More Ben Gordon, please
That's not just me, it's Vinny:
Bulls coach Vinny Del Negro has a strict mission in mind for a two-game road trip to Dallas and Minnesota, which begins tonight against the Mavericks:
See more of Ben Gordon.
The fifth-year shooting guard missed the first two days of training camp to get his contract settled, then was out for more than a week with a jammed right big toe.
When Gordon finally did play Friday against Utah in Champaign, he scored 23 points, including 13 in the fourth quarter, as the Bulls (1-4) won their only exhibition game to date.
When the same two teams squared off a night later at the United Center, Gordon rested the toe and the Bulls scored 28 fewer points.
...
"It'll depend on how healthy he is and how much practice he gets in and where we are with the rest of the guys," Del Negro said. "I'm not going to sit here and say I'm never going to start Ben. But really he hasn't played.
"I haven't seen him enough with the starting group to figure out where he can be best used. I know he can score. Obviously, I like his ability to score off the bench and give us a boost. But I'm not sure yet either way."
I didn't catch the 4th quarter of Gordon's preseason debut (where he did most of his damage), but just seeing Gordon back and firing was a welcome sight. We got to see some good (drives to the basket, high % on 3-pointers), and some bad (getting shots blocked), but altogether, it was just good to see someone with obvious talent on the floor besides Derrick Rose.
In the handful of preseason games I've seen thus far (I missed Saturday's game though Gordon sat out of that one...big thanks to Sports2 for putting up a game thread) Gordon's my clear winner in the 'who should start alongside Rose' debate.
And as I said, Gordon wasn't even that great. And it was only one game. But the other candidates have shown mounting evidence of bad. Hughes shouldn't have been in the discussion and only confirmed his awfulness, Thabo has still shown nothing to suggest he'll ever be more than a 4th guard, and Hinrich's only looked good when he's been back at his more suited PG position. Any gains in defense with having a taller SG next to Rose hasn't shown to be worth the major hit on offense. The Bulls should go in the season with this oh-so-short Rose-Gordon backcourt, and if the matchup is a defensive problem, let those adjustments come from the bench.
I think Gordon's only real competition is Hinrich, but I worry this game is rigged. We know Hinrich has the contract, the (reported and highly suspected) love from ownership, and his name gets said in the starting lineups even after Derrick Rose. But Hinrich has not looked like the best two-guard on the team, so it'll be interesting to see if this training camp was to answer questions about the roster, or just act as a formality to give Hinrich another chance to prove himself, whether it makes sense or not.
At least the first half of the Bulls preseason has given some answers in regards to Hinrich and the guard-glut: the team doesn't need him to help ease in Derrick Rose. Rose is already competent enough to start from day one, and is showing enough flashes of greatness to deserve heavy minutes. Hinrich only has long-term value on the roster as an off-guard, but instead of gifting Hinrich the job to help Hinrich play better, the Bulls should instead put the shooter, Ben Gordon, next to Derrick Rose. It's about making Rose the best he can be.
3 recs |
141 comments
|
Comments
I'm not the biggest
Gordon fan. But looking at our options he is the best 2 guard we have and should be starting along side Rose.
by J Theory on Oct 21, 2008 8:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It always goes back to the Larry Huges problem
Hinrich can play a bit the 1 and 2 as third guard off the bench (until traded of course).
Thabo can back up the 1, 2 or 3 depending on match-ups, needs, injuries, etc (plus he won’t be a cancer if he doesn’t start or doesn’t get 30 minutes a night).
Gordon can start at the 2 (or be first off the bench as the back-up 1-2).
Hughes : he won’t be happy unless he starts (or plays alot), and nobody wants this to happen.
It really comes down to : do the Bulls (Vinny really) have the guts to sit the guy.
The Game chose him !
by Diabolo on Oct 21, 2008 8:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hughes sitting
“It really comes down to : do the Bulls (Vinny really) have the guts to sit the guy.”
Guts? Hughes is getting paid. What’s he gonna do, beat Vinny up? Quit practicing? Dog it?
That will just be the final-final to get rid of the guy. Who cares about Larry Hughes’ feelings? Really.
The organization is trying to win and build around a young core. Hughes ain’t in the plans.
He is a big expiring contract in 2010, that’s the only “good” thing about him!
Have a seat Larry!
by rtblues on Oct 21, 2008 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have always thought that Hinrich is a player without a real position.
Hinrich would be more ideal in a first guard off the bench role then Gordon. Hinrich is not consistent enough to play PG full time, and is to small to play SG full time. But as a back-up, he becomes very valuable because of his ability to play both positions well for short stints. If defense becomes a problem with Ben, sub in Hinrich. Is Rose haveing a rookie episode, sub in Hinrich.
"Rest satisified with doing well and leave others to talk of you as they please"
by Bigred15 on Oct 21, 2008 8:48 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I think
Kirk is a classic triangle offense PG….he would be perfect in Phil Jackson’s system….a decent ball handler who can score when necessary, and a better than your avg SG passer…..and mostly he can defend.
THe Bulls should work something out with the Lakers…..I see Odom….
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk's not a spot up shooter which would limit his effectiveness in the triangle
He’s a great complement to a SG who can score but doesn’t need to dominate the ball, a la BG
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 21, 2008 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Don't want to see Odom
Odom is not a winner…just ask the Lakers. Flashes of a "good’ player, but not consistent at all.
I know that sounds like I’m describing Kirk, but Odom is not the answer,
by scottie33 on Oct 21, 2008 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what
We lease Odom for a season or we trade him again around the deadline for different puzzle pieces.
Gordon is the scoring threat. Until you replace that with someone comparable or better the options on the table are nearly all going to be receiving a player that may not fit into the long term picture.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we make a trade with that purpose, then I am for it
As a lease for the year, or as a puzzle piece for another move would be great.
by scottie33 on Oct 21, 2008 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
We lose him after a year or rejiggle, rather than be burdened with a backup PG who’s value is higher than a backup PG now, but who won’t be valued as such in 1 year’s time coming off the bench or being forced out of position….
Seems an easy slam dunk. And personally I’d rather have Odom resigned than Drew of the two….
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Problem trading Hinrich to Lakers
is they’re dreaming of Marion (or Deng) type to replace Odom. Also, Farmar and Sasha might be better spot up shooters than our Kirk.
by marionette on Oct 21, 2008 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Hinrich's
A better defender than the aging Fish and should be more consistent and he’ll be locked in. He can help ease the d pressure off of Kobe too and let Kobe focus on what he does better than really anyone else in the league (Score score score).
Seems an ideal fit for them.
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't matter about Fish
that’s why I didn’t mention him.
Kirk’s better defender than Farmar and Sasha (right now), but would really have to hit his spot ups, a la Paxson, Armstrong and Kerr. And Fish…..et al.
by marionette on Oct 21, 2008 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that makes a lot of sense
especially since in the many ways Thabo is not distinguishing himself, it’s especially not as a primary ballhandler.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In that manner...
…I think Hinrich has a future as a starter, but w/ a ball-handling SG. Not one who dominates it like Arenas, but others that are merely competent: Wade, Roy, Bryant, McGrady, etc. In that way, Hinrich can have “stints” as the primary ball-handler or as the off-guard.
I think Gordon and Hinrich helped hide each other’s weaknesses whereas pairing him w/ some of the above would help amplify his biggest strength, his versatility. I think.
by tyger1147 on Oct 21, 2008 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When we start Ben
our opponent will attack him until he’s in foul trouble. Do we all realize this will happen?
Our opponents know that Ben Gordon can score. If he doesn’t have to guard anyone he can drop 30 on any team in the league.
You guard Ben Gordon’s scoring ability by attacking his defense.
If Gordon can stay out of foul trouble and at least stay in front of his man, he starts and is an All Star.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since when has Ben been fouling out of every game?
Like its been mentioned before, Ben is not an inept defender. He doesn’t have the body to be an above average defender but he doesn’t kill a team when he’s on the court and I’ve never seen a great threat of him fouling out of too many games over the last three seasons.
by lampnasty on Oct 21, 2008 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
foul trouble and fouling out
are two different concepts.
The foul trouble I speak of is the approach the Pistons and Sixers take to attack Gordon. Put 2 fouls on him in the first quarter and his 18 first half minutes dwindle to 12.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
might as well start Ben tonight
We already saw Antoine Wright beat up on Hinrich a week ago…no need to witness it again. Even if he does beat up on Ben, at least Ben can offset some of the pain with his own offense.
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 9:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't care who the Mavs throw out there
We need to start Ben Gordon just to see how he pairs with Rose as starters.
Is Rose playing? His uncle passed away so family matters take precedent.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you
Rookie guard Derrick Rose missed Monday’s practice to attend the funeral of his uncle. Rose did not travel with the team to Dallas but is expected to play tonight against the Mavericks.
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
The 2 guard rotation should be Ben and Thabo
it doesn’t matter who starts since the allocation of minutes will still see Ben getting his 30+ MPG and Thabo getting his 20+. These two guys should be the SGs on this team, Kirk should back up Rose, and Hughes will have to be managed.
by messwiththebull on Oct 21, 2008 9:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
With ther spillover minutes
obviously coming from time at the 1 and 3 for BG and Thabo, respectively.
by messwiththebull on Oct 21, 2008 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus Thomas has...
…talent as well. I believe.
by tyger1147 on Oct 21, 2008 9:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hmmm, true
though I guess being a talented shotblocker isn’t as nice to watch.
Should be though, just pencil me in with the rest of the league that over-values scoring :)
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hah... yeah
rebounding talent is cool, too.
after i posted the comment, i realized i could have assumed that parts of the statement could have been “offensive backcourt”. Or something.
by tyger1147 on Oct 21, 2008 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Finally,
the confession we’ve all waited for! LOL!
by marionette on Oct 21, 2008 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
30 Minutes of preseason basketball.
With a third of those minutes running the point. And you are proclaiming Gordon should be the starter???? The Ben Gordon man crush on this website is out of control. Let’s see more than 12 minutes of him playing alongside Rose before declaring he is the best fit to start.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 9:29 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
How about the past four seasons of seeing Gordon
And the entire preseason of everyone else more or less sucking?
by Sports2 on Oct 21, 2008 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like you said the same as me with fewer words. Well done :-)
The Game chose him !
by Diabolo on Oct 21, 2008 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have seen Gordon in the past.
With a plus/minus of -232 last season…
While I am not saying that he should not start, I am saying that we should actually see if he can play with Rose before proclaiming that he should start. I feel that whoever starts in the back court needs to compliment Rose on both ends of the court.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed.
i like ben though i’m not his biggest fan, though clearly he is our best SG. so for that reason i’d like to see him start but at the same time we have to see whether he meshes with rose well and you’re not going to see that after 1 preseason game.
i didn’t even get to see him, that was the one i couldn’t find a feed for. :(
by Jaina on Oct 21, 2008 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe NBA TV
has the game tonight. I’m certainly looking forward to seeing the team sans staccato-imagery!
by marionette on Oct 21, 2008 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the heads up
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by Orlando Woolridge on Oct 21, 2008 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah,
but I blew it- somehow recorded NY vs BOS! Missed all but the last 10 minutes, where they came back from 16 or so. So I guess that’s kinda good?
by marionette on Oct 21, 2008 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it isn't Gordon
then we are screwed as we can already see Hinrich and Hughes are less than thrilling. Thabo might have a chance if he learns how to dribble and shoot, but we can’t wait on that and can only rely on him for defense. It will probably take a combination of Gordon and Hinrich. I’d like to try Gordon out at the start to set an offensive tone and get Rose some successful assists then bring in Hinrich or Thabo if we need defensive stops at either PG or SG.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meh
I think I smell people’s own emotions masquerading as complaining about the perceived emotions of other folks. But still, those emotions show through, as in pointing out Gordon’s crummy +/- last year, which again, comes off like cherry picking in the bigger context of his (and everyone else’s) tenure with the Bulls.
I feel whomever starts needs to be the best overall complement to Rose. So far, Hughes, Hinrich and Thabo have sucked, and their longer track record doesn’t do much to suggest they’re very good complements to him either. Gordon, at least, has some long-run evidence to make me think his game would be the best mesh out of the available options, even if he’s not the organization’s Beloved. Which, again, seems to be the primary entry point of emotion into this particular equation.
by Sports2 on Oct 21, 2008 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that and also how the others have played
It’s not just the one game he played (he also actually has played quite a few seasons before, you know, it’s not like he is unknown), but it’s also a reflection of that game when compared to how the other guys fighting for that same spot (Hinrich, Hughes and Thabo) have performed.
The Game chose him !
by Diabolo on Oct 21, 2008 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gordon
did seem to be the only guy to take fighting for the position seriously. He shot well, proved himself at the three point line, and even got some assists in. Injury aside, he seemed to get out of the starting blocks much better than the others.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually It is one game
because the past really does not matter when considering what is actually important, which is who plays well with Rose. So wanting to see Gordon on the court with him(more) before declaring him the nessicary starter is logical to say the least.
by TruEChiFaN... on Oct 21, 2008 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you can speculate what skills work best with Rose
and which players have shown those skills over their careers.
And is it enough that I already want to see Hinrich/Hughes/Thabo on the court less?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's about the scoring
I’ve always held the position that Ben Gordon starts every NBA game when defensively he is prepared to face the attacks our opponent will throw at him.
I don’t care if he’s 6’1 guarding 6’6" players. Those opponents can shoot all day from 17’ and beyond. If Ben stays in front of them, avoids fouling, trusts his teammates to protect the rim, and forces shooting guards to shoot, they are going to make some shots. They’ll miss some too. But the key will always be Ben Gordon absent foul trouble ready to change ends and put the ball in the basket.
07-08 is an anomaly. For three seasons Ben Gordon gave us scoring chances to win a lot of ball games. The defense still was weak, but we covered for it as a team. The team defense was superb; top 5 in the league. We’re not going to be in the top 5 this season, but maybe we can score more points through more possessions sparked by decent team defense and rebounding.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good assessment
but what happens when they start taking Ben in the post? Or is DRose going to be covering the SGs. With Duhon and (potentially) Hinrich gone, Gordon may really find himself picked on.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 21, 2008 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well,
We do have one of the most athletic players in the game in Thabo who can leap all over the court and seems in the preseason at least to have turned a page and can play….
If guys post on BG, they draw double teams. It happens all the time, not just to the small guys.
We play some zone when the double teams get to be too much, and have the athletic Tyrus and Noah control the paint and due their job.
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
I meant Tyrus, not Thabo above….sorry.
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It did
create an amusing picture in my head though. Thabo, leaping all over the court.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It will be a bigger issue if they insist on having (sorta) low-post offense Gooden start
but I agree that it’s not the biggest deal if Ben at least tries and plays within a team scheme (and he can, he’s not Nocioni or anything).
It’ll likely be bad when teams throw out two guards who actually have post-up games (like Billups/Hamilton or Davis/Mobley) but the hope is that a Rose/Gordon backcourt is too fast, so either they start out hot and the opponent makes the adjustment, or if Rose/Gordon get abused in the post than you can call on bigger guards from the bench.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
But on the other hand, like you mentioned a Rose-BG lineup is lightening quick and add in Thomas and Noah and we run, run run….but I totally see your point. Still I think I’d still rather see Gordon, our best player still play the major minutes at SG than Kirk play out of position and have less offense simply because he can guard SG’s at times….so long as they aren’t Antoinne Wright or Cuttino Mobley.
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm saying he's the starter
Based on his 4 years as our best player playing 30+ MPG…..
And yes this 1 game was enough to make me think he’s a better fit than chuck em up Hughes, PG Hinrich or still tentative and making bad decisions Thabo.
I don’t seem to see the man crush on Gordon here, the man crush has been on Deng, who yet again looks like he’s more hype than star.
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best player
is a really tough sell, rather I would say best scorer. Will he seem like a better fit when he goes 2-12 shooting and his man drops 20 plus? My point being they all have their faults, but really it doesnt matter if Gordon starts or not if hes going to get his minutes anyways, especially in the fourth.
by TruEChiFaN... on Oct 21, 2008 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So then start him.
If it doesn’t matter to you which.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well my point
was that there didnt need to be such a love fest push for Gordon to start. That didnt mean I was against him starting, but that Rose and Gordon need to play together more before hes given the starting job.
Everything has to do with Rose, nothing else compares to the importance for Rose having the best situation to make him the best he can be. Conisdering the better he is, the better everyone else will be and the team as a whole.
by TruEChiFaN... on Oct 21, 2008 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Matt
some of you wiz’s need to fire up the Trade Machine…Kirk seems resigned to his fate anyway.
“But just because I’ve been here five years, tomorrow I could be gone. That’s just the business end of it.”
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by Orlando Woolridge on Oct 21, 2008 12:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Holy crap.
Maybe if Golden Boy drops his no-trade clause, they might actually think about trading him.
by tyger1147 on Oct 21, 2008 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For some reason, I doubt Paxson and Reinsdorf see things the same way
Right now, they both seem to be taking the Michael Scott approach to management: Noce and Hinrich are family and their companionship makes them worth their salaries.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 21, 2008 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My guess is he'd be sort of happy to leave
I mean, it’s nice to be in the same place, but the righting is on the wall for everyone to see. Kirk has publicly stated his preference for playing and defending the point spot in the past and he’s done his best work there. He’d be better off elsewhere in the long-run, as would the team if it got a decent return on him.
by Sports2 on Oct 21, 2008 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
works both ways :-p
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If traded, Kirk will be better off .... only in the right situation
and the right situation could have been with the Bulls except no vision Paxson screwed that up, and also Kirk didn’t take the leadership role during the summers when it was necessary to force this team to build correctly and bring in team mates which expose his strengths as tyger1147 mentioned eariler…
I get so mad everytime I think about this and the supposely love affair PaxsDorf has for him?
His basketball career should have been so much more at this point, another example of yet even being the favorite son, this organization knows nothing about developing talent.
My next big concern is Bulls development of very talented Derrick Rose? exception rookie talent alone can be mashed with Paxsdorf and company because they don’t know what thet are doing!
by exult463 on Oct 21, 2008 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
give me a break
The Bulls have given Hinrich every chance in the world. He started all last season and played horribly. I’m sorry they didn’t get Kobe and Lebron to “surround” Hinrich with. But he has been the starting pg for multiple years and he has been slightly above average. Last year he was awful. Hinrich isn’t a guy a team builds around.
by DangerMouse on Oct 21, 2008 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kirk will be fine
no matter who he plays for. He is and always has been a team player. He said the chance of getting traded is part of the business so I doubt he’d be surprised if he does.
by sue369 on Oct 21, 2008 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sue, not really true ...
If he is trade to a team which is an exact clone of the Bulls;
1) No development effort and individual plan for each player, which is monitored, measured, enforced and accessed with adjustsments and help to get you to the level anticipated.
2) No leadership players/mgmt personnel threatening to figurately “put a foot in your ass for continuing to playing like a wissy”
3) No coaches which develops offense which takes into consideration the strength and skills of the players and matches them with others who compliment their strengths and mask there weakeness.
….
It could also be much worst he he goes to a team where he isn’t the favorite son, like he is in Chicago, where he is given all types of excuses for his lack of leasdership, play and aggression.
A rational assessment, truely aside from personal favoritism wouldn’t have us having this discussion because he’s not so fine on the Bulls as identify by a large fan base.
by exult463 on Oct 22, 2008 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I meant was
he’s not the type to bitch about what happens to him. If he is the back up pg for the Bulls or starting pg for another team he will handle it fine. Money has nothing to do with it although he will be fine in that area too.
by sue369 on Oct 22, 2008 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Way to sum it up so succinctly. I'm sold
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 21, 2008 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His shooting
is fine but his defense is a joke. With Vinny pushing defense so much it will be interesting to see how he reacts to BG’s lack of it.
by sue369 on Oct 21, 2008 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, BG was really allowed to skirt by on the defensive end by the previous coach
It’s hard to fathom how Skiles could completely ignore one side of the court.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 21, 2008 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he did?
well why were the Bulls always in the top 5 of defensive fg% during Skiles’ tenure?
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you never can tell
with the kirk fans here
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, all us Kirk fans are exactly alike
It’s a requirement of the club – we must hate BG and we must alwasy fail to recognize sarcasm no matter how obvious.
This makes it quite easy to distinguish us, you know.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 21, 2008 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
::coughs::
you’re all from Iowa
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, forgot that one. Thanks
Don’t tell the rest of them I’m from Oklahoma or I’ll get kicked out and be forced to join the Nick Collison fan club instead.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 21, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty sure you have to be from Iowa to
join that on too.
by Scotter on Oct 21, 2008 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The rules are just the slightest bit different actually
There are alternative admission clauses – you can either be from Iowa or be a KU grad living within 100 miles of the Thunder’s new digs.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 21, 2008 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems I was successful in my attempt
to forget that the Thunder ever happened.
by Scotter on Oct 21, 2008 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The computers that tally the stats
are just as afraid of Skiles as the players.
shrug
I get it.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no Ben Gordon is a ball player
your fanpost was a joke
by DangerMouse on Oct 21, 2008 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ben has always seemed the obvious choice to me
First, if opposing teams plan on winning games by posting up their PG or SG, I think I am fine with that. In all reality, its not like a team is going to continuously run post up plays for their guards. Just doesn’t happen in the NBA.
Gordon has been the only guy on our team capable of creating his own shot. Now we have two of those guys, so Ben won’t be forced to always create under pressure, shot clock winding down, situations. In fact, we will have a one-two punch of Rose’s penetration forcing the defense to choose to help and prevent the drive or to let Gordon shoot from long 2 / 3. Hinrich can’t catch and shoot nearly as well as Ben. Keep in mind that Gordon’s wingspan in 6’8", so he can be a reasonable defender as long as he stays in front of his man and contests the shot.
Outside of the contract issues, I see Gordon as the clear choice at starting 2.
by Jud Buechler on Oct 21, 2008 1:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Seems pretty simple
When Gordon is shooting well, you leave him in there. If he’s off that night or not in sync with the game yet, they take him out. Been the Bulls MO since day one with BG.
by RogersPark Kris on Oct 21, 2008 1:46 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
did they take this shooting temperature in warmups?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think of what fun it could be
Just pull the SG as soon as he misses his first shot and replace with the next in line, and continue until you find the guys that’s “on.” Some nights BG could be back on the floor by the 8 minute mark in the first quarter.
The benefits are numerous – the guard glut will be almost completely resolved between Thabo and Kirk becoming so scared to shoot that they turn into quivering piles of crap, and Hughes will either learn to take better shots or will get sent to the bench almost right away every night.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 21, 2008 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
THat
Sounds Skilesian “Just pull the SG as soon as he misses his first shot”…:)
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was kind of thinking of him with his quick hook when I wrote that
Nice pick up! ;)
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 21, 2008 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gordon starting
Another problem is that BG has always been a better shooter when coming off the bench. He seems tentative offensively when starting as if trying to prove he’s more than a shooter. This may change with Rose, and it seems he should start by default based upon pre-season.
by El Toro de Goro on Oct 21, 2008 1:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
not really true
he’s had good and bad stretches both starting and off the bench. The only consistent trend is that he usually starts the season like crap.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto on that
Yeah Ben always has a buzz as the hardest working Bull in the offseason, a total gym rat, andthen he always starts the year off playing terribly.
The whole he’s better off the bench mantra was a Skilesian fallicy billed so Skiles could play his love child Duhon and watch Duh do little on the offensive end but slow the offense, but play adequate D.
I don’t buy that Gordon does better against second units argument, when as a player in his career he’s been most effective in the 4th quarter when guys are playing their best players at their highest level….
We’ll see if Skiles tries to kill Redd’s former all star career…..
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vinnie's comments on Gordon were pretty chaotic
On the one hand, he said:
“Ben is going to be a focal point of what we do,” Del Negro said following Monday’s short practice at the Berto Center. “(It’s important) not only for him to be in shape, but for the other guys to work off him and feed off him.”
On the other hand, he said:
"I’m not going to sit here and say I’m never going to start Ben. But really he hasn’t played.
“I haven’t seen him enough with the starting group to figure out where he can be best used. I know he can score. Obviously, I like his ability to score off the bench and give us a boost. But I’m not sure yet either way.”
Vinnie may very well be running for President soon.
by Sports2 on Oct 21, 2008 2:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
don't think it's that bad
he obviously knows what ben can do, but since he’s been out, he hasn’t seen them play as a team or seen him play/practice with the starting unit.
it’s not like vinny doesn’t know what ben is capable of even though he hasn’t seen him in person for practice/games very much.
by Jaina on Oct 21, 2008 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so that begs the question
why doesn’t VDN go ahead and start Ben tonight and the next game to see what it reveals?
That’s like me saying, “I wonder what color my socks are”, but not bothering to take off my shoes to check.
1+1=2
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
and if it were me, that’s probably what i would do. though it might be misleading since i assume rose won’t start due to his missed practice… so it could be the same ol kirk and ben backcourt.
by Jaina on Oct 21, 2008 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be sad to bench Rose
because of a death in the family.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
only going
based on what he did before… and it’s not the worst thing because it’s still preseason and he’s a rookie.
but yeah, i mean, if it were my choice it’d be derrick and ben starting tonight.
by Jaina on Oct 21, 2008 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
its not exactly benching him
they had a 4 hour practice that Rose missed last time he came off the bench.
by DangerMouse on Oct 21, 2008 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will come out and say since no else has.
This team is rebuilding. Its players even said so…
So I don’t understand why they would start a player who is not really part of the future, a player who signed a one year contract and will be leaving next summer, unless they are looking to showcase his talents for a future trade (that of course he would have to approve).
The one who should actually be starting is Thabo Sefolosha, in that he may have a future as Derrick Rose’s sidekick. Oh, but he can’t shoot, score or insert whatever else his detractors say…We have seen enough of him to know that when given minutes he can produce, see last season post all star break as a starter 11.9 pts, 5.7 rebs, 46.3 FG% in 31 minutes. We don’t need another guard in the backcourt with Rose who needs the ball in hands and we don’t need a second point guard. We need a complimentary player to Rose’s skill set. Think Ronnie Brewer or Mo Peterson, not Michael Redd or Jamal Crawford. The second guard just is not that important next to a lead guard like Rose (thanks to Doug Thonus for re-inforcing that idea to me). He just needs to play well with him.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 3:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"So I don't understand why they would start a player who is not really part of the future"
but enough about Hinrich….
Thabo’s been Therrible. He’s not even close to being Brewer or Peterson. And I still challenge the idea that just because some elite point guard don’t have a prolific SG next to them, it’s inherently a bad idea.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brewer had more dunks last season than Lebron
It’s the system, but it helps when you have excellent passing from the 1, the 3, the 4, and the 5.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
whoops
Continuing my thoughts. I think it is far too early to make immediate comparisons to New Orleans or Utah because we don’t have the coaching chemistry, nor the personnel that comes close to these two clubs.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich, Hughes and Gordon. Peas in a pod.
In that their futures are tied to that of the Bulls.
Its some elite PGs, it is most elite Guards. Steve Nash has Raja F. Bell, Jason Kidd has Antoine Wright and had Kerry Kittles when NJ was good. Who else? D. Wade had Jason Williams when they won the title. Kobe has Derek Fisher. Heck even MJ had Ron Harper.
Its true that Thabo has not looked good this preseason, but its not like he has been given a chance to start either. He has been asked to come in and play SF in small lineups. Last season, in the only time he has been given consistent minutes, he showed that he can produce. I will wager that he can do that again.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should say "are not tied to the Bulls"
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nash also had Finley and Joe Johnson
Zeke had Dumars
Stockton had Hornacek
Payton had Hawkins/Gill
Hardaway had Richardson/Sprewell
Fact of the matter is, there’s so little elite “talent” to go around that it’s rare to have not just 1 but 2 All Star caliber players in the backcourt or post or wings or however you want to pigeonhole 2 random positions from any team.
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 21, 2008 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Crap, meant Hardaway had Richmond, not Pooh
We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan
by snley on Oct 21, 2008 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
right
I’d certainly trade BG/Tyrus for Chris Bosh and get all those inside-outside possibilities, but I don’t think that’s possible.
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course there are exceptions.
The point is that its not a necessary to have two all-star guards to win. BTW, Hornacek, really? 14 pts a night and one all star appearance.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But it doesn't hurt to have two all star guards
So why wouldn’t you just play the guy with the most talent?
And those aren’t exceptions. That is just the law of averages. It is rare that any team would be able to acquire 2 all star guards.
by DangerMouse on Oct 21, 2008 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And also one of the most efficient offensive players in the league.
Hornacek was a a ridiculously good supporting player. Good enough to play PG himself, but excellent moving without the ball, and a great shooter. The SG doesn’t have to be an annual All-Star, but the SG matters.
by Scotter on Oct 21, 2008 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don't have the luxury of even asking about the importance of the second guard.
It’s important to us because we don’t have the options at the 3 that exist in New Orleans or Utah. We also don’t have anything close to the point production at the 4 and 5 that NO and Utah have.
Ben Gordon really matters because of what we lack at the 3, 4, and 5 in the scoring department.
I had the view that Thabo should be starting at the SG to open the season, but his preseason has made it impossible to defend that outlook.
by NBA Observer on Oct 21, 2008 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
rebuilding
Only ONE player said that…Gooden.
“So I don’t understand why they would start a player who is not really part of the future, a player who signed a one year contract and will be leaving next summer, unless they are looking to showcase his talents for a future trade (that of course he would have to approve).” – You just described both Kirk and Gooden there.
Even if they are rebuilding, so what! That means we want to start every game 15 points behind by starting Thabo??
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am pretty sure the game starts 0-0 regardless of who is starting.
I am not an advocate for starting Gooden nor Kirk. I would be an advocate for trading both players if/when the right deal came along. The primary difference between those players and Ben Gordon is that Gordon has to approve any trade.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you said Thabo
who’s talking about Gooden or Kirk? Thabo can’t score man…you can’t see that? Having him start is as good as the game starting out with the Bulls -15, in case you couldn’t understand the simile.
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You brought up Kirk and Gooden.
– You just described both Kirk and Gooden there.
Again, I will refer to Thabo’s 22 starts last season. He put up 11.9 points on 10.1 shots. He can score, and efficiently.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
doesn't it make you pause at all
to think that was when the Bulls were, for all intents and purposes, already in the tank that season?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you think the team was in the tank before 41 games?
I was optimistic about a turnaround last year until the trade deadline. But, I tend to be a Bulls optimist.
I wish I had any other opportunity to see Thabo play NBA games, but I have not. So, I am using the only stretch of time that I have seen him play.
"The whole leverage thing, it's a difficult thing to gauge" -Paxson
by Dionysus2.0 on Oct 21, 2008 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and don't you find it interesting
that the Hornets had been reportedly after Gordon in the recent past?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces! Be a 'Nazi' when it comes to thread duplication!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 21, 2008 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only in the sense
they’re already (and basically permanently) capped out and set at the 1,3,4, and 5. Bulls are set at 1 and 3 only.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 21, 2008 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how are they permanently capped out?
i mean, they can go over the cap or trade someone…
by DangerMouse on Oct 21, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I mean
they have their core, the only way they can add player is by trades and mid level exceptions. Under that policy, Ben is the best attainable player they can acquire without losing Paul, Peja, West, or Chandler. The Bulls aren’t set financially or personnel wise.
by CJ Bulls on Oct 21, 2008 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabo starting?????
You’re very brave to come on here and say such a thing!
by marionette on Oct 21, 2008 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
If Ben is really not in the long term picture. We just wanted to avoid some luxury tax. Ben had the ability still to sign a 6 yr 59M contract up to the very last seconds….and the next day Paxson even said Ben will still likely be in long term plans.
Paxson also said “it would have been foolish of me to trade Hinrich and then lose Ben for nothing”….now that Ben’s signed, I predict Kirk’s out the door.
by majoyenrac on Oct 21, 2008 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
With respects to you and Doug Thonus
I don’t get the idea that we just don’t need to get the best players we possibly can. Certainly we need the right types of players, but on it’s face it takes a real bunch of hubris to just assume player A is gonna be so darn good we just don’t need to find the best possible complements to Rose.
Michael Redd or Ray Allen or Kevin Martin would kick some major ass next to Rose. For the similar sort of reasons that Gordon might. Combine a guy who’s a great shooter with a PG that’s likely to create open shots for folks.
Which also gets to another point about Thabo. He’s about the exact opposite of those guys. He’s a shooting guard who can’t shoot. He’s got “defensive-stopper potential” but no more than any other player who’s currently not an elite defender but who has good size and athleticism. And no offensive game to speak of.
Brewer is an interesting comparison because he’s a similar player to Thabo, just a lot better. And you can make the case that Rose will be similar to Deron Williams. But when you look closely, the comparison totally falls flat, because what the Jazz really seem to do is play Brewer in more of the SF role. Mid-range game, slashing to the basket. Etc. Because that’s his offensive game… just like Thabo’s (just much better). This works perfectly well for the Jazz, because they’ve got a whole range of guys… CJ Miles, Kyle Korver, and even AK-47 who can defend well enough against SFs but who can shoot the lights out. And their bigs can step out and shoot as well.
We don’t have that. We’ve got Deng, who’s does a lot of things wonderfully, but shooting from range isn’t one of them. Our bigs can’t shoot either. But mostly it’s about Deng. As long as he’s here, and he will be come hell or high water, our other perimeter player absolutely needs to be a shooter. Not giving that option to Rose is, well, a complete freaking crime.
by Sports2 on Oct 21, 2008 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would like to see
thabo start but I have reservations. Yes because of his preseason play, and more importantly(or atleast going deeper into it) the lack of news about thabo working on his game this summer. I heard things both good and bad(mostly good) about players from different people(VDN, Pax, Thorpe ext..) but nothing about thabo. Taking that and the fact that his preseason has been a disappointment makes me septical.
But that doesnt mean we should start BG when he most likely will be gone after this season, or Kirk when hes not apart of our future(or atleast shouldnt be)
by TruEChiFaN... on Oct 21, 2008 4:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We heard Thabo
worked on his shot. That’s about it. Whatever came of that the results have not shown on the court. What we have seen is that he should have been working on his dribbling if he shot was never going to improve. Its been so awful thus far.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Late word from CSN
…Gordon will not be playing tonight. And Rose isn’t starting. Reasons to watch?
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 6:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Rose is still playing, though, right?
So tune in at 8:00 instead. No doubt Derrick will still get plenty o’ minutes.
Man-slave, bring me my PB&J!
by wjb1492 on Oct 21, 2008 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playing with Hughes...
Gordon might be gone in a year but you could argue that Hughes was never here at all. We’ve seen how they’ve played against the Mavs with this make-up of guards. Blah. I was really hoping to see what Rose/Gordon/Hinrich could do together. With very little or no Hughes. There was at least a possibility of entertainment tonight. In the very least a few questions about Gordon answered in some fashion.
I have to go out to eat with the folks in a few minutes. I am a lot less upset about missing most of the game now.
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ladies and gentleman
the Hinrich/Hughes backcourt is in full effect. Or full defect.
Thank God it’s on NBATV so I can watch it!
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on Oct 21, 2008 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They say its the foot again
but I started a rumor earlier that Hughes and Gordon refuse to play with each other. It looks better in the headlines. :)
Everything I post is speculation. I have no insider information nor ideas deemed concrete enough by those who are self-elected to regulate post content.
by cranscape on Oct 21, 2008 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if hughes knuckle
starts acting up tomorrow, we will have confirmation.
by DangerMouse on Oct 21, 2008 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
VDN held him out
because they are playing back-to-back
by NormVanBeer on Oct 21, 2008 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tomorrow they're playing a team with a small backcourt
Really, they should have sat Ben for that game and made him prove himself in adverse circumstances.
by Sports2 on Oct 22, 2008 6:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still think Luol Deng...
…is one of the most regular players I’ve ever seen. I’ve been sitting quietly waiting to see if he looks like he’s developed. It’s still pre-season so I’m not sure. But the one thing I do know is that he continues to be non-distinct player. People were on here talking about Deng as a #1 option. IMO, he’ll be lucky to be the #3 option when the season gets rolling (Rose developing into the top option and BG being second). Deng will thrive as the #3 option, but as I said LONG AGO, this guy is NO NUMBER ONE option. He doesn’t have the game nor mindset to be such (although now he makes the money to be such). I still don’t understand how we give this guy all that money and low ball Ben Gordon. As always though, I hope Deng proves me wrong.
Anyway, i’m excited about the possibilites with Rose (while i’m at it let me mention that Tyrus Thomas looks better now that Skiles doesn’t pull him for every mistake he makes). Been a VERY long time though since us Bulls fans have had the opportunity to watch the birth of a true star. Rose may very well be that guy. Only time will tell.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 21, 2008 11:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Also, let me say....
…cut Larry Hughes first thing tomorrow morning. I don’t give a damn about his salary. We will have a damn hard time finding somebody to take that salary off our hands. Worst case scenario we should buy him out. He used to be nice and will no doubt have a few good games, but he’s done. He’ll only take minutes from other guys that we need to be getting PT.
For the life of me I don’t understand how the hell we pick up Larry Hughes and keep his ass but when we traded Chandler for J.R. Smith we just shipped him off like he was a nobody. They both got a bit of knucklehead in them but Smith would have been far more productive than Hughes at about a third of the salary.
by lexdiamonds0730 on Oct 21, 2008 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












