Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


spread the word

Post Lakers loss pre-bedtime thoughts

Considering how outgunned the Bulls are against a team like the Lakers, especially in the frontcourt, the first half was an admirable effort.

Gordon was cold all night, but was at least still attacking the rim. Rose tried to pull them back with spurts of brilliance, but he wasn't enough.

I thought Luol Deng looked pretty terrible, including two awful early turnovers: one where he got caught in the air, and another inbounding the ball. Though he was charged with guarding Kobe, and that usually warranted Kirk Hinrich a free pass on the offensive end.

But it's the frontcourt that really separates the Bulls and the Lakers, and it showed tonight. Drew Gooden was in foul trouble, Noah had a particularly ineffective first half (he was better in the 2nd) so it meant a lot of Aaron Gray.

Gray actually did alright by his standards, getting a few dunks, and it helped that Tyrus Thomas was in there with him (Vinny followed Scotter's rotation rules) and playing well. Together they were part of a lineup that actually made up ground, and a lot had to do with Thomas' defense (and some nice passing) allowing the Bulls to run, a time where the Lakers loafed a bit. When the Lakers were set  on defense they were very agressive on the wings, pressuring the Bulls into double-digit turnovers in the first half.

Vinny then stuck with big Aaron a bit too long, and things eventually went bad. He was in relatively early in the 2nd half too. There was the typically deadly pairing with Noc, and Lamar Odom took advantage of Noc's spaciness on defense.

I started writing this once I saw the fourth quarter open with Hunter/Hughes/Noc/Thomas/Gray. They actually held it close enough to warrant bringing Rose/Gordon back, and the Bulls closed the game back to 10 with the ball...and then Aaron Gray telegraphed a pass that wound up giving the Lakers a fast break basket.

Not that Gray's the single reason the expected result happened tonight, but it shows the talent disparity, though some of that is seemingly with Vinny exacerbating the situation (it's not like Gray played himself 21 minutes).

Ah well. There's another game tomorrow where that disparity won't be so high, and at least some of the rotation players got some rest, with Rose getting 'only' 35 minutes.

Other thoughts:

  • Either Gordon gets fouled a lot, or he has really bad body control when heading into the lane. I think it's somewhere in the middle. He does get hacked, but you can see the difference between him and Rose when they get fouled. Rose was getting hit so often early Vinny was actually up and screaming.
  • Hughes is still confirming he's terrible, yet maybe it'll take a dozen or so games before someone affiliated with the Bulls realizes it. Especially considering that he's in the game when Gordon's running the point, there's no reason Hughes plays ahead of Thabo except for the paycheck.
  • Bulls got the Lakers in the penalty real early in the 2nd quarter, but did nothing with it.
  • Pau Gasol sure looked like someone worth trading for.

 

0 recs | Comment 201 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Gray wouldn't have played so much if Noah was even decent

Noah’s been the biggest disappointment for me so far. He doesn’t look like he’s learned a single offensive move, and he’s obviously not in the best condition.

by Big D on Nov 19, 2008 12:17 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're right

Noah’s regressed even. He looks lost on offense, and not much better on defense honestly.

However I will say this: last year it was widely reported that Noah was slow to learn the offense. Well, this year there is a new offense, and while this is by no means a legitimate explanation for his general shittiness, I expect he will get better as his conditioning improves and his grasp of the offense grows stronger. I just hope this doesn’t become a yearly ritual.

Asked what kind of player he expects to be in the next five years, he said: "Not a star, but like, a superstar. Something around, like, Chris Paul, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, something like that."

by BigBenign on Nov 19, 2008 12:35 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think Noah's worse

I think he just came into this season woefully unprepared. It’s a bad sign for yet another pick by ‘good character’ Paxson, but in terms of this season I think he’ll eventually be fine. It doesn’t seem that he has the type of game that should fluctuate much.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The "good character" rap is getting dated.

A better rap would be that he picks “winners”. TT was/is not a “great character” dude. How about that slam dunk contest? Character would have picked Aldridge. Mybe he should have. And Noah was/is not a “great character” dude. And rose was/is better than Beasley. And more importantly to Paxson (and I agree), Rose is a winner.

Look at the Denver and Detroit trade. AI is a HOFer, but I don’t want him on the Bulls. Billups on the other hand never overwhelms you, but he is a winner. He is all about team basketball and winning, not scoring, stats, going one-on-one, etc. I think this is an underrated aspect of the NBA. Beasley, Durant, Carmelo, AI, Vinsanity, T-Mac, Stevie Franchise, Starbury. All had their heyday of being “superstars”, but none of them are winners. The one guy you could argue could work with someone else here is Melo. It worked with Team USA, but there were other All NBA guys all over the team then. I would have gone with Wade over everyone but LBJ and that is the way I felt during the draft, not just after Wade has won a championship.

Sorry I got on a soap box. Maybe I should have made this a FanPost or something.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 2:58 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think 'character' may have played a factor in not taking Aldridge too

he was labeled as ‘soft’.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 9:08 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tyrus' smart possessions.

Tyrus drove the lane 3 times last night. 3 smart moves produced 6 points nice and fast.

Tyrus startled the defense, and used his ability to move to the basket. He also played good defense on a tough assignment(s).

Last night was Tyrus’ best performance of this season. (Now, if only Tyrus could play WITH Rose.)

by chicago-homesick-blues on Nov 19, 2008 10:20 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

me too...

he was awesome that night.

by sue369 on Nov 19, 2008 11:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There still is plenty of time

and I think he will get it all together. Maybe I’ll add this to my Christmas list too. ;-)

by sue369 on Nov 19, 2008 1:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

true

i still hold out hope for him too. :)

by Jaina on Nov 19, 2008 1:23 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think you're right about the new system.

I do think it is a factor to why Noah looks so bad. And I do think he will improve. But if he spent less time partying and more time on his profession, learning the new system, it would be nice. If my job were to implement a new system, I would have to learn it right away. I would be forced to stay late, or take the manual home and get it working. I would probably have a week to get it down and a month or so where a mistake (small) here or there were dismissed. But he looks like he doesn’t know what he is doing out there at all. It has been disappointing to me.

But most disappointing to me has been Luol. I will say that it is harder to “relearn” something once you have established it. And Deng certainly was comfortable with what worked for him for the last four years. But he needs to get with the coaching staff and ask how he can be more effective or ask the questions he is having about where they want him. If he is and this is the help they are giving him, then it’s on the coaches, but something needs to get figured out here.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 3:04 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Somebody suggest to VDN that Gooden is not a center

Gasol was averaging 2 points per minute against Gooden

by BigWay on Nov 19, 2008 12:46 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I've been forwarding him your posts

Gooden’s not a center. But Noah’s barely one, and nobody else is at all. I put that on Paxson, not Vinny.

Besides, Gasol isn’t the center for the Lakers either.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm dissappointed with Noah, but

He is still a better option at center than Gooden. I think that he would actually start to play better as he got regular minutes, he certainly did last season after we got rid of the big Mope Wallace.

Gasol played center for about half of his time on the court, he plays all the post minutes when Bynum is out.

It just seems to me that VDN punishes Noah in a way that he doesn’t anyone else. If he treated the others the same way, Rose would be the only one left on the court by the 6 minute mark of the first quarter.

Gray is extremely limited, but he performed better tonight than Gooden did as a center. Gooden is a 4, and only a 4, so no matter how badly Noah and Gray look it drives me nuts that VDN keeps try to pound a square peg(Gooden) into a round hole(the center position)

by BigWay on Nov 19, 2008 1:12 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree that I hate seeing Gooden at Center.

But as to Noah being better or would get better, I agree and disagree. I think he is being pulled quickly because of practice. I think he is having a hard time with the new system and when he proves that he still isn’t getting it in the beginning of games, they pull him. I think you are right that he improved as the year went on last year and that it will happen again, but I think this is due to him getting the system figured out, which he clearly has not yet.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 3:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow.

Gordon sucks all night and Gray contributes positively, yet you find a way to spin it…

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 19, 2008 12:17 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

heh

at least I spin towards the good players.

Your jumping on Gordon’s bad shooting night (for some reason I ventured into the game threa)…it’s just silly. I’m making a scoffing smirking face as I type this, trust me. I pretty much consider any points you have regarding him tainted with taint.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

for example

I said Gordon was cold all night. That means he wasn’t hitting shots. Sorry I can’t be more rough on the team’s second best player. ass.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You also said he was attacking the rim.

Like that is somehow a redemption for missing 17 shots. Suck is suck, just call it evenly across the board, while refraining from calling your readers names…

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 19, 2008 12:28 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you do not deserve to be reasoned with

take a few deep breaths. gordon = good. gray hopes to be will perdue one day.

by lampnasty on Nov 19, 2008 12:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

good point

I will now abstain from fights with D2.0 regarding Gordon. It was very therapeutic when confronted with the ‘Tyrus is stoopid I alwayzz nu thi$!’ crowd.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:35 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i understand anger after a loss

and people can come to some weird conclusions about the game . But ragging on a good player for having an off night in the staples center against one of the best defensive squads in the league does not get a pass from me.

by lampnasty on Nov 19, 2008 12:41 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Exactly, "good player".

But not great. He bugs me with his inconsistency. Rose is consistent. That is why I can’t find enough guards in the East to keep him off the All-Star team. I might write about this soon. Hollinger is wrong about this one, Rose is definitely an All-Star right now. But Gordon is like Ray Allen (now, not when he was a perennial All-Star) or Michael Redd or Rip Hamilton to me. I don’t like any of them. I would rather have 18 every night then 35 one night and 2 the next. And I know that Rip and Ray have rings and the distinction I will make is that neither is their teams second best player. And certainly not best (as Ben suggested by his “I’m the leading scorer. Who do you think should get the most money?” talk). I like BG. I want us to resign him and I keeping hoping each game that he gets easier shots next to Rose he is a little more inclined to stay. I’m just saying that we have to be rational/balanced when talking about him. It seems you either have to be in the “BG SUCKS!” camp or the “PAY HIM WHATEVER HE WANTS!” camp and I think both are wrong and bad for the team. If we overpay Ben, then in a year (or two at most) everyone on here will be posting everyday about the terrible BG contract that is the weight around our necks and how we would be contenders if not for his terrible contract that is eating up all our cap. I’m just saying.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 3:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's enough we (some at least)

are already saying this about Kirk and Noce’s contracts. And WILL be saying it about Deng soon. BG’s contract needs to be reasonable for the Bulls. I have my doubts…

by BAB-Bass on Nov 19, 2008 4:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think that unless Deng is actually getting worse

you can get away with overpaying him, as at least he has a floor of being good. Same with Gordon. Hinrich’s deal is fine as long as last year was an aberration and he didn’t have the future star of the team playing his position.

Noc, that was just a bad idea from the outset, given that he had known limitations in terms of performance and role with the team.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 9:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly.

You hated that deal before it was even officially announced. He was a known 6th or 7th man w/ Deng ahead of him and there was no way he was ever going to be a starting PF.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 9:17 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i think the worst issue with

him is his salary. But he carries some strenghts that our other bigs just don’t have. He may not be the answer at the 4, but he brings something to the table that noah tyrus and gooden do not.

by gman2849 on Nov 19, 2008 9:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

if there is one model of consistency

it’s rip hamilton… he is exactly the type of player who will give you 18 every night

Once upon a time the Suns got out on the break... and along came Steve sucKerr

by Murcy on Nov 19, 2008 4:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually, Gordon = clown on the court

unfortunately, he is not funny, he is painfull to watch. He is the George Muresan of the midgets.

by BigWay on Nov 19, 2008 12:49 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you're deranged when it comes to Gordon

It is redemption, because while missing shots he usually makes he was attacking the rim, trying to create offense. He had a bad game. It was like the 6th worst game out of the roster tonight, and Gordon’s been the 2nd best player on the team this season.

Heck, I even said Gray had a good game by his standards.

So try having a thought instead of worrying about my ‘spin’. You ass.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

hehe

I just remembered that you are the guy who always says Gray is ‘fundamentally sound’ :-D

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:32 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Again.

Why resort to name calling?

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 19, 2008 12:36 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

because I wish to insult you personally

as I consider comments about my ‘spin’ or ‘bias’ to be personal in nature. So just take it, and as long as I do a diligent job ignoring your points regarding most of the team, I’ll be alright.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:40 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   2 recs

Haha

I don’t know why, but this made me laugh out loud. It’s the old ask a stupid question get a stupid answer bit that always gets me… well played Matt.

Why resort to name calling?
because I wish to insult you personally

by kidronmusic on Nov 19, 2008 1:01 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh yeah.

I remember, I am an ass for pointing out that Gordon only missed two shots in the paint, while missing 15 outside the paint…clearly he was attacking the rim.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 19, 2008 12:41 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There were 3 bad shots in there

The others were good looks. Have you ever taken a course in probability, or statistics, or simply pondered mathematics? These things happen – you play 82 games and in some number of them a good player will have an awful field goal percentage even with good decision-making and relatively high-percentage shots. The proper response to such a game is not to freak out.

Picking on BG for any offensive weaknesses is preposterous … it’s ignoring the real problems this team has on offense and blaming its 2nd best offensive player.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Nov 19, 2008 12:46 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gordon does not play well with Rose

He looks him off and refuses to give it up to him to run the offense. I can’t stand watching it because he would get better looks if he let Rose create.

And what was wrong with Deng? That baseline jumper used to be automatic. I can see D Rose getting frustrated with guys missing wide open shots.

Vinny...you look confused

by Knowledge32 on Nov 19, 2008 12:26 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Isn't every team required to have

a big, stiff white guy? Gray plays that role effectively at minimum salary.

by Granny Waiters on Nov 19, 2008 7:36 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm sorry, but you're an idiot

Gordon having an off shooting night (when he did get to the FT line 10+ times) is considered as him sucking? Talk about spinning it. Players ARE allowed to have off shooting nights right? He did everything else decently…passing, defense, etc. Go away.

by NormVanBeer on Nov 19, 2008 8:20 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And frankly,

those were good shots he missed. Rose got him open, he shot them, they looked good, but didn’t go in. It happens; and I’d rather BG shooting those shots than anybody else on the team. Additionally, the man BG was guarding – 6’10 Radmonovich – exploited him for all of 5 points on 1/4 shooting.

Our starting backcourt went for 48 pts, 13 assists and 8 rebounds on an off shooting night. And this is our problem?

We lost because our interior is relatively small and unskilled in comparison to the Lakers’ interior. Nocioni led us in rebounding and Gray led non-guards in scoring. Not gonna win that way.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 8:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Although I must say,

Gray did well in there. Needs to work on his free throws, but if continues to get stronger, leaner, and improve his conditioning…well, the dude’s 7’1, strong, and actually has post-moves.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 8:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

being able to make free throws would be a huge plus

but he shot 57% last year, 42% this year. His last two seasons in college were 63% and 54%.

He’s terrible from the line, and outside of some Brendan Haywood shotdoctor-aided change, I don’t see it getting much better. Which is a shame because his inability to jump actually could mean he’d draw more fouls :)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 9:12 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ouch

on both accounts. Time to call Brendan’s shot doctor.

And remember those “jumping” shoes with the weird platforms at the toe? If everyone donated a buck, maybe BaB could send a pair over to Aaron. The “Elevate Aaron” fund.

It’ll work. It must.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 9:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Its funny...

looking at the predraft measurements at draftexpress…Gray’s no step vert was an inch higher than Durants (His max vert was an inch lower) Even though Durant isn’t above the rim, who would’ve thought that?

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Nov 19, 2008 11:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow!

That really points out the importance of being a quick leaper in addition to a high one, because I’ve seen Durant throw down some nasty dunks. Who knows, though? Gray lost 30 lbs in the offseason; that’s a hard thing for a big fella. If he continues to work, and finds that free-throw doctor, he might become a Marc Gasol type banger.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 11:10 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Heh, I don't think it's that hard.

It’s easy to lose 30lbs when you weigh 300+ to start with. He got down to what, 275lb?

NBA centers seem to be pretty good sized already when they’re 250-260. I think with a strong workout program, Gray could get there. He still wouldn’t be fast, but he’d go from being dismally slow to just slow. And he’d still be stronger than damn near everyone he faces.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 19, 2008 12:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gray's problem is more lateral quickness

than speed, and I don’t believe dropping another 20 lbs is going to make a significant difference in his lateral quickness.

He could be an effective player (As long as Thomas is on the floor with him) if he improves his FTs and reduces his turnovers. That’s a pretty big IF right now.

by Scotter on Nov 19, 2008 12:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Perhaps

But I think he’d be a better player at 255-260 than at 275-280.

I’d love to be proven wrong though!

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 19, 2008 2:32 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's my hope

that by the time he’s dropped the weight and developed a consistant free-throw shot, we’ll have either developed Noah and Tyrus or acquired genuine NBA starters at the pf and center. If he does those things, he can then be an excellent back up.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 3:13 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Biggest problem

I think Gray can be a decent back-up. My biggest problem is opponents taking a rebound over him when he has position. Both Gasol and Bynum did it last night, and it appens almost every game. There’s no physical reason he can’t box out.

by El Toro de Goro on Nov 19, 2008 5:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I thought Gordon sucked too

but then I saw he had 18 points in the first half and I had no idea how he reached 18. It looked like brick city to me. He still got to the line, but when the shots aren’t falling and the you’re in the bonus with 7 minutes remaining in the 2nd quarter you have to attack the rim on every possession.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:04 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ben had a bad game

but man the guy still put up 20 plus points. Give credit where credit is due! He’s def not the reason we lost. Our big need to play better. Alot better. The one thing i do hate about BG is him ignoring D Rose. What is he thinking? Its like he’s clueless as so what this kid can do for him sometimes! Wake up Ben. You want a trillion dollars start playing with d rose better. Gooden is a terrible defender and not a center. Noah needs to add some weight / muscle because he’s a bi@#!. Tyrus needs to stay near the basket, i swear i want to strangle him when i see him at the top of the key every GDAM play.

by Bulls4Ever on Nov 19, 2008 1:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If Derrick Rose is "unstoppable" than Luol Deng is "stoppable".

I’m not gonna bitch and moan about his contract, but how can a guy that just got asignificant deal like that (I know it’s right around market value) totally dissapear like that. It’s as if he didn’t play at all. And this happens a lot. Just take a look at Danny Granger he got a smaller deal than Deng and he is superior by far imo.

by Juiceboxjerry on Nov 19, 2008 12:22 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He better get used to it

This is going to be a guard-centered offense for the next 10-15 years, so if he can’t adjust to it, then he’ll be pretty useless.

by Big D on Nov 19, 2008 12:25 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right. Deng needs to step up.

Like From The Window To Luol said, we need Deng to be our second best player. And like I said, we need Ben to not be our second best player.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 3:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

meh

Granger isn’t an improvement for us at the SF position either. He wants to jack up threes as fast as Stephen Jackson.

Rose is too good to get practically nothing out of our SF position. I guess we can hope that we see more Thabo tonight because I really don’t want to see Noc starting.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:06 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I like how yfBB mentioned...

…that Hinrich always gets the “well-he-guarded-the-other-team’s-bestest-player-so-of-course-his-offense-struggled” treatment, and everyone knows Deng will NEVER get that from the majority.

Deng is a third option offensively. Those guys aren’t consistent, almost by definition. While it hasn’t been outstanding, I’ve been fairly pleased with Deng as a whole this year. He’s the least of the Bulls problems for the long-term… at least as long as he remains the Bulls 3rd or 4th focus for the year.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 9:16 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I just worry

that he can’t hit a mid range jumper to save his life. Odds are it’s slumping. But he seemingly costs Rose 2 assists a game.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 19, 2008 12:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oden had 22 and 10 tonight

He was probably giddy just thinking about getting to face the Bulls’ interior defense.

by Big D on Nov 19, 2008 12:24 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I fear tomorrow will not look good either

Aldridge will score 25 (with 2 rebounds) and I may take a few days off.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 12:25 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wouldn't worry about Aldrige

He was supposed to “step up” the last 3 games and he hasn’t. Against Golden State he had 20 minutes, 4 points, 4 rebounds, and 6 fouls. Unless he gets out of his funk against Chicago, which I doubt, the Bulls should only worry about Roy and Oden. I’m pretty sure the Blazers don’t have an answer for Rose.

by tominhawaii on Nov 19, 2008 7:22 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Big D. If you got Odom's stats off the net, you better repeat your speedreading class.

He actually got 10 points in 22 minutes before fouling out, after bitching on every call.

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 19, 2008 12:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oden=/=Odom

Tyrusmancrush you better repeat your speedreading class.

Asked what kind of player he expects to be in the next five years, he said: "Not a star, but like, a superstar. Something around, like, Chris Paul, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, something like that."

by BigBenign on Nov 19, 2008 12:55 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   2 recs

I'll take that loss

cause Derrick Rose looked very impressive. I already thought he would be good but he just confirmed it. The rest of the Bulls are really pissing me off. What happen to the team from two years ago,how good would they be with Rose?!

by chi on Nov 19, 2008 12:28 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the bulls had some hustling big men who could

still patrol the lanes some. But let’s not forget that they were still being punished by every major big man (well except for the plodding shaq fu-ee) Plus this is a new Laker’s team. All star power forward and superstar shooting guard vs all star point guard and a very good shooting guard minus an injured Deng.

all and all we are really starting to play better. In contrast to the Celtic’s game, you can see the improvements.

we’ve played ll games, mostly against the best teams in the league, as a new unit. our top 4 of two years ago are still not playing team ball of two years ago consistently.

But now we have Rose who I could see start averaging 25 to 30 points per game soon. And his assists are rising.

Noah/Tyrus/Grey will be getting better acclimated to being around the basket for some easy buckets soon.

We may not have the big men defenders we need yet, but were winning with scoring. I know that doesn’t get you a championship, but it does make us a sun’s-like contender with more emphasis on D team.

One more note. ESPN mag this month points out that most bigs take longer to develop. shoot, Odom and Bynum are just starting to develop now.

by gman2849 on Nov 19, 2008 1:05 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

1984 all over again

The Lakers clearly outclass the Bulls at basically every position, except of course for Rose. Just as Jordan was the only one left from the 84 team of his rookie season, Rose will be the only player left from this team within 3 years. Luckily he is only 20, so we have a few years to build a team around him. Without Rose, I would seriously have to consider cancelling my NBA league pass.

by BigWay on Nov 19, 2008 12:55 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What, exactly, are you doing

With the remaining three years on Luol’s contract? in this situation?

--Torch

by torch on Nov 19, 2008 8:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

trading them, I assume.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 9:20 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's kind of sad how much better Rose is

than every other player on our roster. I hope Mr. Communication can keep Rose interested. Rose looks awfully frustrated out there late in the 3rd quarter creating opportunities for teammates and they just don’t make the shots or pump fake and pass out. Shoot the damn ball.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:08 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just got back from the game

I went to see Derrick do his thing, and he did.

The sad part is the rest of the Bulls did their thing as well.

The inside problem has been said and abused way too much already so I won’t get into that aspect.

The real problem that concerns me is Luol Deng.

Before this season started, everyone had said Deng was the one that would flourish under Rose’s skills. It seems as if Gordon may have been the one that would flourish the whole time.

I’m not saying Gordon had a great game but compared to Deng, you could argue that he he did.

Bleh Bleh Bleh . . . . same story over and over again.

Rose is great and everyone else . . . not so much

by Option27 on Nov 19, 2008 12:57 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

deng it....

I do recall a lot of people, in fact, some of them were incredibly vocal about it, that theorized that Gordon would benefit most from Rose and his drive and kick game.
So that doesn’t surprise me….

of course Loul Deng was supposed to knock down midrange jumpers all day as a result of that same drive and kick game… and that just isn’t happening.

He doesn’t seem to put himself in a good position to catch and shoot, and it does make some sense to me… he simply doesn’t have the range to space the floor well. When Rose drives, the defense collapses, and he kicks it to Deng, but since Deng is only 16 feet away from the hoop, the defense gets back to him before he can get a clean shot off. So Deng passes it back out, and it basically amounts to a wasted 8 seconds of shot clock.

by kidronmusic on Nov 19, 2008 1:06 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Luol Deng fucking blows.

I don’t care how much they paid for him, i’d rather have Nocioni starting at the 3.

by Juiceboxjerry on Nov 19, 2008 1:23 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

let's not go overboard

Deng has been struggling to find consistency with his shot. Apart from the mess of last year, as the year goes on, he gets a much better feel for his jump shot.

Look back at Nocioni’s defense on Odom and really throughout the entire game he was plain awful. Noc is a nice energy player off the bench. Deng can actually guard a small forward. He did a rather nice job on Granger the other day. :)

by lampnasty on Nov 19, 2008 1:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Is it possible to anti-rec a post?

Pleeeeeze!!!!

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 1:25 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

flag?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 1:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That takes too much work.

I don’t want to flag things just for being stupid.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 4:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Deng for Iguodala

Would you do it?

Iggy is really struggling as teh Sixers slow the tempo with Elton Brand. Their leading scorer is Thaddeus Young right now.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:10 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In a heartbeat

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 9:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they won't

Young and Deng play the same position. Iggy plays the 2. Not gonna happen.

by kig on Nov 19, 2008 9:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This may sound crazy, but

one of the most interesting and impressive things about Rose, and an indicator of how advanced his game is his ability to defensive rebound and how he always seems to be around the ball as it comes off the rim on the defensive end, it is almost uncanny, especially for a rookie. The guy is greatly exceeding my expectations, and making me think back to the early Jordan years, even though they are different type of players. At least we have one brilliant slice of hope.

by BigWay on Nov 19, 2008 1:02 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not crazy at all.

He’s got hops like very few. He took a rebound away from Gasol from behind. Superstar in the waiting.

by lampnasty on Nov 19, 2008 1:10 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hops and then some.

He is only a few inches below TT on his vert! That blew me away. I can’t find the link right now, but Rose was 37" and TT is 40 some.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 3:28 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here you

go.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 6:55 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's brains

Most rebounds are going to come back between the dotted circle marking the charge zone and teh free throw line. Rose goes to this area after every perimeter shot. As a real point he’s going there for two reasons. One, if the shot falls he’s right there to get the inbounds pass. And two, a whole bunch of misses ricochet right to this area.

Jason Kidd has made a living getting into this area of the paint to get triple doubles.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:12 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

bleh

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 9:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

your just now noticing

That Gordon has bad body control. Anytime that he takes more than 2 dribbles he looks like an epileptic having a spastic fit.

In fact there should be a Gordon rule, that he is never allowed to take more than 2 dribbles before shooting.

I’d bet his shooting percentage with 0 or 1 dribble is over 50, 2 dribbles between 40 and 50, and 3 or more dribbles under 30.

by BigWay on Nov 19, 2008 1:18 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would love to see actual stats on this.

I agree that he over dribbles and it always causes problems, but from watching, it seems that the catch and shoots he has had haven’t been that effective. He has been better with the ball in his hands. But that is just my feelings from observation and watching all the games.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 3:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm not just noticing it

it’s just even more noticeable next to Rose (who has a similar size/build).

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 9:16 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Derrick Rose looked better than Kobe tonight, although I realize Kobe was on cruise control

all night, because of the competition.

The inarticulate dufus, Gary Payton said prior to the game, that Mayo was way ahead of Rose for ROY. After Rose blew by the Lakers with ease all night, he reluctantly admitted Derrick was a good player, but still would not concede his greatness, as Webber tried to push him in that direction. “Yeah, Rose is a good player. It’s too bad he’s on such a lousy team.”

I do agree with his sarcasm regarding Deng. He said “Where is Deng, he’s not in my pocket. Has anyone seen him”. ala where’s Waldo? Except for a very nice putback resulting in a 3 pt. play, Luol was nowhere to be found all night.

Tyrus hustled thus earning his 31 minutes, contributing some spectacular highlight plays, especially his steal and behind the back pass for a layup and definitely played himself back into the rotation. He was 3 for 6 from the field, missing his only open jump shot, and 3 for 3 from the line. His defense was solid and he was credited with 3 blocks while his jumping jack ability forced some other shots to go astray. My only complaint is that he lays back too often instead of attacking the rim for offensive rebounds.

The LA announcers were impressed with TT’s athleticism and were completely blown away by the overall awesomeness of D Rose, commenting one time that Farmar knew he was there as he flew by him for a layup, it’s just that DR is so fast, he never saw him. They both aagreed there is not doubt he is the top rookie with potential to become one of the all time greats.

Gordon and Hughes were 8 for 30, but Ben was very agressive and kept the pressure on the Lakers, while Larry ’s game can give any loyal fan serious heartburn every time he touches the ball.

Hunter should play in a seniors league, although I’m not sure he would start.

Aaron gives his all, but appears to be playing at half speed even when he is going all out.

Noah is always going at full speed, but was totally outmuscled all night and continues to be a huge liability, which is why the Bulls are forced to put Gray in who has been slightly less sucky so far.

Noce does not have the size to compete against the Lakers and I know this may sound nuts, but Cedric Simmons looks like he could put a hurt on some of the trees in the paint and maybe deserves more minutes in certain matchups, maybe as a defensive stopper, shot blocker and rebounder when the Bulls have a decent lead and want to run some clock. I know it was garbage time, but he looked tough.

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 19, 2008 1:26 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

TT looked good tonight.

He drove the lane, blocked shots and made some athletic plays (and some dumb turnovers). But overall, he played great because he stayed within himself. Hopefully he can watch the tape and emulate these type performances and stop jacking up so many jumpers.

As for Gray, I don’t think he is quite as slow a people say. Slow? Yes. But the real problem is that he is way too nice a guy. He is tentative and is always afraid of contact. Not in the sense like Hughes who doesn’t want to get hit/hurt. It really seems like he doesn’t want to “hurt” the other guy that he is playing against. It’s like in Muay Thai that I train. When we spare, we are often going against people who we are friends with and the age and size differences are often pretty big, so we tend to go at 35-50%. And for some guys, when they get in the ring for a fight, they have a hard time “turning it on”. They are still afraid to “hurt” their opponent. Seriously, I think almost every game I have had a moment where I thought the best thing right now would be one of his teammates smacking Aaron in the face. Or a flagrant foul or something from the opposing team. Something to get him mad. He’s huge. He should play big, not scared. OK, enough about 10 minutes a game Aaron Gray.

by Unrealcity on Nov 19, 2008 3:41 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tyrus played "great"???

Why are Bulls fans content with him playing 31 minutes and only getting 9 points (mostly against the Lakers 2nd/third team) and 5 f*cking rebounds! Remember, Tyrus was a number 2 pick and should be coming into his own in his third year. Thomas will go down as one of the all time Bulls draft pick BUSTS.

by RogersPark Kris on Nov 19, 2008 7:51 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah, I'd say he played 'fine'

but relative to his season so far, it was great. He’s certainly had better games before.

Oh, sorry, you want to start BUST talk. With capitals!

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 9:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I, uh...

huh?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 10:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Relative to the other Bulls frontcourt players

TT was great! Relative to LA, he was simply OK. It would be nice to have more boards, but he gets steals and blocks and made opponents take bad shots. I think “Good” play is a fine description.

by 72-10 on Nov 19, 2008 10:09 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

For every

steal he’ll give a turnover, for every block he’ll have a goal tending play. The Lakers had no fear taking it right into the lane and scoring at will. Bust of Curtis Enis/Corey Patterson Chicago-sports proportions.

by RogersPark Kris on Nov 19, 2008 10:11 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

oh gawd

fine. Since his play can’t be reasonably assessed, you are absolved from discussing Thomas from now on, I’m letting you off the hook.

And I’m not familiar with those names, as if they’re other people from other sports.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 10:17 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I still had Tyrus at a +1

on my good Tyrus/bad Tyrus rating.

I doubt we’ll get to see this tonight, but with Deng injured and if he cannot go or he’s ineffective we should play Tyrus at the 3 and get Simmons out there for the length. I want to keep the Blazer Bigs behind our bigs on defensive rebounding and with Tyrus at the 3 I think we can tell him to just ignore the glass on defense and change ends quickly. With this we’ll see less Nocioni despite the fact that I don’t see dribble penetration as a particular strong suit from the Blazer 3s.

In addition, if Tyrus plays the 3 we can play Thabo at the 2, but all of this is on Vinny to actually use these matchups.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 11:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

RogersPark Kris

Mythoughts exactly. 1 step forward, 2 steps back with TY

Vinny...you look confused

by Knowledge32 on Nov 19, 2008 12:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I couldnt agree more

I think Ced simmons needs more burn as well. Shoot he has six fouls to use, some muscle and he seems more prone to attack the basket than some people! Tyrus…. Heck maybe just maybe he even knows how to set an appropriate pick? This guy might be able to help.

by Bulls4Ever on Nov 19, 2008 1:14 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My bad....

Odom had 10 in 22, while Oden had 22 and 10. While I thought we were still talking about the Bulls/Lakers, BIg D was already looking ahead to tomorrow’s loss if our bigs don’t play big, which is about as likely as having a rainstorrm in Tucson. Actually it does rain here about once every 100 days so all is not lost and hope rings eternal.

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 19, 2008 1:50 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

PRESS REPLY!!!!

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 9:22 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

..and

TT still cant finish

"You’re caught up in basketball. Get caught up in life" - Starbury's Head Tattoo

by Belize on Nov 19, 2008 1:52 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was at the game...

and I noticed a few things things.
-Hughes Does suck. I never really joined in on the bashing, but he is terrible. defenitely a chucker. And speaking of sucking, Lindsey hunter! Oooff. Bad bad bad in only a few minutes.
-Deng also sucked. Problem is, he’s a likeable guy so its hard to bash on him, but he’s gotto be agressive. At least Ben is agressive. He sucks at the point, but he aint shy.
-Noah couldn’t miss a shot in the pregame warmups. He was even banking that ugly looking shot in fromn 15 feet over rand over. But come game time and, well, u saw the game.
-We are far far away from where the Lakes are. I mean we knew that already but they were just toying with us.
-Thumbs up to TT who showed up… Kind of.
-D Rose…my buddy whose a Laker fan and went with me to the game said I have a man crush on Rose. … So! He could do no wrong.
-BG was off. There was a couple of times where if he hit that shot, it could’ve been more interesting.
-Drew played good and hard in the first Qtr, but that’s it.

by scottie33 on Nov 19, 2008 2:36 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Deng

actually needs to watch some game film. Any high school basketball coach (though maybe not VDN…okay I’ll stop beating that horse) would notice the amount of space in the lane Rose is creating. Cut, dammit. BG, Nocioni, let them float around the perimeter. You, Luol Deng, 6.9 dude, cut to the damn rim. Get some easy ones. Then, IF they start sagging away from you, you’ll have some open jumpers.

I still chalk this up to him not being comfortable the offense. Eventually it will come around.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 6:59 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

luckily that is one of his better skills

he needs to do this, because if not it looks like he gets frustrated with not getting shots, and his ‘go-to’ move is a jab-step…jab-step..jab-step..up-fake…jumper aimed at the front of the rim.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 9:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He's still between roles;

somebody needs to tell him this isn’t Team England anymore. The jab…blink…jab…yawn thing really needs to go. He’s put in all this work into his “one-on-one” game these last few offseasons, and it’s a shame, because he just doesn’t have the vertical explosiveness or acceleration to be a great iso player. The good news, we drafted that player.

I’ve heard a lot of talk that this is a “guard” offense and that’s why Luol isn’t playing to his capabilities. I don’t buy it. There’s even more opportunities for cutting now than there were previously. There are more open shots on kickouts. It’s one of the reasons this team – even in its flawed state – still has some upside.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 9:44 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't understand why he sucks at cutting....or is at least averse to it now

He played at Duke under the mighty Coach K. I thought they learned basketball the right way over there?

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 19, 2008 11:10 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He did it a lot more when he came into the league;

I think that in trying to “expand” his game he’s gotten away from it. It is puzzling. Examples: do you guys remember how many times Rose drew two men to him just outside the block? And he’d have to jump up and make a crazy pass just not to get trapped? That’s when Deng should be cutting. The lane was open each time.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 11:15 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So?

Coach K’s genius takes 4 years to seep in?

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 19, 2008 1:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think coach K is overrated

in the area of developing an individual player. He’s trying to build teams. He’s an ARMY guy.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 2:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's true...

Any dope can win 800+ games, and Elton Brand, Carlos Boozer, Grant Hill, Shane Battier, Mike Dunleavy Jr., Corey Maggette, and Luol Deng have all sucked in the NBA. I wouldn’t want any of those guys on the Bulls.

Oh yeah, I’m pretty sure that Coach K was the one who told Jay Williams to ride that motorcycle too. To preserve his legacy as a guy who never developed any players no doubt.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 19, 2008 2:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

An army still has standout soldiers

Ever hear of Jack Bauer?

This is a discussion for a different time (as in how useful are coaches in basketball), but other people have made the point that Deng is still in his Team England routine trying to be the man rather than playing off of Rose.

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 19, 2008 2:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He';s just

not athletic. Watch his body, there is no flow to him what so ever. Noc is more athletic than Deng but you just cant tell cause he’s a chucker.

by Bulls4Ever on Nov 19, 2008 1:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He's done this this season

He did sthis against the Mavs and Pacers in back to back games. We won both. Surprise.

Why the skill just disappears on some nights is a total mystery.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:23 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yup.

It’s on VDN to point it out, and it’s one Luol to listen.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 9:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I love the strange focus Gordon gets from people

The guy needs a serious PR rep or something, because the man is for whatever reason a huge scapegoat for a certain segment of Bulls fans.

Deng, now that he’s got a big deal is going to be next in line, but he had the legitimate excuse of being hurt.

Those guys were not the reason we lost this game.

Why did we lose this game? It’s not rocket science. They have a kick ass set of big men. Our 4 somewhat big men scored 31 points. Gasol, and Bynum scored 52 and you still had Odom coming off the bench. Odom would start for this team, no question about it.

Almost every game we’ve lost this year has been due to our big men being totally outclassed by the opposition. Talking about much besides that as a reason for complaint seems to be missing the point to me.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 19, 2008 8:44 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wrote the exact same thing

about 2 seconds after you. There’s no mystery here. Blaming the backcourt – 48, 13, and 8 on an “off” night – misses the larger issue. Or the issue of our smallness. Or the not-large-enough issue that looms large? Eh…help.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 8:51 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We have to get more from the SF position

We knew our bigs were still potty training. Our small forwards are supposed to be crafty vets at this point.

This is what we go out of 20 million dollars at the SF position last night.

16 points, on 5-14 shooting, with rebounds(off/def) of 5-13, 6 assists, and 4 turnovers.

I’m not even counting Larry Hughes who also played some small forward last night because the numbers get really fucking awful if I factor him in. And his salary? I may need to start smoking and drinking heavily.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:20 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Indeed the SF's played poorly last night

But mostly that seems to fall on Deng, who was apparently hurt. Certainly this wasn’t one of Lou’s better performances, but I’ve thought he’s been coming on the last couple of weeks. I’ll chalk it up to him being hurt.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 19, 2008 12:07 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The difference in almost every game

seems to be the bigs. Do we have the worst frontcourt in the league? In terms of actual production, not potential. I’d think we’re pretty close along with OKC maybe and Charlotte.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 19, 2008 12:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good find

Yes, only the Bulls and Clippers are contenders for worst PF/C combo. LAC a bit surprising given the various Camby or Kaman trades posted. But

Bulls
PF 29th
C 25th

and Clippers
PF 30th
C 23rd

So by sheer average, Bulls take it! Worst PF/C combo! I didn’t check but factoring in Deng they’d probably still hang on to worst front court. Bulls are only 18th there.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 19, 2008 1:05 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"a bit surprising given the various Camby or Kaman trades posted"

heh, no kidding

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 1:14 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Camby's been very solid individually

My take is that the rest of the team is such a trainwreck that everything is gonna look bad.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 19, 2008 2:40 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

okay, okay...

I think you’re the only who has offered to get Camby. And if you want to feel that’s a great idea, no problem.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 4:03 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I also believe

that Camby would be an upgrade over Noah.

by gman2849 on Nov 19, 2008 6:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Other than the Farmar block

I thought Lindsey Hunter was fine last night. For a 38 year old player he was pretty darn effective against the Lakers’ JV squad.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:22 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Any way we can land Blake Griffin?

How special it would be to pair him with Rose.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 9:34 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no draft talk.

till….I dunno, May.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 10:08 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Boooo...

Maybe someone will eventually make an upgradeable thread. Or something. It worked last year!!!

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 10:22 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good rule

But it’s the only medicine that eases the pain of watching our frontcourt and it’s only one channel down the dial. :(

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 10:27 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree

I find watching actual college basketball is pretty painful too.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 10:47 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the Bulls' reality.

We all expected the loss last night.

Last night’s game was perfect in that, it is the Bulls’ reality.
Of course the Bulls will force their guards to shoot and drive a lot, because that’s their best chance!
Of course a strong inside opponent will deliberately bash the Bulls inside!

Tyrus’ highlights were huge high points. Something good might be happening.
Gordon is great as Gordon is made. But Kobe is big and terrific.
Deng just does not appear to fit. Are injuries the only issue?

Damn it, we need a center.

by chicago-homesick-blues on Nov 19, 2008 10:40 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

poetic.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 10:47 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd only add that

I was encouraged that this was not a 20+ point drubbing.

Because, let’s face it, that’s what we would have gotten (and did get) last season. Multiple times.

Now if Noah can learn to stay on the court and Vinnie can figure out that Hughes sucks enough to play someone (anyone) else, we’re on track.

Luol Deng continues to be a major disappointment, and has shown himself incapable of rising to any occasion, except that he drove and dunked on Tayshawn Prince one time. It was in the playoffs. He’s injured, but that is simply part of his personal history now, and seems like that fragile-ness is here to stay.

Whatever you think of how injury prone he is, it’s just one more indication that he just won’t come up with the key play, or come up with gaudy stat lines in games that really matter.

In a bout of utterly unfounded speculation, I’m going to guess that Deng’s best games, and best seasons, are going to come only after fans have written him off and ceased having any All-Star expectations of him. Of course, I hope that I am wrong on this…

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on Nov 19, 2008 1:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Plus the season is

early.

the players are getting to learn each other (i.e. learning how to play around Rose)

The team as a whole seems to be improving with every game.

and we’ve played a lot of the top teams so far.

by gman2849 on Nov 19, 2008 6:24 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, that Blazers experience

should disabuse us of any notions of, say, optimism…

The Suns win almost doesn’t count, since the Bulls played sloppy and the Suns didn’t even show up (I was at the game and it seemed the Bulls were clueless on a lot of possessions).

So beating teams like Milwaukee, and staying close to teams like the Lakers, is about as good as we can hope for this year.

And to respectfully differ with Matt, I don’t think it’s too early to discuss the draft. Not when guys like Gray and Hughes start a game that in theory is supposed to be competitive.

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on Nov 20, 2008 9:38 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In fairness...

Hughes starting is more about injuries, but Gray starting is well… I have no idea.

Hopefuly we can adress our needs through trades or free agency as I don’t really see a center in college that could come in and help us anyway.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 20, 2008 1:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A dose of reality...

For a while there, it appeared that many on this blog were beginning to face reality. But TT makes a couple of athletic plays, and suddenly hope is alive?

Please. It’s painfully obvious that the very best possibility is that the will develop into a useful role player. But given his lack of toughness, both mental and physical, even that it a long shot.

Ben Gordon is one-dimensional, and, while more valuable than Thomas, he’s also a useful role player at best.

The deficiencies on the Bulls’ roster are glaring, and there’s no need to tick through them in detail. But to my mind, what is by far the most disappointing aspect of the current team is coaching. Del Negro is either way over his head, lacks a talent for the (head coach) position. I say that because the apparent lack of planning, poor cohesion, failure to design plays around the strengths of particular lineups, etc., is appalling.

I noticed last night that after three consecutive timeouts called by the Bulls, they utterly failed to produce anything positive immediately afterwards. And while of course execution plays a big role, it seems clear that Del Negro is lost.

There are basically two main issues: maximizing the current roster, and building a better team for the future. In my view, Del Negro was obviously a poor choice to accomplish the former, and several players need to be moved/traded in order to strengthen the Bulls’ long term prospects.

by badnewsintennisshoes on Nov 19, 2008 11:47 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You may be right about TT

but if Gordon were to somehow maintain the level he’s set this year, he’s more than role player. It’s just questionable whether this is just a good start to the season or improvement in Gordon’s offensive efficiency.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 19, 2008 12:14 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Disagree

If VDN were a seasoned, winning, top notch coach, would he be developing his strategy based on this roster’s needs, or would he be installing his system, and letting the personnel strengths and needs reveal themselves? We’re assuming that because plays don’t work that it was due to them not fitting the personnel. Either the staff has a plan or it doesn’t; anyone see evidence one way or another? Look at the Lakers. Phil’s made several major ADAPTATIONS to the changing NBA game, but do you think he’s ever deviated from his core beliefs because of personnel? During every step of his career, he’s had newly acquired veterans trying to resist learning the triangle and do the things they’ve always succeeded with, and the result has always been the same: sit down and let me know when your ready to try it my way. Just because VDN’s a first year coach doesn’t mean he ought to look at the roster and develop a playbook around them. Run what you think will work in the NBA, and develop or acquire players who will succeed in it.

by California Al on Nov 19, 2008 12:23 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

VDN needs to learn 2 things

1.) How to call a time out when the other team starts to pull away

2.) Which line ups work against which team. I thought Noah played great last night. I liked the run we went on with D Rose, BG, Deng, Tyrus, and Noah in the 1st half. Of course, Vinny decides to bring in Larry Hughes.

Vinny...you look confused

by Knowledge32 on Nov 19, 2008 12:31 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You thought Noah

played great last night? What the heck game were you watching? my god he was eaten alive. Its was probably one of his worst performances ever.. Were you being sarcastic?

by Bulls4Ever on Nov 19, 2008 1:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not being sarcastic...but great might have been a strong word :)

Obviously the bigs for the Lakers did what they do to everyone. However, I thought he provided great energy, crashed the offensive glass strong, and runs the floor at a pace you don’t see too many 7 footers do. I really enjoyed that line up when it was in there (1st half-it should be noted I did go to bed mid way through the 3rd).

I am looking for people who can KEEP UP with Derrick. I think Noc plays best with him, but that line up was getting it done in the open court.

Vinny...you look confused

by Knowledge32 on Nov 19, 2008 4:52 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The first half was an illusion

I came home from work at around 10:30 and my brother was telling me how the bulls were sticking close to the lakers, i look at the score and the bulls were only down by 8 still in the first half. I watched a few minutes of the game and i told my brother we had no chance of winning, especially as halftime began. The reason… kobe was in pg mode.

Love him or hate him, kobe is one of the top 3 players in the nba, and since last year he finally bought into phil jacksons system. He spends the first half of most games playing the point and setting his team up, then the next half he starts looking for his shots.

Lo and behold, the second half started with kobe scoring consecutively with ease, and when you saw those shots, you could understand, the bulls never really had a chance.

LU was horrible, he does his best when attacking the rim, and yet, how many times did rose set deng up, just to have deng take a jumpshot and miss. You were incorporated into the offense mr deng, and yet nothing good happened, maybe its not the offense, maybe its you.

Gordon couldnt hit his shots, but thats understandable. Despite the constant jokes made about height on the blog, height had a huge factor to do with gordon missing his shots. The lakers have a bunch of guards that have the length to contest any jumpshot, coupled with the defense the lakers were playing, and its not suprising the gordon couldnt get anything done. Dribble too much and theres a trap coming, look for your shot and be heavily contested by the player manning you up, drive into the lane and the biggest guys on the court surround you.

Gordon could get more shots if deng was hitting his shots, forcing the defense to focus on the inside would have helped find holes from the perimeter.

Aaron gray looked nice, but it was mainly because he was pretty much allowed inside, tyrus keeps showing flashes, but im tired of just flashes already, some consistency would be nice.

Rose is insane, if hinrich truly is being replaced by someone, then im glad its rose. Every game he seems to do something that outdoes what he has already done.

Has gooden found his way into the block at any pont this season, ive seen a bunch of jumpers from him, and its nice he can make them, but i thought he was our best post option. Noah, he just has to bulk up A HELL OF ALOT in order to truly be a player in the league.

If hinrich was on the court, i dont think we wouldve had as many turnovers, but it still wouldnt get us a win. :(

The play when kobe had an easy dunk yet lobbed it for fisher, who screwed up the finish. The ball came towards kobe, and kobe looked like he didnt want to pick it up. WHen he finally did he non-chalantly shot the three and it was obvious before he even shot it that it was going in. It was like practice to him….at that point i truly knew, the bulls were in kobes world and everything that had happened was what kobe allowed to happen

Lakers are damned good, the first half was an illusion.

On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....

by piccolomair on Nov 19, 2008 12:40 PM CST reply reply actions actions   1 recs

The Lakers fouled us in the bonus in just 4 minutes in the 2nd quarter

They were bad to start and we failed to exploit. I really think we had opportunities to get the lead and build it, but instead we turned sloppy, made stupid passes, stopped attacking the rim, and settled for jumpers.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 1:07 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn't really see

Gordon being destroyed by their guards. He just wasn’t making shots he normally would. He had a lot of good looks and they didn’t go in but I didn’t see any smothering defense on him either. What he took were shots he’d typically make. He just wasn’t. When Gordon is jump shooting height really isn’t an issue. He has a very high and fast release. That evens out whatever height “advantage” the guard against him might have.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Nov 19, 2008 1:11 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

right, gordon only gets in trouble

on the offensive end in a trap or with his poor ball handling/body control, but it’s true that one-on-one he doesn’t have that much of a disadvantage height-wise because his form is so good.

it’s on the defensive end that the height matters more, since the bigger guys can shoot over him fairly easily.

by Jaina on Nov 19, 2008 1:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Defensively

I still don’t think his height is that much of an issue. Against jump shooters he just needs to have good position and put a hand up in the guys face. Which is as much as anyone can do. And his reach is as good as Kirk’s as it has been documented here before. They have to shoot over his hand, not his head height. We don’t want our guards jumping at jump shooters anyway. So far this season Gordon seemed to be stepping it up (in a sliding scale of course) on defense and it hasn’t really been a game changing problem. With all of that Gordon is just an average defender, but not the thorn in our side or anything. No one has been dropping points on us at his expense yet at least. Rose is a big distraction and I think that has helped him out a lot even on that end of the floor.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Nov 19, 2008 5:54 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Doug Thonus in his last

podcast brings up some good points about Gordo’s defensive abilities. One point in particular is that he’s generally faster then the taller guys playing against him. He states that because of this, most of these guys can’t shake him and take it to the hole forcing them to pull up for a jumpshot.

It does make for a lower percentage shot.

by gman2849 on Nov 19, 2008 6:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well, right

and gordon’s been doing fine this season so far. but by the same token, a taller guy’s reach is probably still going to be well above gordon’s. and the whole thing with hinrich is he is a better defender, so him taking the taller guy isn’t as bad – or when he’s guarding pgs, they are typically his own height. the issue with gordon is that he was failing to do a good job on people his own height, let alone bigger guys. but i have no real complaints about his defense thus far this season.

by Jaina on Nov 19, 2008 6:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In regards to Hinrich's defense

I think that Gordon’s offense more then makes up for his perceived deficiency at the 2 spot. In particular when paired up with Rose’s ability to spread the floor this year.

by gman2849 on Nov 19, 2008 6:59 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And has an exceptionally-high arc.

just adding on…

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 1:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

just about to post the same thing

Gordon missing shots last night had nothing to do (well maybe not nothing)…but more to do with him just missing shots rather than being destroyed by their guards. He had SEVERAL open looks…he just bricked for whatever reason. Just a bad shooting night. Everyone has them. The comments here are insane.

by NormVanBeer on Nov 19, 2008 2:09 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think the original poster

saw the entire game so that might have been part of it. Hard to comment on how someone was guarded when you miss half of the game.

Speaking of the insane on here, I’ve stopped participating in live game threads and I’ve enjoyed watching the games more. I’m not advocating that for everyone, but if you’ve felt particularly blah that might help.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Nov 19, 2008 5:58 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

More on VDN...

Al,

you said:

“If VDN were a seasoned, winning, top notch coach, would he be developing his strategy based on this roster’s needs, or would he be installing his system, and letting the personnel strengths and needs reveal themselves? We’re assuming that because plays don’t work that it was due to them not fitting the personnel. Either the staff has a plan or it doesn’t; anyone see evidence one way or another?”

Any organization would attempt to do both simultaneously. We have no idea what the Bulls’ management has in mind in terms of trades, etc., but it’s pretty damn clear to me that they have already made some serious mistakes in investing so much in TT, and failing to trade Gordon when they might have gotten some real returns. (To be fair, getting rid of Ben Wallace was very smart – cutting losses – and they couldn’t have done that without accepting Hughes. But of course they should never have acquired BW in the first place…)

But in terms of maximizing and developing current personnel, I’d argue that VDN and whoever else has serious input are failing badly. Thomas, for example, should be reigned in and used mainly as a defensive shot-blocking presence (one of the few things he is actually good at), and lob plays should be designed to take advantage of situations when opposing teams have their big men cheat on defense in an effort to stop Rose from penetrating (as they will, more and more).

The last point is an illustration of why I believe Del Negro to be such a poor, and unpromising coach. The Lakers’ big men were (understandably) cheating like crazy in order to stop Rose from driving, yet what plays did Vinny come up with to counter that strategy? None that I could discern. Why not have Rose execute a quick pass to another player who could immediately lob to TT around the rim, before Gasol and others could recover? Pretty basic stuff, really.

by badnewsintennisshoes on Nov 19, 2008 1:11 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Some good points there

One thing I wish we could know is who masterminded summer/06. The decisions to acquire BW, trade TC, draft TT and dis JR without even a looksee were all wrong. I’ve been watching the Bulls from day one of their existence, and I don’t believe for a second that anyone but Reinsdorf makes the decision on a major free agent like Wallace. I was very pissed that after trading Chandler that they didn’t even want to give Smith a workout, more pissed after seeing him a few times (considering our only perceived weakness at the time was size at SG), and thoroughly disgusted when he was available this summer for cheap, cheap, cheap. So when you say mgt, if you mean ownership, I’m on board. If you mean Paxson, I think other than 2006, his moves have been pretty shrewd. If I’m not mistaken, D’Antoni was his first choice, Collins his second; ummm, who’s idea was it to bring in Vinnie? But, he is who we got, and I’ll support him and give him time to grow into the job.
   The game was no surprise. I wrote in a thread that the Bulls biggest defensive matchup was going to be when they had the ball. They needed to swing the ball a lot and knock down shots without getting careless. LA picked off 15 steals; that means there werent a lot of chances to swing the ball because either A: LA stole the first one, or B: BG liked his first look so there wasn’t a first pass to try to swing. The SOS defense was perfect to play the Bulls, and they executed it well.
    I missed the first few minutes, so I didn’t see Noah’s first stint, but his second half stint looked like exactly what we ought to expect from him, which I consider a big plus. But with nothing at all coming out of the 3 or 4, not sure that Jackson, D’Antoni, Wooden and Auerbach brainstorming could have come up with anything to really challenge the Lakers last night. So to that extent, I agree with you on Vinnie’s rotations so far. I also have been espousing putting TT on a short leash for short stints so there’s a lot of feedback opportunities to try to take some of the duh out of his game.
   I’m trying to remember, what was it exactly that LA wanted for Kobe? And we said no? I’m guessing that if we started Rose, Kobe, Gray, Vinnie and one of the Luvabulls we’d be better.

by California Al on Nov 19, 2008 2:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they were never getting Kobe

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 19, 2008 2:52 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Do we know that for sure?

I mean, I’ve thought the same thing myself, I just wonder if Kobe or LA ever came out and said so?

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 19, 2008 2:59 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well

if for all intensive purposes, the lakers wanted deng, but kobe would have vetoed any trade with deng, how close could talks have been?

it was an unrealistic prospect from the outset, anyways.

by Jaina on Nov 19, 2008 3:11 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

do you mean "intents & purposes"

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 19, 2008 4:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yes

excuse the lack of brain power. staying up to watch the bulls is not good for my health (i’m on the east coast)!

by Jaina on Nov 19, 2008 4:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

irony detector back on, please

Just commenting on how things panned out after 2006. Once upon a time, sigh

by California Al on Nov 19, 2008 3:30 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yet another illustration

NBA Observer makes an excellent point above, and I agree completely. I thought exactly the same thing at the time: the Bulls’ strategy should have been to drive and drive and drive, picking up many free throws for the rest of the quarter. But what did VDN do? Apparently he went with the ‘chaos’ approach to offense, which the Bulls happen to suck at.

by badnewsintennisshoes on Nov 19, 2008 1:14 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was the perfect chance to keep a fast pace

with benefits. We could run and run and catch breathers shooting two free throws.

We did have 11 attempts in the 2nd quarter at the line. 3 of those were freebies from Noc courtesy of a stellar WWE caliber fall on 3 attempt. Gray went 1-4. Gordon was 4-4.

The Lakers had 3 team fouls in the first minute. Even Hughes the free throw begger couldn’t even get to the line.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 19, 2008 2:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, Lamar got jobbed

on that one and the Gordon block. Gordon also picked up a few free throws off technicals that were called on LA’s zone. So essentially, the refs handed the Bulls 7-8 free throws to keep it closer than it was.

by California Al on Nov 19, 2008 2:39 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am worried about our psyches as this road trip continues

This is a brutal trip. We risk killing each other before this is over. I have set my sights low. I will be happy if we are 2-5. 1-6 not so and 0-7 could kill the season. We are a work in progress with one potential great player. Almost every game we are outmatched inside talent wise. Thank god for Rose!

by chgobr on Nov 19, 2008 1:41 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Portland is nowhere near as good as LA, at least as of now

They lost to the Warriors last night in a very frustrating loss and still aren’t starting Oden. This is a winnable game, but it’s hard to win them when only a few players build on their good games and the rest are predictably vanilla.

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 19, 2008 2:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good news is,

I could San Antonio is old and hobbled, Deron Williams has been fighting injuries, and the Bulls can beat both Golden State and Denver. Really its just these first two games that are nightmare matchups. Best part is, Rose didn’t look intimidated at all last night. He looked ferocious.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 19, 2008 3:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

When Rose is on the bench

I believe the Bulls should slow down the offense considerably. Fratello and Van Gundy accomplished this by shooting 3s/jumpers with 4 or 5 seconds left on the shot clock, prioritizing transition defense, and racking up fouls. This is perfect for the Bulls because:

1. It minimizes the bigs’(except you, AG) lack of bulk and maximizes their quickness on the offensive boards.

2. It is to the Bulls’ advantage to rack up fouls so as to slow down the tempo; and because they have so much personnel anyway, fouls aren’t that critical.

3. Most importantly, it maximizes Rose’s rest period on the bench.

Because he’ll be afforded quality rest, Rose ought to have the stamina to initiate the offense on every possession.

I mean, I presume that’s the reason (lack of stamina) Rose wasn’t initiating the offense on every possession last night.

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Nov 19, 2008 5:18 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i wanted to break my tv...

when Gooden was guarding Bynum for a short stretch in either the 3rd or the 4th quarter. They went on a little run and basically put the Bulls out of it. Everyone on the court realized the mismatch and the lakers just kept throwing it inside why didn’t VDN notice this?

by i_like_turtles on Nov 19, 2008 5:59 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2f597263b71b32c9d2a85c1427a038ce_bigger_small
Thank You Ben Gordon
Jayhawk_small
A Brief History of Ben Gordon: the Quotes Version
Horace_20grant_small
To the Bulls' Front Office
Rose2_small
Optimistic view of BG leaving (I Hope)
Derrick_rose_1__small
An F.U. to the owner

Recent FanPosts

Aaron_scantlen-small-square_small
Trade idea: Kirk for Rudy
Small
Iverson to the Bulls in Gordon S/T?!?!
Small
Hinrich Vs. Gordon
-1_small
Could this be Dumar's post-signing-Gordon plan?
Small
Pistons vs. Bulls
Small
Looking back at the 26th pick now...
Small
Back Up Plan...

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports