Basketball IQ? Can Bulls staff teach it?
Many posts note that certain players might lack basketball IQ, or good basketball IQ. I believe this skill is developed over time, and requires awareness and quick reaction. Repetition comes to mind. If the Bulls, a young team, team practices center around just exercise drills, a few motivational speeches and the a-Team competeing against the b-Team running prescribed plays? Might basketball IQ enhancement drills and teaching benefit the players? How do you teach it or can it be taught? Who on staff is able to? Bobby Knight was big on this concept!
Please review the link diagram and discuss your thoughts on this subject as it relates to particular players and the coaching staff if you have any?
http://cmapspublic3.ihmc.us/rid=1171289360649_1941627178_149/Basketball%20IQ.cmap
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
1 recs |
12 comments
Comments
"Bobby Knight was big on this concept!"
was Ditka?!?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 6, 2008 11:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
not towards basketball
yfbb .. review the diagram. I’d be interested to hear your constructive thoughts, if you have any?
by exult463 on Nov 6, 2008 11:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Constructive thoughts on this site?
Surely you’re mistaken, unless you started it with a “Deng is the greatest defender I’ve ever seen” Then said read this diagram and let me know your thoughts about basketball IQ.
Then you’ll get the buy in.
by majoyenrac on Nov 6, 2008 11:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You keep harping on this
Where has anyone on this site referred to Deng as a great defender? The highest praise I recall seeing is adequate. Many have called him a better defender than Noc, but that’s faint praise as best.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 6, 2008 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Matt
Says it quite a bit, indicating that he’s very much above average….sure nobody in their right mind would say he’s the best—-that’s the joys of sarcasm and exagerration…
by majoyenrac on Nov 6, 2008 12:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think I've ever said that.
but please, quit with the ‘everybody else says this, why don’t they value my thoughts instead?’
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 6, 2008 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it's a blog site
You’re supposed to give opinions.
I was being sarcastic to prove a point that’s all.
I’m not thinking everyone has to agree with me…and I really don’t care as such, but it doesn’t mean I shouldn’t say my opinions? That’s weird.
Granted I was totally baiting that response with the sarcasm….that’s all.
by majoyenrac on Nov 6, 2008 1:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And it's a point that no one cares about proving.
“Oh waaahh, no one listens to me. No one values my basketball opinions as much as the guy who runs this site. Waaah. Waaahhh.”
State your opinions, sure, but why whine if people disagree w/ you? You could be wrong.
Granted, I’m totally being an ass w/ this comment.
by tyger1147 on Nov 6, 2008 1:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just
I guess sick of the attacks, that’s all.
I’ve blogged here for a while, stated opinions and left, and after months of it, the attacks if he disagrees are a bit much, and it’s not just to me, it’s to quite a few that aren’t in the clique.
Blogs were everybody agrees are lame, and he seems to want people with a different opinion to leave his site, and that’s the issue I’m having.
I’m not trying to be all wahhh, wahhh, wahhh….
But yeah from one ass to another, I applaud the honesty with the last comment. lol.
Just trying to make a point that’s all.
Once in a while I can see folks getting heated, but tearing down thoughts for no reason other than “he stinks” is silly, and it’s not just me.
But oh well.
I’m off of here for a bit anyway, I’m sure I’ll come back less anti everything…
by majoyenrac on Nov 6, 2008 1:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously though
I think it’s hard to get down on the team for bball IQ just yet. Tyrus had 0 bball IQ when he came into the team and is at least showing more skills—just not converting shots.
Deng has always had very good bball IQ, but is struggling to figure out his place in our new offense.
Nocioni’s always had good bball IQ, but has a tendency to throw it in the dumpster to motivate others when all else fails.
Gordon I really do think knows the game quite well, but this year like last year will do whatever he can to promote his game because he knows the big payday is looming and this is it for at least 5 more years….that’s why I think BG took that ill advised game winning try against the Magic with 5 seconds left, and why he’s been taking more and more dumb shots at the end of games the past 2 years….he has an awful agent.
I think Tyrus needs court time and needs to understand his role….it’s hard with fans gushing over his potential and him wanting to prove himself, but he’s very young.
Noah has a very strong bball IQ….and in the times I’ve noticed him (besides his shot attempts that get blocked that is) he’s looked decent out there….I think Noah’s not playing much because we’re trying to feature others (Gooden, Nocioni, and Tyrus in trades—we’re also playing Thabo as such).
by majoyenrac on Nov 6, 2008 12:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like the post
I was just being a smartass below….thanks for the chart btw.
by majoyenrac on Nov 6, 2008 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good question
I don’t doubt that mentoring a player to get insight into what options were available that he may have missed is beneficial, but I think you have to get to the point where everyone knows their basic roles within multiple sets first. This is a brand new organization. There is no way they are ready to compete on a serious level. From appearances, they are still struggling to run through the basics, and nowhere near playing intuitively enough to get into good flows. If VDN is good and the players don’t put up silly resistance, I’d look for decent ball to be played in March or April. That’s when the IQ part of it will begin to come into play. For now, it’s basic training. Hell, if you followed Jackson’s years, it would take all season long to incorporate a PROVEN veteran into an ESTABLISHED team, because his offense was sophisticated. A lot never got it, the good ones would become useful by playoff time; Rodman was the only player I ever saw get it rightt out of the box.
One would hope that the staff has already determined where they’re going with the team, and this first few months is laying the foundation and determining which of these players is going to work out. I understood what Vinnie meant when he said he didn’t have a problem with TT’s 2-17. We were going to lose that game 95% of the time if he went 17-17; the point is, did he get to the spot he was supposed to, and was he supposed to take that shot. He’s not a 12% shooter; those will fall later when he’s not having to think about every step on every play. That’s the big temptation to play the veterans who pick up the x’s and o’s quicker, and I’m glad that so far, VDN seems content to balance playing a watchable game tonight with getting some PT for the players he has to make a judgment on this year.
by California Al on Nov 10, 2008 9:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 












