Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows



Bulls 115, Warriors 110: That game sorta didn't count either, but at least it was a win

I was so frustrated after learning that Vinny was going to cave into Nellieball and start his own mad scientist lineup (seriously: Rose/Gordon/Hughes/Sefolosha/Gooden) that I didn't watch the game.

Only after seeing the Bulls won did I half-watch the tape, and I'm glad I knew the ultimate result because I would've likely been beside myself most of the contest.

Granted, a lot of this has to do with the way the Warriors play. It's rarely going to be a 'normal' game against them. But I wish our rookie coach didn't make so many rookie mistakes, one being the thought that he could out-coach Don Nelson by 'matching up'.

But, it ultimately worked out, and any circus road trip victory is technically a good one. Yet ugly...and quite lucky.

Larry Hughes had a tremendous game, and that's...rarely going to happen. Lindsey Hunter was 4-6 from the field. Drew Gooden was able to take advantage of a night where he was one of the bigger players on the court.

Since neither team was playing organized on either end of the floor, it was a game where the players alternated taking over streches: Hughes early, Gordon for a bit in the 2nd quarter (overall a poor game from him), and then Derrick Rose with a phenomenal second half, which saved Vinny from himself...

Beyond the odd starting lineup, and giving a DNP to Noah, Vinny was also made the questionable decision to bring Nocioni back in the last 3 minutes to guard Stephen Jackson (there was a stretch where he was attempting to guard Biedrins too), even though he proved he couldn't do that, and he was having an overall terrible game, even getting to the level where his histrionics were causing issues with the referees. Yet there he was, playing the role of trusted veteran...even though he's one of the least trustable players on the roster. Just found it curious that going into a game Vinny was so desperate to 'match up', yet at the end he went with Noc even though it was a terrible matchup.

Now in a game like this one, that sorta didn't count, these types of moves didn't ultimately cost the game. But there aren't many games where you don't have to really coach, and just let the guys (and one very special guy) talent win it for you. If anything, this game is making me set the bar even lower for Vinny: he may turn into a real pro coach, but it hasn't happened yet.

One player who had a great game that we can actually take some meaning from is Thabo Sefolosha. His shot looked good, and he had a very efficient offensive game. I think the forward position (maybe not starting PF like tonight, but...) was always his best shot at being a contributor, and he quietly filled up the boxscore tonight, which was nice to see as it was his first real action in several games, and in the past when he'd sit for a long time he'd be lost for a couple months.

In fact, Thabo should've gotten the starting SF role when Deng was hurt in Portland, but it went to Hughes...and after 40 (while, again, mostly great) minutes of Hughes tonight, it's a real worry that Vinny thinks this guy can play. Now, if the Knicks trades Friday proved anything, it's that teams can still be somewhat suckered by hollow numbers...so maybe that's the plan here. But Hughes isn't nearly as good as Randolph, and not even as good as Crawford...so maybe we should end the showcase right here and send tapes of Friday night around the league.

0 recs | Comment 52 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This is the second game where Rose had a bad first half

and played well in the second, which is a good sign for the future.

Otherwise, looked like 48 minutes of summer league play.

by Granny Waiters on Nov 22, 2008 3:42 PM CST   0 recs

Anyone wanna start taking bets on whether or not Hughes is starting on Sunday?

Between his good game yesterday and the crying to the media, it’s only a matter of time before he cracks the starting five. One guy that is really bugging me lately is BG. I’m not a BG hater or anything, but you know the old cliche, “playing within yourself”? Ben needs to do more of that.

I think Ben should definately be starting, but someone needs to sit this guy down and explain that all he should be doing is catching and shooting, thats it. Occasionally when he drives and hits that teardrop shot good things happen, like the game against Dallas. But for the most part they result in turnovers and bad possessions. Rose needs to be creating the shots for guys like Ben. And I get the feeling he’s not very happy about that.

by Juiceboxjerry on Nov 22, 2008 3:56 PM CST   0 recs

is Denver still starting Dhantay Jones?

Vinny: “we needed more length at guard, Larry’s played really well lately. This isn’t an indictment on Ben, it’s just matchups. Matchups. Did I mention we’re matching up?”

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 22, 2008 3:58 PM CST to parent up   1 recs

If Gordon was smart enough to accept his limitations and his role

He would already have signed a contract extension with the Bulls.

Remember, he thinks that he is the best player on the Bulls, and deserves to be the highest paid. His definition of “best” is the one who scores the most points, so that is pretty much his mentality for this season, score the most points that he can during the season so that he can score the biggest contract that he can after the season.

Yea, that’s the guy that I want to build my team around, and he’s a midget to boot.

by BigWay on Nov 22, 2008 6:20 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Enough with the "he's small" comments.

You are like the guys on the Jim Rome show that have a good take and then flame out right at the end. I totally agree with you about Ben in this comment. But we don’t need anymore mention of his height. WE GET IT. HE"S SHORT!

by Unrealcity on Nov 23, 2008 1:53 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Agreed

it’s his reversion back to his 43.7% FG shooting that should be the concern. Maybe that is what the man is, a scorer on high volume shooting.

by messwiththebull on Nov 23, 2008 10:08 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

We need to keep Hughes so we can DNP him all year like Starbury next year.

Using him as a walking expiring contract lol!

Homecoming

by illwill on Nov 22, 2008 3:59 PM CST   0 recs

re: Thabo at the forward spot

There was some discussion over at the RealGM board that perhaps Deng should be playing the PF (which I think has been bandied about before, before being ultimately deemed silly). I do wonder, though, with the offense that we’re running with the pick and pop if all those open jumpers Tyrus was getting at the 4 earlier wouldn’t be better converted by Deng. If Deng can do the whole David West midrange thing, then I think it’s at least worth thinking about. I just don’t know if he can handle opposing 4’s in the post on defense, but what we’re doing down low isn’t really working anyway, so it’s worth thinking about.

by fundamentallysound on Nov 22, 2008 4:14 PM CST   0 recs

he might not be so bad at defending the 4

he did a nice job on DIrk the other day

by CJOliveira on Nov 22, 2008 5:32 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Dirk is a unique case

he always struggles with smaller, more agile guys on him. It’s the same strategy that the Warriors used in D-ing him up with Steven Jackson to much success. It is nice to see that he can lock down one of the game’s best 4’s though, even if it is just because of Dirk’s personal shortcomings.

by fundamentallysound on Nov 22, 2008 6:17 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

He's also done a good job on Bosh in the past.

I think he could be successful there, but bigger 4s could take him inside and get him in foul trouble pretty easily.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 23, 2008 11:22 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

last year his opponent counterpart PER when he played the 4 was 19.0

and he posted a 20.5. Whereas, at the 3 he posted a 19.2 PER and gave up a 16.6. In 2006-07, he posted a 26.5 PER at PF (in 13% of the team’s overall minutes at the PF) and only gave up a 13.3 PER. At the SF slot in 06-07, he posted a 19.2 PER and gave up a 14.1 PER. Again, in 2005-06 (on 6% of the team’s total minutes at PF), he posted a better PER at the PF spot while giving up a slightly worse PER on defense at PF. He put up a 16.6 PER at SF and gave up 14.9 at SF on D. At PF, he put up a 18.9 PER and gave up a 15.9 PER. In his rookie year, the trend was there too, but he didn’t play enough minutes at the PF for me to consider it significant. Anyway, there seems to be ample evidence that Deng is nearly as good at the PF as he is at the SF spot and more importantly, that he would be much better than the guys we have manning the PF spot right now, especially given our pick and pop offense. Deng would be killer as a pick and pop AND pick and roll 4, because of his slashing ability. Sign me up.

by fundamentallysound on Nov 23, 2008 1:09 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I trust counterpart PER about as much as I can throw it.

At least without digging pretty deeply into the lineups and getting a real sense of what it meant to say Deng was at the 4. Who else was he out there with? For how long?

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 23, 2008 6:18 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

yeah, it's admittedly a very rough measure. The Bulls team point differential per 100 possessions

looks favorable when Deng is at the 4 as well though. So there’s at least some evidence that it could work.

by fundamentallysound on Nov 23, 2008 8:11 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I have always maintained that Thabo appears to be more effective

in the front court, last night, though a special circumstance was still proof positive. He is just not quite quick enough to run around with shooting guards all night. But his rebounding and overall court game seem vastly enhanced in the front court. Since Deng and his contract are a fixture at the three, maybe when we play small ball, Thabo and Deng can both play in the front court at the same, if this means Deng at the 4, so be it. Deng is not an overally athletic 3 so maybe he can deal with some 4’s.

Thabo is one of our most disruptive defensive players, and we need to find ways to get him on the court more often. Trading Gooden would help Thabo, Noah and Thomas get the minutes that they need so that we can decide which if any of them are long term keepers. The Thomas decision is due this summer, Thabo and Noah the summer after that, although they cost only $7 million combined in 2010.

by BigWay on Nov 22, 2008 6:28 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I was a big proponent of Deng at the 4

And I don’t think anyone gave a really convincing reason I was wrong.

However, a convincing reason showed up in his back MRI, at least to me. I look at that as raising a long-run health concern, and coupled with his various other minor injuries, I think it explains why he probably shouldn’t be 1) adding the weight that would be helpful at the 4 and 2) having to consistently match up with bigger and stronger players.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 22, 2008 6:30 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I've got a thing about PFs and Cs who can't rebound for their position

Which isn’t really “convincing”, although it’s somewhat meaningful to point out that for whatever offensive gains we’d get from Deng at the “4” would be at least partially offset by reduced team rebounding.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Nov 22, 2008 6:35 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I can't access Hollinger stats from prior years

So I’ll do this. Let’s look at Deng’s rebound rate historically and then compare it to SFs this year. Deng’s rebound rate by season – ignoring this year’s ~10 games – have been: 10.8, 11.4, 10.7, and 10.5. Pretty consistent.

There are 53 identified small forward this season; a rate of 11.4 would be 14th, while a rate of 10.5 would be 20th.

That is a little better than I would have thought, and it’s pretty obvious that the rate would be higher if he were playing PF. So maybe the cost wouldn’t be that much, although I do believe he’d be decidedly below-average for the position. But the point is valid.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Nov 22, 2008 7:08 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Totally agree about rebounding from the 4/5, but

it seems to me that Deng used to be a much better rebounder last year, and even more so the year before. Maybe at the 4 his game would be played closer to the rim and he would rebound better. Also, we might actually find out if he actually has the post game that some think he might(not necessarily me though).

Given the performance of Thomas, and the fact that as I’ve stated Gooden is wasting OPM, (other peoples minutes), I would like to see Thabo and Deng start in the front court for a few games just to see what happens, what have we got to lose.

Hell since our Bimbo Vinnie can’t figure out that Gooden isn’t a center Thabo and Deng can start without having to sit Gooden.

by BigWay on Nov 22, 2008 6:58 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

With all the other experiments, this at least sounds interesting.

The team they started against GS on Friday can only be described as a “travi-sham-ockery”. Who was he kidding?

by Unrealcity on Nov 23, 2008 1:56 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Last night ESPN made a huge deal out of Rose getting hurt

I just read the recap there and it’s not a big deal. I’m glad he’s OK. I kept meaning to check it online and forgot until now.

I hope Coach Del Negro figures things out soon. Two of my favorite teams hired rookie coaches, only to fire them and watch them go some place else and be successful.

by tominhawaii on Nov 22, 2008 4:14 PM CST   0 recs

Weird, but

it seems to me that BG isn’t really doing well as a spot-up shooter this year. Rose or somebody else hits him, he’s wide open…and it doesn’t fall. Could just be small sample size, or it could be I’m just imagining it. But I seemed to remember someone suggesting (over the summer) that he was never a natural spot-up shooter to begin with. Can anyone verify this either subjectively or statistically?

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 22, 2008 4:18 PM CST   0 recs

Subjectively

Small sample size. I’m not worried one bit about Ben’s ability to shoot, spot-up or not.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Nov 22, 2008 6:36 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Subjectively, I with you.

Ben seems to need the ball (or at least want the ball) to score. And this year, he sure has missed a lot of open looks when Rose has found him. It’s why Noce has looked decent. He has been hitting the open shots that Rose gets him.

by Unrealcity on Nov 23, 2008 2:02 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Hopefully it's just a comfort thing,

and when they get in rhythm those shots will start falling.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 23, 2008 7:51 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

I feel I've mentioned this several times

Sure others have as well.

All signs point to BG needing the ball in his hands for a while before shooting comfortably.

by BAB-Bass on Nov 23, 2008 5:14 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

The man is a career 43.2% shooter

and he’s shooting 43.7% this year. Nothing unusual about this year.

by messwiththebull on Nov 23, 2008 10:13 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Well I did watch the whole game...

but I guess I missed the part in the second quarter where Gordon “took over” for a stretch. When did that happen?

Nocioni’s D was terrible and I don’t know what the point of asking him to guard Biedrins was? That was a joke. I would have liked to see Noah get some action against him because I think he can pattern his game after Biedrins.

Larry Hughes played well I guess but I’m surprised that he does not know how to run a fast break (spacing!) and it should be noted that he got dunked on ferociously not once, but twice last night.

Hunter makes me nervous and when he drives (in slow motion) or shoots I get really worried, but he played solid and was a calming factor.

I think Drew Gooden’s Golden Gate Bridge tattoo gave him extra special shooting power last night. His homecoming clearly was a motivating factor for him, bc he shot and created exceptionally well.

Thabo looked solid. He played with confidence, his deep ball was falling and he contributed in every column.

Derick Rose is a God.

by smash! on Nov 22, 2008 4:54 PM CST   0 recs

meh

it was like 3 straight possessions where he had 7 points. Short stretch :)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 22, 2008 5:36 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Umm...Don Nelson?

I was furious at the lineup as well, but that’s a bit much.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Nov 22, 2008 6:37 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Last night proved that we need to cut down our rotation

We only played eight guys last night, which is about the right number, it may not have been the right eight though. To me Gooden and Hughes pretty much f-up any consistent rotations.

The only way that we can get down to an 8-9 man rotation is to make several 2 o 3 for 1 trades. We need to rid ourselves of Hughes and Gooden first, because they are simply not in our long term plans, and every minute that they play is a wasted minute stolen from a younger player that we need to evaluate.

If Hughes and Gooden were gone we could manage our rotations with the players that we have left, but eventually, either Hinrich or Gordon needs to go, and either Nocioni or Thomas needs to go.

This doesn’t take into account what we get back in trades. Our biggest needs are at 2 guard and center. We need starting quality guys with starter size at both positions.

Eventually, We need a three guard rotation, and a three forward rotation, with 2 guys manning the post. Minus Gooden and Hughes this is what we go with for now;

Guards, Rose, Hinrich or Gordon, and Hunter, with Thabo for spot duty at 2

Forwards, Deng, Thabo, and Thomas or Nocioni

Centers for now Noah, and Gray for spot minutes.

by BigWay on Nov 22, 2008 6:42 PM CST   0 recs

Can't take Hughes too seriously

This was a game that was tailor made for both Hughes and Gordon. The other team had no interest in playing defense, just like on the playground. It doesn’t happen every night in the NBA, and it doesn’t ever happen in the playoffs, unless it is that rare year that a Don Nelson team makes the playoffs.

by BigWay on Nov 22, 2008 6:47 PM CST   0 recs

Remeber we beat GSW last year

without Luol Deng, Ben Gordon, and Kirk Hinrich.

I really consider last night another did not count either. Rose was great so it was good to see him recover. He made a few very bad passes, but he had some highlight reel plays to make up for it.

Hughes and Thabo contributed offensively. Great. It was against the Warriors. What I liked was that they both were active on defense. Larry can’t finish at all as evidence by the Anthony Randolph rejection on a shot at the rim that clearly required him to finish with a left hand kiss off the glass. Thabo came out shooting, but again he’s most effective when playing with Rose where his defense can get the ball right to Rose in transition to let the pointgod go to work. One note to Thabo, get that steal and get the ball to Rose. When it’s a 4 on 1 break giving it to Rose will get you the ball back in the form of a lob pass at the rim. Render unto Rose what is Rose’s and Rose will render unto you what is yours.

Noc deserved to be benched early. He was completely out of the game mentally trying to tell a tale to the refs about his yelping as an indicator that he was hacked.

Larry Hughes had 4 assists. He now has 6 on the season. Hard to believe the Cavs thought he could play point guard.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 22, 2008 7:01 PM CST   0 recs

Thought Noah would get some burn, but then again...

…hasn’t he gotten beaten down on the floor a lot the last few games? If getting back on defense is one of Noah’s current problems, Nellie-ball doesn’t seem like the time to solve it. So Vinnie might’ve played that one well. Still, Noah is supposed to be our “energy” guy with an endless motor—you have to hope he’ll get back into last year’s shape eventually.

by T Maple on Nov 22, 2008 11:04 PM CST   0 recs

Perception is not always reality and figures sometimes do lie, however

some stats I listed in the Thomas post bear repeating. Tyrus logged only 9 minutes against Golden State with Rose on the court. Yes we all I know (+/-) stats can be deceiving, but they showed:
Thomas 17.4 +8
Hunter 16.9 +9
Noce 23.3 +8
Hughes 40.3 +2
Gordon 41.0 0
Gooden 37.3 0
Rose 36.1 +1
Thabo 27.6 -3

These numbers indicate his presence on the floor was a net postive, especially on defense. His mistakes easily stand out because they tend to be glaring, often due to a lack of court awareness or poor decision making, but he also was effective providing help defense and kept some Warriors from finishing due to his pogo stick jumping and shot blocking ability, although he often gets outmuscled by bigger centers and power forwards when posted up. But my point is, he did make a quiet contribution that went almost unnoticed.

Larry Hughes had his best game as a Bull, but was only a +2. Rose completely took over in the 4th quarter but struggled defensively much of the time, resulting in a +1. Thabo looked very good in his stints but was a -3. Noce got burned a few times but rebounded well and was +8.

Is it possible the coaches are so frustrated with TT’s mental errors, their perceptions of his performance get somewhat skewed? It also may be the case with Noah, who seems can do no right in their eyes lately, while Larry the upchucker can do no wrong. Again, his greatest game resulted in a net gain of only 2. How great was that?
Rose was a +20 in the Pacer game by contrast.

My conclusion, more Tyrus, more Noah is needed for the Denver game. Try it Vinnie, you may be surprised by the results.
 

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 23, 2008 3:45 AM CST   0 recs

Those figures are...

a great example of how futile it can be to use a single game’s +/- to argue much of anything. When Hunter, Noce, & Thomas are your leaders…God help us all.

Do get your point though—sometimes the memorable plays do bias our overall impression of a game.

by T Maple on Nov 23, 2008 7:28 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Sometimes? Try... "usually". ;-P

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 23, 2008 11:17 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

The thing with that is though

The guys at the top all played the fewest minutes. There’s a reason why they look better, they didn’t have a chance to regress to the mean in terms of +/-. It was a very close game and Rose, Gordon, and Gooden played for nearly the whole game, so they have a larger sample of those very close scoring minutes. Like T Maple said, these one-game samples in unadjusted +/- are more or less useless.

by fundamentallysound on Nov 23, 2008 9:58 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

The guys who only played a few minutes

Also probably played a heavily disproportionate number of their minutes against the other team’s backups.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Nov 23, 2008 11:33 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Agreed.

Bottom line: one game unadjusted +/- is essentially useless.

by fundamentallysound on Nov 23, 2008 12:56 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Tyrus Thomas era needs to be over
Small
Why has Pax re-created the 2003 Bulls?
Small
Bulls drinking game
Maya_small
Putting this Year's Team in Context

Recent FanPosts

Small
4 Way Trade Proposal
Parkview_small
Bulls/Kings rumor
Roc-sign_small
Going all in for 2010. . . (Bulls/Rockets/Kings)
Parkview_small
Tyrus Thomas - NBA defensive player of the year
Small
Getting rid of Hughes
Small
Observations from Last Night
Small
So who do you want the Bulls to draft in 2009?
Small
John Paxson and his decisions
Small
Fun Exercise: Complete Overhaul
Small
A overhaul is needed

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger

ad

Site Meter