.
Vinny has expressed interest in varying his lineups depending on the matchups and the Suns give him his second opportunity this season to start Ben Gordon.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 7, 2008 9:47 AM CST 0 recs
and against Orlando...
thank God Thabo held down the offensive brilliance of Mikael Pietrus.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on
Nov 7, 2008 9:50 AM CST
up
0 recs
Side note
Im gonna be sooooo ignorant in the bar tonite, PHX fans are gonna dispise me..lol
"You’re caught up in basketball. Get caught up in life" - Starbury "The Great"
by Belize on Nov 7, 2008 10:55 AM CST 0 recs
Im beginning to think
Deng was overrated, Gordon is a wannabe Gilbert Arenas, who is a wannabe Kobe Bryant, there for he is a ball hog that will shoot everytime he touches his hands on the ball. There is only 1 or two guys who should be doing that, Kobe and LeBron. Let the coach decide what goes down, because neither of these guys are superstars that have a say at what goes on in the lockeroom or what plays are drawn up.
WOW WHAT A SEASON!
by SouthsideCUBSfan on Nov 7, 2008 11:31 AM CST 0 recs
ok
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on
Nov 7, 2008 11:36 AM CST
up
0 recs
Gordon
is a wannabe Arenas, but Gilbert when healthy can be a Kobe Bryant for every few games.
Gordon rarely can be an Arenas in 1 game….
And the sad thing is that Gilbert might not be able to be the Hibachi again, but yet he’s making more than either BG or Kobe….
by majoyenrac on
Nov 7, 2008 12:28 PM CST
up
0 recs
Oy
yet he’s making more than either BG or Kobe….
Wrong.
Gilbert’s 2008/09 salary: $14,653,465
Kobe’s 2008/09 salary: $21,262,500
I know shots at Arenas are fashionable these days, but c’mon, at least get your facts straight.
You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.
by Pradamaster on
Nov 7, 2008 10:47 PM CST
up
0 recs
Considering Amare could drop 40 on us if Thomas doesn't play too much
And Noah doesn’t play that much either, I’d agree with Vinny and shake things up here. I said the Thabo experiment would die after a week or so. It’s just foolish to put your team in a hole because your starting 2 guard can’t shoot. Now, if this lineup could actually play as well as they are capable of given all those minutes……..we’ll see about that.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 7, 2008 11:40 AM CST 0 recs
Amare can drop 40 regardless of who plays.
He is just that good…
Noah has not been playing much because it has been reported that he is not in game shape…Stacy King said that Noah asked out after six minutes the other night…he should probably quit smoking.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on
Nov 7, 2008 12:28 PM CST
up
0 recs
Noah, did the same thing
in the 2007 NCAA championship games. He played the first 4 minutes of each half and was winded and came out to seat on the bench out of breath.. It wasn’t becasue of his shoulder he was truly winded. In that championship game is scored only 8 pts 3 rebound in 21 minutes. The lowest minutes for any of the starting five players by more than 12 minutes less.
review link
http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=274000063
Do you think he is consistently out of shape? health? smoking, drinking and/or drugs?
by exult463 on
Nov 7, 2008 2:28 PM CST
up
0 recs
Wow.
In general it’s seemed on BaB people have complained/blamed more on the coach & lineups, and slightly less on the individual players sucking. You softening up on Vinny Matt? :)
by T Maple on Nov 7, 2008 12:25 PM CST 0 recs
the way I see it
the individual players sucking is a bigger problem, but the lineups are easier to correct.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Nov 7, 2008 1:11 PM CST
up
0 recs
Word round the campfire is...
Shaq will not play tonight…he played in back to backs earlier this week and the Suns are committed to getting him rest during the season…I don’t expect Gray to get much burn tonight against the Amare/Diaw/Lopez trio…
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 7, 2008 12:35 PM CST 0 recs


