Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Tobias Harris signs with Tennessee

Could he be coming to the Bulls?

about 1 year ago Rose2_tiny illwill 72 comments 6 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Where would we play him though?

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Oct 28, 2008 11:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Give them

Hughes/Gooden for Harrington.

by Edicus2288i on Oct 28, 2008 11:47 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Jucier

More from Tim Kawakami:

It is not clear if the Warriors–or who on the Warriors–will move with urgency in this situation. There are several teams that are believed to have expressed some interest in Harrington recently, possibly including Chicago and Cleveland.

by Ben Q Rock on Oct 28, 2008 11:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

don't mind his contract

but I really wouldn’t want him to play a lot. He’s basically plays like Nocioni, but acts like a turd.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 12:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nocioni is better ..

but you’re right he not only acts like a turd. but plays like one also.

by exult463 on Oct 30, 2008 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tech9ne fans the flames

http://www.rumorpress.net/?p=57

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 12:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

for Kirk and Sef?

Tempting

B.J. for three.... KABOOM!

by chibullsfan03 on Oct 29, 2008 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about Thabo and Gooden?

I guess that makes us even less “bulky” up front, but I wouldn’t mind having GS rid us of one of our guards. Plus, this would give Noah more time at the 5 which I’d like to see. 19 minutes isn’t enough.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Oct 29, 2008 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The more I think about this though

I don’t see Harrington fitting here with Deng, Noc, and Tyrus who will all presumably still be around.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Oct 29, 2008 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I agree

Harrington’s a good player and all, but with Deng, Noc, and Tyrus he’s superflous, we just add a new glut at the SF/PF spot, and personally I want most of the PF minutes to go.

by majoyenrac on Oct 29, 2008 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that I think it could be an odd fit on this team if we are going

to want to wait and see how Tyrus develops. The only way I do this trade is if we are trading Thabo and one of our forwards, and I don’t know which forward I’d want to trade in this scenario. I think your idea of trading Thabo and Gooden for Harrington is interesting, but what do you think the lineups would be then? Can Tyrus play C? Maybe against a few teams… Does Harrington only play PF position? Would Harrington even start on our team? We aren’t trading Tyrus to get Harrington… The only way I would trade Tyrus this year is if it is for a superstar, and Harrington is an above average player at best.

Hmmm…. this is what I think could happen if it was Thabo and Gooden for Harrington.

Rose/Hinrich
Gordon/Hughes/Hinrich
Deng/Nocioni
Thomas/Harrington
Noah/Gray

Wow, that gets me kind of excited about the trade if it is Gooden and Thabo for Harrington!

by Mattchoo on Oct 29, 2008 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why anyone would want to do...

this, I don’t know, but it sort of works. And it gets “something” for Thabo and Gooden. Helps the back court, but only in giving Thabo’s scrub minutes to Hughes. Just throwing something out there.

by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noc and Thabo seems the most logical package for both the Bulls and Warriors

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 9:03 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah, I'd only consider a deal if Noc is included

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

someone remind me

again why Pax gave Noc that contract. It sucks to see him fitting in perfectly like last night as a backup 3/4, giving energy and hustle and (not last night) some 3 pt range, and you know he’ll never complain about getting only 15-20 mins a game. If only he had a freakin reasonable contract. Bummer. Now we’re stuck in situations like this where (rightfully so) we’d jump at a trade for Harrington if it includes Noc, even though Harrington isn’t half the hustle/energy player Noc is, but has basically the same skill set.

by kig on Oct 29, 2008 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although Harrington

is bigger, more athletic, and a better defender than Noc. Not because he’s a lockdown dude, just because Andres is…not so good there.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noc is a "good" defender insofar as he's tough and never backs down.

He doesn’t care if the offensive player is a star or that he’s going in for a dunk. He’ll get up there and contest it. And he does get above the rim to block dunks pretty frequently for a guy of his size.

But he’s a “bad” defender in terms of abandoning the game plan/ team defense or leaving his man to gamble on a steal too frequently, or to double-team when it’s not the proper thing to do.

Offensively, Harrington is something of a chucker who takes a lot of 3’s even when he’s playing PF instead of SF.

If he could agree to stay down low and play more of a conventional 4 with the Bulls, then I’d be very interested in a potential trade for him.

But the intangibles may still favor Noc. By that I mean that Noc’s cliche’d grittiness and spirit are a very positive influence on younger players. I’m not sure what Al H’s attitude and intangibles will mean to a young team like this. He’s not the crazyman that a Dennis Rodman or Rasheed Wallace type would be, but I don’t think he’s a PJ Brown type either.

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on Oct 29, 2008 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing that Harrington has in his favor

is that his contract is up after this year opposed to Noc’s 4 year contract

by J Theory on Oct 29, 2008 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

His contract is NOT UP after this year.

I don’t know where you get your salary info…He has a player option of over $10 million next season…Do you really think he will leave that much money on the table??? No way he can make up as a free agent.

http://www.storytellerscontracts.info/resources/08-09salaries.htm

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I did not know about the player option

Just went off of the trade machine that states 1 year. Please forgive me.

But it is still less than Noc’s contract and it expires in 2010. Juicy.

by J Theory on Oct 29, 2008 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yuck

Harrington basically wants minutes. At least Noc wouldn’t complain about that.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not in favor of guaranteeing a guy minutes,

especially one who’s not part of the young nucleus the Bulls need to be developing right now.

But on the other hand, I do feel for the guy. Don Nelson may be a basketball genius, but he’s not exactly a piece of cake to get along with. (Can’t find the link now, but he’s apparently had acrimony or even sued his last 5 employers or something like that.) And it seems like in his role with the Warriors, he almost has a Jerry Krause-like need for attention. “Coaches break playoff draughts and revive franchises. Not players.” is what he seems to be saying.

It’s almost as if he feels threatened by star players. He sat Baron Davis for almost an entire game at the end of last season at a time when the Warriors needed to win the game to make the playoffs.

It’s not necessarily that Al H is right in this situation. It’s that Don Nelson seems like kind of a jerk, that’s all.

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on Oct 29, 2008 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah...no thanks

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Oct 29, 2008 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a good sixth man,

but nothing more than that. Including Noc would give us a cap-space component too. But he’s not worth Hinrich, and he’s certainly not worth BG, or either of our young bigs. If they’re really desperate we could try to milk a #1 out of it – not to use, but as a resource for the deadline deal we may actually see this year.

He’d give us serious scoring punch off the bench.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What does Harrington give the Bulls?

That Nocioni and Gooden do not already give us? Um, nothing.

Even with that said, I would offer Larry Hughes for Harrington.

A deal like this could work, we could keep Hendrix and dump Watson.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=35630834353277&teams=9444&te=&cash=

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 9:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What do mean sense for GSW?

I like to watch their games a lot, primarily because they don’t make sense…Larry Hughes would actually fit in their ridiculous line-ups…

In reality, I don’t want Al Harrington…he is a worse version of Nocioni…but taller. But if we can rid of Larry Hughes for Al’s cheaper contract, then I am all for it. I really like Hendrix too, he is one those tough second round picks that could be banger in tough games.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why would GSW

Get rid of Hendrix just to able to get rid of Harrington? His contract is up at the end of the season so if they don’t find something that makes sense they can just sit him and save money at the end of the season.

by J Theory on Oct 29, 2008 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

From what I have seen...

The second round pick Hendrix will be wearing street clothes more often than a uniform this season in Golden State…They barely used first round pick Brandon Wright, who (should) play the same position as Hendrix…

The thing you are missing, when a player demands to be traded, his value is reduced to the point of matching contracts and little more…Granted, that could just play with an unhappy Harrington for the next TWO seasons (he has a player option for nearly $10 million) or try to move him for something of value in return…in this case, Larry Hughes.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In relation to Al Harrington.

Its a wash…neither player really has much value because they are not very good.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Hughes sucks, so why would they want to give Harrington and 2 young players to get him

Nelson may like crazy lineups, but usually his crazy lineups include good players

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shawn Bradley is an obvious exception to that of course

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

Larry Hughes in Nellie ball

I vote for Thomas to play, play more and play regularly.-Sam Smith

by tyrus4prez on Oct 30, 2008 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Harrington offers financial flexibility in the future while replacing what Noc offers for this season

That should be the ideal result from any Kirk/Noc deal

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hehe

yes, it is indeed.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i posted something similar

a week or so ago (it was Williams & Harrington For Kirk) but got the “but Williams sucks” treatment.

I think the Bulls have to look at this…especially if it gets Noc’s contract off the books.

by NormVanBeer on Oct 29, 2008 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Williams does suck, immensely

Bringing in Harrington while Noc is still on the roster doesn’t make sense.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

DUH

as I explained last week, I KNOW he sucks…the point is to get someone in who’s contract is not as much and/or doesn’t require a significant amount of minutes.

And if Harrington was acquired, it would obviously mean that Noc has to be moved

by NormVanBeer on Oct 29, 2008 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, thought we were trying to be realistic about a trade scenario

Realistically, Harrington’s a better offensive player than Noc while likely a wash on D. He has one year left on his contract as opposed to 4 for Noc. Just to amuse you, let’s call Harrington for Noc an even swap in terms of talent. In today’s NBA, if you can get equal talent with a shorter contract, you have to take that deal almost every time. If the Warriors are serious about fulfilling Harrington’s demand to be traded, they likely won’t do much better than Noc. Throwing in Thabo makes the numbers work and offers them a prospect, though not much of one, to sweeten the pot for them a little to take on the remainder of Noc’s contract. Other than maybe you’ll miss seeing Noc flail his body aimlessly around the court, I see absolutely no reason to do this deal.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Realistically

Golden State will probably want a PG in return. Realistically the Bulls will probably pawn off Noc with a PG.

Hinrich is the only extra PG we have.

To make the numbers work the trade makes sense. Brandon Wright is buried behind Randolph in playing time. Williams is buried behind Watson in playing time. Bellini is buried on the bench behind Jackson and Maggette.

IMO if I was the Bulls if Golden State will not take back Noc I would back off, wait until January, and then see if Harrington is still around and work something out with Gordon.

by J Theory on Oct 29, 2008 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think a deal like the one you proposed depends on how much, if any, influence Mullin has left in the front office

Stealing Wright will probably only happen if Nellie and his cronies have total control. Harrington’s a nice replacement for Noc this year and Wright could hopefully fill that role starting next season. I’m not overly impressed by either Williams or Belinelli. I really don’t think either belongs in a team’s regular rotation. In the end, though, I think that would lead to a ton of Rose and Gordon in the backcourt which I’m certainly fine with.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

The Bulls won't have a viable backup SF/PF after this season...

…especially if Gooden turns out to be crap. You lose Thabo, Nocioni and Gooden. I suppose they could go after Hedo or Odom and pay $10 million again for a backup there. Or something. Thabo backs up the 3. Gooden the 4. Nocioni the 3/4. You’re losing any depth they have at SF/PF after this season. You could replace any one of them, but not all three.

by tyger1147 on Oct 29, 2008 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think they'd need to plan to replace all 3

Really, what they’d need is a 4/5, and if Gooden sucks, they’ll need that anyways. Then they’ll need a 3/4 which may be available in free agency. Hell, they might be able to get Harrington back on a one year deal to play that role again. If a large contingent of the NBA is playing for 2010, even guys getting below midlevel next year will have a hard time getting more than a 1 year deal. If the Bulls decide to play the 2010 game, they can get someone on one of those one year deals. If they aren’t, they could probably get a steal like Harrington around full mid-level for 3-4 years. Replacing Thabo shouldn’t be too hard either. Essentially, it’s a warm body to play spot minutes at 2/3.

I think they can go this route and follow the course of 2004-05 → 05-06 → 06-07. Make a strong showing, clean up some cap space while taking a step back on the court, grab a free agent and move forward. Of course, going this route means finding a way to get rid of Hinrich too and doesn’t have the added parachute of Isaiah’s fat boy love.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Oct 29, 2008 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they sweeten the pot a little

with a trade resource, like a #1 or Brendan Wright, it makes sense.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe including a third team would make more sense

How about this witht the Knicks? You know they want to unload Randolph’s contract- his high scoring, poor defense fits perfect with the Warriors. I know he can’t fast break, but he rebounds like crazy and would give them a good half-court option when they need one… and they wouldn’t have to run any plays.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=101770327823563083242&teams=944181818&te=&cash=

We can just tell Q and Nate that if they don’t want to show up in street clothes every game they can just sit at home until we trade them again or their contract expires. It gives us some more flexibility next year. And NY gets a good PF for D’Antoni’s style of play with a short contract, and a prospect in Wright. And Hughes can take on the combined duties of Q and Nate – streaking shooting and boneheadedness at the 1, 2 or 3 spot.

by kig on Oct 29, 2008 10:57 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it's positive for all three teams

We get rid of Hughes and gain some financial flexibility next year

NY is obvious

GS gets a guy that only they can love and would probably thrive in their offense and put up big numbers

by kig on Oct 29, 2008 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like it from the Bulls' perspective

But it worsens the glut at the guard position. Whatever you may think of Nate Robinson, he should be getting regular playing time somewhere, and that place would not be here. I don’t think he’d be a happy camper, but then again he might have trade value.

I don’t see the Warriors trading Brandon Wright, but I could see how the Knicks would want Harrington; he’d be a great fit in D’Antoni’s system.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Oct 30, 2008 12:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think the Warriors intend to trade him.

Considering coach Nelson just named him a team captain.

Additionally in that article it says that Nellie is considering using Maggette at PF…reiterating my point that the Warriors don’t make sense.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 12:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Kirk was named captain too.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 29, 2008 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What does that have to do with Harrington?

Kirk has not demanded a trade. By all accounts, Kirk has been a model citizen and handled his benching quite well…Harrington is like the opposite…and he is a starter.

"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson

by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 29, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

From Rotoworld

LINK

Contacted by 48minutes.net on Tuesday, Al Harrington denied reports that he has demanded a trade from the Warriors.
“I haven’t said that to anybody,” Harrington said. “I’m being honest with you. Training camp went perfect. Coach told me I’m one of his guys, he’s gonna play me as much as I want.” Don Nelson also denied the reports. Whether Harrington demanded a trade or not, it still sounds like some trade talks are in the work, potentially involving Bulls PG Kirk Hinrich. Check back soon for updates. Oct. 29 – 8:57 am e

by Option27 on Oct 29, 2008 2:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

good lord,

Hinrich is much more valuable than Harrington.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hollinger posted a great potential trade

Harrington and Marcus Williams for Felton and Adam Morrison. That makes so much sense I’m surprised it hasn’t happened yet.

by CJ Bulls on Oct 29, 2008 3:43 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That is good.

Much better than anything we should offer.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Oct 29, 2008 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only reason I kinda like Harrington

is because he can score with his back to the basket, but thats when he is not chucking up threes. Add to the fact that he can’t rebound for shit. I would trade him for Hughes straght up.

Homecoming

by illwill on Oct 29, 2008 4:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Noc for Harrington hurts our cap position next year

makes it less possible to re-sign Gordon, and replaces a well-liked player with a guy who’s likely to bitch about being in a crowded frontcourt.

In the longer run, of course, it helps finances.

I don’t mind Harrington in the abstract, but in practice I don’t see how we can make this work. It just exchanges one set of problems for another set of problems of pretty much equal badness.

by Sports2 on Oct 29, 2008 8:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Kirk and Thabo for Camby?

Just to try and make something that’d work financially and on the court for us, how about this?

Bulls trade Kirk and Thabo to the Warriors who trade Harrington to the Clippers and CJ Watson back to us. The Clippers trade Camby to us.

This works for the Bulls because we get a useful center in Camby and one who will save us money (he will cost $10.65M next year, while Kirk+Thabo will cost about $12.5M. So that gives us $2M extra to work with under the luxury tax threshold, which makes it more possible to either 1) resign Gordon or 2) accept something back in a sign and trade.

1- Rose, Miles
2- Gordon, Hughes
3- Deng, Noc
4- Tyrus, Gooden
5- Camby, Noah

I’d be mildly optimistic that the Clippers would go for this because Harrington seems like a real PF who would compliment Kamen better than Camby will. And he’s a little cheaper, which always warms Donald Sterling’s heart.

Golden State, I think, would like this deal.

It’s not a perfect deal for us, because we end up with probably not enough minutes to go around in the frontcourt, but we do end up with a somewhat better team on a more solid financial footing.

by Sports2 on Oct 29, 2008 9:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the Clippers might need a little bit more of an incentive

But if you could get the Clippers to do this – I mean, this is a great trade all the way around. As good as anything I’ve seen anywhere else, to be honest.

"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas

by Jivas on Oct 30, 2008 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Camby is a fine complement to Kaman

and even if he isn’t, considering they just traded for him, they think he is.

management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 30, 2008 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

i don’t understand all the proposals for camby. could be nice, in theory, but he’s got the exact same build as noah (if we’re trying to get bulkier), and the clips just got him for trash, why the hell would they give him up?

by Jaina on Oct 30, 2008 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, and even more than having the same build,

he essentially has the same game as Noah, as well. He has better form on his jumper, but he’s not exactly a jump shooter. He gets cleanup points / broken play points. The Bulls don’t need him, since Noah will be that same guy within the next couple of years.

But he’s older than Noah, and his age is starting to show, plus he’s had a bunch of injuries.

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on Oct 31, 2008 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noah will be that same guy in a couple years...

.but Noah is not that guy now and will not be for a couple years. Camby is, and his contract is conveniently up in a couple years.

Which is why Camby makes sense. Establish continuity, a way you want your center playing, and do it. It’s a great fit with Rose (you don’t necessarily want a hulking guy getting in the way), and let Camby hold down the fort and make us better for two years. Let Noah grow into the role.

It’s not a matter of “needing him” in the same way that we don’t “need” better players anywhere. It’s a matter of interior defense being crucial and being a current weakness for this team. So fix it and give everyone a good chance to succeed.

by Sports2 on Oct 31, 2008 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm
Al Harrington, amidst reports that he did not demand a trade, was quoted by the San Francisco Chronicle late Tuesday saying that his relationship with Don Nelson was strained and that he wanted to be traded.
“If you ask me if I want to be traded, I’ve been wanting to be traded since the end of last season,” Harrington told the newspaper. “With everything that happened in the summer and coming into training camp, I was hoping things were going to work out between me and Nellie, but I don’t think that’s going to happen.” Tyrus Thomas fans have to hope he doesn’t land in Chicago, while Harrington owners would like to see a quick resolution. He was named a team captain over the summer, but he obviously doesn’t feel that Nellie was sincere in giving him the title. Oct. 29 – 7:58 pm et

"Sharapova's Thigh": Sports, Entertainment, Booze, The Ladies... And Their Thighs.
http://sharapovasthigh.blogspot.com

by CubsClapp on Oct 29, 2008 9:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He actually played 42 minutes in their season opener last night, though.

When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer

by Illini15 on Oct 30, 2008 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, and I think he took some key shots at the end, too (missed them),

showing that he not only got minutes but also crunch time minutes.

"It’d be ridiculous to hate someone for simply what they say in a sports blog. But I greatly dislike every syllable of your angst-filled, smarmy, nondescript, half-assed, elitist-garbage responses." –Rogerspark Kris

by bullhockey on Oct 31, 2008 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anybody hearing anymore about the Al for Thabo & Noc?

Could it be that the Warriors really want Captian Kirk. I mean they do need a Point Guard, I mean Monta isn’t really a true point.

by Ibleedbullsred on Oct 30, 2008 3:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Blackstar_small
Plan B: if the Bulls fail to sign a FA superstar at the 2 or the 4 spots...
Small
How About A Whole New Plan?
Small
Game Preview #10: Chicago Bulls vs. Los Angeles Lakers
Small
Rose Problem: Trying too hard to please Vinny and "teammates"
Small
Your thought on a GS-Chi Ellis A-R for Kirk TT trade dreams
Noah-thumb-500x401-6596_small
What's going on in Derrick Rose's head?
Drose2_small
what i'd do as GM right now...
Small
The concern about Rose...
Old_logo_gif_small
Game Preview #10: Bulls at Sacramento Kings
Small
The move that no one talks about

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger