Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The USA TODAY/Bloody Elbow Top 50 MMA Fights Ever, I


spread the word

Quick post-Indy and pre-Annual Circus Road Trip of Death thoughts

Good on the Bulls for running and pressuring a tired and not-that-good Indiana team, eventually putting them away at home. Rose was spectacular, and Noc had a great game: somehow finding a frontcourt opponent he could blow by towards the lane, and taking advantage of it.

Every win (no matter my quibbles with the long-term perspective) thus far this season has been huge, because I fear they'll need the cushion as this trip goes ike the others. Real tough games, and even some of the easier ones are the second of a back-to-back.

And Vinny is still playing small lineups. Lineups with Aaron Gray and Noc as the front court. Lineups with Aaron Gray with any combination. A finishing kick was starred by Rose/Gordon/Hughes/Noc/Gooden...but can that be counted on?

It's not just a Vinny problem, the young bigs aren't doing the job. It's Tyrus one night, Noah the next, and sometimes neither. But it takes both sides to get it turned around. Tyrus played 6 minutes in the first half, and didn't do much outside of 3 rebounds. But he does need at least a second stint in the game. The same thing happened to Noah last outing. Both players are having bad starts to the season, but they should have earned (yes...they've had success in the past. I swear.) a status beyond 'matchup' player.

Noc is getting ran out there for the last 15 minutes of every game, and Aaron Gray stinks. Sure, at the end of the 3rd quarter the dreaded (by me) Noc/Gray frontcourt was part of a positive lineup, but that happened to be the time Rose hit two 3-pointers in addition to his other usual brilliance. Noc/Gray should never be out there, and Noc/Gooden works only when Noc is on. Otherwise the defense and rebounding deficiencies will kill them.

I'm not worried yet, it's not like Vinny has shown inflexibility, and neither Thomas or Noah have forced his hand. Just...I'm hoping that Vinny hasn't seen this and figures it's "working". Because it won't on this road trip. And I'd rather get creamed while seeing Thomas/Noah struggle, as at least we can learn how deep that problem truly is.

0 recs | Comment 168 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I just read a blog

about their front court problems.

I love Tyrus’ potential, but this picture and article is just too funny. Plus he sends a shout out to blog a bull.

by gman2849 on Nov 16, 2008 10:07 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lol, good stuff.

Also, so very true. At what point is it Tyrus’ fault for not being able to play more than 5 minutes? I don’t get it, this is his third year now and it appears that he is regressing. And Noah, let’s not forget that while this is only his second year in the league he’s gonna be 24 in Febuary and has yet to show a serious commitment to basketball. So I think more of the venom needs to be aimed at those guys rather than guys like Noc, who’s at least a contributor.

by Juiceboxjerry on Nov 16, 2008 11:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Unfortunately Gooden not Rose is VDN's security blanket

Even though Gooden is our best big, (although that isn’t saying much) he should be traded immediately so VDN can’t play him at center for over half the game. Even though Gooden is not in the Bulls longterm plans, I could live with him starting at power forward and playing power forward only. Noah and Gray should be the only guys playing center, with Noah getting at least 30-36 minutes per. I am convinced that Noah would get his game together with consistent minutes,(a double/double at least). Gray can hold his own, especially against real centers for a few minutes per half. Gooden cannot play center, especially defensively.

Gooden’s presence is killing our development/evaluation of Thomas and Noah. We need to know about Thomas before this season is over. Nocioni is clearly our best option as a backup power forward. Thomas has not shown any sign that he is ready to be a starter. So if we keep Gooden Thomas doesn’t play at all. If we trade Gooden we don’t have a true starter at power forward, or we have to sacrifice the season to give Thomas a shot to prove or most likely disprove himself.

Again, since Gooden is not getting a longterm extension from the Bulls after this season, every minute that he plays is a waste of time. We aren’t winning anything this season anyway, so get rid of Gooden and Hughes and suffer the growing pains with our young guys and find out for sure what we have and who ultimately fits with Rose.

Personally, I think that Noah is a keeper, although ultimately probably not a full time starter. He is also a center, not a power forward, so VDN having him gurad troy Murphy out at the 3 point line, while Gooden gets creamed inside by Rasto is beyond stupid, even for a rookie coach, and especially for one who has spent the last 30 years in the sport.

I keep praying that the light bulb in Thomas’s head will finally click. However, I am afraid that there is no lightbulb to click, but we have to give, and I mean give him the minutes to absolutely find out this year.

I think that Thabo is a servicable/valuable piece as a backup at both the shooting guard and small forward positions, in fact I think that he is more effective as a small forward.

We have no answer at starting shooting guard, Gordon is not and will never be the answer as a starter. Hughes is the Gooden of the 2 guards and should be shipped out with Gooden, he is just waisting minutes. The real queation is do you prefer Hinrich or Gordon or neither. Hinrich being out is not helping the evaluation. Personally, I think that neither is the answer, but that Hinrich is a better overall option than Gordon. In either case the Bulls would be better served with either as a third guard/combo guard, which Hinrich is definately better suited to.

I believe that it is painfully obviously that we need to acquire a starting caliber power forward(someone in the Boozer/Brand class) and shooting guard(someone in the Joe Johnson class), both of whom need to have the classic size and abilities requisite for these positions. The only 2 starting caliber players that we have are Rose and Deng, who barely qualifies, despite his bulging wallet. If we were to acquire these players Noah and Gray would suffice at center, and Thabo, Nocioni, and either Hinrich or Gordon as our primary bench players would be a solid/contending/watchable team.

by BigWay on Nov 17, 2008 11:42 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No

He’s getting his PPG, that’s for sure…

But how is he doing other than that? Is he feeding off Rose’s game or taking from it? Is he scoring as an off-guard or with the ball in his hands?

by BAB-Bass on Nov 18, 2008 8:53 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

he's scoring at a very high efficiency

Honestly, I don’t know what some of you want out of him, especially given the alternatives for these posessions. It’s not a good thing for Rose to have every responsibility on offense.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 18, 2008 10:01 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Personally

I thinkl they should change the rules so that baskets don’t count unless it comes on an assist from Rose.

