Chicago Bulls defeat Milwaukee Bucks 108-95: postgame thoughts
Man, that was a fun game to go to. Nice win against the type of team the Bulls should be beating if they want to get to the playoffs. Plus it was against Skiles and his dopey apprentice...one of the regrets of not seeing the telecast was that guy's sad sack face in disappointment as the Bulls pulled ahead for a victory.
On to my fragmented bullet-points.
- Maybe one of the best signs was that the Bulls played this well offensively without Derrick Rose having a great game. I thought he was very tentative after his first stint, unselfish to a fault. I believe he only attempted one jump shot (he missed). His defense was poor, except he had an uncanny ability to play defensive-back when breaking up a couple fast break outlet passes. But even without the aggressiveness he finished with 9 assists in 32 minutes, and it was a noticeable difference when he wasn't on the court. More more more Derrick Rose.
- 41 minutes for Tyrus Thomas! I bet out of habit Skiles tried to take him out of the game before realizing he wasn't coaching him any more. He had 8 FTAs (missed 3, which is actually a percentage below what he'd been doing in the preseason) and drew several more fouls. The man is a foul-drawing machine, and the entire team did a very good job getting the Bucks in the penalty. (You can tell Skiles is taking over the Bucks defense by first getting them to foul a lot...eventually the refs will get sick of calling it and it'll morph in to 'tough defense'.) He makes so many plays where you say there's no power forwards who can do that, or stop that. He's such an instinctive passer and his jumpshot has improved to the point where defenders are running at him. The one 'old Tyrus' part of his game was the 2 goaltends (plus an offensive basket interference), but if you let him play it's usually a net positive. And then some. Was slowed a bit in the 2nd half when he re-tweaked that ankle, so hopefully that's not a recurring thing.
- Ben Gordon started his 'get me my damned money' tour a half late. His first stint was not good, he didn't make a shot and did some of his patented "look I can do other things too!" moves that usually turn out poorly. But in the second half he was so good. Finished with 18 points in 26 minutes, 3-6 from three. He did not play as much with Derrick Rose as I would've liked, but he did get the opportunity in the 4th when the Bulls pulled away. In a game where Rose wasn't assertive (and the times Rose wasn't in the game), the Bulls needed Ben Gordon and he delivered.
- Kirk Hinrich also had a good shooting game, though before I looked at the boxscore I wouldn't have guessed it. Consider it one part anti-Kirk bias and one part Ben Gordon's prettier jump shot. Overall I still think Hinrich just looked much better when he was able to control the ball, which is why I still think it's a mistake to bring him off the bench before Gordon, as it exchanges the time Rose spends with Gordon to Hinrich instead.
- But maybe the real solution is to get Thabo out of the starting lineup. Expectedly, he did nothing on offense (he did refrain from turning the ball over) and didn't exactly 'disrupt' Michael Redd as Redd has his best stints to start each half (and 30 points on 19 shots overall). While Thabo certainly has the tools to be a great defender with his long arms, he's not exceptionally quick for a guard. So Redd can always get him away by running off the ball. And beyond that, the fact remains that you're not going to be able to stop most prolific wings anyway, so sometimes the best way is to get back at them on the other end. That's something Thabo cannot do. He played just under 12 minutes but it was still minutes that could've gone to Gordon and Hinrich, and more importantly, those were all minutes with Derrick Rose, which should be held to a premium.
- Noah showed why he's such a good complementary player. He had 6 boards and 3 blocks in 19 minutes, and his superlative hands really helped in the lane, either for his own shot or a deft pass.
- Luol Deng did what a $12m SF who's a very good 3rd option should do. Get 21 points and have an observer like me not really remember much of it. Nice to see him attack the basket, as mentioned it was a real team strength for tonight.
- There were some bad bounces of the ball that helped cause this, but I thought the Bulls did not do a good enough job (in the first half)
securing defensive rebounds, which led to too many easy opportunities. Bogut/Villenueva/Allen/Moute will not be the most formidable front line they face this year.
- Was I the only one giddy every time Malik Allen entered the game? Sometimes at Center with Mbah a Moute at PF. Skiles-ball at its finest. The Bulls weren't able to punish them in the first half but it eventually did catch up with them.
- Congrats to coach Vinny Del Negro on his first win. I was too far away to judge his mannerisms, but they shouldn't be judged anyway (beyond my curiosity to make lame jokes about them if necessary). His team played fairly crisp (obviously 18 TOs is too much), played hard, and ran when they could. And he didn't play Aaron Gray a single minute. As I mentioned, played Tyrus Thomas a ton. But the guard rotation will be an issue throughout the season. Rose with 32, Hinrich and Gordon both with 26, Thabo with 12. Clearly Gordon (and Hinrich if he keeps this up, but he needs more to earn my trust) should get a bump after tonight. Play so well that Hughes has no spot when he returns, please.
- It was a rare Bulls sellout where most of the paid attendance was actually in the building, a very cool atmosphere. There was a brief pop any time Derrick Rose appeared on the video screen. Clearly Bulls fans are ready to embrace him, and even after a so-so first game he led a Bulls victory. Hopefully the first of many.
(I guess those thoughts weren't so fragmented)
2 recs |
357 comments
|
Comments
Good to win this one
with a rough start to the season, have to get all the wins that can be gotten.
I have no problem with Thabo starting. It ensures he gets the playing time he needs to develop because you’re going to need what he presumably can bring you, otherwise you’ll have to seek it from Hughes. Thabo starting and playing 15 MPG while Kirk and BG get their 25-30 MPG is fine. BG will be on the floor at the end of games, Kirk can be the 6th-7th inning guy to get Rose to the 8th-9th.
I was encouraged by Tyrus Thomas at times. Maybe he’ll deliver this year. The 4 slot looks like it’s his because Gooden and Noah appear to have played exclusively at the 5 all night.
I like the 29-19 or similar MPG split at the 5 between Gooden and Noah.
Richard Jefferson was really off and Bogut is getting no shots with RJ and Redd firing away. Bogut had a stretch last year where he put up strong numbers and now it will be interesting to see how many opportunities he gets.
by messwiththebull on Oct 28, 2008 11:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This is going to be a shit show when Hughes is back in the mix.
I bet he’ll take more of Gordon’s minutes than anyone else’s. Because, you know, Sefolosha is a tall, defensive machine— he needs those minutes he’s getting.
by NittanyCub on Oct 28, 2008 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He needs to be bought out or things are going to get really, really messy.
Which is a shame after tonight’s performance and its resulting optimism.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Oct 28, 2008 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree on the shit show part,
but disagree about taking Gordon’s minutes. I think Thabo and Hughes are interchangable in VDN/Pax’s mind. In the pre-game, it was mentioned multiple times that Thabo was starting only because Hughes couldn’t.
by arjoseph on Oct 29, 2008 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't Thabo get his playing time off the bench?
Redd lit it up at the beginning of the game and the beginning of the half Thabo started again. He had a bunch of threes in a row to start the half. I don’t see where Thabo shut him down at all. And Thabo does little on the other end to offset that. How does getting yanked for sucking after starting each game seem like good development time? Put him in sometime later on in the game once he sees from the bench how things are going and can be sent in on assignment. Getting five minutes to start the game and start the half are terrible for development. Especially when the guys that are put in for you get it done and you don’t. With how fragile he is he will just be waiting to be pulled at that 4-5 minute mark like clockwork.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 28, 2008 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most guys have difficulty with Redd
All one can hope for is to force Redd to prevent him from getting clean looks, make him work to get the ball, and make him take difficult, lower percentage shots. He scored on Thabo, no doubt, but early on I saw Redd his some turnaround fadeaways, which I’d rather have him shoot. He had a hell of a night, though, no question.
Thabo got pulled early as much for his 2 quick fouls as anything. He needs to play better, no doubt.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The way to get to Redd
is to have decent defense (something that is even attainable for shorties like Hinrich and Gordon) and make him work on the other end. You are never going to completely take away his shot, but making him work on the defensive end keeps him busy. Thabo had two uninspired stints defensively against Redd and doesn’t have anything on the other end to disrupt his offensive rhythm.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 29, 2008 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Redd averaged 29 PPG against the Bulls last year in 4 games
I’m not sure how many of those Thabo started in or got significant playing time in. He probably got 12 minutes like last night. I’m assuming guys like Hinrich guarded him most of the time.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
right, so if Thabo isn't a big upgrade on that end
why have him out there?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he doesn't improve, you don't
but you have to give him that opportunity to get better. 15 MPG leaves enough for BG and Kirk to play significant minutes after the first quarter. This team is going to need something from a big guard, whether it be Thabo or Hughes.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
While Thabo didn't shut him down
starting a great defender doesn’t guarantee the other player won’t score. As much as you can point to Redd’s stats, the Bulls had 10 points in 4 1st quarter minutes thabo had. So their offense didn’t suffer either.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My fantasy team disagrees.
But really, as long as Tyrus is getting minutes, getting the opportunity to make mistakes so he has the opportunity to learn from them, I’m happy. Noah’s game is what it is; I like it, but I don’t know if he’s going to “develop” much more (except physically).
by arjoseph on Oct 29, 2008 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not into Fantasy Basketball ;) I like REAL basketball
His shot is so gawd-darned awful I would be shocked if there wasn’t room for improvement.
(Shaq’s career-long inability to master such an easy and repeatable aspect of basketball as the Free Throw, notwithstanding…)
by BAB-Bass on Oct 29, 2008 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Sefolosha needs to play 30 minutes per night for the 'magic starter juice' to kick in...
…but if that turns out to actually be a myth, they should at least start him for development minutes, even if it’s only 10 minutes per game?
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He needs time to play on the court
preferably time that is relevant to the outcome of the game. I think it’s better to put him in there as a starter because he is guaranteed to get minutes during meaningful portions of the game. Should his production during this time merit more playing time, then I’m sure the coaching staff will find ways to accomodate him getting those minutes. So he plays 15 MPG mainly driven off his starter’s minutes, and should his contributions and production be there, you can scale up his minutes over time.
What you don’t want to do is not commit time to letting him develop and grow as a contributing teammate. That’s what the Skiles regime did with Thabo and Ty and now here we are in Year 3 hoping we can get some meaningful production out of them. We already tried the method you guys are advocating. BG isn’t going to start (a stance I agree with but that’s moot) so I can only surmise those of you who are against Thabo starting would prefer to see Kirk or Larry out there instead because BG isn’t going to start (unless it’s a spot start here and there).
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's all about draft position
If Thabo was the #2 pick, people would be trying to work him in and defending him. He hasn’t earned minutes, but he also hasn’t been given the chance
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, pretty much
that and HE’S 24!
This Demetrius Nichols character never had a shot either.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just saying
he’s an afterthought because TT was taken that year.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus WAS a contributing teammate
even when he was getting yanked around.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His minutes didn't reflect that
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And that's why people were mad.
Thomas played well in extended minutes (Detroit at the beginning of last season) and in limited minutes. Thabo did well ONLY when playing 30 min. per game. It was very likely a fluke.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Tyrus' on the court flash had a lot to do with fans (outside of BaB) being mad
I thought Thabo played well last year which makes this year’s start for him that much more disappointing, and frankly, disgusting. I expected more out of him and – right or wrong – I attribute a decent portion of the blame on Skiles complete negligence in commiting to develop guys like Ty and Thabo.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe we just need a new rule:
don’t group Tyrus and Thabo. They came into the league with entirely different expectations and investment, and have performed differently since that time.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we please have that rule for Kirk and Larry, too...
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 29, 2008 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
heh
agreed :)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 30, 2008 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You do like your +/- numbers, right?
Look ’em up. 82games.com, basketballvalue.com, etc. They ALL say the same thing. Despite getting nearly identical minutes over the past two years, Thomas has been good, Sefolosha has been bad.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like them to complement what I see on the court
and +/- numbers aside, Tyrus did not look like he knew how to play professional basketball over the past two seasons.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and in spite of that
he was still productive!
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like he "knew" how to?
Right, he played like a “raw” “project” player he was drafted as. Which can be helped by… um… playing more.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Thabo has shown to be any less raw?
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the difference between the 2
Tyrus was drafted for his potential, Thabo was drafted for his supposed polish. One of those players has lived up to his predraft hype while the other has not.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's like this
Tyrus=raw+productive
Thabo=raw+unproductive
The difference is productivity. Tyrus has posted two season with a PER around the league average. Thabo has put up historically bad offensive numbers.
by Scotter on Oct 29, 2008 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and at the risk of getting annoying
Tyrus is also (+ potential)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt
the expectations are different and higher for Tyrus, as was the investment (and opportunity cost if you factor in Lamarcus Aldridge). And we all knew he was raw, but he produced, yet Skiles still inexplicably refused to commit to his development. The minutes weren’t there for him, not consistently.
I had high expectations for Thabo and was a bit surprised he wasn’t more “ready out the box” than what he actually was. I probably had similar expectations to what I thought Pietrus would be when the Bulls considered him in the 2003 draft and likewise, Pietrus seemed to lack the committed minutes in the development years of his career. Maybe this is all he was going to be and maybe the expectations should be lowered for Thabo, but I’d like to reach that conclusion after seeing him get a legitimate opportunity for at least one full season.
You can visibly see the lack of confidence in his offensive game and it’s a disgrace because he can do better and he should be better.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The difference really
Has more to do with athleticism and upside. Sure Thabo can guard Kobe or Wade well in stretches, but he can’t shoot well (And hasn’t improved) and his passing also hasn’t improved…and he’s absolutely nowhere near the athlete that Tyrus is (but few are).
Thomas is a freakish athlete, and absolute freak out there who has shown signs of improving in the skill areas (not foolishly leaving his feet as much, staying on his man, dribbling, passing and most importantly hitting the jumpers)…..
I would be fine with Thabo as our guard of the future if we didn’t have Gordon and Hinrich (Hinrich can be a better defender than Thabo—the big guard—by virtue that Kirk has been….and Gordon’s a million times better of an offensive player.
We have enough guards. Thabo needs to fight his way back into a rotation (or hope for injury). He’s just not very good—he’ll project as an avg player….he’s not ridiculously young anymore, and unlike THomas, Sef had some overseas pro playing that was at least supposed to prepare him for the NBA game…
Thabo’s not bad, but he’s one of those—while his value is still high because of the upside we should trade guys before that bubble pops.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The real problem is the stuff Thabo is good at
is hard to express in numbers. I’m sure you all consider Battier to be a horrible player too.
Thabo can develop into that type of player. He just needs the attitude and drive. It’s hard to tell if he has that when he never plays.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabo could develop into that type of player
But we don’t really need that type of player with 2 solid pseudo stars who are and will always be better already on our roster in Kirk and BG….
I like Battier’s game too, and I don’t hate Thabo, I just think he’s as redundant on a solid guard team as they come.
And I don’t think he’ll ever be Battier solid either—too thin, too poor a shooter and doesn’t seem to quite have Battier’s bball IQ (since we’re still talking about the same things with Sef that we talked about after folks were impressed with him out the gate as a rookie.
Plus unlike Tyrus Thabo’s had a decent chance to play consistently. He performed ok, but again hasn’t drastically improved, and will always now be at least our 4th best guard….
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That may be true
but let’s throw him a bone to see. I just don’t see us keeping both Gordon/Hinrich so we need to know if Thabo can manage.
Thabo is also a lot quicker than Battier. I don’t think you’re giving him enough credit there. They were putting him on Chris Paul and Lou Williams last year after they started killing us.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabo may be quicker than Battier
but he’s not in the class of defender Battier is. Just because he has a reputation as a defensive ace doesn’t mean he’s actually an elite defender.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Battier has a career 38.9 3-pt FG %.
Never shot below 34.9%.
And it’s getting better in discussing those things in numbers, some just choose to ignore those discussions.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are many players in this league
who have developed a 3pt shot as their careers have progressed. To judge Thabo or any players shooting as a finished product at age 24 isn’t fair.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
even so
Battier is a superlative individual and team defender. Thabo isn’t anywhere near that, except perhaps they both have long arms.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not say Thabo can be like Kirk Hinrich?
I think it’s a poor comparison. I was just pointing out one reason why I think so.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't never playing some evidence of having "attitude and drive"?
I mean, for every game he doesn’t play in, there are probably 2 or 3 hours of practice where his attitude and drive are on display for the coaches.
by Sports2 on Oct 29, 2008 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So he must be doing something right
if the coach decided to start him?
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
if he had ‘the attitude’, he’d show improvement.
Or he has the attitude, maybe it’s not a question of attitude.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I belive he's an extreme confidence player
and if he doesn’t get over that, he will continue to suck. If he does, he can be valuable. His style of player tends to be underpaid.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still maintain
that the payoff (and chances of that payoff) isn’t worth sacrificing anything to coddle Thabo’s confidence. If it’s going to happen it’ll happen whether he starts or not.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
By style I don't mean no confidence
I mean defensive wing
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very fun to watch this opening game
Nothing made me smile more in tonights game when I saw Skiles’ frown when the Bulls led by their biggest margin.
What really stuck out to me this game was the Bulls’ willingness to run with the ball. Take a look at the stats: 20 fast break points opposing Milwaukee’s 1 fast break point.
I really like how the Bulls are now revamped and eager to run because they know that each fast break will turn out to be a positive play since Derrick Rose will be handling the basketball. In addition, I enjoyed seeing the Rose to Thomas dynamic alley-oop. I hope to see more of that.
Overall, it was a good game to start. But one thing that concerns me is having a complete starting line-up that will be stable all throughout the season. Good luck to the Bulls this year!
by dannyp07 on Oct 28, 2008 11:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Milwaukee TV had a great shot of
Skiles’ blotchy red face and scowl as he walked off the floor….
good times
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by Orlando Woolridge on Oct 28, 2008 11:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Heh. Nice tag:
if you heard ’that’s for you boylan’ during the game that was me
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Oct 29, 2008 12:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
3 pointers...
I missed the game :-(
However, one painfully obvious stat simply from glancing at the box score: not one starter ATTEMPTED a three.
Please Vinny, just, give BG a chance.
Oh also, how was VDN’s demeanor during the game? Was he in control? Vocal? Or clueless and holding Harris’ hand?
Asked what kind of player he expects to be in the next five years, he said: "Not a star, but like, a superstar. Something around, like, Chris Paul, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, something like that."
by BigBenign on Oct 29, 2008 12:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Vinny looked calm and confident
He had a few moments of personal chatting with his players in addition to a few squabbles with the officials about some calls.
After the game BG went up to every coach and shook their hand as they patted him on the back. BG had the better night, but even he deferred to Rose to do the post game WGN interview.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did hear BG do the post-game radio interview
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great opener
We totally out athleticized the Bucks, and to be honest the Bucks with Redd and RJ and the very quick Lue and crew I thought would have been a nice athletic matchup, but when we play like we did, we’re tough. God I hope it continues.
It’s a far cry from last year’s opener, which was the first ever opener of any team I had ever been to, and was very excited about….by the 3rd quarter the no energy Bulls were getting a solid Kobe chant that continued throughout the game….
THis game, we hustled….
Tyrus Thomas the star tonight. I know he made a couple of stupid goal tending plays and I know he also had a charge or two that looked dumb (the offensive interference call was complete BS from this television viewer)….but Tyrus was all over the place and the Bucks and Skiles/Boylan couldn’t stop him….bet they mis Adrian Griffin now huh :). If Tyrus keeps this up look out.
Deng played his ususal good game. He looked incredible in the first quarter and like always disappeared in the 2nd half especially in the 4th….but nonetheless a good Luol game no less.
Rose looked a bit like the rookie he is tonight….his passes weren’t too crisp, and his D was pretty weak, despite very solid transition D. Ridnour at times out veteraned Rose. But Rose’s instincts were solid and that athleticism was a boost.
Hinrich again was the man. He really played well, lead the team in pivotal spots. He should start, or Gordon should start (Thabo’s not ready).
Gordon looked rusty at first, but thankfully Vinny kept BG out there for most of the 2nd to get his legs (Skiles would have pulled him), and it paid off in the 2nd half when Gordon and Redd put some of their usual shows. I know Redd had solid pts tonight, but from this viewer, it didn’t look at all like he outplayed Gordon either. BG’s defense was good. In the first half, the slow and Rusty Gordon mad emore of the normal BG mistakes, but int he 2nd half, Gordon proved again why he’s valuable. I agree would like to see more o fhim with Rose, but with BG and Hinrich playing so well tonight, it’s hard to complain.
Noah, was awesome, all energy and really came through when we needed him.
Gooden too played very good D, although I am one of hte few that seems to remember that Bogut’s huge contract is a bit of a pipe dream as he hasn’t proven himself at all yet…..Gooden played good D, seemed to grab a bunch of boards, and his shots when he looked to shoot went down (I haven’t read or studied the stats, I’m just getting done watching the game—I DVRd it—and am taking my initial thoughts.
As for the bad:
Thabo. Redd destroyed him tonight. Thabo has done well in the past against some of hte elite offensive players, and to be fair Redd is an elite offensive player for a reason….but Thabo really looked slow and his instincts were all off. Basically he proved to me at least that he’s got a while to go before he’s the pick over Hinrich and BG to start. Though I don’t want to yet bury him…..still its ridiculous not to play or honor our best guards first….they deserve it, even after a rough year.
And that’s about it. Nocioni didn’t do a hole lot, but he seemed to annoy RJ which is enough for me.
The Bucks didn’t look very good, yet they somehow stayed in the game for most of the first 3 quarters….the Bulls seemed to outplay them but yet the stats were similar. The Bucks can come on, they have some talent, but they look a ways away.
Chalk it up to Vinny and crew, the team played loose…..Ran (I know Boylan talked of having them run run run, but then they’d stand stand stand and shoot shoot shoot)….Vinny had them running. It wasn’t just with Rose on the court either. Hinrich for the 2nd game in a row (both against Skiles) seemed to morph into former Kirk, but smarter former Kirk. He made some “oh wow” passes in there….really good game.
Oh well I gotta go “wife’s a-calling”. Good game.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 12:07 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I agree on Deng.
Sorry to repeat this, but he looked like a bona fide finisher in the first half, especially in the first quarter. I guess I can’t get over this, because one of the big quesiton marks when we were drafting him/ acquiring him from Phoenix was whether he was athletic enough. But there were a number of contested dunks/dunks in traffic by him, he looked great. Granted, some of these were waved off because the refs had aleady whistled the play dead by the time he threw it down, but still, the guy was taking it to the rack hard and finishing above the rim. Can you tell that I was impressed?
The other really great stat was that at one point the Bulls had outscored the Bucks 17-1 on fast break points. Again, just a stat I cannot get over. It’s all Rose, and the contagious effect he has—Noah and especially Tyrus have gotten the message to keep running, and to expect the ball on alley-oops.
The result was more alley-oops (including alley-oop attempts where Tyrus was fouled) in one game than we’ve seen since the Jordan-Pippen era.
This also means easy baskets for a team that struggled to score last year. If we had played this game last year against this Bucks team it would have been nip and tuck until the final buzzer. But because Rose was able to get the ball to the bigs in scoring position (i.e., above the cylinder about to dunk the ball), we had way, way more easy buckets than we had anytime last year.
"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris
by bullhockey on Oct 29, 2008 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well....
Tyrus Thomas’s athleticism really showed too with the quick pace of our play.
God I hope he keeps it up, after looking “meh” int he first couple of preseason games, he looked really solid (in 20-25 minute stretches) now seeing him carry that on in more playing time REALLY has me excited.
I agree on Deng. I’ve always dogged him for his athleticism, but he did make a few plays yesterday where I was like, is that Thomas? No it’s Deng. He played well, I just really wish he’d bring that energy/spark in the ends of the 2nd half (When it’s MOST needed)…..because he proved again that he could be an all star, except that he has to do it all game.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
alley-oops
they were nice to see, because after that first preseason game I don’t think they ever went back to it.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The one time that Tyrus ended up guarding Redd on the perimeter,
Redd threw up a high arcing shot that barely got to the front of the rim. I consider that intimidating defense, when all Tyrus has to do is stand about 5 feet away from Redd by the 3-point arc.
I know you mention, Matt, that the goal tending was a flaw, but I actually think that it helps to build this notion that Tyrus is just a better athlete, with a better reach, and therefore it intimidates the other team. Alonzo used to do this—he’d clearly goal tend, and even when it would be called, it would just take the wind out of the sails of the offensive player.
Also, it was awesome to see Tyrus gathring in rebounds not by positioning or laying a body on his man, but just by simply out-jumping the 3 closest Bucks.
Tyrus’ mid ranger jumper was falling, and on both the mid-range jumpers and free throws, you can see how well his shooting mechanics are coming along.
I know it’s one game, but overall he’s developing very nicely. Once he learns a couple of go-to moves in the post, he will establish himself as a force.
"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris
by bullhockey on Oct 29, 2008 12:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
IMO...
Go-to moves in the post should not be a priority for Thomas at this point. For me it’s (1) finishing around the basket, (2) continue perfecting the J, and (3) ballhandling/dribbling/passing. At 6’9", 230 lbs, he’s a high-post offensive player whose quickness is his best half-court attribute. No need for him to start trying to bang in the post.
Maybe as he starts declining physically in a number of years and adds a few more pounds, he’ll want to develop post moves. But for the forseeable future, IMO, that’s shouldn’t be a priority.
"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas
by Jivas on Oct 29, 2008 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Tyrus isn’t going to be a post player. We need to stop trying to force a square peg in a round hole and maximize what he does have and can bring to the table.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
WoW nice way to begin the season.
I had to watch this via game cast at work so a lot was missed. My first thought when it became of that Gray got a DNP… somewhere Matt is smiling.
TT 41 minutes 15 points 10 boards. A sign for things to come?
Gooden, Kirk, and Gordon put up the numbers they need to put up. Rose didn’t seem to have a good shooting night but its clear the offense was clicking.
Comment on the number of TOs… with the new faster style of play can we expect to be a higher ratio of TOs as there are more possesions? What did Phoenix (pre Shaq) and the GS teams average?
"If you're not going to compete, then I'll dominate you." MJ
by Rankdog on Oct 29, 2008 12:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i think a lot of the guys are still learning how to play with each other
the first half was especially sloppy. turnover numbers will be something to watch as the season continues.
by lampnasty on Oct 29, 2008 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree too
A few of the turnovers were just sloppy play, and a few were mistakes, Tyrus had a couple of charges, Kirk grabbed the ball from Nocioni on an out of bounds play, a couple of crappy offensive foul calls in there, and then Gordon threw a nice pass into Noah at one point that Joakim wasn’t ready for, and Rose had some rookie issues….
I wouldn’t put too much stock in it, but I would expect similar TO’s for the start of the year.
Bring on Boston, I hope we at least have a solid showing (unlike last year) against them…
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha, that in-bounds play was kinda funny...
There was nowhere to go, so Kirk Just ran by and Noc handed him the ball…On WGN they called it “The Statue of Liberty.”
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on Oct 29, 2008 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was wondering what happened there
On the Milwaukee broadcast this was the approximate exchange between the announcers
Play by Play: So, um, the Bucks get the ball
Color Guy: Think there was an illegal screen by the Bulls?
(silence)
PbP: Um, there was a, um, uh infraction against the Bulls
(silence)
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
kinda like that play in one of the preseason games where noc reached over the line to try to grab the ball from the inbounds passer.
wtf? lol
by Jaina on Oct 29, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
I just imagine like, my 6th grade basketball team, when we would call the “stack” inbounds play from half-court…And then the ball would just kinda be thrust into the first guy’s hands…
Brian McRae's 5 o'clock shadow
by PurpleLineToWrigley on Oct 29, 2008 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree (with Matt), especially about not allocating precious D Rose minutes to Thabo
instead of Gordon (whose defensive lapses will be forgotten as he explodes playing alongside the Chosen One). Kirk should come off the bench to give Derrick a breather and let Ben rest his arm after nailing open jump shots with DR. Thabo can be rewarded with garbage minutes at the 2 and 3 while filling in where he can use his length to his advantage. He has demonstrated a lack of quickness and poor shooting touch which can weaken our offensive sets, but is still a vast upgrade over Larry the upchucker, just because he doesn’t have a hair shooting trigger everytime he touches the ball. Can we send Hughes to Washington who is riddled with injuries and may still have distant memories of his one memorable season. Can the Bulls eat most of his salary without kicking in the luxury tax?
Finally, I mistakenly posted this earlier as the last entry on a thread that was already dead but I still have a strong urge in my loins to profess my Tyrus love to the multitudes.
41 MINUTES!!!!!!
—-15 points, 10 boards (not counting those he kept alive by skying over everyone else with his leaps and quickness like an all-American vollyball dude)
—— provided solid help defense with some rotation failures (like everyone else) by altering many shots
——3 assists, 2 steals, 1 block (+2 goal tends…If his name was LeBron or Kobe, it would have been at least 2)
——only 2 turnovers, both on offensive fouls resulting from his aggressive moves attacking the basket. one dubious charge called against him. maybe he is too quick for the referees to notice he had established position?
If his alley oop wasn’t taken away (sorry his first name isn’t Kobe or LB) and hit free throws as he did in the pre-season, he would have had at least 20 points. OK, my mancrush has once again sent a tingle up my leg and if he ever learns how to finish, it will send fearful shivers down the backs of the opposing coaches and players.
As Matt said (roflol), Skiles probably tried to pull him just out of habit…..Just think of what his stat line would have been if the bald dome and his Lilliputian bird-brained assistant were still in charge of the Bulls……probably something like this:
3 1/2 minutes, FGA 0 FTA 0 Rebounds 2, ONE TURNOVER.
and thus a seat on the end of the bench as they fume at his inability to run the floor at light speed and not run Skiles precision offensive sets.
I hope they both enjoy reading my proposed upcoming book.
"The Stuck On Stupid Twins"
An epic tale of 2 stubborn asswipes, one whose mind was like a steel trap, always closed, while the other, his almost mindless loyal lapdog spends the season staring vacantly into space, like the open space between his ears, trying to remember where he saw that number 24 who just made the all star team, play before.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Oct 29, 2008 12:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
And while Noah unfortunately got only 19 minutes (Thanks to one of the really good Gooden games—Gooden’s D was solid)….Noah really had a spark.
I loved the Noah, I’m going to grab a board and scream like a maniac play, where he grabbed the board and did exactly scream like a maniac, only to have Charlie Villanueva decide to reach in to get the ball that Noah secured (Stupid Charlie V) and Noah again secured the ball, screamed like a maniac, and Villanueva picked up his 4th or 5th foul.
I laughed…..
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, this is incredible:

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Oct 29, 2008 1:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
re: Gooden's hand job
Illini15 said that picture is “incredible” but I say it was merely a normal and hardly unexpected reaction,
since he was looking at the Bucks bench at that time and had just made eye contact with B&y*#n.
In scientific terms, it can be described as an automatic physical reflex similar to a verbal Freudian slip. In fact, every time the unamed one’s hangdog visage appears on my TV, I have to keep at least 9 feet from the set to avoid kicking in the screen since my involuntary nervous system triggers a powerful leg kick that could convert a 60 yard field goal if it occurred on a football field instead of my den.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Oct 29, 2008 1:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's with those Ruskie stars tatooed on his chest
His head looks like upside down rastafarian.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Thoughts
The entire team was clicking offensively, taking it at the rim not caring if they got rejected (gordon, rose, and kirk all got swatted away once and still went back for more, i like that) however team defense was kind of bleh. A few times rose bit a few fakes from luke, but someone was able to cover him, the worst defense was inside the painted area, especially in the first half. the lakers and celtics will destroy us if this keeps up.
Gordon showed off what i think made him famous, the ability to turn it up late in the game. Does that make him more of a 6th man, i dont know, but id figure letting him start to check and let this man be a 6th man…
Kirk hinrich did what ive wanted him to do, and what he should do every game. He put up good numbers, hit a good percentage from the field, kept the offense moving (the team was a bit more efficient when kirk was on the floor, or so i thought) and played great defense. I dont much mind him coming off the bench, because that keeps his fouls low, and allows him to be more aggressive coming off the bench. His shot looked good today (man i kept calling them, the hits and misses, thank you 2k9 for helping me understand perfect releases). Oh but wait…supposedly he was playing pg during most of his fgs so i guess it doesnt count or something rolls eyes he looked good and if he keeps it up i think the bulls have a good chance.
Luol attacked the rim, and looked good doing it, ill take more of that please.
Noah and Tyrus look good on the court together, blocks and dunks galore. All that hustle should be illegal.
How long has it been since the bulls won thier season opener?
Thabo can be a role player off the bench for some defensive purposes, hughes is not needed. Gooden could be traded also, lets get a good center instead and keep gordon and hinrich, finally ending this wierd hinrich/gordon war thingy in the world of bulls….or maybe im the only one who wants that.
On Behalf of Sue, Wjb, Bullshooter, and all the other Hinrich fans...Ill keep the Hinrich Hope coming...There will be light....
by piccolomair on Oct 29, 2008 2:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: "ending this weird Hinrich/Gordon war thingy."
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you're alone in seeing a rotation of Rose/Gordon/Hinrich as a good thing
It’s just Kirk and eventually Gordon will be paid far too much to keep both of them here. Gordon’s the better player and better fit with Rose, hence, why many of us are waiting for Kirk to be sent somewhere else.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk keeps looking like he did last night
and he’ll recoup his trade value in this league.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guard Rotation
I think that Rose/Gordon/Kirk can be the best 3-guard rotation in the league. (Who is better?) Thabo can get minutes as the 4th guard or as a back-up to small forward. That being said, I am convinced that this team will go as far as Thomas and Noah take them. This team will be able to run on anyone, and if the bigs can continue to improve, we may sneak into the 7-8 spot.
by Cannoli on Oct 29, 2008 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Billups-hamilton-Stuckey would be my pick
by CJOliveira on Oct 29, 2008 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Close
but I like the Bulls trio better. Billups/Hamilton over any two we have right now; Stuckey is an interesting player, but I like ALL of the Bulls better. It will be interesting to see which trio has better overall stats at the end of the year. And remember, Kirk always gets under Hamilton’s skin, so we win the face-to-face.
by Cannoli on Oct 29, 2008 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lakers and Celtics are going to destroy a lot of teams
They are very good. They are very deep. They have multiple MVP candidates. They have proven head coaches and assistants.
We’re not in their class yet. Our average age is 24.9 years old. We’re green. We’ll get there. We’ll still compete. I just odn’t think we’ll be able to compete for the full 48 minutes.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll echo messwiththebull's sentiment and ask
whether we can compete. “Compete” means be in a close game at the end. With our youth and the size/girth advantage down low, We’ll have to manage our game pretty much perfectly to compete.
I’m not saying we definitely won’t compete; just that after last year, it’s a question in my mind. Can we compete with the Lakers/Celtics?
"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris
by bullhockey on Oct 29, 2008 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now? No way?
In 3 or 4 years? You betcha.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Celtics could suck in 3 to 4 years...
every one of their stars is 31 or older
"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."
by jpchi on Oct 29, 2008 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Over a long enough time line the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
we can’t compete today, while other young teams have frontcourts than can compete, such as a healthy Portland. Granted there aren’t many teams like a Portland, or perhaps even a Toronto, but the Bulls certainly can’t compete in the frontcourt with what they currently have on the roster.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you seriously going to try to negate everything I type today?
Toronto is young? Przybilla is young?
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As in: in 3-4 years what frontline is going to be so demonstrably better...
…than the bulls frontline, when Deng, Thomas and Noah will be in/entering their prime, that the Bulls won’t even be able to “compete”?
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gooden is not a center
The most obvious and disconcerting thing about opening night is that Gooden started at center. First, he is absolutely not a center. Second, it is obvious when he is the center we become a bad rebounding team, and our overall team defense suffers, and he cannot guard anyone in the post. Noah should start, and Gray should get the substitute minutes.
Now for all you Gordon fans. Just stop looking at the box score, and for one game take your eyes off the ball, and just follow Gordon around. You will puke or die laughing within minutes. When he is not shooting he is simply jaking it at all times. He doesn’t even make an effort to look like he is trying on defense, he makes half hearted attempts to run out on shooters and contest their shots while ducking his head and vearing off. At best he is faking at looking like he is trying. No way a guy like this should ever start an NBA game. He is acceptable as a third guard in limited minutes for instant offense. Actually it is not instant offense, since he is does not have a single offensive abililty other than shooting when wide open and not defended, which is worthless in the playoffs when even bad teams actually try to play defense. His body language is absolutely disgusting and reflective of his brain dead attitude. We simply cannot afford to play double midgets in the backcourt. Since Rose and Hinrich are going to have to split the point guard minutes, Thabo has to start unless you want to see more of Hughes. Thabo played well last season when he got regular extended minutes, and along with Noah is our best team defender. Considering that Rose is a rookie and defense is not a strength and Deng is not a defender, and Hinrich and Gordon are unathletic midget stiffs and Thomas is still walking around in a puppy dogs body and mind, we need somebody on the court to focus on defense and rebounding, Noah and Thabo are our best options and starting with Rose Deng and Thomas or Gooden give us our most balanced lineup. Hinrich and Gordon’s deficiencies don’t look as obvious as backups as they do as starters. Scoring, or should I say shooting is not everything, remember MJ and Pippen were all defense NBA and even defensive player of the year. Open your eyes people, Thabo may not be the answer, but Gordon and Hinrich never have been or never will be. And niether is Gooden, particlular as a center.
by BigWay on Oct 29, 2008 3:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's complete BS
Gordon’s defense was decent yesterday, he had a couple steals and even a block (Don’t know if it showed up in the box score or not, but it was a block and the commentators even said it).
Gordon’s not a great defender, but he does try and played well defensively yesterday. Redd had his most explosive moments against Thabo (who could do nothing against him)….
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the 2 minutes Gordon was on Redd
Redd attacked him twice and I believe got fouls on both. Redd is one of the toughest matches BG will have all year though.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Redd was 13th in FTA last year, and 6th among guards.
He’s going to get fouled, no matter who plays him.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would palm slapping the hardwood help?
Maybe some shorts tugging up to the hips. You know, ‘get loose, come get it’ body language.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what a play!
“Jefferson in the back-court, pressured by Thomas who tips away the pass, it’s tracked-down by Rose, who lobs to Tyrus Thomas for the dunk.”
Athleticism, defense, transition, good decisions, and FINISH!
This is the future man!
Wow, that was the S*H**T man!
:-)
P.S. Less Thabo, More Ben Gordon.
Just sayin’……
by rtblues on Oct 29, 2008 4:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That sequence didn't make the ESPN tp 10 plays of the night
3 Laker highlights did.
*shaking my head
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where's Matt at now?
.. Kirk Did Awesome, BG proved why he’s only half of a shooting guard.
Luol actually surprised me, he’s startin to go up STRONG. I woulda liked to see Gray match up with Bogut sometime during the game, but other than that.. It looks like the bulls are going to be damn fun to watch this year
by Los on Oct 29, 2008 5:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Where did BG prove he was only half a SG?
Was that when he allowed Redd to get 3 quick 3’s at the start of the second half?
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You saw how Redd got those three's, right?
Who had to help out on Charlie V and RJ?
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am sure Thabo's
defensive assignment was not to leave Redd open to help out guarding lesser threats. Leaving Redd a good three steps away from you at the thee point line three times in a row is idiotic.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 29, 2008 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am sure the defense was supposed to rotate quicker
you know, the help defense VDN has been preaching, not to be afraid to help out (Thabo) because the man you leave behind will have a defender rotate over to him. The assists to Redd on those threes in the 3rd quarter came from Charlie V. and RJ.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny how that only happened
when Thabo was on the floor. I guess the other guys were not rotating only then.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 29, 2008 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They weren't rotating all night
and got bailed out at times by RJ’s poor shooting night. The defense could have been better overall. BG got hit with his share of Redd in the 3rd and 4th as well, let’s not pretend Redd scored all 30 on Thabo. He did score about 15 on him, though.’
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
VDN's on it
After a film session, Del Negro said defensive rotations and transition were his emphases for improvement.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabo got worked by Redd
no question, and not trying to paint a picture that says otherwise. He needs to play better, but he needs his 12-15 MPG each night to do that and this team will need contributions from him this season.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He can get those minutes
from the bench. Starting him just to yank him is not good for development.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 29, 2008 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he's on the bench
he’s not going to see those 12-15 MPG. Hughes will.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So it's either Thabo to start or Hughes for garbage time?
So if Thabo starts, Hughes won’t sniff the court? If that’s the case, why wouldn’t Del Negro play Hughes over Gordon or Hinrich later in the game?
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just have this
awful feeling that Vinny will start Hughes when he comes back. It should never happen but it will.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know...
…and, from the looks of one of the comments below, it’s only because they’re “big”. BLECH!!!
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well there are a few weeks left before
Hughes comes back and I hope Kirk and BG show Vinny without doubt Hughes has few playing minutes on this team.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, Hughes screws everything up
but I’ll worry about that in 2-4 weeks, not today.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also think VDN is committed to playing a big guard
at the 2 for a decent amount of minutes. I don’t blame him, so it’s either Thabo or Hughes getting those big guard minutes. If both get those minutes, then I don’t know who will get screwed between Kirk and BG.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not sure I follow
your meaning there. I don’t think starting Thabo means Hughes will not play.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 29, 2008 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In an ideal world, it would
but I agree with you. But I do think not starting Thabo means that Thabo will not play when Hughes returns.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone got worked by Redd.
He shot over Tyrus…He shot over BG…He shot over anyone who was on him…That is the one thing Redd does well, shoot threes.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know
it’s like they just saw Redd scoring and assumed Thabo’s fault. On at least 2, Thabo was rotating and the guy intended to rotate to Redd never did (in one case I caught it was Tyrus).
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't assume it was Thabo's fault
To me, last night just hammered home the point that when you play an elite shooting guard, they’re going to find a way to get their points. If your “defensive ace” can’t slow him down, then you’re better off putting out there a guy who can actually score some points himself.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
yes. yes. yes.
exactly.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And they did just that.
Last I saw Thabo got half the minutes both BG and Kirk did. What’s the problem again?
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it should be less than half
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was
Thabo got 12 minutes, BG and Kirk had 26 apiece.
by messwiththebull on Oct 29, 2008 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's been said elsewhere in this post, but warrants repeating
Rose, Gordon, and Hinrich are all so much better than Thabo that it’s hard to justify giving him even some development minutes in each game.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya got me.
?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Against a team that's not "the worst in the East"
those are wasted minutes.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what happens
when you take a one game sample size.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great start to the year
All the above and in the game thread captured what I feel. Rose seems to be the glue that can lift this team. TT was terrific. 41 minutes does send a message that TT is a key member of this team. I hope our enthusiasm doesn’t get wiped out in Boston. Great night!
by chgobr on Oct 29, 2008 7:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Bulls should use this starting lineup- Rose, Gordon, Deng, Thomas, Noah. They each play 30 minutes.
2nd unit- hinrich, hughes/sef, nocioni, gooden, gray 18 minutes each. Give or take a few minutes depending how well they play.
NBA Gauntlet for team and player analysis
by mindfeck on Oct 29, 2008 8:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Got's to Love It
The thing I enjoyed the most last night was the ball movement. Everyone was passing the ball and rotating on offense. It was beautiful. There were the times when Hinrich was running point and he did his old routine of standing still and dribbling back to the half court line. But at the same time he would wake up and start moving around as if they have been working with him……
I don’t know if it was just me or did anyone else notice that when Gordon first came out in the game; that they did not pass him the ball right away. He would be wide open and they would look at him and pass it to some one else. This happened for the first three plays he was out there.
by J Theory on Oct 29, 2008 8:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Watched the game from the Milwaukee feed
Every time Gordon touched the ball, you could hear some ignorant drunkard shouting “You suck Ben, you suck. Trade Gordon! Trade Gordon now”. As much as I was enjoying watching the game last night, couldn’t help but get pissed off at the sound of that guy’s voice. Ben’s an integral piece to this team and if last night served as a baseline for how they can perform, I think a playoff spot will be hard to miss out out.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 8:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
where I sat
it was a pretty pro-Ben crowd. I was worried that the contract talk would cause many to turn on him.
Though who knew BaB-Bass had the connections to sit behind the bench?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do in fact have connections in Chicago
Nothing I can get into here, though….
But I can tell you that I’,m neither a drunkard or an ignoramous. And the behavior described by snley is something I don’t condone and would never do. Even if it were Larry Hughes (and that’s saying something)
As long as BG is a Bull I want him to be the best he can be. That may be hard for you to wrap your head around seeing your apparent disgust for players like Gray, Nocioni and Thabo.
(Side note: Nocioni was a team-best +16 today, better than BG’s +13. Obviously you neglect to mention this in your evaluation of player performances…)
by BAB-Bass on Oct 29, 2008 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The behavior is what I was describing as that of an "ignorant drunkard", not the opinion
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I got that :)
The post was directed at Matt, not you ;)
by BAB-Bass on Oct 29, 2008 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mention any +/-
on a game-by-game basis it’s more useful to assign it to lineups, not players. Noc didn’t really do anything of note (good or bad) so there was nothing much to say. Do you have any analysis of his game or just the +16?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cheerleading on the court
Grit of impenetrable steel.
I got nothing on that +16 other than his defender couldn’t afford to leave him to guard Kirk, Deng, Rose or Gordon.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you didn't.
You didn’t mention him amongst the people who contributed.
To me the point is scoring more than the opponents…
When your team outscores the enemy by 16 points in the 18 minutes you play you’re contributing in some kind of way. Don’t really care if it shows up in your normal easily statisticizable (Yes, I just made that word up) box scores.
Intangibles, I believe it’s called.
I believe in them. You don’t. That’s fine.
by BAB-Bass on Oct 29, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well let me know then: what did he do?
he did have a nice rebound where he also managed to take down two Bucks to the floor before they could get back on defense. You’re correct that it does not show up in the boxscore. Well, the rebound did, but that other stuff…
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let you know what the did?
This isn’t meant to be rude… But you do know what “intangible” means, right?
by BAB-Bass on Oct 29, 2008 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um, intangibles are still evident somehow
You can say something like “Garnett changed the culture of the Celtics.” “D’Antoni got the Suns to buy into his philosophy.”
You need to get over your nit-picking habits. If you want exhaustive play-by-play breakdown of what Noce contributes, then ask Hubie Brown or Doug Collins. Noce didn’t have a huge game, but if he makes a good defensive rotation it deserves its own bullet point? He obviously didn’t have a bad game, but it’s not like I would value what he did over the value of the 5 other players who were far more important yesterday (Kirk, Rose, BG, Deng, Tyrus) just because of +/- numbers.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Oct 29, 2008 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken.
I will nit-pick less. (or at least try… ;) )
by BAB-Bass on Oct 31, 2008 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it means you can't quantify it
but you can at least give me some anecdotes.
Unless you’re confusing intangibles with ‘magic’.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you also have to look at who he is playing against
your +/- is going to be higher against Charlie Bell and Dan Gadzuric than it is against Redd and Bogut. The Bulls have a great bench. It wouldn’t surprise me if the Bulls bench +/- was harder than the Bulls starters all year. They are going to be playing against the other teams bench and they SHOULD have an advantage
by DangerMouse on Oct 29, 2008 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Matt's not going to give Noc credit
for his time on the floor.
The coaches will. They’re aware that your 2nd unit is judged as a whole and when they go out there and put up +16 numbers together they really did a lot of thing right.
Besides, Matt wants Gordon to start which would take +8 of that +16 and move it to the 1st unit.
Can you twist this into a Matt bias against Noc? I think so. But he really doesn’t like Noc as is and really doesn’t like Noc as a 38 million dollar contract. I can’t really harp on him for the latter. Noc is way too expensive as a 2nd unit guy that is unlikely to ever be a 1st unit player.
by NBA Observer on Oct 30, 2008 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still waiting to hear all these things Noc actually did on Tuesday
Just quoting a +/- number is lazy. I watched him and he didn’t do much. Though it’s better when he’s actively submarining things.
That lineup does get credit for being productive, absolutely.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 30, 2008 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My theory
You’ll never see it. At least not when the reflection is positive. You will see it when it is negative.
Question for ya. Paul Pierce was the MVP of the NBA Finals last year. Who was the most important player on the Celtics in their wins?
by NBA Observer on Oct 30, 2008 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHAT HE DID THAT MY BIAS MADE ME MISS???
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 30, 2008 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no they can't
NBAO…come on man…are you suggesting that Noc is the Bulls most important player??
by NormVanBeer on Oct 30, 2008 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a pretty comical comparison
So you’re saying one of the greatest PFs of our generation might have contributed to a NBA title with his hard-nosed defense (which by the way isn’t intangible. You could see KG defending, rotating, boxing out, blocking shots, etc).
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Oct 30, 2008 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's even worse
You’re rooting for one of the Bulls players to play badly just so you can be right?
You don’t really sound like a Bulls-fan to me. No offense…
by BAB-Bass on Oct 30, 2008 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
ya know, I didn’t catch that. It’s meant to say its EASIER to identify when he’s mucking things up. It’s not ‘better’. May I never stoop to that level.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 30, 2008 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As far as "Behind the numbers" of the 16+
Like I said it’s intangible so it doesn’t show up in the stats.
Think we’re just gonna have to agrre to disagree on this.
I won’t expect you to recognize Nocionis contributions in the future.. ;) (At least I will try to…)
by BAB-Bass on Oct 31, 2008 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
argh
I recognize it doesn’t show up in the stats (though +16 is a stat, no?). It should show up SOMEWHERE. I am not content with hearing that they exist but nobody (not just me, apparently, since I’ve asked several times )saw it.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 31, 2008 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I'm realizing this
So I’m just gonna let it be.
by BAB-Bass on Oct 31, 2008 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We won, but we were better than I expected
Reviewing the game flow you can see where the game shifts dramatically as Ben Gordon AND Andres Nocioni enter the game with under 5 minutes remaining in the 3rd quarter. The other lineup change is an exiting Derrick Rose.
Hinrich played really well in this stretch, the team rebounded, they missed too many close shots in the paint, but they did rebound the misses as it was Noah and Thomas playing “Rodman” stat padding right next to the rim. However, this same stretch was defended by Lue, Bell, Redd, Allen, and Gadzuric. With a stronger 5 man defensive unit, the intensity of the Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Noc, Noah probably isn’t as strong.
The 50.6 FG% was a delight.
I missed most of the first half but did catch the commentary claiming that free throw shooting was keeping us in the game. We finishd the game +24 in FTA. Nice. The officials were not giving Jefferson his expected 6 fouls against while shooting, although he was begging for them. The Bucks also were +12 in the foul category. Yay Skiles defense.
One thing to watch from the Skiles Bucks is how they use Bogut. He is a low post threat, but you have to get him the ball and he needs to put up shots. He was getting it last night, but passing out to the perimeter trying to come rom down 6, down 8, down 10. We should be able to tell if a Skiles team just cant get points in the paint because his coaching strategy consistently goes away from it.
As for Rose, more please. More with Gordon please. The closing minutes were a pleasure to watch with the Rose, Gordon, Deng, THomas, Gooden group. I’d like to see more Noah closing games, but I expect he will be out there as the center if the game is close. We’ll need stops and noah gives us a better chance to get them than Gooden.
Short short analysis: The Skiles team that doesn’t rebound is a guaranteed loser.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 8:37 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
i really wish
popcorn machine would get some updated pictures
by NormVanBeer on Oct 29, 2008 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk looks like he's 15 years old
lol
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's recap:
—Luol Deng played like one would expect from him. Nothing more, nothing less. No worries there.
—Thabo should not be playing except in limited-minute roles. Gordon and Hinrich are such far superior basketball players, it is actually kind of funny. That the coach might forget to play Thabo “development” minutes is not an excuse to start him.
—Gordon is awesome and showed why he should play a lot.
—Hinrich, too, had a very good game. Hinrich and Gordon should get 60 minutes between the two of them. For everyone who said even though Thabo is starting, Gordon/Hinrich will still “get their minutes”, they obviously did not.
—Noah is awesome.
—Thomas is awesome, independently of DRose.
This is an exciting team. The more the coaches start actually playing the better players, the more exciting it will be.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 8:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Every player who played had a positive overall impact...
…except Thabo. Yet, he “deserves” to start. Logical.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He started to pick up those two fouls
so Hinrich and Gordon didn’t have to pick them up.
Redd is going to score. Ray Allen is going to score on Friday. Thabo probably starts that game as well in order to pick up the fouls so Hinrich and Gordon won’t have to.
Wear down these shooters with Thabo’s defense. Wear down these shooters by making them chase Ben Gordon’s offense.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You really think that's the plan?
Starting the game w/ an intentional fouler of jumpshooters? If so, again, it did not slow Michael Redd down. yes, those guys will score, but they didn’t slow him down at all, considering 30 ppg will almost definitely be more than his season avg.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not the exact plan
but rather the expected outcome. Redd’s offense draws fouls whether he shoots it or not. Just chasing him draws fouls as the defender sometimes tugs or hip curls around the screener to keep up.
I’d rather Thabo absorb those fouls early than have Hinrich or Gordon get them and have to sit because they’re in foul trouble.
I missed the first quarter so I don’t have any recollection of what Thabo did. I just have the written reports.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think if that's the strategy you want
Hinrich can be the designated fouler.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That mucks up the rotation
You need Kirk to enter to spell Rose because he’s the only other ball handling option. If it’s anyone other than Kirk it’s 5 seconds off the shot clock to start because just to get to set up an offense will be delayed with ball pressure from the opponent.
Kirk showed you last night that he can lead the second unit effectively when he has Gordon and Noc and sometimes Deng as options to distribute to.
Look at it your way. Kirk starts with Rose. Kirk picks up the fouls. Gordon enters. Bulls score some points. Rose needs a rest. Thabo enters. Now it’s Thabo and Gordon for 6-8 minutes until Rose is ready and/or time has lapsed for Kirk’s foul trouble to let him come back in.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why are we picking fouls up again?
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 29, 2008 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know, I was playing along with NBAO's strategy. :)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're not intentional
They are predictable. The good shooters that receive double screens do draw more fouls unless their defenders know they have stellar defensive rotation from their teammates as the play occurs.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah...
I think that’s a bit too much strategy.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
solution
never take Rose off the court :)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Problem
His stamina drops off the map around mid February.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not so much his stamina
But the knee Tendonitis might become an issue again.
by RogersPark Kris on Oct 29, 2008 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just watched hi-lights on NBA.com...
…what did everyone think of Tyrus Thomas’s steal, dribble leading the fast break, w/ a pass to “can’t-finish” Ben Gordon?
And then they cut away to Skiles scowling. AWESOME!!!
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've never had a problem with Tyrus leading the break. Didn't get to see that play.
But, I loved the play where the Bucks trapped Derrick Rose at halfcourt to get the ball out his hands, Derrick found Tyrus in the middle of the court, and Tyrus created a 4 on 3 situation finding Noah under the basket for a dunk. There’s only a handful of PFs that can punish a team for trapping like that.
by Scotter on Oct 29, 2008 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's on the espn.com
recap, if you go to the recap over there.
by Jaina on Oct 29, 2008 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They'll Pay
every time they try to trap Rose. Dallas tried it, and the Bulls came back for 20+ down in the 4th. He’s simply too good with the ball.
by Cannoli on Oct 29, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was a ridiculously awesome play
That’s where I was screaming for more T2 and Noah this year…..
I loved seeing Tyrus play a pseudo SF role at times in the offense…
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I stopped the DVR
and replayed that for my roommate. I’ve been telling him how awesome Rose is, and used that as an example of something he does that doesn’t show up in the box score. They were trapping Rose because they wanted the ball out of his hands, that would never happen for any of our other “point” guards. That led to an easy bucket that we wouldn’t have got last year.
by runningman on Oct 29, 2008 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great regular season team
This team has quality guys up to 9 or 10 into the rotation. During a grueling 82 game season, they should be able to win alot of back-to-backs and 4 in 5 night games because of their depth. This might not translate into playoff series wins, but during the grind when alot of teams are not bringing their A game, the Bulls should do well…IMO.
by MuleTrain on Oct 29, 2008 8:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's what they've always been.
and I agree about this team.
Hopefully, though, guys like Rose, Thomas, Noah and Deng are still young enough that at least two of them will get over that plateau into “really goodness/greatness”.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Value BG and TT, trade Hughes and... what do we do with Thabo?
BG is a great player and should start beside Rose. Especially now with Hinrich returning to good form. BG struggles, let him take some air. And TT… man! And he is just a kid. He will be great. Charles Barkley style.
Hughes has no place and Thabo has potential but it doesn’t make sense having him playing so much with the Rose/BG/Kirk trio. Maybe he too should be traded or used to sweeten Larry’s trade
by JustAnotherFan on Oct 29, 2008 9:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We need Thabo's length
But if we have to package him with Hughes to move Hughes that is OK so long as we’re getting back another guard. Preferably one that is tall and quick.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the backcourt of the future
is either Rose/Gordon or Rose/Hinrich. The point is you need a low cost 3rd guard to play 20 mpg. That’s what Thabo has a shot at becoming. Playing him can help determine if he’s right for that spot. If they do go Rose/Gordon, Thabo seems like a great low cost complement.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um...
They should first figure out if Gordon or Hinrich (one or the other, that is) can play 30-35 minutes next to Rose. That decision MUST be made this year. They just picked up Thabo’s option for 2009-2010. They can worry, if they’d like, about his situation after they’ve settled who the starters will be.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't agree more
but 10 minutes a game from Thabo won’t slow that. Now if Hughes comes back…..
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
um, yes it will
if it’s 10 minutes with Rose
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
If Rose plays 35 minutes, and Thabo is playing w/ him 10 of those, that leaves 25 minutes between Gordon and Hinrich. I’d rather have the full 35. Figure out the “best players”. Worry about the supporting cast later.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok but
it’s not like after 82 games of 25 minutes they’ll know less than if they played 82 games of 35 mintues. It will sort itself out long before then. In the meantime we still need to decide if Thabo is good enough to be the 3rd guard here long term.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But if you want to know about Thabo...They can deal w/ Thabo next yer.
And it’s 1/3 of the Rose’s playing time. That’s a lot. Would they know more 2,400 minutes than in 1,600? I think so. The larger the sample size, the better.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just don't see why we'll need a larger sample size,
given the variance of skills and abilities of Gordon/Hinrich. I think it will be pretty obvious who fits better with Rose and who should be moved.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But what if it isn't?
Or what if Hinrich gets hurt for a third of the season? it’d be nice to have that time back. Thabo is not that important this year. Like I said, figure things out between Hinrich and Gordon, move the other, and give Thabo 25 mins per game next year if ya want.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus!! (Gordon & Vinny, too)
Tyrus was fantastic. It was a pleasure to see him play so well with all those minutes – but that was a lot of minutes. A great start, hopefully he’ll evolve into a 20 & 10 guy if he’s going to avg 40mpg.
Gordon had me shaking my head in the first half when he wasn’t playing well. I was surprised he was not the 1st guard off the bench, and feared his poor play was a sign he wouldn’t get much burn in the 2nd half (or even the rest of the season!).
But Gordon got his touch back in the second, and looked like the guy I remember. It will be interesting to see how he’s used as the season progresses.
I think the most promising trend I noticed last night was that Vinny will let these guys play through their mistakes. He let everyone play through and get the feel of the game (with the exception of Thabo and his 2 fouls in 6 seconds). This was true especially with the way Kirk & Gordon started out.
What a refreshing trend that is! I liked Skiles as a coach, and missed him when Boylan was running things. But it appears that Vinny has a lighter touch with the players which is needed right now. We’ll see if can hold them accountable (privately or publicly) when that time comes.
"I'm very important. I have many leather-bound books and my apartment smells of rich mahogany." - Ron Burgundy
by mdmnd9294 on Oct 29, 2008 9:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
mabe Vinny DID think about starting Ben
his comments in the Sun-Times:
‘’I just thought with Larry [Hughes] being out [shoulder] and Ben [Gordon] missing most of training camp, [the 6-7] Thabo gives us more size,’’ Del Negro said before the game. ‘’With Kirk coming off the bench, it helps our second unit. Like I’ve said all along, we’re going to have flexibility with the starting lineup.’’
To me, that sounds like he either wanted to go with Hughes or Ben, but only went with Thabo kinda by attrition.
by NormVanBeer on Oct 29, 2008 9:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting.
I like the Hinrich as second-unit-bringer-of-energy/ability-guy. (Although, if he wasn’t going to start Gordon, Hinrich still should have been the starter.) If either Rose or Gordon are starting poorly, Hinrich can spell either.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The good news is that with Thabo starting
he was still +3 in his stint and thus he departed the game with the Bulls in the lead. Once Hinrich entered the game the Bucks shifted the momentum, took the lead, and held it until Derrick Rose came back in for Kirk.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not enough
I refuse to be content with a result if there’s a possibility they could’ve done better. Maybe they could’ve been +6?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
It’s not “good enough” to win handily against the “worst team in the East”. Gordon and Hinrich were so much better than Thabo the whole game, it’s really, really tough to argue (because there is no factual evidence for it) they wouldn’t have won by even more had his 11+ been split between those two. Against a better team, that matters.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabo was the only Bull yesterday with a Negative +/-, and really he was the only player who played poorly (Nocioni played ok, not great, but definately not bad):
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because of the 2nd half start
-6 in that stint.
He close a -2, but he was a wash(zero) if you subtract the last 76 seconds of garbage time.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was merely
indicating that not only did Thabo not look good or as efficient as the rest of our guards, but it showed up in the stats, where his +/- was the only one in the negative and 5 pts off his next closest performer on our team.
I don’t care so much that a -2, that’s minor….but the stats illustrate more what I saw in watching the game (And I didn’t like what I saw). I think it was despite Thabo’s poor play that we were only -2 when he was out there (as early on Gooden, Tyrus, Rose and most especially Deng played really well in Thabo’s first stint in the game).
I know it’s one game and wouldn’t be so down on Thabo if we didn’t ahve 2 light year’s better guards on our team, but facts are facts Gordon and Hinrich are light years better than Thabo….the game 1 experience on O and D proved it. Let’s focus on playing what we have first, rather than constantly thinking (future) especially when this future guy is only 11 months younger than our already solid and much better Gordon….
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please don't make me start shouting sample size already!
Being up or down roughly a basket less than halfway through the very first quarter of the season tells us absolutely nothing. The +/- for a single game are totally meaningless beyond the fun of discussing them, much less the +/- stats for a few minutes.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 29, 2008 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read my other posts
Before you start making judgments on a post you weren’t involved in.
The sample size for Thabo has been his career to date and the preaseason. He is an average player, who has not had the major strides of improvement…..but mostly he’s a poor shooter, and we have 2 VERY MUCH BETTER NOW and always will be better guards in Hinrich and Gordon who can play now and can play letter at at least an above average clip.
That’s the argument. Last night’s game was just another incident of a poor Thabo game.
I like Thabo, without Rose on our team, I’d be all for his development as our 3rd lead guard….but let’s face the facts, we have Rose, he needs some scorers beside him, Gordon’s a top scorer in this league (not a top player, but pure scorer/shooter, Gordon is as good as any for the minutes he plays)…..Hinrich has that hint of combo in him, but also can take PG responsibilities in stretches to either give Rose a breather or to have a 2 PG attack.
Thabo, well he’s a decent defender (not in Kirk’s league there though), he’s tall though. He can pass at times ok, he makes a lot of turnovers, he’s very apt to self confidence issues, he can’t shoot well, and he still is making rookie mistakes in his 3rd year.
Facts are Facts though regardless….Thabo will never be much more than an average guard in this league, and therefore he’ll never be in a Gordon class….and he’s not in the Hinrich class now at all….it’s silly all this Thabo needs to play 25 MPG talks…..have you watched him? With our gluttony of guards, it’s just not worth the effort.
by majoyenrac on Oct 30, 2008 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read all the comments
And if you notice, I specifically responded to NBAO’s use of +/- over a 4 minute period at the beginning of a game. That Thabo played 4 minutes to start the game and the Bulls were up by 3 points when he left is a fact, but it’s completely meaningless as far as any significance. Who the hell cares? It’s lovely that the Bulls were up by 3 at the specific point he was pulled, as opposed by down by 3, but you’re still talking a single possession away from potentially being tied and he was pulled with the Bucks in possession.
And if you’ve read any of my other posts, you know I’m one of the biggest (and few) vocal Kirk fans around here. I like Ben, too, and think he’s our best option at SG. I wasn’t disagreeing with you at all. But thanks for reminding me to read before making judgments. ;)
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 30, 2008 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No problem
I thought you were bashing me that’s all…
by majoyenrac on Oct 30, 2008 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
None of this changes the facts that when Thabo left the game the Bucks went on a run, took the lead, while the only thing the Bulls were doing to stay in the game was drawing fouls(good) to get to the line(still good).
But yea, sample size. It matters. Not that I made any argument that it doesn’t matter nor did I say everything in game 1 was indicative of how that will extend to more games.
by NBA Observer on Oct 30, 2008 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To me, Thabo has to actually show something
considering he didn’t earn the starting spot in the first place, he has to be a difference-maker to keep it. Just being out there and continuing his bad preseason isn’t enough, even if they win.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 30, 2008 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to see Gordon start too.
He ‘earned’ it or something like that. Joking aside, we both wanted Gordon to start the opener. Ben Gordon is better.
We want the same things. We want the most out of players that can do what we ask of them. I just want to give VDN the chance to show me what he’s got before I crap all over him.
by NBA Observer on Oct 30, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about
we just go for the “best” players period, that’s an idea. What happens if the most out of someone isn’t as good as someone else?
i.e. – the most out of Thabo will never equal an average Ben (offensively)
by NormVanBeer on Oct 30, 2008 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
THe only reason we’re going with Hughes is to hope he has a few of those pre injury T-Wolves games early in the year in the hope we can pull off a deadline trade. That’s also why there’s all this “Hughes had a great preseason” crap.
I hope he does it (plays well enough so we can trade him)….Thabo will be relegated to the bench then….and get little or no burn until mid season (if the Hughes trade doesn’t happen, then Hughes’ll be benched). Until then, we’ll see the Jacker play quite a bit, look awful in 4-5 straight games, have a huge game and have the announcers talk of how solid he’s been playing in the hopes of promoting trade value subconciously. Hell it worked with Big Ben (Ben was really active tonight on games where Ben mailed it in completely)…
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was an ecouraging game to watch
I think we can safely say the Bulls will win more than 33 games like most “experts” are saying.
My brief synopsis:
Thabo: Did not look good, but to be fair, Redd was locked in last night and he was going to score 30 no matter who was guarding him. If Thabo isn’t going to help you defensively, then he should sit (which is what ended up happening).
Rose: Did not shoot well (and looked very hesitant to take any shot outside of 15 feet) but found ways to contribute. You can tell he has really made an impact in getting this team into more of an uptempo, fast break mode on offense.
TT: Very active, cut down on his stupid early fouls, was a presence down low. Still needs to work on his interior moves, but overall his performance was very promising.
Deng: Showed some early assertiveness and played well early. I don’t quite understand why he disappears late in the game. Perhaps he gets tired and starts to settle with those 25+ feet jumpers that are out of his range.
Gooden: Playing out of position. Looks to be more comfortable coming off the bench and playing the 4.
Hinrich: Playing with a chip on his shoulder. No matter how much of a “team player” he is, you just know he does not like a rookie pg coming in and taking his spot right off the bat. At least his trade value is increasing.
Gordon: came out shooting. Gordon will never be known as “gun-shy”. Struggled a bit early with his finishes near the basket, but rebounded from a shakey early start to shoot lights out. Defensively, I thought he played well at the keys, but get him down low in any kind of post position and you can do whatever to him. Still, of all the back court possible combinations , a Rose/Gordon one would be my starting choice.
Noah: Brought great energy off the bench and really played well. was a force defensively and on the boards. Offensively, not much of a factor last night.
Boston will pose all kinds of match up problems, but for now, things are looking up.
by RogersPark Kris on Oct 29, 2008 9:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
agree with your assessments in general
eventually I’m going to want Noah to be our starting center. He was very good in limited minutes, and frankly, he need his defensive intensity in there.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng also disappeared at the end of the game
because he played less than half the quarter.
"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."
by jpchi on Oct 29, 2008 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry to manage expectations
but Deng is not going to average 30 points a night. Sheesh….
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um...okay...
I don’t expect him to, I was just looking at the game flow and saw that might be an explanation. I’m sorry if you thought my explanation inferred that I thought he was going to average 30 in this league…
"Worker bees can leave.
Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave."
by jpchi on Oct 29, 2008 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry
meant to jab at Kris for the initial ‘disappear’ comment.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
I don’t think he’d score 30 pts a night, and wouldn’t expect him too. Facts are though he looked awesome in the first and second quarter, decent in the 3rd, and a forgotten shadow in the 4th.
It’s one game though, but unfortunately with Deng that’s been the case for his entire career sans the 1 series against Antoinne Walker.
But I would hardly call yesterday a bad Deng game, it was a great Deng game….still there are reasons for concern because he could do more on most nights.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't everyone's favorite "last piece of a championship team" James Posey guard him in that series as well?
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Posey
Focused mostly on Gordon (rewatch). Riley doubled up Gordon and tripled up Gordon because the Skilesian Bulls ran the same plays 98.5% of the time that featured Gordon and everyone else normally stood around and watched….but with Walker on Deng, Skiles knew he had the man.
THe few times Riley tried to put Posey on Deng, Gordon would light them up.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haven't watched anything from that series in quite some time
But, Deng was on the court a lot more than Walker
Game 1
LD 45 min JP 28 AW 30
Game 2
LD 39 JP 30 AW 24
Game 3
LD 36 JP 36 AW 23
Game 4
LD 43 JP 44 AW 15
Seems to me someone other than Walker must have been guarding Deng. Without watching the tape, I’d assume a large chunk of that fell to Posey.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 29, 2008 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It did, though a lot of times Posey/Walker were on the court together
Posey was able to prevent Deng from cutting to the basket as easily, but his jumpshot was so money that series that he was still able to get his baskets with a better defender on him.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Oct 29, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he disappeared in the 4th
because they were going to Gordon. They can’t shoot the ball at the same time. When one guy is scoring, the other guy shouldn’t go, “hey, its my turn.” That is the Larry Hughes brand of basketball.
I’m sick of people saying he disappeared in the 4th. He played last than half the 4th and Gordon had it going.
by DangerMouse on Oct 29, 2008 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
That was that game
Deng always disappears int he 4th…and while we went to Gordon for a few shots, had Deng been aggressive like he was in the start of the game we’d go for him.
Have you watched Deng the past 4 years? Don’t get sick of folks saying that he disappears in the 4th. The reason folks say it is HE DOES.
Now Deng’s a good player, but it’s that disappearance that keeps him good and not all star….
One game or two games is one thing, but not every game.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
doesn't matter anymore anyway
Rose is going to be the 4th quarter go-to guy. I’m ok with Deng staying ‘good’
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know and agree.
I’m just rebutting DangerMouse here.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought jpchi's point was....
…Deng only played five minutes, and only took one shot. Still had a block, rebound, assist. It was okay to “disappear” for this game at least. The team was ahead and others were showing up.
by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you
are wrong on your “Kirk has a chip on his shoulder” crap. He has shown no signs of this at all. How do you know he’s not OK with Derrick taking his spot? From all I’ve read he’s been great with Derrick.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk was vocal and standing
while watching his teammates from the bench.
This Kirk is “cranky” crap is completely unfounded. It should stop.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I know Rose has metioned
that Kirk has been very helpful in showing him the ropes. I think Kirk can really shine in this role as Rose’s backup this year if he excepts it all year long. It gives us incredible depth at the guard spots.
by kig on Oct 29, 2008 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really think he
would be happy in this role. Maybe in a way it takes pressure off him.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He suits great for the role
His contract, however, not so much
by CJOliveira on Oct 29, 2008 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe the organization
isn’t worried about his contract as some in here are.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they should be
since they’re the ones all Tax-scared.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You worry too
much over stuff you have no control over.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's called fandom.
maybe if you worried more you could contribute to the discussion.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
rawr
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Oct 29, 2008 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
::drops mic::
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fandom? More like
your obsession of BG making sure he gets his money.
I have real life issues to worry about.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sue come on now
This is a Bulls blog site. This also is presumably Matt’s job (I don’t know if he gets paid, but I presume he does and gets advertising funds—and deserves them for a job well done).
Your comment is ridiculous.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't say anything
that is not the truth. If you think it’s ridiculous so be it.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe you had some background or this was a joke...
but the whole “I have real life issues to worry about” thing I thought was you demoting Matt for doing his job and talking the Bulls on a Bulls web site instead of blabbing on and on about his personal life on here….was a bit much.
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, these are not real issues and this isn't a real job
but I always get surly when that sentiment is shared (and it’s usually by Sue), because whatever your real-life situation, you’re on a sports blog. There’s an inherent perspective of assumed lunacy that comes with that.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know nothing of
Matt’s personal life. I don’t me to demean Matt for the job he does in here. Blogs like this one take a lot of time to do.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, well
saying “you have no control so who cares” and that there’s more “real” issues, is exactly that: demeaning. (‘insulting’ is a better word)
I can take it and all, but that is what it is, so don’t be surprised if I am a jerk about it.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go back and read
what I said. I never said “so who cares”.
I’ve taken insults on here too.
by sue369 on Oct 29, 2008 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Rose and Tyrus come on
Then I bet Jerry opens up the check book…..I just see his point in not doing so after a 49 win team regressed to a 33 team without any real warning signs (given that we were universally hailed as the team to beat in the East with our depth, athleticism, presumed improvements of our solid young guys and coaching)….
by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
consider it spending their way out of the Wallace mistake
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
By "chip" I mean he's using this as motivation
What player would like to be demoted?
by RogersPark Kris on Oct 29, 2008 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In Europe this happens all the time
and players accept the role.
That’s the finesse area where Vinny has to work. How to get guys to play together to win with more players playing 25-30 minutes instead of fewer players playing 40-45 minutes like the Suns played.
by NBA Observer on Oct 29, 2008 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winning is probably key.
If you’ve been demoted and the team is losing…it is quite easy to get frustrated. The whole team was that way last year. If your team is winning and you are contributing you should be relatively happy. Unless you are Hughes and are only worried about your own stat line.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 29, 2008 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

