Bulls/Mavs preseason reaction: Derrick Rose is awesome
He should start. It's comical in every instance he hasn't, especially given this franchise's recent history of 'developing' talent, re-emphasized in the offseason when Paxson did his damndest to try and lower expectations for Rose.
Well even if there was some misguided yet good-intentioned reasoning behind Pax's turd-in-punchbowl attitude, can it officially stop now?
Derrick Rose is already the best player on the roster. He was getting to the paint at will, finishing over shotblockers and opening up shooting opportunities for teammates. Had 30 points and 7 assists in 37 minutes, and eventually had the Mavericks gameplanning to stop him. He showed both confidence and poise.
So any time he's not out there with first-stringers and playing against first-stringers it's aggravating. Outstanding for his part that he was able to lead (to the point of dominate) a 4th quarter comeback, but it's still time wasted seeing him sit on the bench while Larry Hughes and Kirk Hinrich put the team in to a hole to start each half.
It was almost at the point where I viewed the team as Rose, and everybody else. Either you're helping Rose, or you're taking away a shot that could be his, dropping an assist that should be his, or handling the ball when it should be his.
It's an admittedly exaggerated way to look at the team, but it's not that far off.
1 recs |
129 comments
|
Comments
i also dig how..
TT has upped his shot blocking and rebounding game. He will for sure average a double double this season.
by CWhiteman on Oct 21, 2008 11:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think this was more an example of a 'floor' Tyrus game
he’ll always be able to shotblock and rebound. He actually was lost at points on defense tonight, and outright lazy at other points. He was missing too many gimmees on offense, and not able to convert when getting fouled.
But what showed is that even with all that, he still had a good game. He can be productive even when ‘inconsistent’, if you just leave him out there.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rose is a wilted flower with lots of thorns.
How can any objective observer justify his starting over Hughes, the most gifted playmaking guard since Homer the thalidomide hunchback came off the bench for the Romeoville Roosters 5th grade summer league doormats back in the day.
D Rose scored more points in the paint than the Bulls centers accumulate during a good week, while Tyrus has become a shot blocking rebounding energy machine whose game would take a quantam leap if he did not have to share so many minutes with the Upchucking Black Hole Offensive (in a literal sense) killing machine.
I never thought I would fantasize getting the corpse back if they would take this out of contriol turnover, air balling fool off our hands. Does he have pictures of Vinny in a comprimising position with an orangatang? There cannot be any logical explanation for allowing him to soil the hardcourt by being allowed to be a one man wrecking crrew who can only lead the Bulls in one direction, that is, right over the abyss the more he is allowed to eat up minutes.
I wouldn’t be so hard on Kirk. He posted the 3rd highest % in the league for point guards last year in spot up shooting (.472). Granted he has trouble getting it off but with Rose drawing so much attention, I see him, just as Noce showed tonight, being able to hit the open shots that DR creates. The same goes for Thabo.
But first I suggest in athe spirit of this election season, a new campaign should be started……with the slogan
WE MUST BURY LARRY WE MUST BURY LARRY
before he sinks our playoff chances just by being there.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Oct 22, 2008 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was going to go with
“a Rose growing from a pile of crap”
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're "fantasizing" about getting Wallace back?
Yeah, I don’t like seeing Noah and Thomas playing together either.
by NittanyCub on Oct 22, 2008 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hughes tonight.
4-14 and 0-4 from the three point line.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 22, 2008 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For as bad as Larry is
He’s still a welcome sight over the way Ben Wallace pouted and sucked last year. Especially because Larry is completely redundant on our team and Wallace last year was such a need. I do think as bad as Larry’s looked, he’s played better than Big Ben did last season for us……which is crazy but true. Wallace couldn’t defend last year, or rebound, and his offense was always horrendous….it’s a shame too because Big Ben had been amongst my favorite hustle solid players on those Pistons teams, and his D was definitely not overrated then, he had been incredible, but he doesn’t have it anymore, and he was more of a locker room problem than Larry will ever be….
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's a wash
Larry still can’t shoot and he fell asleep last night on defense twice.
Larry Hughes is hurting our team just as much as Wallace was last season.
by NBA Observer on Oct 22, 2008 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade Noah, Hughes and Kirk...Start Gary at Center
The play of Derrick Rose is causing several problems on this team, more specifically player personnel. More than ever, Paxson needs to make a trade, sooner than later, to enable Rose to become the Star he has the potential to be. Rose is beating one of these guards out of the starting line up and that causes problems in the long run. Might I add the only reason Rose is make erodes into the starting lineup and sending a veteran to the bench is because he can get in the lane when others rather shoot jumps and let the opponent defense off easy.
The other problem is the starting line-up. What Vinny has been touting this preseason won’t work at all. Gooden at the 5 and Thomas at the 4 is leave gaping holes in the Bulls defensive shell that teams are now exploiting on a nightly bases. Along with Deng, there’s not one guy in the frontcourt capable of stopping anyone coming through the lane. Gooden is one you shouldn’t plug in at center and is not known for his defense. Thomas is decent when it comes to blocks, but can’t lockdown his man, yet. Deng, of course is not known as a defense stopper – right now I can’t say what is his specialty – all are 6-9".
Vinny needs to start Gary at center, only because he is the only nature center on this team and have shown improvement. He knows how to play center better than Gooden. I understand that Vinny wants to play up-tempo, but this line-up is a liability on the defensive end. Also Gary at the 5 is not always looking for his shot: Gooden at the 4, Deng 3, and Gordon 2, Rose at the 1, of course.
Players up for trade: Kirk, if his shot isn’t falling what else can’t Hinrich do? Before last year, Kirk was known for his defense and PG abilities, but Kirk hasn’t shown that in Preseason games to date. Joke Noah (what growth has he shown in recent preseason games? he gets beat by deep bench guys), and Hughes (erratic shot selection and nice size contract).
I would rather see, Thabo backing up Gordon and Rose or starting; Thomas subbing for Gooden and Deng, and someone other than Noah backing up Gary. With the right trades that’ll bring back decent help and starting line-up, Thomas and Rose can develop into respectable players. Paxson can’t be sitting on his hands with the logjam at the guard position that causes instability in your line-ups. A trade needs to happen fast.
by Soloistic on Oct 22, 2008 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's GRAY!
Seriously? First, I would be interested in seeing Gray get a preseason start to see what he does, but I would start TT next to him. He is a double double machine this year and I want him on the court. Gooden is pretty good (on some days) and terrible on others. Too inconsistent. He can get back-up minutes and see what type of day he is having. And Joakim just needs some time to get back in shape (although, if he were more professional, he would have already been in shape instead of partying this summer).
by Unrealcity on Oct 22, 2008 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
only the bulls
would take a star pg with the number 1 overall pick, then spend the whole offseason convincing themselves he isnt good and that they need to keep their 10 mill a year underachieving point guard around just incase
by Calogero on Oct 21, 2008 11:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
I do have some faith in this team.
Rose
Gordon
Thomas
Deng
4 big players that could step up this year.
What to do, with Larry Hughe?
by Rudey on Oct 21, 2008 11:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Noah will be Noah.
He won’t wow w/ powerful post hook shots or monster rebounding or shutting down the likes of Tim Duncan, but he is the ULTIMATE ‘little things’ guy. Tipping balls to keep rebounds alive, making passes to a cutting Thomas or Deng from 15 ft out, etc. I like his abilities.
by tyger1147 on Oct 22, 2008 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i do too
but so far, not so hot.
Is he going to have to wear those goggles indefinitely? They do not look comfortable.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought he
said 2-4 weeks for the goggles. I think they are a distraction for him.
by sue369 on Oct 22, 2008 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
distraction for me too.
wow those things are ugly.
by Blacknight23 on Oct 22, 2008 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that IS an exaggerated way to look at the team.
It basically is Rose and everyone else at this point. Rose has been that good, and the rest of our team has been that bad. We have a starting five that is nice and is developing, and a bunch of scrubs playing ahead of them.
by Prevenge on Oct 21, 2008 11:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hornets
It was almost at the point where I viewed the team as Rose, and everybody else. Either you’re helping Rose, or you’re taking away a shot that could be his, dropping an assist that should be his, or handling the ball when it should be his.
that’s the exact way i felt watching paul and the hornets last year. god i love derrick rose.
by Calogero on Oct 21, 2008 11:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hornets
I think the Hornets had some solid backing guys for CP3. David West played great last year. Tyson was good as well. Adding Posey to that mix will be interesting. Hornets should be a seriously dangerous team this year.
by careyrd on Oct 22, 2008 12:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
David WEST was incredible last year and outplayed Duncan in the playoffs until he got hurt. He’s a real star who is still very much underrated, and Tyson Chandler has turned a corner into star territory as well….
I hope we do the same with Rose-BG-Deng-Tyrus….Bulls have talent that needs to come together. If we can skate by until January playing close to .500 ball, we really will surprise….hopefully if we’re 3-4 games below .500 by Jan, our young guys will take over….they have the talent, and they seem to want to play for VDN, but we’ll just have to see how well they learn this year.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post, and i'm especially feeling the part about feeling like the whole team
is Rose. Quick question though, when is the hammer gonna come down on Luol Deng? I mean, Deng is having zero impact on this team. He’s the highest paid player and our suppoded “star” and if he got injured and had to miss the season I don’t think it would really bother me. Seriously how much better than Nocioni is he? Think about it. With Derrick Rose Nocioni is probably the better fit at the 3 spot. All Deng does is crowd the paint and occasionally hit open 20 foot shots. The guy is also weak stock. He just mopes around the floor with the same look on his face, no energy, no enthusiasm, no clutch shooting. I know it’s only preseason but i’m really down on Luol Deng.
by Juiceboxjerry on Oct 21, 2008 11:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Man Juiceboxjerry!! You could be on to something!!
I spent most of last year bashing Deng because I got so sick of hearing people talk about how great he is because of the Miami Heat playoff series a few years back. Being a huge Duke fan, I loved Deng and was thrilled when we got him. However, I had visions of a healthy Grant Hill. Deng is a decent forward who may someday average 20 and 8 (which would be great but still not put him in the superstar category), but he just doesn’t do enough in my opinion to even justify having given him all the money we just did at the expense of not paying Gordon and losing a player who will OBVIOUSLY benefit from playing with Derrick Rose. Much like Nocioni spaces the floor, Gordon is similar. Plus now we shouldn’t have to deal with Gordon dribbling the ball off his feet in the 4th because Rose will handle the ball. I just hope that Luol Deng surprises you and me both and explodes!!!
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 22, 2008 1:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now I GET IT
Your problem: You expect Lu to be Grant “Top 3 NBA When He Was Young And Healthy” Hill! LOL!
by marionette on Oct 22, 2008 1:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hell, that's what I envisioned when he left Duke.
But it’s apparent that he’s nowhere near as athletically gifted as Grant Hill was and lacks explosiveness in general. Deng is solid, but far from spectacular. I used to be on here all the time arguing with folks about Deng because so many think of him as a potential superstar. I don’t. Derrick Rose is a potentia superstar!!! Deng is a regular dude that got offered a nice amount of money. In fact, I said there are anywhere from 10 to 15 small forwards in the league I’d take before him.
Again though, the Bulls fan in me wanted Deng to be Grant Hill. I’ll settle for him being Luol Deng, an ok #2 option or a solid #3 option.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 22, 2008 1:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a #3, IMO
And I think Thomas can be a #3/#4 with impact defense and rebounding.
That’s why the 2010 plan is so important. If we can get another star to pair with Rose, then Deng and Thomas become assets in less significant roles. And the contributions of someone like Noah would be far more apparent since nobody would be worrying about his lack of scoring.
"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas
by Jivas on Oct 22, 2008 1:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
I remember our arguments well. Well, they were mostly your arguments, as I try to ignore the negatives as much as possible.
by marionette on Oct 22, 2008 1:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well ain't nothin' changed. Bottom line...I'm still on him!!!
And he still a regular ass bum until he proves otherwise (and it’s worse now because he’s making big money). Thankfully we FINALLY have a guy who looks like a REAL star in the making so that all you kool aid drinkers can stop harking back to the 2007 Heat series and quit calling Luol Deng a potential superstar. Maybe y’all do that because it’s been such a long time since we’ve had a real star around Chicago Basktball. Looks like the drought may have come to an end, because you don’t win a championship with Luol Deng as your best player. Stars win in the NBA….so let us all pray that we finally have one!!
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 22, 2008 2:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i am really shocked
by all the deng hate in this thread. everyone just relax on deng, he’s the least of our worries. in fact, he doesn’t even qualify as a worry other than “why isn’t deng totally dominating preseason?!”. i’ve been a bulls fan since the 80s, but it’s especially in these last 10 years that i’ve really come to appreciate having a player who doesn’t cause me concern when he’s holding the ball. as in:
“PanicPanicPanic – oh thank goodness, fill-in-the-blank’s got the ball now”
loul deng is one of these players, and i am a happier bulls fan for it.
with that said; seriously though, when the hell deng going to start dominating!? :p
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket.
-- Abe Lemons
by cakezula on Oct 22, 2008 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng
Was never in the same league as the young, healthy Grant Hill. Hill was one of the most athletic players at his prime, and Deng has solid fundamentals, but has never been that kind of an athlete to go with it….
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aren't you taking too much thought into a preseason game?
I’m going to presume a lot of things right now: he didn’t start, so his minutes were probably filled in the 2nd half, when the Maverick starters weren’t on the floor.
It sounds like he played his ass off, and it’s getting me excited for this season(I can’t believe I’m getting old enough to the point where some of these guys - Rose- are younger than me) but honestly, it’s a preseason game.
by NittanyCub on Oct 21, 2008 11:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
When he played against their
starters they didn’t have an answer for him either. He shot over them, around them, and they even sent in a double team at times and resorted to fouling him towards the end. I missed the third quarter, but from what I saw in the first two quarters he was playing against the starters well. It wasn’t just against scrubs. Besides, he led our scrubs against theirs. It wasn’t like we had our “best” players out there with him to finish the game up. Thank goodness. The Scrubs seem to be willing to have Rose set the offense for them. The “vets” like to do their own thing.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 22, 2008 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's my point
this just proves he should be playing against the top talent possible.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he played 38 minutes...
it doesnt matter if you started the game on the bench when you played 80% of the game
His stats are as good as Fields -- that's the sad thing
by Jbasic89 on Oct 22, 2008 12:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it does matters
getting off to a good start and creating a nice tempo for the team from the very start is very important. if you noticed by the time rose came in bulls were already in deep sh*t
by sin on Oct 22, 2008 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
rec'd
Down 20 is a huge hole to climb out of. Up 5 or down 5 is game where the other team has to work harder. We have to start Rose. We cannot allow Larry Hughes to see the court.
Rose is the fastest player on the court with the ball in his hands. He can go anywhere he wants. We have to start him.
by NBA Observer on Oct 22, 2008 7:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know, I never really bought the
“speed of Chris Paul, size of Williams” deal, since it seemed like it combined the worst of draftnik tendencies. With all the trait/body part swapping the pundits do, they make these kids out to be mythological creatures or something. In this case they were right. He is that fast.
There’s no point in digging holes.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 22, 2008 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not only is is a huge hole
but I don’t like the idea of Rose then going against a team that’s let down its guard a bit. I don’t doubt that the numbers themselves were inflated by who he was playing against in the 4th, but if you watched him you can just see how fast he is and how well he can attack and finish at the rim.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think, in this sense, the meaning is different.
Yes, it’s best to have the team’s best players start the game, but I don’t think this was the argument. Seemed to me Jbasic was responding to the argument that Rose “probably” didn’t do it against the starters. Jbasic was just responding that, when a player plays 80% of the game, he most certainly played a lot against the starters.
I don’t think it was the usual “starting is the same as coming off the bench argument”.
by tyger1147 on Oct 22, 2008 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fortunately
I turned the 4th quarter on after seeing the stats on NBA.com and saw at least Rose was having a good game.
A few things:
- Rose should start. This shouldn’t be a question.
- Players who don’t give the ball to Rose, hit their open jumpers for Rose, finish their lobs from Rose, or otherwise work within Rose’s offense need to sit out.
- Mav starters could not stop Rose while he played against them. His offense opened offense up for our players even while we were down prior to the 4th. But only when the Bulls let Rose lead. Rose already commands a double team.
- Hughes should never play. He doesn’t look serviceable on the floor or on paper. Only in his own head. Buy some earplugs and bench him.
- Rose has a jump shot and a number of tricks already. What he doesn’t have yet he will work on and likely succeed in.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 22, 2008 12:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We have a player that commands a double team . . .
Still in awe of that feeling.
by Option27 on Oct 22, 2008 1:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ben Gordon
Has definitely commanded double teams, especially in the 4th, where he’s been double and triple teamed….now we’ll have two threats where teams can’t just focus on Gordon anymore.
We need Ben back. Bad move signing Deng when Ben was our better player. Deng’s shown little, Noc fits better with Rose and Ben really would put us over the edge with a real solid playmaker/scorer…..dumb move.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
CUT LARRY HUGHES!!!
Get this dude outta Chicago as fast as possible. Didn’t we eat Tim Thomas’c contract a few years back? We may have to do the same with Hughes. Maybe we’re jumping the gun, because if he can look anything like he did in Washington then he can help tremendously. But something tells me that it’ll never work for him here. Start BG or ever Kirk and bring whoever doesn’t start off the bench first. Hughes will just be stealing time.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 22, 2008 1:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, just put him on the shelf till 2010
We suffered this much, hang on, No minutes, except in routs at clean up time.
Then in 2010 we have his HUGE expiring.
What’s he gonna do? Complain and pout?
Doubt it, unless he wants to sabotage his own future marketability.
Let him sit and rot.
I haven’t seen a guy take so many ill-advised shots since Bobby Wilson and Leon Benbow!
The selection is atrocious – he takes these shots and you just know that they have no chance of going in.
Give him a 60GB I-POD, and a pillow for his ass, it’s gonna be a long sit LARRY!
P.S. That late drive by Rose where he crossed-over on the first dude, then beat two guys on the baseline with that little flip shot – SICK!!!!
:-)
by rtblues on Oct 22, 2008 1:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Doubt it, unless he wants to sabotage his own future marketability."
He doesn’t have any of that. And, evidenced by his basketball “performances”, he has the headstrong tendencies of a two-year-old.
Oh, he’ll complain and pout.
by Prevenge on Oct 22, 2008 2:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the Bulls can trade Hinrich for Brad Miller,
which seems more likely as Spence Hawes continues to start and play well, and Sac continues to have the worst point guards in the league, that would give us 25 MILLION in expiring contracts in 2010….excellent….(said in the voice of Mr. Burns)
.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 22, 2008 7:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We won't have that though
As I’m sure Tyrus is getting resigned……barring injury.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then still having $25 million coming off the books is that much better, no?
by tyger1147 on Oct 22, 2008 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying it's bad
But It won’t be that high :)…
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No it'll be trimmed a bit
When Tyrus’s extension offsets some of the $25M….but I think we agree, my bad on communication
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand the "offset" bit...
…My point is that, ESPECIALLY if Thomas gets extended, $25 million coming off instead of $13 million is a big deal.
by tyger1147 on Oct 22, 2008 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When he learns to
split that double team like CP, then ya really got somethin’.
by marionette on Oct 22, 2008 1:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah CP is an extremely intelligent, savvy point guard.
if Rose develops that intelligence, he’s gonna be scary.
Even without CP’s savviness, Rose may end up having an edge on CP as far as athleticism and scoring ability.
by swede2287 on Oct 22, 2008 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so was kidd guarding rose?
cause if so, kidd had no prayer of staying in front of him
by swede2287 on Oct 22, 2008 6:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good way of putting it
Everyone on this team needs to be evaluated based on how well they fit with Rose (and yes, that includes Del Negro). This is pretty much going to be an evaluation year anyways, but it’s nice to know that Rose is for real. Forget about this year – how good is he going to be in 2 or 3 years? I mean, he’s 19! This is his franchise (all this game did is confirm what should have been obvious anyways), and everyone else is going to have to adjust to his game, not the other way around.
by Big D on Oct 22, 2008 12:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess it technically was this way since he was drafted #1 overall
my change in philosophy is in regards to this season. Not only is viewing everyone with respect to Rose the thing to do going forward, it’s how they’ll win the most games this year.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
SHOULD SMELL SO SWEET.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Oct 22, 2008 12:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's amazing the talent difference between Rose and the rest of our guys
Hinrich, Gordon, Luol, Tyrus, Gooden, Noah … these guys were all lottery picks?!?!
Whether it’s athleticism, size, or anything resembling basketball skill, the guys we’ve had are all blatantly missing something. It’s crazy to think that three years ago I thought our core could someday be good enough to win it all on their own.
by YaoPau on Oct 22, 2008 12:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good points.
Although I would contend that Gordon could end up being a very good player alongside Rose and end being a big time scorer. He’s gotta get better defensively (though he’ll never be a lock down defender) but there is no mistaking his ability to put the ball in the hole. Could be like watching a Golden State game with Rose/Gordon/Thomas/Deng all in transition.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 22, 2008 1:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want to get into an argument about Ben's defense,
but what if Ben Gordon was truly an average defender at the SG position. He would be the perfect Rose complement. Put it together Ben, somehow!!
by CJ Bulls on Oct 22, 2008 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I, too, sometimes feel like a sucker
For overrating that team from 2 years ago. Until I realize that ALMOST EVERYBODY overrated them as well.
"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas
by Jivas on Oct 22, 2008 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's why it was so much better to win the lottery this year than say...
…when Andrea Bargnanni was No. 1.
by tyger1147 on Oct 22, 2008 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
was nocioni playing the 2 today
early on the lineup on the floor was noah thomas deng nocioni and rose
and based on matchups it looked like they played him at the 2 and when thabo came in for deng it still looked like noc was the 2 and thabo was the 3
anyone who can clear this up or verify?
by sin on Oct 22, 2008 12:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I actually sort of liked that lineup
I wouldn’t get too caught up in the names of the positions, but what I look for is whether the necessary roles are being filled.
With Rose, you want a guy who can score in general, but you also want a guy who can shoot.
Noc does one thing pretty well to complement Rose, and that’s catch and shoot. Deng isn’t that classically good shooter, but he scores in a variety of other ways that Rose can set up.
So offensively, that’s a pretty nice pairing. Defensively not so much, because you’re forcing Deng to guard the best perimeter defender and he’s not a good defender, and you’re forcing Noc to guard threes when he is better guarding fours most of the time. But with solid interior defense, it seems at least passable with a lot of room for improvement. Put it this way… I don’t see Deng as much, if any, worse at guarding 2s than Hughes, Hinrich or Gordon have been.
In general I think there’s a lot to be said for pairing up one of Deng & Thabo (guys who can score but not great long-distance spot up shooters) with one of Noc and Gordon (guys who are good 3 point shooters). Between those four guys, I think we’d generally have our bases covered in giving Rose the right types of tools to work with. Obviously you’d like everyone to be better, but you’ve at least got some flexibility. You can go Gordon-Thabo or Gordon-Deng. or Deng-Noc. Maybe Thabo-Noc in a pinch.
The only thing I don’t really want to see is Thabo-Deng, which gives us crap all for shooting.
by Sports2 on Oct 22, 2008 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rose Highlights From Tonight
Not sure if anybody posted the video, but I put it up on my blog.
"Sharapova's Thigh": Sports, Entertainment, Booze, The Ladies... And Their Thighs.
http://sharapovasthigh.blogspot.com
by CubsClapp on Oct 22, 2008 12:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
http://sharapovasthigh.blogspot.com/2008/10/derrick-rose-man-crush.html
I thought I had posted it on the last post but I guess not.
"Sharapova's Thigh": Sports, Entertainment, Booze, The Ladies... And Their Thighs.
http://sharapovasthigh.blogspot.com
by CubsClapp on Oct 22, 2008 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Del Negro better figure this out before opening night
It makes me want to puke to have to watch Hangdog Hinrich and CrackHeadHughes start.
Unfortunately, Rose is already our best player, I say unfortunately because we just signed up to pay Deng $14 million in 2012. I never got the Deng lovers, he looks and plays like an old man, has no athleticism and is at best a third fiddle player. Think about it is Deng even better than Horace Grant was to the first 3peat Bulls or Dennis Rodman, or even Kukoc were to the second 3peat Bulls.
Rose needs to play every minute that his body allows him too. That means that we need a true backup point to play 8-12 minutes, at $10 million per I doubt that Hinrich is the answer.
Del Negro seems to be making the same mistake that RockHead Skiles and BoneHead Boylan did last year, which is burying Sefolosha on the bench. Sefolosha is the type of player that needs to play regularly to realize his real total value. He clearly plalys better with the confidence that comes from regular minutes. He should be the starting 2 guard. we are a defensively challenged team and he is our best defender in the Pippen mold. Gordon should be the sixth man, and Hughes should be sent home to join Eddie Robinson to snort, eat or burn his millions and leave us alone.
Next, Gooden is not a starting center, in fact he is not a center at all and should never play center on a regular basis. Noah and Gray should get all the minutes at center. Gooden should be the first forward off the bench.
The starting lineup should be Rose, Thabo, Deng, Thomas and Noah, with Gray as the primary backup at center. We need his big body against other legitimate centers.
The Bulls shoud build the team around this new younger “core” and divest ourselves of our old “core” in the following order.
Hughes, ( we’re are probably stuck with him until the trading deadline in 2010).
Hinrich, has regressed massively, can’t stand his hangdog body language.
Nocioni, overpaid, and seems to have lost his zeal for anything but jacking up 3’s
Gooden, a servicable veteran not in our long term plans, valuable mostly as an expiring contract.
Gordon, might be worth keeping as a sixth man only, at the right price, no more than $1 over the middle level exception, which would be far less than he already turned twice, and is actually less than Nocioni, so the self deluded Mope a Dope superstar in his own mind is not likely to stick around.
Deng should be moved in the summer of 2010 in a sign and trade deal for one of the major superstars likely to be available that summer, Wade, Amare, or dare we dream Lebron.
This season looks to be very painful, except for watching Rose, although I can still hold out some hope for the further development of Thomas, Noah, Sefolosha and Gray.
by BigWay on Oct 22, 2008 1:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
that starting lineup would have way too much trouble scoring points
His stats are as good as Fields -- that's the sad thing
by Jbasic89 on Oct 22, 2008 1:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
That combination is too weak offensively.
It’s going to be interesting to see how efficiency VDN manages the various talents in his first year as a coach – the reviews of the plus/minus of various lineup combinations is going to be fun! Unless Larry Hughes is included in any of those combinations, in which case the result will be neither “interesting” nor “fun”.
"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas
by Jivas on Oct 22, 2008 1:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabo got all of
9 minutes tonight! That’s under even your 10 minute plan, Jivas.
If Gray starts, it could help that lineup offensively. As long as the matchup is okay for him on D. (Don’t worry, I wouldn’t play him big minutes.) Or you could start Gooden at center, but I wouldn’t want him to play big minutes there, either.
I agree that Thabo has to play much more. The defense and rebounding boost he gives that can lead to a running game shouldn’t be overlooked. This team isn’t gonna win many if it doesn’t play good defense.
by marionette on Oct 22, 2008 2:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with just about everything you said, except....
…I think that Gordon’s value is understated. I always contended that if this guy played for Phoenix or Golden State he would have averaged 25+ppg. We have such a lack of star level talent that down the strech we ask Gordon to set up the offense and lead us in scoring. With no post options, with Deng routinely disappearing in the 4th and with Hinrich shooting 14% in the 4th quarter (I read that somewhere recently), that leaves Gordon as the only viable option. With the ball in Rose’s hands, we don’t have to suffer balls being kicked off his feet anymore. Rose can make the decision to do what he’s gonna do. Part of what he’ll do though is create clean looks for Ben Gordon who will be an absolute sniper now since he likely won’t be defended by the best perimeter defender anymore and he won’t see any more double teams down the stretch. In this sense, Gordon is far more valuable than either Deng or Hinrich.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 22, 2008 1:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gordon's not understated
or underrated. Not around here he’s not!
by marionette on Oct 22, 2008 2:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Offensively, I agree
Gordon is clearly the most valuable offensive player on the pre-Rose Bulls team. The question of overall value comes when determining just how far his defensive liabilities influence his overall value. I’d suggest that they’re significant enough to lower his value below Deng’s value, but not lower than Hinrich’s.
It’s important to realize that our offense last year was close to last in the league in offensive efficiency, and that was WITH Gordon’s brilliance; if we remove him from the equation, our path to a league-average offense becomes much, much harder.
"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas
by Jivas on Oct 22, 2008 2:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you've watched any of our 2 guards try to stay in front of their man so far
it’s obvious Gordon can’t be worse.
The defensive liability argument flies out the window when the “defensive stoppers” taking his minute aren’t stopping anybody.
by CrashDavis on Oct 22, 2008 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
Hinrich’s defensive brilliance is mostly reputation at this point. All Hughes does is gamble for steals.
Thabo is actually a great defender but his offense sucks too much for him to get playing time. None of these people should be taking Gordon’s minutes.
by runningman on Oct 22, 2008 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"at best a third fiddle player"
how much do you think those guys cost?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This guy Rose
Noticed what everyone else noticed and even something else.
That 4th quarter, he got mad at the spacing and was yelling at the team.
Gotta love the balls on that kid already.
That performance was literally breathtaking.
Oh and I know it’s preseason
by Option27 on Oct 22, 2008 1:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He got mad at
Nichols throwing an in bounds pass that left him straddling the half court line. You can throw it in back court, but you can also be whistled for an over and back.
Wish I’d have seen the whole game.
by marionette on Oct 22, 2008 2:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There was another incident when he was trying to direct the right side of the court
The team was all bunched up
by Option27 on Oct 22, 2008 4:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Backcourt minutes
This assumes that we either buy out or “Kerrigan” our friend Larry Hughes. I refuse to contemplate a world in which he actually plays on this team.
Rose – 34 mpg
Gordon – 31 mpg
Hinrich – 25 mpg
Thabo – 10 mpg
TOTAL – 100 mpg (assumes a few minutes where 3 guards are used simultaneously)
I don’t mind if Hinrich is the “starter” – it’s a fair point that the combination of Gordon with a 19-year old point guard may be too weak defensively – but Gordon absolutely has to get his minutes, whether it’s 31 vs. 25 as I outline above, or if they’re each at 30 or whatever.
Isn’t it amazing to consider, however briefly – if Rose is as good as he’s looked, that we might have – gasp! – a league average offensive team? Dare to dream!
"You ain’t as hot as I is / all of these false prophets is not messiahs /
You don’t know how high the sky is / the square mileage of earth or what pi is." - Nas
by Jivas on Oct 22, 2008 1:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm with that
except for Hinrich. Give his minutes to Thabo.
by ToroToroToro on Oct 22, 2008 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would go for that.
But look how much Hughes played last night. How will VDN keep him off the court.
by sue369 on Oct 22, 2008 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BigWay you make many big points
They don’t all make perfect sense but your nicknames of our toolish players speak for themselves. I think we can all agree that LH deserves a special place in the Mockery Hall of Fame. Crackhead Hughes could be a winner or maybe Crackwhore Hughes might work too since he is paid lots of green to spread his BBall STD’s to infect the rest of the team. I agree he should be sent home or else be allowed to only show up at the United Center during hockey games and be put in quarantine during road games.
Maybe the solution to awaken Deng from his coma is to move him to the 2 against slower guards, where he won’t be abused by stronger defenders and can feed off good looks given to him by D Rose. He can be an effective slasher going to the hole at least more consistently than Hangdog Hinrich. He just needs to keep working on extending his range to become a 3 point threat. Plus this opens up more minutes for Thabo to interchange with Luol based on matchups between the 2 and the 3.
Noce brings energy and provides spacing with his ability to drain a 3 when open. His defense is sometimes lacking but never his effort. Ben “Mope a Dope” Gordon can still be a big asset as long as he is willing to play second banana to Derrick the Destroyer, and as you stated, that goes for the rest of his supporting cast as well.
Aaron the Plodder can do a lot of damage in the post if utilized properly, but if matched against quicker centers will do even more damage to our defense. This is where our whacky bong collecter, Noah can step in and run stride by stride with the Baby Bulls, TT, Thabo and Rose. Unless VDN is a sorceror and can turn lead into gold or turn Gooden into a strong defender in the paint from his current status as a disinterested bystander, I can’t see giving excess minutes to Gooden at center will not be a disaster. His shooting skills make him a good PF off the bench.
I see the season as an opportunity for growth and improvement as long as Vinny doesn’t repeat the stupidity of the recently reunited team as you so warmly call them, “Rockheaded Skiles” and his trusty lap dog, “Boneheaded Boylan” who were responsible for nailing our young studs to the end of the bench last season thus retarding their development, apparently because they refused to respond to their imbecilic coaching methods in a groveling manner that the petty dictators demanded.
As long as the Rose is in bloom, Hope springs eternal.
If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost. You can still call him vile names.
Elbert Hubbard
by Tyrusmancrush on Oct 22, 2008 1:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Do not forget that Dallas' starters were out
I am also favorably impressed by the way Rose plays but keep in mind that all starters were out when the Bulls (or should I say Rose) outpowered the Mavs. So I would not be 100% enthousiastic but still it remains good news in an underachieving preseason.
I am especially bothered by the underachieving big contracts (Deng, Hinrich, Hugues even if for him it was expected). Only Noce begins to earn part of his money.
On the other side, I would like to see more of Sefolosha and preseason would have been a good opportunity to see him more, especially with Gordon out.
I also regret to see Gray benched over Noah as Gray seemed to deserve some heavy minutes considering his summer improvement. It is not as if the Bulls had a force in the paint.
Overall, it is truly difficult to guess where the season is gonna go considering so many uncertainties.
by nitrate on Oct 22, 2008 2:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So what
Which Mav starter was going to keep up with Rose? Kidd? Wright? Terry?
None of these players could keep up with Rose. Rose is already showing mastery of angles in the NBA penetration game. The fact that he was hitting 17 foot jump shots was just icing on the cake.
If Rose was 6’6" I would think I’m watching Michael Jordan. We are so lucky to have Rose.
by NBA Observer on Oct 22, 2008 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"If Rose was 6’6" I would think I’m watching Michael Jordan"
slow down partner…
by NormVanBeer on Oct 22, 2008 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You remember Mike's rookie season
It was incredible how much better he was than everyone else on the court when it came to getting to the rim. He was so fast he had enough time to draw maps and leave them behind so the defenders could pick them up to see where he was going.
What I mean by the 6’6" comment is that Rose is so quick that with a little more height he’d be dunking on almost every attempt. You wouldn’t be able to stop this. You’d just have to foul.
Rose has it. It’s mastery of the small windows that crack open in a defense and employing the exact type of shot that sneaks through the small cracks.
by NBA Observer on Oct 22, 2008 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
there's no doubt about his explosiveness and ability to finish,
and i would think he could develop a jumpshot.
Since he is a 6’3" point guard, i think the bigger question is can he lead a team from the point? (initiate the offense, superior court vision, etc)
That’s gonna go a long way in determining whether this guy’s gonna be GREAT.
by swede2287 on Oct 22, 2008 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Start Rose and trade Hinrich now (before he loses even more value)
And let’s hope TT keep playing better and better and that Deng wakes up and shows he is worth the ton of money they paid him
by JustAnotherFan on Oct 22, 2008 3:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Rose for 30 and Kidd for 0
Also decent passing. Well, that was a really good sign by Rose that he is ready to start.
Odenied: If you're given lemmings—make lemming-ade (Bow4Meow)
by Norsktroll on Oct 22, 2008 3:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Did I just miss one of the greatest Bulls games evar?
by Belize on Oct 22, 2008 3:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Rose Highlight package from the Dallas game on YouTube already
here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM2Iel1pM9A
SICK!!!
P.S. To the negative posters, D-Rose seems to be sticking it to the starters on Dallas
and not only some scrubs. There is a nice one of Dirk trying to help and getting a D-Rose jumper in his face. Look, the kid is nineteen and most around here have already posted a sentiment that says he’s the best guy on the team.
So, to diminish Rose’s performance with comments about it being pre-season, or vs scrubs, hey, that’s not fair or accurate. He had too many face-jobs all night, against help defense too. Getting to the hoop at will, and finishing, often with the plus-one.
I don’t know which game the haters were watching, but, preseason or not, it’s fairly obvious what they’ve got here in D-Rose. Yes, this was one pre-season game, and it was a lot of minutes played for him, so he spread the face-jobs all over Dallas’ lineup, sorry haters. Watch the video, and the games more carefully in the future too!
This was only a taste. People who have seen Rose at various levels know, he is simply one of those guys. He always has looked like the best guy on the floor at every level. This is all new and he is 19. Just wait, he’s feeling his way through it all right now. He will start to make others around better too. The 7 assists were almost kind of lost with him hitting for 30, as well.
So, how you all like the pick? Beasley already showing signs of “head case”, talented or not.
RT
“Cut the head off and the body dies”………Al McGuire regarding Point Guards
by rtblues on Oct 22, 2008 4:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
and Rose
More valuable in the next ten years….
Besides, all the “experts” over at ESPN have Oden winning it. :-)
Peace-out man, you can have Beasley, that’s cool.
We dig D-Rose in Chi-town. Time will tell…
by rtblues on Oct 22, 2008 5:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
marionette’s on the blogabull old-school team. he was kidding.
But it’s interesting: I just don’t care about the ROY. Beasley’s going to score a lot – I still wouldn’t pick him with that brain of him. Oden’s going to rebount a lot – but frankly, having watched him a few times, he moves like an old man, and I worry about injuries (which is sad – I can’t help but like Portland). The dark horse might be Mayo. Excellent defender, shooter, decent passer, and he’s going to take a lot of shots. I could imagine a scenario in which Rose has a marvelous rookie year and doesn’t sniff the ROY – this draft class was rare.
But like you said: it doesn’t matter.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 22, 2008 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deng
practice hitting 3’s and has gone away from what little game he had. Forgot the 3pts and move closer for mid-range and slashing. At least give the impression Jerry Reinsdorf is not a complete idiot for signing you to 72 million.
Heck, we already know that Paxson is an idiot GM. Paxs has no concept on putting a team together or chemistry! Deng at the expensive of Gordon… another Paxs blunder to add to his mistake trophy case with is overloaded with mistakes…
by exult463 on Oct 22, 2008 7:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not worried about Deng:
he just hasn’t had much time on the floor with Rose. They’re out of sink. What made him good was his midrange game, his cuts, his rebounding. Not one-on-one, which he’s been trying to do this year, and which he failed to do last year. He needs to realize hey – we’ve got a point guard now. No need.
I don’t care about nomenclature. 2nd fiddle/3rd fiddle. Super-star/star/“go to guy”/role player. Luol can average 20/8, and shoot a very high percentage, this year. He fits what we’re doing. And the fact that he hasn’t yet fit points to the fact that, as Matt pointed out, Rose needs to be starting!
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 22, 2008 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol: "out of sink."
um, coffee time.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 22, 2008 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rose didn't have to score 30
He was actually looking to pass to open shooters for most of the 2nd half. The problem was that his teammates were not rotating to the open passing lane. Rose wants to pass to open space where the Bulls shooter should migrate to.
Hinrich and Deng have to move to that spot. They’re looking at Rose just dumbfounded. What they need to do is identify where Rose is going to go with the ball and how their man will cheat down on Rose. They then must take 3 steps left or right where they will be wide open for a 3 point shot.
by NBA Observer on Oct 22, 2008 7:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly-
Deng and Rose haven’t meshed well yet. Deng’s still trying to do his “hold the ball” one on one thing; what he should be doing is migrating into the soft spots and cutting to the rim. Noce has been effective in spurts because he hasn’t pressed. Not so for Deng – yet.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 22, 2008 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am absolutely thrilled with Rose.
Finally a go-to guy. He is exceeding expectations. He is so much better than the rest of the team. I’m not worried about starting. He will start. We need to rebuild around Rose, TT and possibly Gordon. The rest of the guys, including Deng are replaceable. LH seems even worse than last year. We need a big that can play defense and take advantage of Rose. I never expected Rose to have this kind of impact so soon. I am smiling with shock and awe at his talent and demeanor. The make-up of this team however is terrible. I like Paxson but we are in desperate need of a GOOD trade for a big man.
by chgobr on Oct 22, 2008 7:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The team looks to be
Rose (incredible, he looked like CP3 yesterday)
Tyrus (who looked like a monster even though unfortunately the shots didn’t drop, he was active, he defended, he grabbed boards, he blocked shots, he made some nice moves, the shots just were a bit strong, but give him time).
And dare I say it, Nocioni was solid in the second half, Nocioni does work well with Rose so far, and Luol’s going to need to step it up soon because Luol’s definately more talented, but is not showing anything other than that he’s now severely overpaid.
The Hinrich-Hughes backcourt should never be tried again. Hughes’ penchant to chuck comes up more with Kirk next to him for whatever reason. Kirk started off poor, but then he looked pretty decent defensively all night. He needs to find some offensive rythym soon though.
The rest…..well I wasn’t too impressed.
Luol better step it up in the regular season as he looks like he’s taken another step back from last year so far….very very disappointing. Josh Howard absolutely annihalted him again (Josh Howard looks better than ever at least against us in the first two games, my jaw was dropping).
What’s the deal with Noah? He hasn’t really been a factor at all out there in the 3 games I watched so far this preseason that he’s played (I’ve watched 4 to date…he’s not playing many minutes yet….he hasn’t been the energy factor or leader on the court that he seemed to be last year. Anyone know what the deal is? Is it still the eye issue? I thought by yesterday he’d be a bit back.
I’m over my Hughes should play because he makes a ton of money and he was once good 3 years ago. Hughes is AWFUL, god AWFUL. With a crowded backcourt that features 4 better players than Hughes, he should just ride the pine. I mean he really is not a thing like the player he was even 2 years ago when he was bad, but could show flashes….he just does not play team ball at all, can’t defend, and can’t shoot but shoot’s often. I’d rather see Duhon back, which is a tough enough thing for me to say, than have Hughes out there again.
I want Noah to get back to form or better soon, because I do think a Tyrus (now that Tyrus is playing at a high energy focused level) and Noah will be a better frontcourt than a Tyrus and Gooden. Drew’s a decent outside jump shooter who would play better or fit better (better description) if he played alongside a guy who was an inside the paint force on offense. Drew can hit a 15 footer pretty well, but when all our guards and SF’s have a similar offensive style, Drew’s less deadly than he can be. But he’s not bad. It’s likely his last year as a Bull though.
WE NEED TO SEE GORDON. Having Ben out there with Rose (2 big time scorers) with the ever active Tyrus these days and the little bit of everything Deng really should give us a pretty solid 1-4 I think. Now we need to see Noah step it up as a real 5….
Exciting to see Rose erupt especially for the future. Granted I know it’s very likely in the regular season we would have lost by at least 15 last night—considering Dirk was absolutely on fire looking like the former MVP he is last night…..but it’s nice to see an emerging star in this league. Rose has already grown quite a bit in these 6 games….I’m definately thinking he has as good a chance as anyone to be rookie of the year.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 7:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nocioni did have a good game
because he was making shots. I know some here think Gordon should be given the ‘if he’s cold, sit him because he’s worthless’ treatment, but to me that’s actually Noc. Last night he was hitting and didn’t try to force much, so it worked.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well he also played well
against Utah….
I know it does help that he hit his shots, but he’s also playing his typical aggressive game, which has to help with a very aggressive PG.
Deng needs to step it up now. It’ll be very disappointing if he’s our 3rd straight big payday player to not play as well as he did in the past (joining Chandler and Hinrich)…..
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Noc is just so terrible on defense though
and Deng…well what can you do but give him time. It’s not like he’s going anywhere.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 22, 2008 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
He does leave his man at times, but he does do well at switching, where his teammates don’t.
His gritty play also can disrupt guys that doesn’t always show in the box score.
He’s merely an avg defender…..because he does tend to leave his man too often (especially when his man is an awesome 3pt shooter).
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"gritty"...ugh
Noc is horrible at switching. He often doesn’t switch to the correct man, plus he is ultra slow on his close-outs. Either that, or he closes out not in control and ends up flying by the shooter or fouling them.
by NormVanBeer on Oct 22, 2008 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He switches often
He just leaves his man alone at times….
But I’m not getting caught into another I like Noc BaB hates him arguments, so I’m stopping.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but he is not merely an average defender
he is bad. he is terrible one on one and makes too many mistakes in team D
by DangerMouse on Oct 22, 2008 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How sad is it that this is the most pressing IF-THEN of the team:
IF the Bulls play their best players the most minutes, THEN the Bulls will be a good team.
by tyger1147 on Oct 22, 2008 8:35 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
On Dallas in general
If we could pull off a Dampier-Stackhouse for Hinrich-Hughes deal, I wonder how everyone would feel about it?
Stackhouse’s deal is not guaranteed for next year, so we free up enough cap to re-sign Gordon if that works out. In the shorter run, he’s not a turd like Hughes. And if he is, turn around and trade him again.
Dampier’s deal is not guaranteed for 2010, so we free up the 2010 option unless something really kick ass comes along. And in the short-run, he provides the big guy we need up front while Noah fills in.
This isn’t a perfect lineup by any stretch of the imagination, but I can see the possibilities.
1- Rose 36, Gordon 12
2- Gordon 24 Deng 12, Thabo/Stackhouse 12
3- Deng 24, Noc 24
4- Thomas 30, Noah 18
5- Dampier 24, Gooden 24
by Sports2 on Oct 22, 2008 9:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well
I’d like to see a bit more Noah than 18 MPG…..
And while Stackhouse is a shell of his former self, he’s still better than Larry….
And I don’t know why the Mavs would need HInrich with Kidd and Terry.
Not happening. THough I like 20 MPG of Dampier….to anchor the paint.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
'Cause Kidd is also a shell of his former self?
And Kirk is the next Steve Nash? :)
by Sports2 on Oct 22, 2008 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I don’t think the org is buying into that yet and will tell their friends that.
Plus Kidd did a very good job leading their transitiion bball last night.
I think he’ll have a very solid year with Dirk and Josh, as long as Josh doesn’t clam bake again during the playoffs like he did last year.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol.
Steve Nash is fast, can shoot, and direct a potent offense. Kirk hinrich is the bizzaro world Nash.
by Blacknight23 on Oct 22, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm actually more interested in Rose's passing highlights
They weren’t in the video that was posted. Don’t get me wrong, the way he got into the lane against anyone (the comeback was against scrubs, but he was dominating everyone on the Dallas roster) was awesome, but he is our PG of the future. Any thoughts on how he ran the offense? I like that he took control of the game when they were down big, and that he didn’t look too jumpshot happy.
"I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Gonna kick some ass in the USA. Gonna climb a mountain, gonna sew a flag, gonna fly on an eagle. I’m gonna kick some butt, gonna drive a big truck. I’m gonna rule this world. I’m gonna kick some ass. I’m gonna rise up, gonna kick a little ass. Rock, flag, and eagle!"
by Ozzie Montana on Oct 22, 2008 10:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't have a clip
But he did a very solid job passing. While he posted a respectible 7 assists (very respectible), he had many more solid passes to guys (Kirk, Tyrus, Kirk again, Larry, Larry Larry Larry Larry) that were good but the shots didn’t fall…..
Tyrus looks very solid, his shots are toos trong still, but I think he is showing some offensive mojo and some of those shots will drop.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems that a lot of times our guys aren't ready for his passes
By mid-season, I think we’ll be seeing a lot of 10+ assist games from him when guys are getting more used to when to expect his passes or not.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on Oct 22, 2008 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kind of like the early D. Wade
Not that Wade’s a 10 assist a game night, but if he needed to play that role he could. At Marquette and early in the pros though he’d make crazy passes where guys wouldn’t at all be ready for them.
I think Rose’s guys will adj a bit more to it though by midseason like you say. Hinrich at times has given guys the ball when they weren’t ready too and last night was no exception.
by majoyenrac on Oct 22, 2008 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 











