Performing with a small front court

by torch on Oct 29, 2008 7:58 PM CDT Comment 4 comments

One nice thing that came out of last night's win was our ability to produce when going small at the PF position.

Last year (after the trade), we spent a ton of time with either Noc or [gasp] Deng at the 4 and suffered horribly from a +/- standpoint. This is even more dumbfounding when you realize that we have three guys (Thomas, Noah, Gooden) who can easily eat up the 96 front court minutes between them - especially if you are giving any minutes to Gray.

Despite this depth, we had over 6 minutes last night (over 13% of the game) playing "small" in the frontcourt. Unlike last year, however, we managed to be +10 during those minutes last night. I think a lot of that has to do with the match-ups during this "small" time. Most of Noc's time at PF was when Bogut and Villanueva were on Milwaukee's bench, meaning we were facing a frontcourt of the likes of Allen and Gadzuric. Against these types of lines, we can stomach being small upfront - but only with these types of matchups.

Some final thoughts on us going small upfront: I noticed while writing this that Noc's time at the 4 last night pretty much accounts for Tyrus's time onthe bench. That's awesome, because it means Tyrus played over 41 minutes!

The other thing I noticed is that Noc's minutes at PF came around the change in quarters, after Thomas/Gooden had played extended stretches to start each half. Noah could only come in for one of them, so it was often Noc in for the other shortly thereafter. If we are going to run our starting front court for long durations like this, then seeing Noc at the 4 is inevitable. But I don't like it, because I keep thinking there's got to be a way to rotate Noah-Thomas-Gooden in such a way that two of them are on the floor at all times. I'd even prefer Gray/Noah or Gray/Gooden over Noah/Noc or Gooden/Noc for the times we need to spell Thomas and one of Noah/Gooden. With Gooden playing 28 minutes and Noah getting only 19, there's got to be a way to play one of them during those times.

Don't take this as a rip against Andres; I love what he does for this team. I just think he should be doing it at the 3, not at the 4...

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

0 recs | Comment 4 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

"Performing with a small front court". Something you definately don't want to hear a girl saying about you.

by Juiceboxjerry on Oct 29, 2008 8:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

better than not performing

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 30, 2008 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Which in turn is still better than not being in the game

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Oct 30, 2008 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Gooden is not a center

Hopefully VDN figures this out soon. Gooden was dominated inside and on the boards by Bogut the whole time that they went at each other. When Gooden is at center we are a deficient rebounding team. When Noah is the center we are active on both boards and usually win the battle. Noah and Gray need to split the post play. Thomas and Gooden have to split the power forward, leaving no time for Nocioni at the 4, meaning he has to pick up Dengs scraps at the 3. We have at least one too many guards, and one too many front court players. We need to make a 2 or 3 for 1 trade where we get the best player, hopefully either a starting 4 or 5 who is obviously better than Gooden, Thomas, or Noah. The best option would be to move Hughes and Gooden at a minimum, with Hinrich, Gordon or Nocioni available as add on options.

by BigWay on Oct 30, 2008 1:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs