Orlando Magic 96, Chicago Bulls 93: know your role
This was very 2007.
Thomas (16.5 minutes) and Noah (5) barely played. The 3-guard lineup was used a lot, they folded late. And the Magic beat the Bulls, as they did in every meeting between them last season.
To be fair to Vinny, Nocioni was hitting shots, and Aaron Gray is at least able to box Howard out a couple possessions. I can understand why VDN didn't want to use Noah and Thomas too much. But Noah wasn't even given first opportunity over Gray, and that's just wrong. And while Tyrus Thomas made some awful decisions with the ball in the 3rd quarter, he doesn't need to be banished to the bench for the rest of the game for doing so. It's so Skilesian.
The ineffectual starting lineup (and Kirk - as the 4 points in 34 minutes sixth man) put the Bulls in a hole to open both halves, the Bulls were able to come back with Nocioni, Gordon, and Rose. The lineups went from small (Noc at the 4) to smaller (Kirk at the 3), and while it was successful for a stretch (Noc was hitting shots and Turkoglu wasn't) I do not want to see more of that in the future.
(biggest fear: VDN finds the Skiles plan in his desk drawer and benches Thomas for Noc because Thomas had a bad game at the same time Noc had a good one)
But the fact that the Bulls were able to threaten the Magic (they never led) near the end of the game, it not only made it a competitive contest, it also revealed a bigger problem: the misuse (bordering on non-use) of Derrick Rose to close out the game.
Rose is this team's closer now, and I'm already more comfortable with late deficits than I was in the past because of him. So to see him stand in the corner in late game possessions while Hinrich handles the ball and Gordon takes the shots makes me think the veterans don't realize how they'll help themselves and the team: let Derrick Rose run the show. Gordon especially: after having a solid game, he still thought he was the man, and rushed up a bad shot with the team down two and barely over a shot clock's time remaining.
But while that poor decision likely sealed the game, the entire contest was full of Bulls taking shots that seemed dictated by whose turn it was and not who was open and in position to shoot in rhythm. Hinrich still thinks he's the PG even when Rose is in the game. Drew Gooden hit a few early shots and as a result thought it justified whatever else he threw up. And speaking of throwing up, Luol Deng was completely missing, not making a single field goal and finishing with 1 point in 25 minutes. It's not just a shooting slump, he's taking jumpers early in the shot clock with defenders on him...as if he's trying to get his...like everyone else.
All these guys need to realize they'll play better, and the team will be better, if they let Rose do the work. Ben Gordon should be happy he doesn't have to be on an island in end-of-quarter situations. Deng, Thomas, and Gooden don't need to rush jumpshots if Rose can give them an open one later in the possession. Hinrich...well he just has to get used to a kid taking his job, and become a damned good bench combo guard.
I guess it's a bit much to ask to have the transition happen right away. But hopefully the team sees that the accelerated progress Rose has shown means they need to adapt at a quicker pace than they originally thought. I think some things will correct on their own, like Deng's shooting. And others could be helped by lineup construction, as in getting Gordon more time with Rose. But at the core it's still counting on the players to buy into it.
And if they don't, Vinny needs to tell them. If he is and they're not getting it, Paxson needs to trade them. Though if that was the case, he should've known these players he drafted better, and have traded them already.
0 recs |
311 comments
|
Comments
Excellent review.
I thought it summed up the game perfectly. These guys need to defer to Rose, even if it is a hit to their egos, or whatever. It really was frustrating watching Lu disappear, Kirk attempt to be the PG again, and BG try to take over every possession at the end of the game. Tyrus being benched I was actually okay with, because he’s been god awful the last 3 games for the most part. Hopefully he continues to start though, otherwise that would be annoying. It’s still early.
Best line:
Drew Gooden hit a few early shots and as a result thought it justified whatever else he threw up. And speaking of throwing up, Luol Deng was completely missing, not making a single field goal and finishing with 1 point in 25 minutes.
I had a good laugh there. Thanks for that.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Nov 3, 2008 11:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think he was justified
the guy was 9-16 with 21 points. He’s proven he can score and rebound (although not on the same nights I guess). The guy should be the starting PF. We should continue to play and develop Tyrus with an eye on moving him in a bigger package this offseason.
Gooden looks like an affordable starting PF. I would guess 6-7 million per year would sign him and keep him around. The guy is only 27.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 7:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
except Gooden's never been an efficient shooter
and as you mentioned, the nights where he does so (and rebounds) are sporadic…plus he’s a space cadet on defense. And I don’t mean in the ‘Tyrus is stooopid haha’ way. The kind that actually hurts the team.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 8:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden pump faking at the 3 point line, 4th quarter
why is gooden at the three point line? and have the ball?
this is not what the bulls need from a PF. he may have done well last night, but the Bulls lost.
side points:
1) Hinrich?
2) Deng?
3) Rose has too few assists.
4) TT looked too timid. but he should be after the 2-17 outing.
by chicago-homesick-blues on Nov 4, 2008 9:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So they lost because of Gooden?
I guess Rose really needs to step it up then since they lost.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 11:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's just weird to pick on the one guy
who’s actually produced on this team. 21 points and “attempting” to guard Howard.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 11:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I also don't see where
he’s inefficient. He’s considerably more efficient than Tyrus. His biggest knock is help D, but he should be playing PF and not C where the help typically comes from.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 11:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, well
it’s not a competition between Gooden and Tyrus. Tyrus needs to play.
But no, I do not like Gooden’s shot selection so far, even if he’s hitting them now. He’s not a post player either, and his FG% has been decreasing the past two seasons.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 11:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...play Tyrus
If he develops enough, he could be very nice to add in a trade.
And you can’t knock Goodens post game when he’s going against Dwight Howard. He should be playing PF. He would have killed Rashard Lewis inside if given the opportunity. You act like it’s his fault they’re playing him at Center.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 11:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's his whole career.
sheesh.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 12:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why judge him on his career?
that’s like saying BG will forever be a 6th man because he’s always been.
Or Nash should never have elevated his game in Phoenix.
People roles change and they can be a better fit in those roles. He was asked to do a lot of dirty work in Cleveland and that’s not all his game. He has about 25 games now the bulls posting a per over 17.5 Maybe we should take a closer look at him.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 2:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
but do you think he’s a post scorer? I don’t see it.
He may be an option but only if they’re convinced Tyrus isn’t.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 2:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree he's not an all-star 25ppg post scorer
but he’s an effective player that can average 16/10 and sign for a reasonable contract. If both were free agents right now, Tyrus might get more money and I’m not convinced he’ll ever be as good as Gooden is right now.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 2:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you're going to sign him for less than he currently makes
Especially if he has a good season and Tyrus doesn’t make any drastic leaps in his play. This is all months down the road anyways. I still don’t see how bringing Drew off the bench and letting Noah start is going to hurt this team. If Tyrus sucks Drew will still get minutes, and if anything his weird shot selection doesn’t look so stupid if he’s seen as the offensive force off the bench.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 4, 2008 11:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Very few teams under the cap
I think about 7 million is what he’s looking at.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
by the way
I did not read most of the comments in the venting thread…and if you’re going to be a reactionary goof, please put it there.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 3, 2008 11:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you 100%
I just wrote it in a shorter way . .
What Gordon has to realize now that Derrick is playing
If he moves without the ball, Rose will find him!
Instead, he feels like the only way he’ll have a chance to save the game is for him to handle AND shoot when the game is on the line
by Option27 on Nov 3, 2008 6:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
by Option27 on Nov 3, 2008 11:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure Gordon
only feels that way – VDN IS the coach… he’s allowed to tell Gordon to give the ball to Rose in that situation. If he doesn’t, then the blame is on him more than Gordon, imo.
by kig on Nov 4, 2008 7:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In Sam Smith's blog
“It is a good lineup,” Rose said of the three-guard. “But it is up to coach. We’re a young team and trying to get to know one another and play with each other. For us to go out there and come back like that really showed good signs.”
I’ve always believed in going with your best talent and what works best for you, no matter what the convention is. You try to put players in position to succeed. The Bulls don’t have post players. So don’t bother. Former coach Scott Skiles used three-guard sets often, but Del Negro isn’t as demanding on missed shots and there seems the potential to play with more freedom. Plus, I like to put opposing offenses, like Don Nelson does, in position to try to attack you because of a perceived match-up advantage with what they might not do best.
by Option27 on Nov 3, 2008 11:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I actually liked the uber-small lineup better
with Deng than Noc. That fits in better with the ‘just play your best’ strategy.
However I think the Magic were just a unique matchup. Their big players (besides Howard) are mostly shooters who rarely post up.
I’m guessing Sam Smith doesn’t value rebounding too much.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 3, 2008 11:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That is if Deng was playing his game
Sure I think everyone would liek that lineup. But you’re an idiot if you think you’d rather have had Deng out over Nocioni yesterday, when Noc clearly was our on the court leader and was playing a very Nocioni game very well. Deng was in the shadows. There’s no need to keep praising him, he’s got his big, undeserved contract.
I want to see Deng attack and play to his abilities. I don’t think Deng takes nights off, which is good, but I do think he defers and loses confidence, which is a real shame and pisses me off.
Deng is far more talented than Noc all around, but Deng rarely plays to all of his abilities and so the gap between Deng the player and Nocioni the player creeps ever closer.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 8:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
nah
Noc still stinks.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 8:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm
convinced matt was slighted by noc a couple years back. maybe we’ll hear the story one day and the “aha” lightbulb will start to flicker.
by leeac on Nov 4, 2008 12:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Maybe in a pickup game, Matt was driving to the basket and Noc clobbered him, then took the ball against Matt and drove to the lane, kneeing him in the gut and getting hacked in the arms and yelled and screamed and gave Nocioni’s team a great chance of getting back into this as the crazy guy who’ll do anything to win.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right now...
It’s Deng who’s stinking it up. We know how good he can be. He’s just not showing it right now. I don’t think we should bench him though. Deng will snap out of it in a week or two (I hope!).
Besides, I remember Noce saying last year that he didn’t like starting for the Bulls. Why? Coz that meant the team’s best players weren’t playing well. Noce would rather have Deng play in front of him because he knows if Deng is playing well, the Bulls can win. That’s team spirit.
by PatBull on Nov 4, 2008 9:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice wrap up
It was a game with shades of last year, but unlike last year we managed to somewhat fight our way back.
by Tobo on Nov 3, 2008 11:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
and if you recall in the pregame it was mentioned
that the bulls lost all four games last year to the magic by an average of 17 or so points.
by gman2849 on Nov 4, 2008 10:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
David Thorpe on Deng
David B. Thorpe at 9:52pm November 3
The Bulls have put in an entirely new offense, and it is not small forward friendly. As of now. Stay tuned!
by Option27 on Nov 4, 2008 12:03 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It's time to stop hating Noce
He continues to pysch out his opponents and gives maximum effort every time he is on the floor. I still want TT to become the force I fantasize, but he needs to get his head out of his posterior and into the flow of the game if he doesn’t want to return to his seat on the end of the bench.
I ‘m hoping Deng will awake from his coma soon and maybe Ben will learn to stop ruining every close game with his pratfall performances when the game is on the line. There is a simple cure to this brain cramp disease….just put the ball in Rose’s hands and find an open spot on the floor.
VDN needs to tell Noah to put his bong away and pay more attention. My God, if he can’t even beat out the Bulls version of Herman Munster, maybe he should go into rehab or visit a shrink.
I will not give up, but this is really getting frustrating. Hurry and get the ship righted before the one man wrecking crew, Larry the leper, recovers and eats up even more valuable court time. Even Sam Smith is falling under the illusory spell of the 3 guard offense….been there, done that…..failed miserably. Rebounds are still important the last time I checked. Just ask Orlando’s manchild.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 4, 2008 12:10 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Stop the Noce-Hate.
Nocioni and DRose seem to be the only ones who give 100% all the time (last year, it was just Noce!) and Deng’s shoes seem to have filled with concrete, now that his pockets are full.
TT is a basketball mirage and Noah seems to be hitching a ride with him.
Gordon needs to go, if we want DRose to be The Man. Gordon doesn’t seem to have Scottie Pippen’s mental fortitude to accept that he’s playing with a much better player and that he can still be a HOFer and one of the NBA’s best playerseven if he plays sidekick.
by PatBull on Nov 4, 2008 4:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gordon
Had a good game. A bad turnover and a horrible shot notwithstanding. Gordon was instrumental in our come back, and I think VDN needs to just work with Gordon and say, he can be our shooter, but that he needs to have Rose be our PG to get BG the best possible shot.
I don’t understand how it’s Kirk’s our 4th quarter PG, Rose is our SG, and yesterday at least BG was our SF….and then the last shot, it’s Gordon (easily the worst facilitator and ball handler of the 3 taking the ball downt he court and forcing a shot). He might have had to do that at times with Kirk, but there is no reason for him to keep doing that with Rose on the floor.
Though I would still have Gordon our first option to take the final shot, Gordon shouldn’t be the guy creating that opportunity, and hopefully VDN knows this and teaches this to the team.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 8:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it also points to the new offense
and players who better fit it.
by gman2849 on Nov 4, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well, i'm optimistic, and i think it's only a matter of time till rose takes the ball and everyone else realizes that's the way it should be.
he’s only gonna get more confident and more assertive. there will come a time, hopefully sooner rather than later, when the supporting cast will understand that the best chance to win occurs with rose with the ball. they’ll all get a chance to score points, but they won’t need to try to create their own shot.
Cashing checks and having sex.
by MarketMaker on Nov 4, 2008 12:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Just in case no one noticed
Rose had his worst game of the season, and wasn’t going to win this game by himself.
That said Deng and Thomas were beyond description awful, at this rate they might rate as the worst starting forward tandem in the league.
Gooden is not a center, and transgresions not withstanding Noah should start at center until we acquire Howard, or Yao Ming, or Bynum or you get the idea.
Gooden should start at the 4. Thomas has already proven that he is simply too stupid as a human being to even be an NBA player. Unfortunately, I would demote Thomas to the third, with Nocioni being Goodens backup at the 4.
As Jeff Van Gundy said, more than once during Fridays telecast against the Celtics Nocioni is better as a small power forward than he is as a small forward. This was obvious tonight.
When we go to a three guard I would prefer to see Thabo at the 3. I actually think he might be a better matchup at the 3 especially defensively, although Hinrich did a much better job tonight against TurkeyGlue than Deng did.
We are basically a small team, so we have to find a way to play to our strengths.
New starting lineup; Rose, Thabo, Deng(for now anyway) Gooden and Noah. If Deng continues, fuck his salary, put him on the bench, start Thabo at the 3 and move HInrich into the starting lineup, or heaven forbid, Gordon, or Hughes.
by BigWay on Nov 4, 2008 12:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Noah needs to get more time. He’s a talented player who isn’t doing as much as he can in the stints he gets. That Battie block yesterday was awful, but Noah’s passing, hustle and grit help. And playing him will improve his D against the best. Gooden’s a solid PF too…..not as good at C.
I would rather for now keep the lineup as is to hopefully get Tyrus back into the confident player he was in the preaseason and pre Garnett….but his leash is shrinking, which is a real shame.
God I almost hate having Tyrus on our team. He makes plays and things few players in the league can do, and yet he still can’t be counted on to play major minutes…..I worry we trade him and he figures it out…..but at this point he’s still worse off that Tyson Chandler was in year 3….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 8:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It was a good games
I know we lost, and that sux, but really this was a good game.
I dont think orlando can be considered a great team, but they are the teams we definetly gotta beat to get some respect in the league. I think this game really should have been ours.
One key thing i noticed, and so did stacey, that we won the 2nd and 4th quarters of the game and lost the 1st and 3rd. The main reasons for this is Thabo, Deng, and Tyrus. Im not gonna pull a ‘they suck, trade them now’ rant (enough people will do that for me :>) ) but they clearly were not helping us at all in this game, and ultimately i think that is what led to the 3 guard lineup.
Thabo had a couple of good defensive plays, but his turnovers turned me off. That and his inability to score especially since he is more of slasher, and howard would have killed him had he tried that. Which was also the biggest problem for deng and tyrus.
Those three werent impacting the game at all, and were playing against their strengths which on the offensive side is taking it to the rim. The three guard lineup was working because our three guards were either defending well (hinrich) shooting well (gordon) or were named rose (hall of famer) and noch was completely unafraid of howard.
The end of the game play by gordon was foreshadowed when gordon hit the end of the half jump shot, maybe it was gordons fault for taking the shot, maybe hinrichs for giving the ball to gordon or vdn for not calling timeout, but that play really was bad. No one wouldve minded rose missing the shot, everyone hated gordon for missing it.
Hinrich didnt get involved in the offense, mainly due to his lack of of offensive moves, he is only effective taking shots that are open rather then contested. his defense was good on turkoglu but his play overall wasnt amazing. If it wasnt for the poor performaces by deng thabo and tyrus hinrich wouldve seen more bench time. Gordon looked good out there on offense, but he portrayed that need to control the ball to score. Rose gave him a few nice dishes where he shouldve just popped the shot, but he either missed or decided to put the ball down.
Well the cavs are gonna scare me, but i see us beating the suns….
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Nov 4, 2008 1:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i think we have a better chance against the Cavs
I’m not liking our chances against Shaq and Amare. If they give the ball to Rose however, he should live in the lane because the Suns are bad defensively.
by DangerMouse on Nov 4, 2008 8:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Rap Up and comments
Now, we’ll see how VDN and Paxs responds..
by exult463 on Nov 4, 2008 5:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is going to sound strange, but
winning in Memphis was the worst thing that could have happened. The Bulls played exactly the same way tonight that they did then. The difference is they won, so naturally they think that they can keep playing that way and win. To me the play seems to be getting worse as the season progresses, and you can almost see the trend in Rose’s assist numbers. The only game that the Bulls played together was the Bucks game, when Rose had 9 assists. This also reflects in the teams assist totals. They had 27 assists vs. the Bucks then 13, 19, and 11. Until the team starts playing TOGETHER, then they will keep being inept on offense. As far as the players go, Tryus is playing really soft, Noah has zero energy, Gooden is a black hole, Deng is too but he is also playing like he is lost on offense. That’s not to say that these players are our only problems, but they are the most glaring and frustrating to me.
"Rest satisified with doing well and leave others to talk of you as they please"
by Bigred15 on Nov 4, 2008 8:04 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
When everybody said the Bulls would struggle
because of a new system, new coach, and new point guard, this is what they meant. There’s a Serbian word that describes what was out there on the floor – gushva. It means choas to the n-th degree.
The Bulls, right now, are gushva. They don’t really run offense, because nobody’s moving. They don’t really play help defense. Nobody’s in an established role.
I realize that it will take time for things to get better. But here’s the thing – Vinny’s never done this before. Never installed an offense, never run drills. I can’t help but think it would be more useful to Derrick to have somebody who knows what they’re doing.
There’s talent here, which is what makes it frustrating.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 8:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
In the 2nd section of today's daily dime,
Hollinger talks about he Bulls offense…
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-081104
"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."
by jpchi on Nov 4, 2008 8:26 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
For those who say Hollinger is a know-nothing number cruncher
His analysis of the Bulls seems pretty much on the money.
I know it’s early, but that’s sort of what concerns me. We aren’t scraping for games at this point, we ought to be working hard to develop Rose and make the system work.
He needs to be out there with a shooter, and he definitely needs the ball in his hands, not standing in a corner.
And yeah, I know it’s only one game, but it’s definitely a trend at this point, as is the poor off-the-ball movement, which pretty much disappeared after the first game.
by Sports2 on Nov 4, 2008 8:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I agree with most of what he said. Unfortunately, I think his appraisal of the Bulls’ offense as “European” is generous. It just doesn’t resemble what we’re used to seeing in the NBA, which is a modicum of organization.
Here’s the main issue for me. BG, Deng, Tyrus – everybody except Nocioni – are doing a terrible job getting open. When playing with an elite point guard, you don’t just stand still. Your man moves to help, and you move. You don’t cut all the way to the basket, no. But you do cut, opening the space for both the pass to be made and a shot to be taken. Derrick has to not overpenetrate, too. But the main issue, at this point, is that the Bulls big guns are just standing out there, waiting for the ball to be delievered.
That’s not how it happens. You float to the corner. You make an L-cut to the space Rose vacated. You do anything but a) stand there b) cut to where Rose is driving. I’ve seen both of those boneheaded moves.
But hey, it’s gonna take time. ::deep breaths:: Time and patience.
(I just thought we’d have to be patient with Rose, not the other guys.)
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 8:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate Nocioni. He might not be selfish, but his play is.
Gordon drove to the lane, found his shot contested and passed out to Nocioni. He then floated to the corner, left uncovered. Nocioni drove to the lane, found his shot contested… and , w/ Gordon clearly in his vision wide open… shot the ball.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 8:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
One play
And Noc the aggressor was getting to the line.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 8:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know, admittedly, I didn't watch much of the second-half
And that play pissed me off. If I was another poster, I might harp on that play as evidence or something. I do wish Nocioni had more “timely” or “appropriate” aggression.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hate him as much as you want,
he’s fit with Rose better than anybody on the team. I don’t think it’s close, either.
Which is sad.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 9:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd agree with that for now
Hopefully, before the end of the season that will change.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 4, 2008 9:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
only when he makes shots
all the ‘little things’ he does is actually a negative. Like losing his man on defense, fouling often and excessively, shot-jackin.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right. People talk about Gordon is "only" a shooter.
That’s better than only being a shooter w/ a bunch of little negative things, too. At least in my opinion.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True,
but he is getting open. He’s using Rose’s abilities to put himself in a position to succeed. Luol and BG haven’t done that. On the contrary, they’re engaged in a tug of war with Rose to see who gets to dominate the ball.
The minute those three accept their roles this team will start to succeed. If they do that and play defense, they could be very good.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 9:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think BG's done that too
Though he’s barely played with Rose.
Luol, nope. But what the hell everyone, they’re not going to sit Deng for Nocioni. Deng’s the team’s SF for the future whether he sucks or not, and most evidence points to him not sucking.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why, I'm convinced, Gordon wanted so much money.
Nothing to do w/ ego or whatever. Just “stability”. If they pay him more, he’s the starting SG of the future. And they aren’t likely to trade him anytime soon. I don’t know why, but I feel secure in my assumption that that is why he wanted “leading-scorer” money.
Anyway, I just read the BG-contract-revelation fanshot…
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
Hollinger’s analysis was more spot on that normal because he actually was asked to watch this game, rather than just crunch the numbers and watch highlights…..
I’ve never said Hollinger didn’t know what he was talkign about (I’ve often been slightly negative on him), I just think when he doesn’t watch the games he uses the numbers a bit too much to skew his opinions, and often times those opinions directly oppose to what I’ve seen. It’s not just on the Bulls either—because I do watch quite a few other games—but mostly ont ehBulls since I easily watch them the most and follow them the most closely.
But now that we have Derrick Rose, ESPN likely wants to get their numbers expert and solid analyst to actually watch and observe the game, and that’s what lead to Hollinger’s great analysis of our play in today’s daily dime….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If he doesn't watch the games, do you have a better way to evaluate a team/game?
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know
You evaluate some games from stats….but Hollinger seemed to NEVER watch the Bulls, and that’s his problem…..
But as this post proves, when he does watch he’s good. I think he’s watched very little of us over the past 1.5 years.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think MOST have watched the Bulls.
He says the same things anyone else says from national telecasts. Or seems like it. At least he’s trying to find a better way to evaluate them.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 10:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So don't defend him when he's wrong
better way to evaluate them
Let him search. He’ll come up with something eventually. In the end, most fans are going to want to win that night, not blog about 3-5 year trends.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
I do think when Hollinger follows a team (in the past few years more geared towards Spurs, Suns, Heat, Mavericks, Cavs, etc) he’s on point and mostly has awesome arguments, where he uses his visuals to come up with ideas and then the stats to further the arguments….in reading him over the years you can generally see a stylistic change when he’s forcing numbers into an argument, rather than when he’s watched/followed that team….
He’s very good when he watches, when he doesn’t (such as 2 years ago when he claimed the Bulls were easily the best team int he East and that the Bulls could likely beat the best in the West because of their point differential and style, when anyone watching the Bulls knew Detroit still was the leader (even though Cleveland ousted them, Detroit was the faves) and that the Bulls inside weakness was a real concern….we had a chance if the pieces fell to do well, but we most certainly weren’t the favorites with our holes (And that’s just a more recent observation—I had insider for a year and loved Hollinger at first and then gradually was turned off—though I still read his freebies and generally like his player rating comments, but like his team comments far less)….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I generally take some from Thorpe and some from Hollinger
Thorpe watches a ton of games, not sure about Hollinger. Analysis from both can put things into perspective.
by messwiththebull on Nov 4, 2008 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There is hope.
The Bulls had the ball with what was potentially the last possession with the shot clock off, rather than call a time out like they are supposed to, they pushed the ball up the court and Gordon took a bad shot. If the coach/players had made the right play in that situation, we could be discussing how we pulled on out…
The fact is we have a rookie coach with a rookie star…both of whom showed their greenness last night down the stretch…we will get better as the players begin to learn their roles and the coach learns how to use them in those roles. But those types of chemistry issues take time.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 4, 2008 8:24 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
we're not that simplistic
it wasn’t just the last possession, Rose was a bystander for most of his final stint in the game.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 8:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I watched the game
again yesterday, and really liked our grit.
I actually thought Kirk Hinrich was a major factor yesterday. His defense was incredible, he made Turkoglu look like Adam Morrison. And to say the 3 guard lineup folded, is a bit much, the two times we went to that lineup, we made the game competitive.
Ben Gordon took a very ill-advised shot. I was pissed when he threw that tough shot up there with so much time left on the clock….a flashback of old Ben, which was a shame as Ben was having a pretty decent game for us.
I feel for Tyrus, I like the confidence factor in his game this year, and I also don’t know exactly what happened as he was hitting those shots all preseason and against the Bucks…….but look if the Bulls keep playing Tyrus major minutes while he takes wild shot after wild shot after wild shot, we’ll be worse off in the win column than we are right now….and folks will start to blame Vinny for that. I hope Vinny keeps Tyrus in the startng lineup to give him some burn early in the game and get his feet wet….but I had no problem yesterday benching Tyrus after another bad shooting night. When/if our team really falls out of the playoff picture, then we just let Tyrus play. You have to think though, Tyrus’s godawful shooting and trigger happy ways have to be hurting his trade value…..so it also might help that Vinny gives him some 15-20 MPG to get him through this slump as to avoid potentially more 2 for 17 nights….
A real shame though, because I love his energy and his highlight reel plays, and really want to see Tyrus succeed as much as D. Rose.
When are folks going to start bashing Luol here? Seriously. Nocioni’s hustle and grit does more than the box score shows, and yesterday was a game where his play showed in the box score. Where’s Luol? One game out of 4 does not indicate a nice $71M investment…..Even in games where Noc’s stats are underwhelming, he’s been making smart little plays to get us an extra posession, or fouls to take the opponents out of their finesse ways and save some easy baskets….
Where’s Luol been? He’s been in the shadows doing very very little. Luol can drive with the best of them and use his length to get over many of his SF counterparts (long, wiry arms)….Yet he’s been just a jump shooter and isn’t taking the best jump shots either. Plus for all the bashing Noc gets for defense, nobody touches the fact that Luol’s been worse….very frustrating performance. Luol outside of the Bucks game has been playing like a rookie, not like the very talented 5th year pro he is who has a major contract to live up to.
Finally, much as I think Kirk has settled us down when the game’s on the line of late as our PG….I don’t like the trend to now force Rose into a SG….that started against the Celtics and now seems to be the norm. Rose has amazing passing skills, and if we create habits that force him into being a shoot first point guard, we could create a new Marbury…..hopefully a more sane Marbury….but a new Marbury, instead of the Paul/Williams but stronger and more athletic clone he was for us in the preseason and opening night.
Having Rose as our PG and accepting flaws there for losses is something I can live with for our future. THat is 100% against the having Tyrus play 35MPG (which to me is ideal if he is hitting shots), because Rose is really our future, and we need to develop him into being the player his skill set indicates he can be.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 8:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i agree with everything you wrote except
about Luol’s defense. Look at Jefferson, Gay and Turkogulu’s numbers against Deng (I know Kirk guarded him in the 4th, but Deng had the assignment most of the night). Deng has been the Bulls best defensive player. The problem is he is doing his best Sefo impersonation and giving us nothing offensively.
The Bulls need to figure out how to get cutters to the basket while they are working the pick and roll. Right now, they run the pick and roll and the other 3 guys just watch. If they get cutters, there will be more assist. They really need to go back and watch film of how they played against Milwaukee. That is the type of offense the Bulls need.
by DangerMouse on Nov 4, 2008 8:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll believe it when I see it
I recall Gay torching Deng, and I know Hinrich was the Turk stopper. Deng played well on both sides in Milwaukee and got me excited about him turning that corner, but that’s been it so far this year….which is unacceptable.
Kirk Hinrich has been easily our best defender.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Turkoglu just had a bad night
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That might be true
And would seem fair considering he’s 7 inches taller than Kirk….but Kirk definately helped keep his game down, staying in front of him, forcing him to hoist less than ideal shots, playing solid defense.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
kirk did what he could
but he sure didn’t cause turk to go 3-16. i commend kirk for playing him solidly, but a lot of his shots just weren’t dropping, clearly.
by Jaina on Nov 4, 2008 9:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so did Deng
he guarded him the first 3 quarters. Turk didn’t go 3-16 in the 4th, he did that for the entire game. The only opposing 3 to shoot over 50% against Deng is Pierce. He is playing good D even if you refuse to see it.
by DangerMouse on Nov 4, 2008 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NOt so sure I agree...
with your assessment of Luol’s defense. Nocioni got mentioned (and a vote, i think) in last year’s Defensive Team considerations (with Hinrich also getting a vote). Luol has never been and (i think) will never be a major defensive factor.
He doesn’t take charges, barely figures in help defense, doesn’t block shots, doesn’t lock down on his opposing number…
In the Bucks game, Jefferson was least effective when Nocioni was there, messing with his head. Noce totally took him out of his game (must be memories of the Noce hit from the game before). With Turkoglu, it was Hinrich taking him out of his game.
So while I agree that Luol is a better player over all, Noce is way better in defense, three point shooting and intensity.
by PatBull on Nov 4, 2008 9:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
HA!
“Noce is way better in…intensity”
Classic!
by NormVanBeer on Nov 4, 2008 9:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well, we will have to disagree than
because i don’t think its really close comparing Noce’s defense to Deng’s defense. And I don’t think Noce got into Jefferson’s head. He just fouled him 3 times and sent him to the line. Just because guy gets pissed after one of Noce’s hard fouls, it doesn’t mean they are intimidated. Sometimes, quite the opposite.
by DangerMouse on Nov 4, 2008 10:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that's also true...
except Jefferson didn’t get fired up either.
I think Noce is like one of those hardhitting linebackers, you know, who affect opposing receivers by making them hear “footsteps” and anticipate the hit before focusing on the ball.
And, again, until Deng gets a vote for the Defensive team (or gets discussed), Noce will be perceived as a better defender.
But, I do agree that Deng is a better player and should start. Hey, even Nocioni says so.
by PatBull on Nov 4, 2008 10:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you forgot to mention the grit
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 8:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That was my bad
I always talk about the grit. WHich is funny because I hate grits, though my wife loves ’em, she lived in Florida for 15 years though….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 8:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Make the grits, mix with cheese, then top with corn flakes and bake
You’ll love em.
by Sports2 on Nov 4, 2008 9:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure my wife'll
love that recipe….and we’ll no doubt give it a try. Thx.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Stacey King got it right last night
This team is in desperate need of spacing. Last night, the three guard offense seemed to provide that. I don’t think they have to go uber-small to get that kind of spacing. At least one of Thabo, Luol, and Tyrus needs to be moved from the starting line up. My preference would be Gordon replacing Thabo. Kirk would suffice. My fear is VDN is just waiting for Hughes to return before making a change at the 2.
If he can’t make that change, then Noc needs to come in for Luol or Tyrus. The two of them seem to be getting in each other’s way right now. And as Matt said, when either gets the ball, they just take it as its their turn to shoot. I think if BG is out there with Deng and Tyrus, it’d open things enough for them to start getting the ball slashing to the basket instead of running iso’s on the wing or top of the key. If BG’s out there, it’d at least open things up a bit more to make those 1 on 1 plays a bit more effective.
One other thing I’ve noticed is that Rose has been run off to the quarter more than just at the end of halves. It seems there’s been far too many plays (though, in this situation 1 would qualify as too many) when Rose brings the ball up the court gives it to Thabo and runs to the corner or wing. It’s not enough to have your best players on the court. The ball must be in their hands as much as possible.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 4, 2008 8:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
thabo really needs to go
nothing he’s done in the first four games (and preseason) has made me think he should be more than a limited role player, let alone a starter!
i want thabo to succeed, but i really just don’t see it happening.
by Jaina on Nov 4, 2008 8:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he had a nice 3rd quarter against Memphis
and got a whole article written about it :)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 8:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's unrealistic to think these guys will have a mass-revelation...
…of a Rose-first team concept. I’m guessing that’s part of the reason any uber-star has a team-wide change. Guys don’t want to defer to a 20-year-old. They don’t want to believe, and thus won’t, that deferring to him will make them a better player.
I’m putting this on Del Negro and Paxson. Sure, a few guys will have to go; they’ll just never get it. However, there are some (maybe Hinrich, Nocioni, maaaaaaaybe Gordon, etc.) who, if slapped up-side their head and made to realize they aren’t in the future of this franchise unless they capitulate, might actually change. Until the coach demands it, it’s not happening. Hell, Paxson’s insistence all summer that Rose wasn’t ready and to take things slow might have something to do with that.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 8:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
it's also on Paxson
because all along he’s boast about the ‘character’ of the guys he drafted, and how it influenced taking them and keeping them. So if Hinrich and Gordon are selfish, Deng’s a mental mess (lemme guess, before it was because he didn’t have a contract, and now it’s living up to that contract), Tyrus and Noah can’t concentrate…what the hell?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Paxson's choices look worse and worse.
Tyson’s developed. LMA has a post game (and clue). Hawes is averaging a double-double.
Meanwhile Ben Wallace has transformed into Larry Hughes, Tyrus is awful, and Noah has apparently fallen behind Aaron Gray.
Did I mention the end-product of that long, drawnout “process” of coach searching was Vinny del Negro?
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 9:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't believe that, yet
just saying that if Paxson sees the need pull the plug on these guys, he should follow them out the door.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why he won't give up and won't pull the plug untill it becomes overwhelmingly clear.
As I said, Rose is looking like the Real Deal and is probably in Chicago for his entire career. He’ll outlast any of this mess, and that’s a good thing.
And, in retrospect, I’d rather have LMA and Hawes right now, too. Or at least one or the other.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
::deep breath::
You’re right. It’s one game. It’s just that your “yet” is looming larger and larger for me. Thus far Rose has drastically exceeded my expectations, and Tyrus has really dissappointed me. We gotta remember he really hasn’t played all that much yet. This is his first experience playing this many minutes.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 9:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
Del Negro and Del Harris are doing a masterful job so far, especially in dealing with the mess that is our roster.
But yeah, Noah is the most perplexing. Tyrus was drafted as a risky pick, who would have been superflous to an already considered elite in the East team that was on the rise….then Ben Wallace collapsed and Tyrus got thrown into having to be more than he was too early….and now we’re not seeing what we hoped we’d see.
Aldridge was a safer pick, but if that Tyrus ceiling gets cracked, Tyrus will quickly vault ahead of LMA…..of course with each passing game it’s seeming less and less likely.
Tyrus should spend the entire day today shooting…..some of his shots look good, they just come up too hard….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He should spend the entire day dribbling and driving. ;-P
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That too
But hopefully with a defender on him….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can buy into Gordon
being selfish, and I think that’s more a case of his contract situation than Ben the player….but ultimately that’s Ben’s fault….and I can buy into Dengs a mental mess, becasue well he is, and I don’t get it.
But I don’t think Hinrich’s been selfish at all as a player for our team (besides quite possibly him playing like complete crap last year in order to rid ourselves of Skiles and Boylan) but that might just be a coincidence.
I think Kirk has been our PG in the 4th instead of Rose by VDN/Del Harris design, since Kirk is not that great off the ball….and Kirk’s played decently as our PG….the problem is we have a better PG on the wings playing SG, when he’s a more pure PG….and that’s what makes no sense.
I think that issue will fix itself when “he who’s had a great preseason, a great preseason” Hughes comes back….
I hate Hughes, but I do think Hughes’s chuck everything ways will be beneficial only when we have moments like we had against the Celtics (entire game), Memphis-first half, and first quarter of yesterday when we couldn’t hit any shot and nobody was moving with the ball. Hughes will move the ball, and while Hughes doesn’t always shoot well or take smart shots, when he gets hot, he is incredibly tough to stop. So he’ll add pressure to the defense, and might at least help get other guys some more open looks…..
Of course, I want that pressure to only be in 15-20 MPG stretches at most unless Hughes is having the Larry game where he could put 40 pts on you in a jiffy, otherwise, I would want him out there only when our offense does the Bullsian stagnation that became a Skiles rite of passage.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
priority: making Rose comfortable
it’s not a priority to adapt to Hinrich. At all.
And you’re way off on Hughes.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and thus far, I've seen that you value
1) Nocioni’s grit
2) Hughes’ ability to get hot
So….yeah, I think we’re going to disagree a lot.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate Hughes
But I do see his value in some limited stretches, if he buys into that role….or at least if he learns that’s the role he should play. I don’t have any qualms about anyone arguing that I think Hughes might have some value in a role that I gave him. Granted I’d much rather see him traded for a solid SG, but Hughes can put some pressure on the court when we get in stalemates, and that’s where his offensive talents and height will more than offset the BG height issue. But, woudl I rather see Hughes gone? Sure, but we’re stuck with him, and he can be of value if the coaches can get him to buy into a “you play this way or you don’t play” stance.
But yeah I think you’re off base with the Noc hate. I know Deng’s our SF of the future because he’s immovable now, but I think with him playing so tentative, maybe we light a fire under him by playing more Noc…..Deng is a better player than he’s shown and for all of Tyrus’s bad shooting woes 10-39 for the season….Deng’s been worse the past 3 games shooting under 20%…
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 10:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Drew Gooden
Seems to understand this as he’s publicly stated many times of Rose leading this team already. I really think Drew is having a solid season (Sans the Celtics game) and is inching out a possible extension with us, though it’s early and that all will depend on our draft status and on a future guard trade that’ll happen with 97% accuracy at this year’s trade deadline.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:03 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I'll buy into that.
And maybe he’s the one player w/ something to prove… and knows hes not a star. Who knows? Or because he’s already played w/ a real star, he knows you have to defer.
It’s arguable that Hinrich, Gordon, Nocioni, Thomas, Noah and even Deng have never played on a team where, in their mind, someone was definitively, at all times, better than them.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nocioni
played with Manu and definately deferred to Manu.
And Nocioni definately seems to have quickly eased into Rose’s game…
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What is Nocioni doing differently than he's always done?
And Manu, and I could be completely wrong in his int’l play, doesn’t play like a “dominating the ball star” like Kobe, James, Paul, Nash, Rose, Wade, etc.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing
But he’s playing healthy, which he hasn’t done the past few years, and is playing quite well….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 10:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Noc
outside of last year really never was a “need to dominate or chuck away” player that Boylan made him, and he’s now playing more like he did prior to the Boylan mess…
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 10:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For Manu, it depends on the matchup
to determine whether he dominates the ball for Argentina. Against Team USA that strategy is worthless. Against Angola? Manu will get the ball to do whatever he wants to create.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Second that
Gooden has been our second best player and it hasn’t been close.
by Sports2 on Nov 4, 2008 9:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The coaching strategy fails to capitalize when it counts the most
With Dwight Howard on the bench.
2nd Quarter
00:06:42
Gordon 2pt – make
Noah 2pt at rim – blocked
Thomas 2pt – miss
Thomas 2pt – make
Thomas 2pt – miss
Rose 2pt – miss
Gordon 3pt – miss
Thomas 2pt – miss
Thomas 2pt – make
Hinrich 2pt – make
Gooden 2pt – miss
recap: Magic extend lead by 5 to 13 points.
4th Quarter
00:02:48
Bulls get 2 shots at the rim. 1 gooden makes. 1 Nocioni makes and gets hacked.
Hinrich 3pt – miss
Hinrich 3pt – miss
Deng 2pt – miss
recap: Magic 8 point lead drops to 6.
If you don’t attack the rim when Dwight Howard is sitting on the bench you have failed to take advantage of the matchups. Superstars don’t sit for very long, but when they do if you do not make your opponent pay for it then you are not going to win close games.
You can see Stan Van Gundy paying attention. In the 2nd he’s not in a rush to put Howard back out there because it’s not really hurting the team. The Magic were extending the lead with Howard on the bench. In the 4th, Howard is rushed back out there after less than 3 minutes of rest. When Rose checked in for Deng the 3 guard lineup was out there so SVG puts the big fella back out there to clog the paint and get the rebounds.
You put the 3 guard lineup in to space the floor, but also to get to the rim. You have to attack the opponent and make them foul you. It’s the only way the three guard lineup really works unless they shoot lights out. They’re not going to rebound. They’re small. So it has to fall on the first attempt or it has to fall in the 2 FTA with 85+% FT shooters.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 8:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
That is also
Because the Magic have a stud player in Rashard Lewis, who is like a mini but better Deng in that he defers too much. But he was coming to life more when Howard was on the bench.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 9:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lewis isn't stopping anyone
His only real benefit while Howard is sitting is his rebounding. He rebounds when Howard sits. He doesn’t look to rebound when Howard is playing.
Noc was taking Lewis to the rim. Punish these defenders. The strategy has to attack what the opponent is giving to you.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 9:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lewis
Was hitting those 3’s and hitting shots more when Howard sat. That was my point and that’s why the Bulls couldn’t take advantage.
I would never say Lewis is a good defender.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 10:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NBAO is saying
that the Bulls didn’t take advantage on the offensive end, because they shot a bunch of jumpers. And we can, instead of shooting jumpers, get a bunch of open cuts to the basket. More open cuts and charging to the basket is good.
by Prevenge on Nov 4, 2008 8:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
But he was also indicating that we didn’t get a chance to dip into the Magic lead as much when Howard was on the bench, and I’m saying, easier said then done when you’ve got 2 great shooters on the floor that can get hot (and Lewis was that guy the other night) when Dwight was on the pine….
It does go both ways.
by majoyenrac on Nov 5, 2008 9:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Magic shooters
will make shots with Howard on the floor and with Howard on the bench. That’s a constant. They will get better looks when Howard in on the floor.
However, these factors do not change my criticism. The whole purpose of taking Howard out is that it creates a shot blocking void in the Magic paint. They have no elite defenders on their roster guarding the perimeter. They’re average, but with Howard behind them it’s a stopgap providing protection.
When Howard sits you’ll see grea NBA teams exploit that by attacking the rim on every single possession. You want to put Lewis and Turkoglu on your hip and make them foul you. They’ll try and block shots once they are beat to the rim. This is going to lead to fouls, but at most a decent shot attempt near the rim.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 5, 2008 12:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Got it and agree
entirely, I was just posting that our lead didn’t grow because in that one instance of of their major shooters had a hot streak when he wasn’t on the court….that doesn’t happen every game though.
I know the Bulls need to drive more always, hopefully that’s what their talking about.
Can’t wait to see tonight’s game….even if it’s a loss, I like this team’s renewed energy, and hope it stays as we only played this hard for 3-4 games all of last year, and we’ve now played hard in 3 of our 4 games (having gotten lost against the Celtics—we played hard in the 2nd half, but there were times in the first quarter where the flags seemed to wave for minutes at a time stretches…
by majoyenrac on Nov 5, 2008 12:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
on the bright side
When was the last season where we started 2-2? 06-07?
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 5, 2008 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dwyer
a night of some pretty stupid basketball for the Chicago Bulls.
The team played needlessly small lineups during good runs and bad runs, got away with it for spells (probably the worst thing that could happen), and managed to make a game of it relying on bad three-point shooting and low-percentage perimeter looks that went in. Most other games, these shots won’t go in. And the Bulls will suffer, badly. This morale win will hurt more than it will help because it will allow the Bulls and the Chicago coaching staff to think that Andres Nocioni pulling up for bombs early in the shot clock or as a transition threat helps. Or that running an undersized power forward, a small forward, and three 6-2 guards as a five-man outfit will work down the stretch. Or that playing Derrick Rose off the ball while Kirk Hinrich dribbles like it is 2004 somehow makes sense. The Bulls could have done much, much better; but because they nearly pulled this one out, they may have done themselves a year-long disservice. Great.
I definitely see some people here already buying into ‘the Noc’ after this freaking game. Argh.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This echoes the "But we whooped Milwaukee so Thabo starting isn't a big deal" vibe.
The Bulls might have too much talent to get better.
Whaaaa?
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 9:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I saw this all game last night
it will allow the Bulls and the Chicago coaching staff to think that Andres Nocioni pulling up for bombs early in the shot clock or as a transition threat helps.
Wait. It didn’t happen once. Whoops.
How about 0-8 Deng playing a role in the fan boosting of “the Noc”?
The whole reason why Noc draws so much support is because he goes out there and plays hard whether we suck or we’re good. Fans would easily adopt Luol Deng as the torch bearer if he just played with heart and passion. They would love him. They would cheer for him. They’d even stand up and applaud him for fist pumps. If he could only penetrate and finish.
When the matchups dictate it, we better play Noc and sit Luol Deng on his waffle cone ass.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 9:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it's not Noc vs. Deng
It’s the mis-use of Rose
by Sports2 on Nov 4, 2008 9:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
EXACTAMUNDO
It’s totally the misuse of Rose (And I guess the inferior play lately of Deng doesn’t help), but ultimatelyt he misuse of Rose.
I agree, if Deng played with even 50% of Nocioni’s fervor, I’d love him. He’s infinitely more gifted, but Noc is one of the top “do the most with the least” players in the league….
And right now Nocioni is clearly outplaying Luol…that gap hasn’t really ever widened too far (though the injuries that plagued Noc the last 15 months made it seem that way)…
The gap between them should have grown by leaps and bounds given Luol’s talents and Luol’s huge pro minutes and chances to improve….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
then fans are idiots
What makes you think Deng isn’t playing hard? He could just be playing bad.
Noc looks like he’s playing hard because he has to struggle to even compete at this level. That’s not really endearing, unless you’re a member of meatball nation.
(and he did shoot early in the clock a couple times)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 9:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Deng
Waits in the wallows and shows little emotion, and let’s Rudy Gay absolutely destroy him and doesn’t play hard like he can much.
When Deng attacks and wants it, he’s good. Problem is he doesn’t try to get the ball or be aggressive when it counts.
I don’t know who you’ve been watching these past years.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 10:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Since he shows little emotion that must mean he doesn't play hard?
When Deng attacks, it’s when the opportunity is there. That’s what makes Deng such a great complementary player, he normally doesn’t force the issue. This year, we’ve seen what happens when he tries to get his own, a lot of jab steps and missed long jumpers. He’s never going to be a great 1 on 1 player who should demand the ball. He’s a fantastic off the ball player who should be a perfect fit with a point god like Rose. Give me a team of guys like Deng who don’t waste effort on showing you how hard they play. They’d efficiently run your team of gritty Noc’s off the court.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 4, 2008 10:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rudy Gay absolutely destoyed Noc too
though I’m sure Noc’s face was full of vigor as it was turned the other way.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 10:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We'll see how the season progresses
The blind Noc hate is ridiculous, especially when he’s playing well and Deng is 100% not.
But there is little arguing the points when it’s been so one sided so far this year AGAINST your man Luol.
I want them both to succeed. I do, but I think the Chicago fans have to stop putting Deng on this pedestal he doesn’t deserve. In my eyes he’s under the gun until he plays the way he CAN PLAY. I’d much rather Deng play 35 and Noc play 25 subbing between the 2-3….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
do you think Nocioni is a better player than Deng?
I don’t. The Bulls don’t. So I’d rather worry about how Deng gets better, than care what Noc does.
Deng can play, as long as you’re not basing it on 3 games.
Noc, also not basing it on the less than 3 games he played well, has proven he’s not a big-minute player. He’s a high-usage tweener. And he’s still shooting under 40% for the season, including a flukey 43% from 3.
So I think the reactionary ‘hate’ or ‘love’ is actually coming from your end.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 11:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You do realize
the comments about Noc and Gordon are very similar:
Undersized
Poor decisions with the ball
Selfish play
Bad Defense
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 11:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good thing we can measure the degrees to which they are good and bad at these things
Otherwise, we’d be stuck making these simplistic comparisons and thinking stupid things like Noc is the same quality of player as Gordon just because they have similar strengths and limitations.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 4, 2008 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no kidding
plus, the ‘undersized’ and ‘bad defense’ is much more glaring at the PF spot.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 12:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
there are just as many undersized 4s in this league as 2s, if not more.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well, the ones who can't rebound or defend
for the position are hurting their team.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's not always true.
You just need to pair Noc with an above average rebounder. Deng outrebounds his position to help clean up some of deficiencies as well. Defending your position is a matter for both BG and Noc to discuss.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it's not just the rebounding
Noc’s swivel-head defense is a big problem as a frontcourt player since he’s responsible for rotating. Combining him with Gooden (or Gray), even if they’re both average rebounders as you suggest, is a bad interior defense.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 3:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed Noc/Gooden is not a great combo
But Noc Gray won’t kill them. Gray is a more effective rebounder than you give him credit for. And the key is putting Noc in positions to be effective. Not keep him on the bench because he only meshes with certain players. He’s stuck here right now with that contract so let’s maximize his strength. He clearly helped in the Magic game.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah when the objective stuff comes out
like adjusted +/-, everyone ignores it and says it’s not a useful stat. See the fanpost across the way for that info.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For the record:
Gordon offense +.1/defense -3.47
Nocioni offense +1.02/defense -2.17
Noc did better on both offense and defense
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 2:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome CJ
Puts the point that I’ve been saying….
If Deng plays his game though and continues to grow he would change this gap.
Of course you also have to consider that Noc plays more with Gordon in our 2nd unit than Deng, and that our 2nd unit for years has oddly been better than our first unit….
But it does at least hold the point that despite Matt’s issues and the Nocioni hate diarhea on this site, that he is as solid a player as Deng.
Deng has more skills (many more skills) and still has considerable upside….but Nocioni might be as good a player currently (or dare-I-say-it) STILL BETTER….especially when healthy.
Should not be the case, especially given the tools Deng has, but Noc’s grit does indeed count for something.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair
Deng offense +4.52/defense +.43
So Noc still has a ways to go before he catches Deng.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Noc and Deng
I have very few reasons to put Deng under the microscope when he makes shots. When he gets to the rim and makes shots I think he’s an all-star. When he does neither Noc is the better player.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 5:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I do think
Nocioni is playing as the better player so far this year. I like Deng’s upside and his game in some of the past, and I do most certainly know Deng has more considerable tools to be better than Noc (he should be light year’s away).
But yes, Nocioni is playing better ball than Deng.
That doesn’t mean gun to my face I’d choose Noc, I wouldn’t….but maybe for our new offense and team, Noc fits the bill better.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 11:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Its been 4 games
and Noc has been pretty crappy, too
by JeffD on Nov 4, 2008 12:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
But when Noc is healthy they’ve been close in the past….and Deng isn’t getting better, he peaked so far 2 years ago.
Plus counting preseason it’s been more than 4 games….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Its never been that close
If we are going by peaks, Noc peaked 3 years ago.
And preseason means nothing.
by JeffD on Nov 4, 2008 12:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Noce peaked when he came in the league
He has been the same player since 2005. Deng has improved every year till last season, there’s no reason to believe he’s peaked at age 23.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 4, 2008 12:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Deng
Seems to continue to regress……which is the exact opposite of what he should be doing.
I know preseason in the grand scheme of things means nothing, but it should prepare your big gun (Deng) for the regular season, which so far it clearly has not.
Nocioni peaked 3 years ago sure, but when healthy he hasn’t regressed….injuries have caused him to miss time and him playing when injured have caused statitistical issues….
Noc plays harder than anybody in today’s NBA, treating every game like it was a 7th game in the finals, which you have to love. If everyone played that hard on every single play, the NBA would easily rule the sports world.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You need to ease up a little bit
Noc plays harder than anybody in today’s NBA, treating every game like it was a 7th game in the finals, which you have to love. If everyone played that hard on every single play, the NBA would easily rule the sports world.
That’s one crazy ass statement, as I could find plenty of players who try just as hard as Noce.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 4, 2008 12:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
majoenrac
You’re obviously viewing this through Grabowski-colored lenses. I have no interest in such fans.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know who
Grabowski is, but he sounds like a fine individual.
Sorry that we disagree on the Noc point, but I think you’ll come around especially if Deng’s play continues.
Like I’ve said, I like Deng, I am glad in many ways we didn’t lose him. I do think he has tools to maybe be close to worth that contract, especially given his age….but I don’t understand why he can have a horrible preseason and a bad first 4 games under the new contract and everybody says “well it’s Deng, la-dee-da”, if it was Tyson Chandler, the radio would be calling for him to be killed, like they did 3 seasons ago already at this point…..but since it’s Deng everyone’s like “oh he’s on his 5th season, regressed considerably last year, but that was all injuries—it doesn’t matter that he would disapper in the 4th quarter when we needed him most—-we’ve got Deng locked up, and he’s playing worse than even OJ (4th game) Mayo, much much much worse…la la la, I love Deng”….while Nocioni’s looking like a solid SF starter for us and still everyone here says “I hate him”.
That makes no sense to me.
I want Deng to succeed, mostly becasue I want the Bulls to succeed. Deng needs to step it up and folks need to start putting some pressure on him. Because he can deliver if he gets that confidence. Maybe lighting a fire under him will do it.
He should be a better player than RJ by this point, and yet still hasn’t gotten better…..
We hate Gordon for what he doesn’t have…why can’t we hate Deng for what he doesn’t do (he has but doesn’t do)?
Seems silly to me…
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What seems silly is you seemingly rolling a wide range opinions of a number of players
Held by very different groups of fans and wondering why those standards aren’t applied to Deng. Here’s the thing, most fans are idiots. Why should we piss all over Deng because others pissed all over Chandler or are currently pissing all over BG? Deng’s playing like crap and if he keeps it up, people will start ripping him apart. I think the biggest reason Deng’s not getting ripped right now is that there are other players playing like crap. The whole team has looked discombobulated 75% of the time out there. Everyone’s getting their fair shots taken at them including Deng. It’s just that as Deng has provided a solid baseline of performance and is still relatively young, there’s no reason to panic on him 4 games into the season. I don’t think anyone here really hates Noc. It’s just that he’s wildly overrated by many for his “effort” and overpaid by the team for his role. If Deng is seen in the same position of being more a burden to the team than help, he’ll likely be just as “hated” around here as Kirk and Noc currently are.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 4, 2008 3:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
I do think Nocioni is overpaid for his role, only because the team isn’t what it was supposed to be (last year’s debacle).
If we were a championship ready, young and improving team that we thought we were when Noc was signed to that extension in the first place, he’d be a steal as a glue guy 6th man.
I do agree most fans are idiots.
I mostly am just wondering why Deng gets little but the pat on the back, where our other guys who also are mostly young get nothing but grief.
I want him to succeed as a Bulls fan, but keeping Deng in a bubble from criticism might just not let him reach his potential.
Deng has a fabulous upside and game when he plays to it. He is as dangerous as any SF in the league when he’s aggressive. He cuold be a top 5 SF in the league if he has played the way he’s capable in the 4th quarter (instead of playing it in qtr’s 1-3, throwing this year out)..
I just haven’t seen much improvement from Deng over the years, and that’s disappointing.
He got better shots a few years ago, and became more comfortable, but he’s still up to his old tricks after what was billed all summer as a ridiculously fabulous offseason.
I hope he learns quick, or else he’s an immovable piece (because his numbers will regress) playing on a team taht doesn’t fit his abilities….
I wish Deng could be that solid #2 man behind Rose….he’s played 5 years now, and done well overseas and played with his share of players (major minutes too) against a variety of opponents. He’s now paid like a #2 or #1 and isn’t doing anything different….
I hope I’m wrong, especially as a Bulls fan—the only sport I really follow is basketball and I follow it hard.
I want him to do well, but think if we keep him in this bubble and not put any pressure on him, he won’t reach that potential….that’s all.
He’s a good kid, good for the NBA, does a lot of charity work, and seems to stay out of trouble.
I want to see him demolish everyone on our team sans Rose in the stats and in his play…but I haven’t seen that, and we still give him too much credit.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
who is patting Deng on the back?
just because they don’t want him benched for Noc? I think it’s a solid consensus that Deng is currently playing like crap and needs to play better.
Did you check under your bed to find other boogeymen?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 3:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
there's a difference between ripping Deng
for being bad (which I think everyone is doing), and ripping him for being ‘soft’.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 3:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BTW
No need to take insults at me, you’ve done this twice with your “no interest in such fans” and a comment 6-7 months ago that really pissed me off but I don’t remember it exactly….
I try to state my opinions on your excellent blog post. I never would reach to that level by the way.
And while we disagree on this matter, I do respect your opinions (which is why I come back to this site), and I’m sorry we disagree here, but comments like that are unnecessary.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not respect the opinion
that Noc is better because he shows more fire.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I am not
saying Noc is better because he shows more fire. Nor have I said he is better in skills.
He’s playing better, and his hustling ways and annoying to the guys he’s playing defense ways can disrupt the other team.
Deng is a better skill wise player, but hasn’t always played like it and certainly isn’t playing like it oday.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 4:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Mattorize your opinion
Playing more of Noc with Rose is better for Rose and therefore better for the Bulls.
Noc won’t be part of the club in the long run when Rose is getting really really good. Deng probably will be so you’re forced to defend Deng at all costs, but call a spade a spade. A bad shooting night for Deng is bad for everyone.
I’d like to see Deng play better against better teams so 0-8 nights against pitiful defense in Orlando make my fist pumping go limp.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 5:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Start naming them
Per minute basis, I would be surprised if you saw anyone play as hard as Noc. That’s a big reason why other teams despise him so much…..hard fouls, in your face attitude, constantly trying to ring in the troupes and be a motivator, playing on 1 leg, with one arm, getting annihilated by the other player with a monster attack hit, and grimacing for a minute only to play at all costs.
I love the league, follow many teams, and I don’t see anyone who plays like that until late in the season….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why does Noc
get your benefit of the doubt for injuries but Deng doesn’t?
by JeffD on Nov 4, 2008 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Because
Both are healthy and Noc is playing better.
Deng was hurt last year. I expect more from Deng, but he isn’t delivering.
Let’s turn it around:
Why when Noc was hurt, everyone hated him? Now that he’s back and playing well, while Deng’s healthy, everyone hates Noc more, and gives Deng a pass?
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But Noc isn't playing well, he's actually playing worse than past years
When they have both been healthy, Deng is much better.
When they have both been hurt, Deng is much better.
The only time Deng hasn’t been much better is this 4 game sample, and even in that Noc isn’t good, he’s just not as bad.
by JeffD on Nov 4, 2008 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
43% not flukey
Noc has been near 40% from 3 every year. in ‘06-’07, he was mixed in with the league leaders for most of the season. .391 in ‘05-’06, .383 in ‘06-’07, .364 in ‘07-’08 when everyone shot horribly. i’m not saying he’s the second coming of Steve Kerr, but i can live with those numbers. if you’re above 40% from 3 in this league, you’re a good 3-point shooter.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 11:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
...and they've been declining every year
"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."
by jpchi on Nov 4, 2008 12:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not the Noc hate
It’s the use of Noc hate to defend Luol Deng.
I don’t know if Matt can defend Deng without throwing Noc in the mud to save Deng.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 12:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's never about the other guy
I’m not the one even considering Nocioni as an option. Deng’s struggles are being brought up in contrast to Nocioni’s goofiness hustle, whereas I don’t even consider Nocioni an option as a SF regardless of how he plays this season. And he hasn’t even been that good, for chrissakes.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and I don't think anyone can say Deng's played well
so I’m not sure how I’m ‘defending’ his play. Except maybe against your lame observations of his ‘heart’.
But he’s been terrible, and needs to play better.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Noc is a waste of money
but he looked bad because Deng posted 1 point in a game we lost by 3 points.
I like your observation methods better.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks.
they usually are for more than one game.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
rudy gay scored 20 points
he didn’t destroy anyone
by DangerMouse on Nov 4, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Unbelievable
He could just be playing bad.
You are walking, talking excuse generator for your guys. It’s pathetic.
How about instead of playing bad as any player could do on any given night, he was playing the same old charmin downy snuggle soft Deng that won’t attack the rim, will settle for jumpers, can’t finish, but will now get paid like he can do all of these things consistently.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 12:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I still just don't get it
I really don’t understand why some guys here get passes “Kirk for most of last year and would have continued to get a pass considering last year was a bad season because of Skiles and Boylan had we not drafted Derrick Rose” Hinrich, and even more perplexing Luol “I had slight improvements, but improvements in each of my first 3 years culminating in a dominating performance against the Heat where I actually realized my matchup was crap and that Pat Riley was focusing all of his attention on Ben Gordon before I forgot against the Pistons the play that made me look so good the series before, and then I followed that play with a mostly poor poor season and so far am looking worse than I did as a Rookie this year preseason through the first four games” Deng.
And yet we always attack Gordon (who does take stupid shots, but who also hits a lot of those shots and definately does play his role well) and even more perplexing is Andres Nocioni who’s paid like a 4th starter to 7th man in this league and yet he’s deferring his starting role because he does what he can to help the team, plays his ass off (he’s probably as naturally talented as I am—not much) but plays so damn hard and has studied the game so well that he does very well in his role….
It makes no sense.
Let’s start complaining and being fair about all our guys, sans the 3 young guns: Derrick Rose, Joakim Noah and Tyrus Thomas…..and Thomas is only in the “young guns” still because he is 1-young and 2 mostly because he didn’t play much at all or get many real learning opportunities on the court in real game time plays against great competition signficantly his first 2 years….and it doesn’t hurt that he has such a nice upside potential….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you may not get it
because it’s more nuanced than you can handle? I’m not really sure.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How is this nuanced
Noc is dirt.
Where’s the logic, there.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well....
maybe I should quit that. It’s just in response to those trying to bait with the ‘what do you think of Noc now!’ comments. (as in, I feel the same)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 3:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's fine
No problems, sorry if we got off on a tangent that resulted to thinking i was arguing just to argue or anything.
I’ve always been a stout Noc defender and wanted more from Deng, nothing new from me. It’s just nice to gloat :)….
Although I do know (and would be stupid not to) to say Deng doesn’t have a better skill set and when he plays his A game is clearly superior. I just want to see a consistent A game, especially when it matters most.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 4:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if Deng plays like he usually does
he’s worth the contract. If you think that was previously too soft, you may be disappointed.
At least the guys I defend are the best players on the team. That’s what I’m interested in.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if he plays
like he showed he could do 2 years ago when healthy for the entire year, he’s worth the contract. Not last year’s injury riddled season and when healthy somewhat mediocre stats (decent but not $71M decent with more incentives to boot)…..
If he continues to play as poorly as he does through preseason to now, he’s a disaster for our team.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thank you!!
that was my entire argument with the small lineup! thank you kd!!!
by Jaina on Nov 4, 2008 9:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The much-diminshed Cult of Noce is annoying,
but I don’t understand the issue with Noce if he’s used properly. He’s a 20-25 MPG player backing up Luol and Tyrus. Thus far he’s fit well with Rose and played with energy (both histrionic and genuine), which is more than can be said about Luol or BG – in terms of both fitting in and putting up a fight. It’s true that he makes too much money and needs to play within himself to be effective.
You can say that about every Bull except Derrick Rose.
I don’t buy Dwyer’s fool’s gold routine. It’s facile thinking. Nobody believes in the three guard lineup with Noc at the four. It was a gamble – and one that worked, to an extent – to generate points to get back into a game that was seemingly out of reach.
That’s all.
A year-long disservice? Really?
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 10:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Amendment:
BG played hard last night. He even played good defense.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't you mean
“inconceivable”?
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Nov 4, 2008 9:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hold on, let me get my thesaurus.
[Next game. Next game.]
by Prevenge on Nov 5, 2008 12:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not think it means what you think it means
"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."
by jpchi on Nov 5, 2008 12:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he fears, like I do
based on Skiles/[name redacted] era and how they’ve leaned on ‘going small’ in the past.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 10:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Understandable,
especially in light of the fact that there’s a reason why we see these lineups. The likelihood that we hired three midget-fetishizing coaches is small. It’s more probable that our three guard lineups are a product of a badly unbalanced roster.
Unless, of course, this love of smallish, long-range shooting guards stems from the top…hey, wait a minute…Paxson…Skiles…Del Negro…
Crap!
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the most disappointing aspect of this season
I think we all hoped VDN would come in and make us forget about the mistakes made in the past. The too small lineups, good players losing minutes in the rotation to obviously lesser players, infatuation with BG as a bench player while a completely ineffective player starts at the 2… I still feel better about VDN with this team as opposed to Skiles. He’s at least stuck with Tyrus through some tough times. I was really hoping my days of screaming at the TV hoping the coach would hear my pleas to change the lineup on the court would change.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 4, 2008 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand this.
You said:
good players losing minutes in the rotation to obviously lesser players, infatuation with BG as a bench player while acompletely ineffective player starts at the 2… I still feel better about VDN with this team as opposed to Skiles. He’s at least stuck with Tyrus through some tough times.
So, when its Thabo being a completely ineffective player, the coaching staff should bench him. When its Tyrus being a completely ineffective player, the staff is praised for sticking with him through some tough times.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 4, 2008 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, you almost had it!
Tyrus is rarely completely ineffective.
Though you’re correct that if he was, he’d deserve more rope than Thabo. Absolutely.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I liked those five blocks in one of those completely ineffective games.
“But they should ahve been goaltending!!!”
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 1:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Neither is Thabo.
Completely. While Tyrus was going 2-17 with 5 blocks, 5 rebs and 1 steal, Thabo was 3-5, with 3 steals, 3 assists and a block of his own. Tyrus got 26 minutes that night to be less than completely ineffective, Thabo only got 12.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 4, 2008 4:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
but didn't you know
Thabo sucks. People don’t like defensive minded players here. Especially when they take minutes from offensive minded players (Gordon)
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 4:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind what they're minded
I mind the performance.
Thabo is worse offensively than Gordon is defensively, at a position that needs offense in the first place.
Again, this always reverts to a competition between players that doesn’t exist. But that’s because you are used to dealing in simple arguments. Thabo hasn’t played well and he’s rarely played well. It doesn’t matter if it’s as good or as bad as Thomas (because they need Thomas to be better) or as Gordon (because Gordon’s proven to be better) at random reference points you get to select.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 4:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and I'm so fucking sick of this meta-commentary (from several people)
instead of saying what you think about Thabo, Thomas, Deng, Noc…all I read is not about them, it’s about the assessments of what other people think of them.
“people are too hard on Noc, easy on Deng, hatorade, love, if Thomas did this you’d say, why doesn’t Thabo get this same benefit of the doubt”
Have a fucking opinion of your own instead of being the bias police. If you think Nocioni and Thabo should start (or whatever), say so. And I’ll disagree, and that’ll be that.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 4:35 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
for you of all people
to complain about other people’s generalities is hilarious.
by CJ Bulls on Nov 4, 2008 6:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thomas also had the first game...
…and Thabo hasn’t.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 4:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Dwyer
knows so much why isn’t he coaching?
by sue369 on Nov 4, 2008 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't all of us know everything that's best for the Bulls?
How come no one interviewed us?
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 4, 2008 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well I know why
they didn’t interview me. :D You could probably do fine though.
by sue369 on Nov 4, 2008 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if you know so little
why do you comment?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I feel sadness reading your lame comments.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 2:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Deng Problem Serious
We all know the second most important thing to watch for this season is how players play off of Derrick. We have seen Noc figure it out, Gordan and Heinrich look solid in stretches, and Thabo at least doesn’t dominate the ball when playing with Rose. The fact that Deng looks lost on the court is a serious problem.
The last three games the Bulls have gotten very little out of the Ty Deng frontcourt. Ty looks like he regressed to last year after last night’s poor ball handling and shot selection but someone always can say he’s still young so that’s not the urgent problem.
Deng looks lost on the court with Rose. KC Johnson wrote that Deng is getting lost in the corners when Rose runs Pick and Roll/Pop and he hasn’t figured out how to get an open shot. We all know Deng can’t get to the basket and has looked horrible doing so this season. Last nights statline of 0-8 was really 0-4 with 3 tips and a shotclock heave. So Deng got 4 shots in the offense last night. That is a huge problem when this team needs some scoring out of their first unit. Deng’s defense has been fine and will have to be with Lebron coming twice this week, but Del Harris better figure out how to have Deng run trail and hit open jumpers on the secondary break or he may be lost for good in Rose’s offense.
by Jscho316 on Nov 4, 2008 10:02 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
We need to get Deng setting the high screen for Rose
We do it all day with Noc in there. Why not with Deng? Deng isn’t playing off the ball well at all right now. I want him involved in other ways. We cannot afford 0-8 nights from our starting SF.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 12:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Review!
I’m a Gordon supporter, but he needs to realize who the man is >>>> it’s ROSE! Last nights game could of been had if the ball was in Rose’s hand. And Deng! Don’t even get me started. What was Paxson thinking? If he couldn’t take the pressure of last year (the kobe rumors + the not signing regret), why did Paxson think Deng could handle the pressure of a 72 million $$$ contract!!?!?!? Luol is the POSTER CHILD for guys in this league who are just in it for the $$$. In my opinion he doesn’t LOVE the game and he’s not in it for the right reason >> CHAMPIONSHIPS!!! He doesn’t want to go all in. Plus the guys soft as hell! Did any of you hear his comments the other day. He basically blamed his bad play on Rose. Unbelievable!!! He doesn’t know how to play with him. That’s what he said. What a BAD signing!!!
by Johnny"B"ull on Nov 4, 2008 10:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Deng isn't as bad as he showed last night
But athletic 3’s give Deng all kinds of problems. Might as well use Thabo for defense if Deng isn’t gonna score and can’t guard the Andre Iguodala, Rashard Lewis, or Rudy gay’s of the league.
by RogersPark Kris on Nov 4, 2008 10:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
RudyGay had 20 points
He guarded him fine!!!
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 11:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Did Rudy Gay score 40 points on Saturday?
I’m missing where Gay just dominated Deng. Both Lu and Noce played great defense in the 2nd half, but of course why mention this when we must blow everything out of proportion.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 4, 2008 11:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Because
Gay started off strong and was driving to the lane creating things and Deng didn’t slow him down until Noc was substituted in the first quarter and we got a handle of Gay, and took him out of the offense (sans a buzzer 3pter)…
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 11:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Last I knew
Deng was considered the most promising young SF not named James in the league (2 years ago). He still got paid as such, and yet guys like Gay are passing him by…
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol so Deng is supposed to be Bruce Bowen on defense?
Last time I checked, if you’re a talented scorer in the NBA, chances are you will get your points somehow. Deng wasn’t going to shut down Rudy Gay, all he can do is make life difficult, which after the 1st half he did. Like I said, Noce and Deng combined to play very good D, but Lu was on him primarily after halftime.
It’s frustrating to watch Lu be invisible at times, but if you’re going to freak out everytime a talented SF has a good game you’d be better off saving your finger strength and not typing those kinds of posts.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 4, 2008 11:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not
I’m sorry If I’m using that as ammunition, but ultimately I don’t get why Bulls fans are so “let’s pat Deng on his ass and give him a breather for a poor last year and a poor preseason and a horrendous start to this year”…
And then let’s flame out and scream every time Noc does something wrong, when Nocioni’s clearly playing better ball and being involved in the team, and Noc makes FAR FAR less than Deng.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Deng's poor last year
was still better than Nocioni’s poor last year. Because he’s a better player.
I’m not sure what the argument is, except you’re insistence on everyone getting a fair shake in the blame game. If you want to blast Deng for being bad, go ahead. But don’t blast everyone for not blasting Deng enough, and overdoing it on Nocioni. Say what you think.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the Bulls offense
reminds me of one of those old electric football games…nobody knows where to go, people are running around with no purpose and bumping into each other, the spacing stinks, plays are only successful by accident, etc
by NormVanBeer on Nov 4, 2008 11:18 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
lol
Finally laughs. Thanks. Rec.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't get it
maybe there is a referee that participates on this site that can answer this. isn’t the rule supposed to be that if a defender jumps straight up to contest a shot or layup, and the offensive player jumps into him, it should not be a shooting foul?? meaning, the defender jumps straight up, still occupying his spot on the floor, which he is entitled to. if the shooter jumps towards him to initiate contact, but the defender jumps up instead of towards the shooter and gets a clean block, it shouldn’t be a foul. this is what i’ve heard from analysts during games. i’ve seen Aaron Gray do this once or twice the last 2 games, and he gets called. i forgot who the shooter driving to the basket was last night, but Gray maintained his position, went straight up, barely got off the ground (cause obviously he can’t jump), got a clean hand on the ball, and got called for a foul. i dunno. but those calls frustrate me. the kids trying to play sound D and gets a foul for it. i just needed to get that off my chest.
and Lu needs to not worry about ‘getting his’. he has his contract. he needs to let the game come to him instead of forcing it. thats when he plays his best, slashing, running the floor, and spotting up for mid-range jumpers. don’t force the issue, Lu. you’ll get yours.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 11:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Im not a referee, but i think its like this
If you jump to block a shot, then you should only touch the ball. If your body ends up going into the shooter then its a foul. The only way it wont be a foul would be if the shot blocker has his feet set. Aaron gray, although i really havent noticed, might either jump for the block (but the vert is so low that only the refs can see it) or does not have his feet set (so he is either backing up while the contact is taking place or just is having a hard time maintaining balance. I would think aaron gray does the later more.
In any case if the defender jumps and his body meets the shooters body, it wont matter if he got all ball with his hands, its a foul. For guys on the peremeter, its always important to just keep your hands up and remain in a defensive stance, so that you can not only challenge shots, but can keep moving, jumping, or get your feet set immediately.
Again im not a referee, but i think thats how it works.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Nov 4, 2008 11:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the way I've normally seen that play called
Though, in the NBA, it doesn’t seem to matter what the defender does or doesn’t do, some guys are just going to get the call even if they initiate the contact.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Nov 4, 2008 11:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yea
Which is what i think makes the rules so confusing. There are so many rules that get argued in pickup games because at some point some superstar did it and nothing was called. Here are a few of them that get me confused if anyone has the answers
Throwing the ball off the backboard (no rim) and catching it while still standing on the ground-I think this is a travel, its the same as an airball. The way i get that is because in the nba, the ball has to hit the rim for the shotclock to reset, so in order to reset your possession you must hit the rim. Also i cant think of any nba player throwing the ball off the backboard and catching while still on the ground. Ive seen self-alleyoops but the dunker always catches the ball in mid air.
The ball hits the top of the backboard but falls in front of the rim, not behind…is it out?-I want to say no, cuz the backboard is usually still in front of the out of bounds line in the nba.
Getting blocked, do you drop the ball or can you hang on to it. Is it ups and downs if you get blocked for a jumpshot and hold on to the ball?-I wanna say you have to lose possession of the ball in order for you to regain possession, getting blocked but holding onto the ball should be a travel, im not sure though.
saving the ball from going out of bounds then continuing to dribble said ball after stepping back in bounds-the way i see it, you cant inbound the ball to yourself.
pro hop/ jump step/stop-hop-i hate this move cuz of the confusion the comes with it. The way i see it, your feet have to remain in a constant position when you perform the move in order for it to count, and you cant couple it with your two steps. Either pro-hop, or take your two steps, not both.
Im sure theres more but im getting way off topic
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Nov 4, 2008 11:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
ball up and over the backboard is out of bounds, even on the playground
get blocked, you gotta let go of the ball
you can’t save the ball to yourself
and the hop-step needs to be your 2 steps, not use both.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
heres one more that irks me
Performing a fadeaway off a pivot, im pretty sure you can lift your pivot foot first cuz that would be a travel…isnt a travel basically defined as moving your pivot foot? I see alot of guys try to do the kobe fadeaway, not realizing that kobe has the leg strength to jump back off his pivot foot, not just pickup his pivot foot and lean back.
THeres also the fast break question. On a fast break when you catch the ball, do you have to put the ball down then take two steps, too many times (especially in video games) you see players catch take steps and then go up for a jam or a layup. My guess is you get one step, which is actually just establishing a pivot foot then you can either go up wiht it or put it down for your real two steps. Ive seen guards use that one step move to establish a pivot foot when recieving the ball on a pass.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Nov 4, 2008 12:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i know what you mean
you can never change or move your pivot foot
you can catch, take two steps, and layup, without a dribble if you’re moving to the basket. if you catch the ball for a jumper, your feet on the floor is your two steps. if you don’t shoot immediately or pumpfake, you gotta put the ball on the floor before moving your pivot at the point. but even if you catch the ball flat-footed, without stepping into the shot, you can’t then take two steps and go up for a shot without at least one dribble.
not sure if that clears it up, but thats how i understand it to be.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When I did this
at my local gym [getting an easy layup], people said that traveling was two steps.
I looked very angrily at them and stopped playing. …
Helpful though.
by Prevenge on Nov 4, 2008 9:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It is traveling
In order to take the two steps you have to first initiate a dribble. Catching, pivoting, and then taking two steps without a dribble is a travel.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 5, 2008 12:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the rule
A defender owns there space from the floor until as high as they can reach so long as they are stationary or elevating straight up in the air. Arms must extend within this space. Arms exiting the owned space that then make contact with the offensive player yields a blocking/hacking foul.
It’s tough to enforce. The refs probably get it right half the time and the other half of the time make another bad call to make up for it.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thank you
this is what i’m saying. i’ve seen Gray go straight up, there is body contact, but he gets a clean block, and the whistle blows. very frustrating.
how do i become a referee?? i’m really beginning to think its my calling.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 12:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How are you at gambling?
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Nov 4, 2008 12:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
um, i do alright on poker nights. it comes in waves. but i play the lotto every week, and i haven’t won yet. so i guess you can say i don’t make my own luck.
i never bet on sports, though. they can be so unpredictable that i don’t like putting my money on the line at the whim of Tyrus shooting 20 jump shots.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if you bet on sports,
you can get better!
by Prevenge on Nov 4, 2008 9:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gray usually is at least moving somewhat laterally
and his arms are usually down, which is why he gets those calls.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 4, 2008 1:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
perhaps...
i’ve just heard it explained where its like a charge vs. a blocking foul. if the defender beats the ballhandler to the spot, he has the right, then, to that spot on the floor, thus its a charge. if the ballhandler gets there first, he has the right to the spot and its a blocking foul. i think it kinda holds true when driving the lane. on almost any play towards the basket there will be body contact, but if its not the defender initiating the contact, then it should be a no call. i know most times they will call that, but i think its a BS call. if you’re a defender and you have your position set on the floor, and the shooter jumps towards you, you should still be able to contest the shot. same thing when a 3-point shooter jumps into a defender who is jumping straight up in the air just to have a hand up there. i’ve seen that no-called plenty.
i dunno. the ambiguity of fouls in the NBA is so frustrating. and players get points when getting fouled. POINTS, not field position, or a face-off, but actual points!! maybe i should be an NBA ref.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 11:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
and my bad...
i forgot to reply instead of starting a new comment string. i suck. but thats how much those calls get me worked up.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 11:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ty Thomas...
needs to go. I was a fan of him the last 2 years and I’ve always thought he would come around. This year, in just a few games, you can see he won’t. He is a defensive presence and that is all he will ever be. He belongs on a team that does not need him to score (Spurs Bruce Bowen).
You cannot ask this kid to shoot jumpers, pass, or even dribble…because he can’t. And if he can’t do that by now, he never will.
I have given up on Ty Thomas
by Knowledge32 on Nov 4, 2008 11:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
he doesn't need to go
he just needs to stop shooting 18-foot jumpers like he’s shawn kemp or something. lol. he still has plenty of potential and freakish athletic ability. he needs to learn to play to his strengths.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 11:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bullieving...
how long have we been saying that now? I would love to know what he was working on this off season.
I have given up on Ty Thomas
by Knowledge32 on Nov 4, 2008 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i know
i guess i’m still holding out hope. its only year 3 for a guy that only played one season in college and might not have picked up a basketball until high school. he’s that raw. but i know what you’re saying. i also feel thats its time he starts becoming the player he will be, and if that is what we’re getting now, then yes, get rid of him.
by BULLieving in Miami on Nov 4, 2008 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus Thomas
Really didn’t get a fair shake the past 2 years…..I could see that his rookie year, but last year was TOTALLY inexcusable…so in many ways this really is VDN saying, Tyrus do what you will and let’s review what went right and what went wrong….this likely will continue for a bit until Tyrus either gets out of his funk or he’ll be benched.
He still has mad upside, and he is only 23. I like the aggressiveness in his game, love his D intensity, his abilities to get boards….
And it was only 10 days ago that we say Tyrus surprisingly hit all the shots he’s missing now. I don’t think the preseason had taht much to do with it, I think Tyrus is nervous and is playing nervious.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He actualy just turned 22 in August.
by tyger1147 on Nov 4, 2008 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gasp
Give him time. Took Chandler until 25 with more solid time to get consistent, and Tyrus has greater potential to be better (his shooting form is improving, he can dribble, pass, defend, block shots, get boards)….
Thanks.
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can see your point
but I can also see why an organization has to see some dividends before investing five to six years into a player, which is how long Ty will have been on the Bulls if the team has to wait until he hits 25 to get meaningful contributions from Ty.
by messwiththebull on Nov 4, 2008 2:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand that entirely
But the worst thing possible is that we pay Tyrus millions to learn the game, have him switch teams for the next PJ Brown (Antonio McDyess maybe?) and watch him blossom on that team while we still rebuild.
Paxson and Reinsdorf have to know that they drafted a complete project, a wildly athletic, multiple skilled project who really seems to be showing a desire to do better (with his very aggressive play this season)…..now we just have to wait and teach and hopefully not fork over a billion dollars in his extension….
by majoyenrac on Nov 4, 2008 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus may have to play the small forward position
particularly in offensive sets to be effective.
I say slide Deng over to the PF. Let a PF try and chase Thomas all over the court on cuts. Let Deng do what he wants to do, get the ball and shoot, because he’s not going to get much at the rim to help us.
In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.
by NBA Observer on Nov 4, 2008 5:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like that idea...a lot
I have given up on Ty Thomas
by Knowledge32 on Nov 5, 2008 12:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They only way he needs to go
is if he can help us get star big man in a package deal. Maybe he, Noah, and Hinrich are enough to get Beasley? Point is, just getting rid of him doesn’t do anything. He might still be good, he might not. But in my opinion, you don’t base the future of the franchise around the hope that he’ll come around.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Nov 4, 2008 12:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That is ridiculous
He can pass and dribble better than the majority of PFs
by JeffD on Nov 4, 2008 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Speakin of trades
apart from Rose (big exeption) our scouts kinda sucks
"You’re caught up in basketball. Get caught up in life" - Starbury "The Great"
by Belize on Nov 4, 2008 12:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
tyrus thomas and thabo
when lamarcus and roy were right there, but who knows, the way we coach we wouldve screwed up those two also
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Nov 4, 2008 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can we trade Pax?
I have given up on Ty Thomas
by Knowledge32 on Nov 4, 2008 12:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Its not really fair to put Thabo in that comparison
by JeffD on Nov 4, 2008 12:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Im not comparing actually
If i remember right, didnt paxson make a few last second deals, he liked roy and lamarcus, but he like tyrus a lot more than aldridge, so paxson made the deal to get lamarcus, and another one to land thabo who he thought would a lot better defensively and available later on in the draft.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Nov 4, 2008 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He traded Aldridge to get Tyrus, and Rodney Carney to get Thabo
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Nov 4, 2008 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Man carney
He is a video game stud, not sure how he is in real life, really cant remember him doing anything worth anything, but in 2k8 and 2k9 his slashing ability is top notch for a role p

by 