That’ll teach ’em!

by CrashDavis on Nov 18, 2008 10:16 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or comes

from an Andres Nocioni hustle play stemming purely from Nocioni’s grit and clutch moment performance, and hopefully it’s followed by a fist pump (I’m sure Matt loves that).

by majoyenrac on Nov 18, 2008 10:49 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You read my mind! :P

This would be the opportune time for me to mention that Nocioni has the highest net +/- per 100 pos this season… :D

by BAB-Bass on Nov 18, 2008 12:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What I want is for him to be a team player

(As in not behaving like in the incident when BG went one on 3 with Rose wide open with Kidd as the defender on the weak-side)

I want him to COMPLEMENT Rose, and by that I mean (as I’ve said before) that he should either be a Ray Allen or a Reggie Miller type player. Not trying to go all Jordan just to be the highest scorer on the team, which I feel is what he is doing.

“What’s the matter with that?”, you may say. “He’s scoring at a high efficiency”. The problem with it is he’s not finding his offense within a team system and that can have serious impact on team chemistry which I happen to think is rather important… Selfish play from one player may spread amongst the ranks and be a total “team” killer.

This is what worries me. I feel he’s taking from Rose rather than adapting to him, and I for one want a two-guard that adapts to Rose as I see him as the future of this organization for the next 10+ years (knock on wood) I’ve epxressed my doubts whether Gordon is able to do this before and my concerns have not been diminished by the start of this season.

by BAB-Bass on Nov 18, 2008 12:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It sounds like

you want Rose to be the only one creating on offense.

I don’t think cherry-picking one bad posession by Ben is a fair assessment of his season so far. Or you aren’t understanding what “finding his offense within a team system” is.

For example, that Dallas game he realized early that he needed to start going to the basket. That he could get there and finish the way Dallas was defending. It turned that game around.

by CrashDavis on Nov 18, 2008 12:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

From what I've heard that is not the only time

only the most publicized.

If you consider ignoring open teammates who are guarded by inferior defenders “finding his offense within a team system” we just aren’t going to agree.

I don’t want Rose to be the only one creating offense. That is a very false conclusion. I would be just as adamant about Rose pounding the ball on one side forever while BG was wide open for a three on the weak-side. It’s just not good basketball.

by BAB-Bass on Nov 18, 2008 12:54 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What are you talking about

Ben Gordon is playing like an all star, he’s totally deserving starting minutes….and just because he didn’t start, he was playing over 30MPG in the past (Starter quality minutes) Skiles wanted to keep Ben’s legs, mostly because in Skiles offense he needed to since his whole offense was geared around the same stagnant plays and the only player who could do anything to create was Gordon.

I do agree and everyone would that it is painfully obvious we need a PF. Drew Gooden is a starting caliber PF, but his offensive game is very similar to our guards….we need to get a starting quality PF who can take the ball to the rim, and not shoot jump shots.

Drew GOoden is a solid player, not great, but hardly bad and would start on half the teams and frankly is easily our starter at the moment, but he’s jsut not a good fit with our jump shooting heavy talent as he’s not as good a jump shooter as our guards and without a C int he middle at which point Drew’s game could open up the lane more, he’s not as effective as he should be.

by majoyenrac on Nov 18, 2008 10:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How about win...

…without seeing Thomas/Noah struggle?

by PatBull on Nov 16, 2008 10:35 PM CST reply reply actions actions   1 recs

C'mon Matt...

Haven’t we learned enough over three frustrating seasons now? I’ll grant you that Noah might still develop into something useful for us, but Tyrus… Really?

It’s time to accept what Tyrus Thomas is and move on. Any more conjecture on this lottery bust is moot though, he’s lost any real trade value, and his game is so eratic that Vinny just can’t expect any kind of consistent play from him.

He’s not exactly the type of player a rookie coach looks to in clutch situations, for obvious reasons.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 16, 2008 11:32 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yes! exactly

I suggested, in another post, that Thomas lacks the necessary understanding
of the game and had a below average basketball IQ and my post was annihilated
I was badly flamed by one the regulars who’s been drinking too much of the Kool-Aid.

But, hey, you nailed it man… “It is time to accpet what Tyrus Thomas is and move on”

Hallelujah! I am glad some people here are actually WATCHING the damn games and
the players, Because if someone IS really watching carefully, and in an unbiased
manner, then what other conclusion can be drawn of a guy shooting under 30%,
but, who is actually supposed to be getting a lot of high percentage shots – dunks,
but is such a poor finisher at the rim, that, well, the percentage ain’t my opinion,
it is what he is shooting. Reality.

Thanks for your refreshing candor. I realize we are all Bulls fans, but I won’t be a “homer”.
It is the very fact that I DO have the team’s best interests at heart, that I strongly urge
the Bulls NOT to depend on Mr. Thomas in their long-range plans at Forward, either as starter,
or as as a back up.

I would like to see this recapped as flash back post in 2 years, and where Mr. Thomas is
employed and to what end? I have a guess…

Lastly, WHAT is Tyrus Thomas?
A PF? Like, a banger, a back to the basket, post-up, double figure rebounds every night. high FG% type?
Nope
A SF? Huh? Yeah, right. A SF who shoots under 30%. Clang!
Nope.

A Tweener? Seems so. Not a PF and not a SF…. A tweener…

“I knew Charles Barkley, and you Sir, are not Charles Barkley!”

by rtblues on Nov 17, 2008 4:12 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I put this somewhere else, but I'll repeat it:

I’m not buying that Tyrus has permanently regressed. And a lot of people here who think he’s worthless thought that all along, and were wrong. So them saying it now has less of an impact.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 7:10 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Do you think Tyrus is anywhere close

to a level where he can play 35+ minutes a night?

I do see regression, but they’re mental mistakes that when corrected make him an effective player to play aroudn 25 minutes a night. When he develops consistency in those 25 minutes and stops making silly errors like star gazing at shots in the paint he’ll have more opportunities to contribute offensively.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 9:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think he's regressed, given what he's shown these 10 games

I said I don’t think it’s permanent, so his minutes shouldn’t be treated like it is.

I never buy the consistency-first argument. Even when inconsistent before, he could contribute. Consistency is just lame way to say ‘better’. If he was more consistent he’d be an absolute monster. So considering he’s not that, living with inconsistent effectiveness is just a part of his game.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 9:53 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

As a previous Tyrus fan I am withering

He is not just missing shots but hurting the team. One game, I forgot which one, he started, we won the opening tip and his first pass went into the arms of the other team. His stupid basketball is no longer rookie errors. The stupid mistakes are really hurting us. We aren’t going to sign him. Unless I’m missing something he is not part of our future.

by chgobr on Nov 17, 2008 10:06 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What has he regressed from?

He has, in my opinion, contributed to a few wins this year. So I see continued contributions, so I’m not sure he’s regressed. The games where he was running around, rebounding well, blocking shots and hustling, he’s been pretty useful despite his woeful shooting.

So I agree. I think I disagree on the consistency problem. I see consistent inconsistency. Maybe if we had more options it wouldn’t be a problem, or if he was paid a lot less it wouldn’t be a problem. But now we never know what we’re going to get, and that’s bad.

Consistency isn’t just a euphemism. If he stops running, then Tyrus just becomes consistently worse. And that seems to be what he’s trending toward.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 18, 2008 9:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

his shooting has completely gone out of whack

still isn’t finishing around the rim. 28% from the field is a regression.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 18, 2008 10:02 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes and no...

He shot .368 in the pre-season
Last year he had a couple months where he was in the .333 range.

Maybe he’s regressing, or maybe we’re seeing what he would have done then if he wasn’t given the quick hoop. It could very well be that he looks worse because the Bulls have kept him out there this year instead of yanking him.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 18, 2008 2:05 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 18, 2008 2:16 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they haven't been yanking him?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 18, 2008 6:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Regressed?

That implies that he was once good. Sure, I have always thought Tyrus was worthless, and I realize that you know this, but it doesn’t change the fact that the only thing he does on a consistent basis is hurt the team.

You can’t teach basketball IQ by the time a guy gets to the NBA, he had his chance to develop in college, but stupidly (or wisely, depending on whose interest you favor) he came out far too early, and we fell for the old “drafting potential” trick. The thing is, we shouldn’t be mad anymore, follow this bit of logic:

Say we drafted Aldridge, and kept him. In the East he would be decidedly better, probably one of the more talented bigs. In fact I would hazzard to guess that he would account for at least 5 more victories on our team last year, which is exactly how many games it would have taken to make the playoffs. If we make the playoffs we don’t draft in the lottery, if we don’t draft in the lottery we don’t get Rose… Now who would you rather have, Aldridge or Rose? So see, Tyrus did do one thing right for the Bulls… I guess you’re right though, he isn’t worthless afterall.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 10:40 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Sure, I have always thought Tyrus was worthless"

congrats on that, but this is a faulty premise that I can’t start an argument with.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 10:44 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm sorry then...

For seeing something you have foolishly chosen to ignore.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 10:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

don't feel bad

there are plenty of people who agree with you that you can converse with.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 10:54 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Matt...

I really do expect more from you on this. I’m not trying to be a jerk here, but simply saying that you won’t discuss this with someone because they thought Tyrus was worthless already, is a huge cop out. If you can’t defend the guy any longer than simply say so, I’ll still read your blog.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 10:57 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no, you can go then

listen, if you think he was always worthless (which i disagree with), then I can’t have a reasonable discussion regaring how he can progress, since it’s setting unrealistic goals, and you’ll likely always be unsatisfied with his play.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 11:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with Khalid...

The kid is one of the most athletic guys out there. But I think with Tyrus it is more mental/basketball IQ related. That is tough to teach.

Vinny...you look confused

by Knowledge32 on Nov 17, 2008 11:22 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm going to suggest something weird:

Tyrus Thomas is not that athletic. The NBA tends to equate leaping ability with athleticism – in fact, athleticism is much more complex. It’s a combination of acceleration, body control, strength, conditioning, flexibility, balance, and reflexes – and these are physical attributes in which Tyrus doesn’t necessarily excel.

I’m overstating here, obviously. I do think Tyrus has the potential to be an impact player. But we need to stop pretending he’s an athlete on the level of a Stoudemire or Marion. He’s a jumper on their level. There are physical deficencies stopped Tyrus from being great – not just a lack of basketball IQ.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 17, 2008 12:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I tend to agree with you

on that assessment. Derrick is extremely athletic. Tyrus is a great leaper, but he does not possess very good body control or absorb/react to contact well. He’s a prett fast straight line runner for his size but doesn’t seem inordinately quick in his lateral movements.

I’m not sure, though, if gaining strength and physical maturity might overcome the body control issues and mentally maturing might overcome the lateral quickness (maybe he’s just not trying hard).

by kig on Nov 17, 2008 12:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

re: gaining strength might overcome...

Certainly, it would go a long way toward finishing through contact. These are all elements that can be improved with diligent work: conditioning, strength, acceleration, flexiblity.

Other elements – like body-control and balance – are more difficult to improve because they’re essentially neural in nature. Your entire cerebellum goes into processing the complicated types of movements that go into hoops. There is plasticity on that level, but for a number of off-topic reasons, neurons are much more difficult to rewire.

Your comparison to Rose is super. Their vertical leaps are essentially the same (39 vs 42) inches, but they’re on completely different levels athletically. It’s not just semantics: you look at athletes like Rose (or Devin Hester for that matter) and realize that “athleticism” really isn’t just a muscular phenomena.

This doesn’t mean Tyrus can’t contribute. A stronger, better conditioned T2 that sprints the floor can still be a damn good player. But I’m not betting the future of the franchise that this T2 will arrive.

 

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 17, 2008 1:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think body-control

is mostly neural, but you can definitely improve balance with weightlifting/exercise.

"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."

by jpchi on Nov 17, 2008 1:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Execuse me but,

Huh? cerebellum…basal ganglia. Is this webmd or blogabull?

by robinhood on Nov 17, 2008 11:55 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Okay,

that was pretty dopey on my part.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 18, 2008 8:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Got a little carried away

with why I felt Thomas frustrates us (not as good of an athlete as he appears) and why he hasn’t improved to the extent we and probably he want (neural vs. muscular changes).

Back to your regularly schedualed Blogabull…

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 18, 2008 8:02 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I recced it

I also don’t really have a clue what you said. But if I ever need one of you to perform brain surgery on me, I hope it’s you.

De gustibus non est disputandum

by Sports2 on Nov 18, 2008 9:36 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's just being boneheaded...

I can admit when I’m wrong, and I often am, in fact on this subject I hope I’m proven an idiot. Why wouldn’t I want Tyrus to be awesome? Even if I didn’t personally like the guy we could trade him for something decent if he ever developed.

But, what kind of goals should Tyrus have after his third year in the NBA? Give me some numbers and we can try and have this discussion at the end of the season maybe?

What would be realistic for a 4th overall pick?… Say 10-15 points, 8 rebounds? Shooting above 40-45%, with under 2 TO’s, and 3 PF’s per game maybe?

I’d say that’s all fairly pedestrian for a 4th overall pick actually. But what do you think? Is this a realistic goal by the end of this year?

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 11:40 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

FYI, I'm being more than kind here...

I realize that Aldridge was drafted #2 and traded, but for the sake of argument I’ll settle for #4 production from Tyrus.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 11:51 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Give it up Khalid

Tyrus, actually should have been a later first round pick. Not a lottery pick, with Viktor as a throw in. I’m sure the Portland organization drank and laughed for two days straight getting Roy and LM in that draft.

That is where my expectation of his performance and numbers are position. (7 pts 8 rbs) for a 3rd year “steal in the draft” player picked late first round.

The hype, his leaping ability and the LSU tournament elevated him. Big Baby was the dominate player on the LSU team then and he’s a reserve in the NBA. Noah, and Horford of Florida shut down both Baby Baby and Tyrus in 2006 tournament and Tyrus looked very weak with no offensive moves, or very limited moves period.

I guess people don’t really watch games, but look at highlight reels of a dunk here and there. And that’s exactly what we get, nothing more.

Tyrus took advantage of a good situation, which shows he’s got some smarts, maybe not in basketball IQ.

Bigger question: can he overcome these mental lapses and develop a true head for the game to up those numbers to 12pts 10rbs? If so he’s a keeper, but at this point I’d resign him for only 4/14 million.

I don’t think Tyrus will get the payday he thinks he will be entailed too?
Unless Paxson is still the GM..

man up!

by exult463 on Nov 17, 2008 2:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let me understand what you are saying here...

We shouldn’t look at Tyrus as a #4 pick, but rather compare him to players drafted late in the first round instead? Is that right?

I mean… Why?

Late first round players routinely get moved when they don’t perform, and often times waived. But you want us to treat Tyrus as if he’s a #20 or so pick that deserves more leeway to develop?

You do realize he will make 6.25 million next year right? 4 years at 14 million will be a pay cut.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 3:30 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

* Addendum...

Actually he will make 4.7 next year, and 6.25 the following year.

Still the point remains, he’d be taking a massive pay cut to play for 4 years at 14 million.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 3:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

after his contract is up...

if not traded before hand, don’t renew/up his contract at the expected value.

4th pick with the talent of a 20th pick. Next year is guaranteed, but either after next year or the year following he’ll be in a contract year.

man up!

by exult463 on Nov 17, 2008 3:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So you're saying...

Don’t extend him a qualifying offer of 6.25 million in 2010, but instead offer him 4 million when he immediately becomes a UFA? Is that even possible?

Tyrus at 4 million a year for four years sounds about right, I just don’t think A) we can do that, and B) That Tyrus would stick around and take a 2.5 million paycut when he could probably find another team to offer him 4 million and not play for the team that lowballed him in such embarrasing fashion.

Watch how quick Gordon bolts as a UFA if the Bulls even offer him a 10% raise next year.

I would bet even money the Bulls pay TT 6.25 million in 2010 if for no other reason than having to own up to the fact that he is only worth low first round dollars.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 3:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Either that or...

Maybe we’ll ship him off to some team in a sign and trade for one of the coveted 2010 free agents (Chris Bosh maybe?).

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 3:52 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

as part of a package of course...

If that’s even possible or necessary.

I have no clue about that kind of crap.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 3:53 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He put up league average PER

as a raw 20/21 year old. How is that worthless?

by JeffD on Nov 17, 2008 12:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Worthless is probably too strong an indictment...

But he has definitely underperformed IMO…

I’m not normally a stat guy, but if you would like me to give you an average stat production (pts, rbs, asst, and fg%) of every other player drafted #4 (in the ten years prior to TT) and how they performed in their third year I will… Give me a bit and I’ll gather some data averages.

I can tell you this already though, TT only compares relatively well with two/three of those guys and their names are Gooden, Fizer, and Antono Daniels… Not the best company in the world. In fact only Antonio Daniels averaged less points, rebounds, and assists in his third year… Every other player drafted #4 in the ten years prior to TT averaged more points, rebounds, and assists than TT in their third year… How is that for a stat?

Many of them were all stars even. You think TT will be an all star this year? Really?

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 12:47 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

O.K.

Maybe not rebounds, but pts, assists, and fg%. But the rebound disparity is far from overwhelming, even on the guards.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 1:30 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The numbers I spoke of...

Here is how every #4 pick performed in their 3rd year prior to 2006 (the year TT was drafted, and traded for our #2 pick by the way)…

16 pts, 5 rebounds, 5 assists, and a FG% of 46.

TT by contrast has performed thusly:

7 points, 6 rebounds, .06 assists, and a FG% of 28.

I realize the sample set is small as we have only played ten games thus far, but for points and rebounds this is a CAREER BEST for TT.

The rest of it MIGHT improve, but it could just as easily not.

Personally I think we would be foolish to think any of these stats will ever measure up to his draft position, and let me tell you, in their 4th year the jump is even higher.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 1:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yay for per-game numbers!!!

you’re definitely not a stat guy, are you?

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 17, 2008 4:11 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I get it...

You think I should be using per 48 numbers right, or maybe some other Hollinger matrix that proves that Tyrus can jump to the sun if he wants to? But that would also imply that TT does enough to deserve more time on the court (ie, not make silly passes, actually sprint back on D, and also try to be where he needs to be in the flow of the game on both ends of the floor).

These numbers are just raw data of the #4 guys that came before him, but hey if you prefer to see it another way then that’s fine too.

No I’m not a stat guy at all, but I do understand how they work.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 4:24 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think the complete unfairness is in the comparison.

Instead of every #4 for the ten years before, you should look at the guys around him in that draft. Since you know the Bulls couldn’t have drafted the guy who came out in 2002 or whatever.

Besides Roy, Gay and Aldridge, nobody’s been much better.

by CrashDavis on Nov 17, 2008 4:47 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Some people have blinders on (see the jamoke below this thread for proof)...

It’s best to just not mention Tyrus around here really.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 7:24 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And go look at those guys per game stats coming into this year

I’ll give you Paul Millsap, the problem there is the 42 other picks between Tyrus and him. Which is why I said guys around him, not second round sleepers.

I guess when you still think a 22 year old has completely flamed out and is worthless you have on blinders, but when you think anybody here would have been happy picking Daniel Gibson(7.5 pts, 2.0 rebs and 1.5 asts) you’re a realist.

by CrashDavis on Nov 18, 2008 10:13 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

I'll take tyrus over any of those guys

with definite exception of Rondo (who’s pointless with Rose here) and probable exception of Ronnie Brewer.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 18, 2008 12:00 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or per-36

But… the complete idiocy of your original comparison was comparing the entire third year of all the guys drafted from 1996-2005 compared to just 10 games of Thomas. Considering that understanding “sample size” noise is a key part of statistical comparisons, I think, no, it’s highly unlikely you really do know anything about stats. Well, anything meaningful, anyway.

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 17, 2008 6:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Um...

Alright, but I did mention that the while the sample size was small it was still CAREER BESTS from Tyrus (and thus favored him more).

Try reading the entire post next time before you ride in and add nothing meaningful to the dialogue yourself buddy.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 7:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You could have

made that comparison after one game. You would still be looking at Tyrus’ CAREER BEST. (and the data still wouldn’t really mean anything)

by silentpete on Nov 18, 2008 8:47 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fair enough...

Then how about we just look at Tyrus’ career averages… He’s still a bust.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 18, 2008 9:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

and that sir,

is an argument I can’t counter, at least not yet.

by silentpete on Nov 18, 2008 11:04 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

For the sake of the Bulls...

I do hope his career averages will spike greatly this year.

Just to be clear on that.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 18, 2008 1:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What are careers bests?

I read your entire post. You’re typing out of your ass. Which is why smarter people than me have ignored you from the beginning. You’ve taught me a lesson, sir. I thank you!

Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!

by tyger1147 on Nov 18, 2008 10:12 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You sir are an abrasive idiot...

He is currently averiging career highs in points and rebounds, but feel free to keep dropping by and typing out of your own ass. Do you ever have anything substantial to say at all, or do you just troll through and rip on what everyone else says without ever backing up your own thoughts? I wonder.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 18, 2008 10:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Plus

Just to throw this out there, what were the average ages of those guys drafted #4? I know Bosh was young and I know Gooden was young, but don’t know the rest…..and I don’t know if those guys were 22…or not either.

by majoyenrac on Nov 18, 2008 10:52 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

2 years of college...

… Is the average college tenure of the players drafted at #4, which I guess would be about 20/21 when drafted, and 22/23 by their 3rd year in the NBA. Tyrus of course played one year at LSU, and yes he would have probably benefited greatly from at least one more. But does this even matter?

Almost everyone drafted in the lottery is drafted on potential, but not potential that stretches into their rookie contract extension. Barely anyone drafted in the top half of the lottery plays even 2/3 years of college ball. Of the last 7 players taken first they have a combined total of 3 years of college, and one of those years was Greg Oden’s campaign at Ohio State, when he could have probably gone in the high lottery after his junior year of high school (if David Stern didn’t have anything to say about it). And lest we not forget Lebron? These guys are being scouted in High School for God’s sake, he was on ESPN and driving hummers when he was 17.

It’s not like the Bulls didn’t realize Tyrus only played one year at LSU, they knew they were drafting on potential, but do you really believe they thought he would be where he is after 2 years and 10 games? Of course not, everyone expects that the guy drafted at #4 will not only start in his 3rd season, but will be an anchor at their position. Does anyone think the Bulls knew this all along but have a master plan for him to finally break out in the second half of his 3rd season after toiling on a yo yo rotation for the two years prior? He is struggling, and doesn’t seem to be getting much better, even regressing in some aspects of his game (certainly his shooting). The potential and age argument is bunk IMO.

My question is this though, If he is still making rookie mistakes two years from now (when he is 24?) will we still be arguing about his awesome potential because he is so young and has so much upside? Will we drop 6.25 million dollars on him in 2010 just so he doesn’t find another team to “develop” for?

We have drafted guys straight out of high school that didn’t work out that well either, and we moved on when it didn’t.

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 18, 2008 1:59 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

agreed

Vinny...you look confused

by Knowledge32 on Nov 17, 2008 11:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed...

The weird thing is, though, that even knowing full well that Tyrus can be so frustrating to watch due to his inconsistency and low basketball IQ, I still for some reason prefer him playing over Gooden because when he does play well, he can make some spectacular plays. I think that has more to do with the relative lack of athleticism of the Bulls’ front court, though. Unfortunately, Tyrus doesn’t seem to learn from his mistakes and I’m resolved to the fact that he’ll either be a career back-up for us or a gamble for another team.

by Dalibored on Nov 17, 2008 3:00 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I promise...

 that Portland won’t be too hard on ya’ll after you upset the Demon Hoards of Los Angeles ;)

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out burns out farms and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Nov 17, 2008 12:18 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Demon Hoard?

Didn’t he start at QB for the KC chiefs this year?

by silentpete on Nov 18, 2008 8:56 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hah!

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 18, 2008 11:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I just hope that...

Noce continues his fine showing.

Deng’s current fine playing form lasts the whole season. Am really happy to see him transform into the Deng of 2 seasons ago.

DRose doesn’t run out of gas. He’s playing way too much but we need him to play!

Gordon scores but not to the detriment of the team.

by PatBull on Nov 17, 2008 4:21 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What I loved

was seeing Derrick’s improvement on the defensive end. A few times, Ford – one of the NBA’s quickest players – had Rose in the open court and was turned away. Other times he tried to take Rose down low and the ball squirted out. It was the first game which showed how serious Rose is to improving his legitimate deficiencies – keeping his man in front of him, and three point shooting.

Agree that we absolutely need more Noah. For god’s sake, the man actually played well the first half, and then he gets no run the second? And so Aaron Gray can go in? The objective of this season is to develop young talent and win. Benching Noah accomplishes neither.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 17, 2008 8:45 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wasn't it even TJ Ford

that “Basketball Guru” aka Doug “The Dufus” Thonus figured to be Rose’s ceiling before the season started and wanted the Bulls to draft Beasley?…

That’s just hilarious if I remember correctly. :D

by BAB-Bass on Nov 17, 2008 9:46 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah he'll have trouble living that comp down

but Doug’s admitted he was wrong. He was trying to scout the guy, and formed an opinion. Sheesh.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 9:54 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm not one that's usually for bashing opinions, but...

he really said that Rose’s ceiling was TJ Ford? I’m going to go ahead and guess that he never watched more than 5 minutes of him at Memphis, because that’s just ludicrous coming from a guy who apparently watches a lot of basketball.

Or maybe he just shouldn’t try to be a scout. That’s pretty bad.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Nov 17, 2008 12:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I thought he said that for the first couple of years?

Maybe I’m confusing it with someone else’s opinion, though. But I don’t remember him talking a low ceiling for Derrick, it was more like he was setting lower expectations, particularly starting off.

Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!

by wjb1492 on Nov 17, 2008 12:40 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let's not forget that Rose

has improved a lot since college…

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 17, 2008 1:03 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

actually through a scouting service

he watched hundreds of minutes

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 12:43 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think he said for the first year

that is what he expected out of him. He was expecting him to be much better after three years since PGs like that, even great ones, have taken a few years to mature. That was all based on what he saw on film before the season started and considering the hedging coming from the Bulls organization and the style of game Rose was a part of in college a lot of what Rose is able to do now wasn’t as evident then. The Bulls are letting him take over, score more, and Rose is adapting well to that. And he’s said more than once since then that Rose is obviously better from the starting gate than he had predicted and he is happy we have him on the team.

Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.

by cranscape on Nov 17, 2008 1:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He said he would be happy if Rose's first year was...

A really good Rajon Rondo, second year TJ Ford and third year Deron Williams…

I interpreted as most point guards, even really good ones, take time to develop in the NBA…and this is the timeline that Doug would be happy with…

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 17, 2008 1:36 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't like it when it's said in the media, and really don't like it when it's practiced

Aaron Gray is not a ‘young big’ that needs development like the others. I don’t get why he came in that game either. I guess the dominance from Big Rasho required some fouling.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 9:55 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rose gave credit to Hunter.

I can’t find the link, but Rose said that Hunter gave him tips on how to guard TJ Ford, essentially to stay back a little bit and bother him with Rose’s size…and it worked.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 17, 2008 12:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The best part of the Hunter signing

is the defensive tips he’ll be able to give Rose. That’s cool to hear.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Nov 17, 2008 12:36 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thank god we didn't pay too much for the coaching staff

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 12:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ha.

While a coaching staff can do a lot of film work and scouting, a lot can be learned from the actual experience of playing against someone on the court.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Nov 17, 2008 1:38 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's a much different perspective to get coming from a guy like Hunter

who has been known as a great ball-pressure-applying PG and has individually ‘matched-up’ with a good majority of the league’s current PGs over the years

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Nov 17, 2008 2:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm not a hugh Tyrus fan, but ..

..imagine him getting some current player mentioning from one of the best, similiar to the D.Rose and Hunter situation?
I know Dennis Rodman is probably available for the defense teaching assignment?

I guess the questions are 1) would Tyrus remember what was told to him when he entered the game and 2) is Rodman’s mind functional to teach?
  

man up!

by exult463 on Nov 17, 2008 2:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tyrus was again falling asleep in the Pacer game

There is enough material in just 6 minutes from Tyrus Thomas to fill the pages of a blog in regards to his poor play. I guess it’s the one I have to write because I want Tyrus to suceed, but he’s never going to come close if he dresses as an NBA player yet spends his court time as a fan spectator.

The corrections that are necessary are minor. When he makes them he will play 25 minutes a night at least.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 9:14 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It would also be nice

if he stopped jumping on EVERY shot-fake and kept his feet on the ground and just and arm up…. The 13-16 year olds that I’ve coached have all managed to do this after at most a couple of months…

It also buggs me to no end that he lets people drive by him trying to go for the block. SOOOO bad defence! Gah!

by BAB-Bass on Nov 17, 2008 9:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No longer rookie errors for Tyrus - he is really hurtng the team

Sorry I made a similar post above.

He is not just missing shots but hurting the team. One game, I forgot which one, he started, we won the opening tip and his first pass went into the arms of the other team. His stupid basketball is no longer rookie errors. The stupid mistakes are really hurting us. We aren’t going to sign him. Unless I’m missing something he is not part of our future.

I couldn’t help myself.

by chgobr on Nov 17, 2008 10:10 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

VDN so far

VDN gets a good grade so far, but a large part of it is due to circumstance. Hughes injury got him out of the mix, and Vinnie was forced to start Ben due to the team’s offensive shortcomings. He has largely been letting Thomas and Noah play games their way and only pulls them when they’re hurting the team.
I’m interested in seeing the Lakers game. Skiles would usally put Kirk on Kobe. I think VDN has four options: 1. Switch Luol to Kobe and have BG try to guard Radmanovich. (Skiles’ choice?) 2. Start Hughes on Kobe. (Bad choice, they’ll really have trouble scoring.) 3. Switch Rose to Kobe. (Too much pressure on Rose. They’ve got a game the next night.) 4. Let Ben guard him and get beat up. Thoughts?

by El Toro de Goro on Nov 17, 2008 10:44 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

#4

Kobe’s going to beat up anyone. Hope he sees shorty Ben and settles for shooting over him.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 10:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd consider Deng too.

but worry Kobe sees Deng and drives around him, and draws fouls on Deng or the bigs.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 10:50 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

right

but to his credit he didn’t stick larry in the starting lineup right away, so i hope he keeps ben in there.

i agree with matt that they should just stick ben on him.

by Jaina on Nov 17, 2008 10:47 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

right away

upon his return, i mean…

by Jaina on Nov 17, 2008 10:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I's impossible to bench Gordon now

He’s playing the best stretch of his career. The only thing that keeps Gordon off the floor is a few 2-3 minute breathers to end a quarter and foul trouble.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 11:06 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

knowing the Bulls-Gordon history

they’ll come up with something :)

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 11:09 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

right

it’s not like i expected it to be logical if he was benched for some reason…

by Jaina on Nov 17, 2008 11:15 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Deng guards Kobe

Ben guards Radmonivic. Let them post up Radmonivic. I would invite this.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 11:05 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what about Hughes and Thabo

they’re so tall

Thabo Sefolosha: His last name sounds like a disease, and his ballgame IS one.

by chibullsfan03 on Nov 17, 2008 11:13 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Won't matter

Radmonivic is an awful defender. Every offensive possession should end with Deng until the Lakers sub in Trevor Ariza.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 12:25 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I thought Ariza was already starting.

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 12:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ariza

8 GP, 0 GS

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/teams/stats?team=lal

He should be starting though IMO.

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Nov 17, 2008 1:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He has made some starts

I wasn’t aware it was the standard. I thought I saw the Lakers start Fish-Kobe-Rad-Gasol-Bynum against the Pistons and then bring in Farmar-Vujacic-Odom-Ariza. Maybe they were starting Rad and Ariza and bringing Bynum off the bench.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 1:16 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ha maybe the Knicks can

scout talent after all…

"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote: 'A flute with no holes is not a flute, And a doughnut with no hole is a Danish.' He was a funny guy."

by Ugh It Live! on Nov 17, 2008 1:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They've made some good picks

David Lee and Wilson Chandler were excellent picks for their place on the board. Ariza was another good one, but he was injured and then apparently Larry Brown hated him and told Zeke to trade him for Steve Francis. Ouch.

Ariza still only has one full season played under his belt. His rookie season. He’s your front court version of TJ Ford.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 1:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Your first lineup is typical

Rad’s doing a lot better in the new D, but yeah, Ariza’s been phenomenal. Phil’s done such an amazing job with this team, I don’t know how he can go up in my opinion of him. I swera, there 8-9 Lakers who can look like the best player on the team any given night. Rose-Gordon v Fish-Kobe is our best matchup; it gets a lot worse after that. Scary. Maybe Sasha and Noce can matchup and blow up into an international incident for shits and giggles.

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 1:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No but their bench plays so much regardless

Aside from Odom who’s complaining about his role on the team, everyone seems to be humming along on the roster which scares the crap out of me. Then again, I think Rose could feast on Fisher/Farmar, and if they put Kobe on Derrick BG could light up those guys as well.

"get rid of the wiry cunt, he’s fucking hopeless"
by hoodlight on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 PM CST 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 17, 2008 2:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My guess is that

Kobe won’t try to run over whoever the Bulls put on him early, and that the Lakers will continue to focus on their new zone d. Therefore, essentially, the d that the Bulls have to worry about playing is when they’re on offense. The lane will be clogged with more size than the Bulls can handle, and the wings will be sniping the passing lanes. They need to move the ball around a lot and carefully, and then hit some shots. BG’s got to start and get the bulk of the minutes.
   Rose is going to get a good test from Farmar, who’s amazed me in his ability to muscle up a bit and retain his quickness and hops; kudos to Phil for playing him so much his first 2 years. If VDN comes up with any ideas on how to match up with Gasol and Bynum, he should get early HOF consideration. Deng’s gonna get tested big time by Ariza, Kobe and Sasha.
   I’d say give it a shot early, and if the Lakers show up tonight, it’s a good learning opportunity…, not just for Naoh and TT, for Pax and the staff! Gasol would be a great opportunity experience for Noah, but it won’t be pretty. Maybe try to match Gooden up with Bynum and see if he can knock down some jumpers while Bynum’s trying to stay home.
   I wouldn’t obsess with winning this game; if the Lakers play well at all, it’s a poor matchup game. Good time to work on some things with the young-uns.

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 1:27 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah...

it sucks that just as we win consecutive games our next one is the lakers. :(

by Jaina on Nov 17, 2008 1:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who knows...

Maybe Odom will decide it’s “Lamar Time” and shoot them right out of the game.

A boy can dream right?

Don't call me doughboy!

by Khalid El-Amin on Nov 17, 2008 1:38 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He could get inspired

by Larry Hughes!
Time for Hughes to start, and show Odom how it’s done! Oh yeah.

by Prevenge on Nov 17, 2008 11:32 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let Rose work with the ball

Carve up the Lakers like a turkey. They might have to put Kobe on Rose. Rose is going to blow past Fish and Farmar all day long.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 1:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No such luck

In the new D, the point’s not facing up, but overplaying him TO the side he wants to go. They want to either trap him there or take him to baseline. Kind of like an aggressive box and one. And I don’t see him having a quickness advantage on Farmar. Kid’s shocked me. He plays a lot like Kevin Johnson. Kobe’s gonna be patrolling the lanes.

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 1:49 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pistons let AI go to work on the Lakers

and it created all sorts of opportunities.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 1:53 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yup, but

who the hell is gonna do Sheed’s job for us, Gray?

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 1:55 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Deng, actually

"get rid of the wiry cunt, he’s fucking hopeless"
by hoodlight on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 PM CST 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 17, 2008 2:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

or Tyrus

you have to have a non-center on Sheed…so the tendency won’t be to drift into the middle, while he stands out at the arc bombing away

by NormVanBeer on Nov 17, 2008 2:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

you talking bout againt LA or Detroit?

I was wondering which of our bigs could drop 20+ from outside against the Lakers..

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 2:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ah...i mis-read

I thought you were asking who would guard Sheed…my bad.

by NormVanBeer on Nov 17, 2008 3:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Deng's not going to pull a big out of the paint

He might get some back door looks while his mass is trying to pick a pass. Sheed drifting out while the towers were zoning was a good weapon.

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 2:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd say Gooden, but I don't count on him to produce at all

"get rid of the wiry cunt, he’s fucking hopeless"
by hoodlight on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 PM CST 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 17, 2008 2:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sheed doesn't move on offense

It’s high screen and camp or low post and camp.

Noc and Deng can do those things. Somebody else has to rebound.

In a trust with Vinny Del Negro.

by NBA Observer on Nov 17, 2008 2:36 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And

for better and worse, Rose isn’t AI, thank God. Piston’s played thier best game, LA didn’t. So much for undefeated, eh?

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 1:57 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey, this is Hollywood

They’re just as capable of letting up and clowning as any team in the league. Phil has them playing as such a team that at times nobody’s looking to score. Maybe Rose can put up a quick triple double before they put Farmar in. That ought to be the most entertaining matchup.

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 1:39 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

while i try

to remain optimistic about each game, i try to be realistic so i don’t get disappointed. :)

by Jaina on Nov 17, 2008 2:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's a good attitude for the next year ot two

I want to see improvement in their play; I don’t give a damn about the score. They were moving very effectively against Indy. But I agree with Matt 100% for once. Unless they have an inside track on a 2009-10 free agent, this team’s going nowhere if they can’t invest the next 2 years teaching Noah and TT how to play basketball.

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 2:37 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is the NBA, more importantly the Chicago Bulls

At this point what “how can you teach then how to play basketball”?

What type of examples exists at this stage of their development?

I’ve always held the opinion that Tyrus should have been sent to the D-League his entire first year, but
surely he was drafted to high and this probably would have been a slap in the face? Now you can’t send him down, because it is more of a slap and his trade value drops faster than the stock market. The same situation for Noah.

LA did it right with their big A.B.

Didn’t we miss our window on theses guys? Nobody has time for slow achievers with 3 years experience in the NBA.. (imho)

man up!

by exult463 on Nov 17, 2008 2:48 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There are plenty of examples

Right off the top of my head, two Bulls come to mind: Boerwinkle and Corzine. Rodman converted his game to a specialist and went from a solid 7th or 8th player to HOF talent. Most big men do improve later. Noah’s had one year, not three. TT’s a different story. I’d suggested short stints with specific assignments. Maybe two minutes is his attention span. Teach him how to run a specific set correctly so that he can find a comfort zone once in a while. Expand his role as he earns it. But you’ve got to pull him out and give him immediate feedback, and then put him back on the bike. I’m not saying you can turn either into all stars; functional is possible. My main point was that if we can’t turn the two of them into players, we got nuthin. If they can man the 4 and 5 just ok, we can hope to find one more stud. 2 all stars, one good player (Deng), and 2 role playing starters and you’re competitive. If we have to look for three positions, good luck.

by California Al on Nov 17, 2008 5:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wonder how Noah and Thomas might have developed...

differently if they were drafted during the championship years. I know its just speculation, but I bet that a few of the players on those teams would have held them more accountable for their mistakes and made pretty damned sure that they either learned to play smart basketball or didn’t play.

by Dalibored on Nov 17, 2008 3:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

except that they seemingly drafted a big man

every year during the championship years and most didn’t make it 5 years in the nba.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 17, 2008 4:03 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well picking 28-29 every year has that problem

Were you expecting Travis Knight to be a force of nature?

"get rid of the wiry cunt, he’s fucking hopeless"
by hoodlight on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 PM CST 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 17, 2008 4:08 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

higher picks - same results - different VP/GM

only two VP/GM over the last twenty years …

Is interesting to see Krause honored banner hanging in the UC.
I guess he was a good GM..

man up!

by exult463 on Nov 17, 2008 5:07 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The point is

that team of veterans didn’t develop one young guy over the 8 years of title runs. I think people are overestimating the “veteran locker room” idea.

by CJ Bulls on Nov 18, 2008 12:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wasn't Stacey King a top 4-8 pick

And he was a bust if I recall, I seem to think he was either 5th or 6th and then BJ Armstrong was 11th….I remember (I was a kid) by my brother and I were like, wow, we’re already good and now we’ve got these two. BJ was good, but King was a bust……

by majoyenrac on Nov 18, 2008 10:57 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good memory

But Stacy is forgiven everything for that body slam on Ferry in the playoffs. Classic!

by California Al on Nov 18, 2008 2:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I suspect we'll start to see Rose

beginning to exert his “will” much eariler than I envisioned, a true leader, and influence this team (Noah, Tyrus) to “man up” during the road trip.

Therefore, they will be able to win a few games.

man up!

by exult463 on Nov 17, 2008 3:08 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ugh, the announcers for Wednsday's game against Portland

Mark Jones and Jon freaking Barry. Hey Bulls fans, did you know we had LaMarcus Aldridge? Did you know we shoot lots of jumpshots? Did you know Ben Gordon is really small? DID YOU ALSO KNOW TYRUS THOMAS IS A BAD BASKETBALL PLAYER AND JOAKIM NOAH HAS LOTS OF HUSTLE?!?!?!?!?!

"get rid of the wiry cunt, he’s fucking hopeless"
by hoodlight on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 PM CST 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 17, 2008 3:18 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sweet

knowing that I have that to look forward to. I thought that I was the only one cursed the homer announcers. Our homer announcers notwithstanding.

by Dalibored on Nov 17, 2008 3:32 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i was so happy

when the celtics game was on ESPN so i didn’t have to listen to tommy all night (i’m in boston).

by Jaina on Nov 17, 2008 3:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Blech

I’ve got Portland friends coming over to watch the game. I should start drinking now. This is gonna be painful.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Nov 17, 2008 4:42 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comical note

The Bulls did not have 5 wins before the circus trip post MJ once until this season. That’s some consistent early-season futility.

"get rid of the wiry cunt, he’s fucking hopeless"
by hoodlight on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 PM CST 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Nov 17, 2008 3:24 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

but they've been at .500

2 other times, so at least those two trips had fewer games before they departed on the road trip.

still.. only 2 other times.

by Jaina on Nov 17, 2008 3:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

I think it helps that Thanksgiving is so late this year. Have we ever played 10 games before the circus trip?

by majoyenrac on Nov 18, 2008 10:58 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what the hell

this has been up all day, and nobody let me know the title had a typo?

USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 17, 2008 5:45 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Centers too young, need an old vet on the bench, MUTUMBO

Diekembe Mutumbo you know has another 30 games in him for a million, after that unbelievable performance last year with Houston. Need a coach/old player on the bench for these big men, or player past their second full year in the league, don’t see any of them developing without some help and don’t think the team needed another guard right now. Going to get their clock cleaned against the big men in the West within the paint all season unless these guys turn it way up. Not sure Noah has got it in him.
Rose is GREAT, but its 10 games and not a 24 game season, better stop on the 40 plus minutes (when your up 12) and get him used to that NBA 3 pt line and start launching them, cause he is going to be wasted in a month or injured driving on the mediocre teams.

by Know on Nov 18, 2008 1:24 AM CST reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Mutumbo, yes

I second that idea to get him, or should I say I third that idea since California Al already seconded it. But is he available?

If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard

by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 18, 2008 4:54 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i can't believe

people actually want Mutumbo. He has less than zero left…stay away. We had him once before…those 2 days (or however long it was) was enough

by NormVanBeer on Nov 18, 2008 6:09 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

On my way to Bulls/Fakers....

wearing my red throwback Pippen jersey…
Go Bulls!

by scottie33 on Nov 18, 2008 5:56 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2f597263b71b32c9d2a85c1427a038ce_bigger_small
Thank You Ben Gordon
Jayhawk_small
A Brief History of Ben Gordon: the Quotes Version
Horace_20grant_small
To the Bulls' Front Office
Rose2_small
Optimistic view of BG leaving (I Hope)
Derrick_rose_1__small
An F.U. to the owner

Recent FanPosts

Bulls-2a_small
List of 2010 free agents (start choosing)
Aaron_scantlen-small-square_small
Trade idea: Kirk for Rudy
Small
Iverson to the Bulls in Gordon S/T?!?!
Small
Hinrich Vs. Gordon
-1_small
Could this be Dumar's post-signing-Gordon plan?
Small
Pistons vs. Bulls
Small
Looking back at the 26th pick now...

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports