Problem with my plan
This is reference to my initial thoughts after the lottery, where I reasoned that the best course of action with the 9th pick would be to package it with a sign/traded Andres Nocioni and some other parts to get a starting power forward for next season.
I didn't spell out this logistical problem at the time, but it is certainly an issue: the draft is June 28th and free agents (including restricted ones like Noc) can't be even negotiated with until July 1st. So unless there's a lot of shady under-the-table negotiation, the Bulls won't be picking for another team and packaging that pick with Noc.
That doesn't mean the pick can't be traded on draft night, it just can't be paired with a big salary to acquire another big-salaried player. Maybe someone on a rookie contract who can be had for #9 and Duhon, for instance. And Noc (or PJ Brown for that matter) still is a candidate to be a part of a sign/trade deal. But could Pax just take any prospect with that pick and hope it'd be wanted by any team that's a part of such a deal?
So it's realistic that we could see this #9 pick being made not to be traded itself, but to replace in the rotation whoever is traded later. And that really can open up the possibilities to all positions, however perhaps only to players ready to contribute right away.
(tip o' the hat: Red's Army)
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My question is
I really have no clue what Im talking about. I tried.
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Jun 7, 2007 11:48 PM CDT reply actions
bulls
by Sambossanova on Jun 8, 2007 12:44 AM CDT up reply actions
They make it out of the
by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Jun 8, 2007 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions
Three principles that will guide Paxson
- The Bulls need a low post presence. Therefore, the conventional wisdom says that the Bulls need a 4 or 5 who can post up. Well, Jordan's Bulls didn't have a 4 or 5 who could post up but they did have a post-up game--just ask John Starks. They did have a collection of 5's that could hit a 12-15 footer on occasion which made the opposing 5 respect them, follow them out to the elbow area, and clear out the middle. So, there is more than one way to skin a cat.
- The CBA dictates that in a trade salaries must match, making matching talent difficult. This also makes it difficult for teams with good young players to trade them before they sign their second contract (plus there is the "base year" problem). Noce will be the only one in this category this year, but not until he signs his new contract. Therefore, trading for someone this summer is going to be difficult.
- The Bulls seem to be following the Suns plan, and here's how they could match up in the future:
Diaw ????
Marion Deng
Bell Sefalosha
Nash Heinrick
Thomas Wallace
Jones Nocioni
Barbosa Gordon
Implications:
Gordon will come off the bench and needs to learn how to be a point guard.
The Bulls will draft the most athletic 2,3,4 available and
Don't forget Nicholas Batum will be available next year
Suns...Bulls Style
The suns game play style (flashy offense first, dramtic defensive stop, quick quick quick) is depicted of thier point gaurd (nash) and center (stoudemire), while the bulls play style (defense first, pass the ball around and find the open jumper, dribble penetrate) is reflected in thier point gaurd (hinrich) and center (wallace)
if the two teams are gonna match up the way you say it would be pretty fun to watch, the ultimate offense vs the ultimate defense?
What the Bulls should do...
Sweetney,Brown, Nocioni, Duhon, #9 pick.
I realize Sweetbread and Brown are FA's, but Im thinking sign and trade to help match $$.
They should trade some combination of the above for Nick Collison. It works for both the Bulls and Sonics. Sonics get the #2 and #9 pick, with maybe Duhon, Brown, Sweets to make $$ work. They can rebuild. the Bulls get the low post threat they are looking for. IT can work. It can work for both teams. If necessary, the Bulls can add Nocioni to the trade, but I would hope its not necessary.
-Mac
by MacLean on Jun 10, 2007 11:03 AM CDT reply actions
Some combination of the above?
by Paxson Jackson @ Blog a Bull on Jun 10, 2007 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions

by 













