Blog a Bull: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Bulls/Nets postgame reactionary thoughts.

That game thread got out of control early, so I'll start in a new one with some post-game thoughts. Before I get started, this is just one game and I don't understand the need to extrapolate any of it into the season or franchise direction as a whole. Nothing you saw tonight should change one's thoughts on the team's direction one way or the other.

  • Last thing first: Skiles sat on his hands for the last 5 minutes and overtime. It was Nocioni at the PF for too long of a stretch, and that just kills the team rebounding. If you want to get 'tough' rebounds, don't play 'tougher', put in better rebounders. Sure, after struggling all game, Noc hit some big shots at the end and was the only one converting in OT, but I don't want him taking shots in overtime anyway.
     
  • To pick on the 5-year man some more, he was part of that clusterfuck that was the final play of regulation. He waited too long to set the screen, and then couldn't wait to run towards the basket, making his contribution to the play was bringing a second defender towards Ben Gordon. And that ended as well as expected.
     
  • Tyrus had a tough go in his opening stint, getting two quick fouls. He also missed a few easy conversions that he'll usually make. But he was still on the floor during the Bulls best stretch, and didn't seem to make too many mistakes overall. I was disappointed we didn't see him more, or Joe Smith for that matter. Skiles seemed to have always have Smith in without pairing him with Wallace or Tyrus, and that's yet another bad rebounding combination, but offensively Joe looked quite good.
     
  • Ben Gordon had a phenomenal third quarter shooting the ball, and while I'd normally complain that he didn't get to the line quite enough, I acknowledge the possibility that he was sick of getting jobbed by the officials on a lot of contact plays. Put his drives next to Vince Carter's, and there was a clear discrepancy in how they were called.
     
  • The Luol-post option went alright, but there wasn't enough of it. Especially in overtime when it was the Noc show. There was also a play when Luol was able to dribble the length of the court with a man tailing him and finish, a situation that in years past would've likely wound up a turnover.
     
  • I thought Skiles had pretty good rotations overall until the aforementioned final lineup. Joe Smith was the first frontcourt player off the bench, and Thabo the first backcourt player. Of course when Thabo got two turnovers in a row late in the first half you could hear the doghouse door open. Duhon actually had a decent game, and it was needed considering the foul trouble Hinrich was in all night. But we even got a glimpse of the tiny-ball lineup, which I thought had been destroyed in Mt. Doom. "Duhon +  Richard Jefferson = success" is written on the dry-erase board of the locker room.
     
  • The worst part about having no 'go to scorer' is that they should at least be giving the ball to Deng and Gordon to give them any opportunity to become that. Instead we received a heavy dose of Nocioni and Ben Wallace. 
     
  • Ok, so would Kobe Bryant have helped the free-throw discrepancy, and given a better option on the last possession? Sure. But it's not just Ben Gordon for Kobe Bryant, so don't react like it's that simple. [UPDATE: Oh man, how predictable.]
     
  • Antoine Wright? What the hell?

0 recs  |  Comment 144 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Not that much has changed.
I like Joe Smith and I think they should have subbed him in for Wallace.

I just don't think this is a Finals team. I really wish I knew what the hell is going on. I'm in a bit of limbo as a Bulls fan. I would like to see the Bulls make the trade.

''This whole parties out of control!''-Moose

by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Oct 31, 2007 10:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wright is the new Moore
lets just hope this doesnt start a spiral into a 45 win season...

-Mighty fight, but loss at the hands of angry Kidd and hateful Carter and officials who love Da Stars
-contract situations, Kobe situations...every shot Deng and Gordon shoot has the potential to be overshot
-Joe Smith is the only new player. Oh.

ugg...the Celtics seem alot harder to overcome after tonight...

SAY NO TO THE CHICAGO LAKERS!

by hongydraw on Oct 31, 2007 10:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

tonight should change nothing
if you think that way now, you should've felt that way all along. This one game, an overtime loss on the road, should mean nothing regarding the freaking celtics. Also, if you think that Deng and Gordon's contract situations will make them 'overshoot', then they don't deserve the contracts in the first place. And lets put your overreactions into clear view: In the 2nd quarter you wanted Gordon pulled from the rest of the game, declaring it an 'off night'. You forgot to add 'greetings from the land of the retarded'.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 31, 2007 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well Put
If nothing more, the fact that we came back from a 15 point deffecit was amazing. It wasnt like we did in garbage time, or if the nets werent going at as at all. Actually, the nets werent that great, the only thing that really put them in front of us, was the fact that we (or rather the officials) kept putting them on the line. Was it something like 20 of thier first quarter points were free throws (dont jump me if the numbers wrong)? The maturity to get it together, especially since we are (incoming cliche) a jump shooting team, that isnt easy. Ben gordon didnt declare its an off night and hang up his shoes, he did what great players do, kept shooting the ball with the concept that  the next one was gonna fall, maturity indeed.
im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Nov 1, 2007 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about kirk?
 Before he fouled out was he effective?  Did he ever get a chance to play for an extended stretch? Were TT or Wallace playing like they were hurt?  I was in my car for the whole game :(

by haze on Oct 31, 2007 10:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They didn't look hurt
until Wallace stepped up to the line to shoot his first free throw, which was 5 feet short.  Kirk played a lot of the 4th and most of the overtime.  His fifth foul was a bad call, but it's hard to argue after the first four.  He was effective when he was in, and the Bulls looked better with him in there, but he wasn't in much until the 4th.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Oct 31, 2007 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kirks fouls
His fifth one was a bad call, as was his first, and his second, the only ones that seemed like real fouls was the one when he was trying to get that loose ball, and the intentional...I thought he was effective when he was in, and he did top jordan in three pointers
im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Nov 1, 2007 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In Defense...
...of the 3 Guard Lineup: New Jersey was also running it with Kidd, Wright and Carter, and I think Jefferson may have even been playing PF for a spell.

That said, yes, let's hope Skiles doesn't get too fond of it again.

by BenGo07 on Oct 31, 2007 10:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

True, but it's rarely a good idea to
have the three shortest guys on the court all on your team.  

by Scotter on Oct 31, 2007 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if the bulls arent a finals team...
then what team from the east is? the cavs team last year.. ugh i dont see james carrying them again. even when the pistons won it a few years ago they didn't have a bona-fide superstar. billups, big ben, or rich hamilton? Yes all good players, but not of the kobe / duncan / kidd skill level.
Yeah Gordon for Kobe = No brainer.  But if you have to give up a few pieces to get Kobe, then it becomes complicated. Sort of like Boston giving up so many players for KG. Except Chicago's players are actually good lol.

by duaneo88 on Oct 31, 2007 10:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the third quarter and the last play
perfectly typify the BG conundrum.  As hot as he was in the third, he has no magic left for the end of game situations.  Everybody knows he was going to try to get a shot off, and since he can't create for anybody else, the play isn't hard to defend.  I think it's time to put the ball in somebody else's hands with the game on the line.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Oct 31, 2007 10:29 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I blame the last play
on Skiles. That is all you could draw up? A pick and roll with 8 seconds left. It did not work last year and won't work this year. Why didn't Kirk have the ball to drive and kick? We should have ran the regular offense and looked for an open shot or gotten to the Foul line. Nice coaching!
It's Go Time Pax!

by Knowledge32 on Nov 1, 2007 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

last play sucked
I was yelling at TV, not again, not again, move, move, move!

I think Bulls waited to long to start play and from what I remember seeing last year, BenG holding ball until last sec only results in a contested long range shot

when tied, shouldn't the bulls try and get something going towards basket or pass to open shooter, why when they run such a good offense do they make obvious dumb play at end

by NY Chicago Fan on Nov 1, 2007 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

all of the articles
that I read this morning (my DVR cut off before the end so I didn't see it) said that a man (Noce) was supposed to be cutting towards the basket...when that didn't happen, BG was forced to take the tough shot

So my assumption is that it was drawn up correctly, they just didn't execute it.

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

KC sez
In the recap:
The Bulls had the final possession of regulation, but Gordon, who led the Bulls with 27 points on just 8-of-25 shooting, had to force a 27-footer off a broken play that left coach Scott Skiles screaming at Andres Nocioni.

Maybe he screamed 'YOU JUST EARNED PT FOR THE ENTIRE OVERTIME!'

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not blaming Ben
Just to clarify, I'm not saying its BenG's fault, I can not tell as I was not in huddle and practice (I assume they PRACTICE these things?).  Maybe it was bad execution and maybe Noc screwed up.  All I know is I everytime they put ball in BenGs hands and wait, wait wait it doesn't seem they ever get a good look.  

Also just because BenG is capable of making that somtimes doesn't mean its a good play, so even if it goes in, I still don't like idea

I'll hope Skills did design something else and the Bulls execute better.  

by NY Chicago Fan on Nov 1, 2007 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

small brush fire maybe?
I have to disagree...I'd rather have the ball in Ben's hands as the clock winds down than anyone else.

MAYBE Kirk, but that's it.  Those two are your best creators on the team.  Lu is a finisher.

Again, I think the problem with last night's play strictly came down to bad execution on the team (it took all of my might not to single Noce out just then)

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BenG
I didn't mean to say not to give it to BenG.  I mean don't have him stand at top of the key with the ball until under 10secs then move sideways for a 3 pt shot.

Shouldn't be shooting a 3 if the game is tied unless its open off a pass

I agree Lu is finisher, and didn't rewatch play but don't even remember where he was and I'm sure NJ was defending him so he might have been taken out of play

by NY Chicago Fan on Nov 1, 2007 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so was
the play designed for BG to shoot a 3 or for him to pass to the would-be cutter (Noce)?  Sounds like I'm hearing mixed things.

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it doesn't matter
I don't think BG is going to be able to do either very well in late game situations.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

'magic'
Another word for clutch? :-)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

heh
you got me.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A Deserving loss.
Agree with joejoe, but I just don't want to actually type it.

Matt, the Nets are better than #9 in the east. They'd be even better IF Carter never shot another jumpshot all year.

  • Yes, Deng was consistent...but quiet!
  • Gordon brought us back in the game in the 3rd, but while Wright was freezing Gordon with sick defense for the rest of the game, Wright HIT OPEN SHOTS. Shots he shouldn't even have.  Why was he so open? I'd like to review that tape. hmm.
  • (Gordon, 6 TOs, huh?) huh?
  • Noc and Hinrich = stupid, stupid fouls.
  •  TT doesn't look any older. Please, let me be wrong.
  • Duhon kept this team together while everyone else was mis-stepping. duhon was consistent, with only 1 poorly chosen shot.
I think we all need to remember that the trade rumors have to be affecting the team. The rumors aren't even focused on 1 bulls player, any player can be traded. These facts have to affect the vibe, the communication, and the concentration of the bulls.

by chicago-homesick-blues on Oct 31, 2007 10:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

About Kirk's fouls
Two of them were not fouls at all it was just the stupid refs being decieve by Jefferson accidently slipping too the floor and Hinrich happened to be standing right next to him.

I do agree that Noc had a foul night.

by AngryAsianAce on Oct 31, 2007 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blah
The nets are better than ninth seed???? THey shot 4 freakin airballs in a row....the only real points they had in the first quarter were from free throws...seriously, the nets werent as good as they looked, the bulls just played bad. Even with the foul calls, there were too many baskets that should have been cake that were missed, tyrus a few times made layups when he shouldve pounded the ball in, and his layups missed, same with wallace...even deng missed a couple of inside buckets. Hinrich has gotta learn to stay on the good side of refs, and skiles has gotta learn to put in some fresh legs rather than stick with a comfortable line up.
im trying hard to become the next kirk hinrich, therefore im doing nothing more than being the next chris duhon.

by piccolomair on Nov 1, 2007 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
I've been hating on Duhon all summer and he really looked sharp yesterday.

Joe Smith looks like a gigantic upgrade over PJ and I think given Tyrus' struggles and Smith's smarts, Joe should be our starting PF (I expect the switch to occur soon.

by majoyenrac on Nov 1, 2007 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Joe
agree, JoeS looked decent

Thomas has to make those easy baskets, even with that said I don't think we should judge him too much on one game, but still doesn't look comfortable out there, although I worry that the only way he will improve is if he keeps playing (downside is that he may never really be that good on offense)

Thabo - not sure what happenned there as he lost his mind on those 2 passes which lead to NJ baskets, I still think Bulls need him

by NY Chicago Fan on Nov 1, 2007 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jefferson was a beast &
15 assist for kidd -_-;;;

&

The refs were mental.

by AngryAsianAce on Oct 31, 2007 10:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I read on the paper today
Gordon negotiations with the Bulls more or less fell apart. From the sounds of it, the Bulls seemed to have offered more money to Deng. It seems very likely that Gordon will be a restricted free agent next year.

Paxson you got fuckin 13...12 minutes to sign Deng to an extension!!!!!!!!!!!

by AngryAsianAce on Oct 31, 2007 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel like the Bulls were more confident against
the Nets tonight than they were last year. They never panicked and actually could easily have won. I think well be fine this season.

by philosoball on Oct 31, 2007 10:35 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Kind of funny that the Pacers,
who were picked to finish last in pretty much every season preview I saw, get to be on top for at least a day or two.

From the little I saw flipping between games (and recaps seem to confirm it), Cleveland looked pretty bad tonight.

"They had me do a psychology test and I asked Coach Skiles if that affected his coaching. He laughed and said, `No way.'" (Joakim Noah)

by wjb1492 on Oct 31, 2007 10:36 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh Well, Time to feast on Sixers on Friday!
Home Sweet home for the home opener!

Andre Igloodalla (w/e) and his team can't match our lineup.

by AngryAsianAce on Oct 31, 2007 10:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Just did...
... a quick +/- for Tyrus and Nocioni. Ty was +6; Nocioni was -18.

by BenGo07 on Oct 31, 2007 10:45 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm glad the numbers bear out
what I felt watching the game.  I thought if Thomas was playing defense instead of Noc, Noc's 3 pointer wouldn't have even been needed.

by Scotter on Oct 31, 2007 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noce was really bad defensively tonight
He looked lost out there most of the time.  And to think Dr. Jack Ramsay picked him to be the Defensive Player of the Year this season.

by Big D on Oct 31, 2007 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just realized
I slightly miscalculated (I thought Noce was in during that awful period late in the 2nd.) Still, he ended up -11. And Ty was actually +7

by BenGo07 on Oct 31, 2007 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

found out NBA.com boxscores have +/-
sweet, right?? It's like a quick fix while waiting for popcornmachine the next morning.

http://www.nba.com/games/20071031/CHINJN/boxscore.html

They have Noc at -12. Second worst, Thabo with -16.

Wallace and Thomas the only ones with + ratings. Somewhere Dave Berri smiles.

And beyond the rebounding, Noc was also roaming on D, especially on that Jefferson 3-pointer...per usual.

I do have to say it's Skiles I should be mad at, not the Noc.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Oct 31, 2007 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh..
...they only have Ty at +3. Must be f*cking up somehow.

by BenGo07 on Oct 31, 2007 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well
I wonder if we swapped Noc with Tyrus in the starting lineup if the results would change.  Noc was on the court when Thabo f-d up, and that hurt his effectiveness and Tyrus was on when Gordon went wild.

Fact is that besides a few lapses on defense (and who could blame Nocioni--I'd typically give Jefferson some 3pt tries since shooting has never been his strong point--but the shots just went down), Noc looked decent in the clutch for us where Tyrus looked still like a rookie (I was disappointed in his game after being pumped by his growth all offseason--but I know it's just one game.

I'm tired of the Noc hating here.  It's easy to see why Noc wouldn't have as good of a +/- spread when he's playing the bulk of his minutes with the second unit--and Noc did look rusty at the start of the game.

by majoyenrac on Nov 1, 2007 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No you don't
you want them to "be clutch."
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think getting a chucker out of the lineup
would help them be more active in clutch situations, which is all I ask. If they can't do it, fine...but I don't believe in getting your clutch players the ball, but getting your best players the ball.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

running that last play
with Joe Smith instead of Noc might have been a better idea.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe
The thing that got me last night was that I partially understood Skiles riding the same lineup until the final posession. Coaches do that. But then why keep everyone out there for the whole overtime?

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if play
was for Noc to cut to basket, yes I'd rather have Deng or JSmith (hopefully someday Thomas could attack rim) cutting to basket and Noc spotting up for jump shot if they need a kick out

with tied game, I think you need to attack, defense doesn't want to foul (and there was ton of whistles that game, although I know Bulls have history of not getting best calls) and maybe more movement could have led to better put back attempt opportunity

by NY Chicago Fan on Nov 1, 2007 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate all this hate on the word clutch here too
I like this site, but every time I mention clutch you guys go crazy...

Fact is there are several players who play well but do little when the game is on the line.....

Others thrive (Wade, James, Bryant, and I'd say Mr. 4th Qtr can too in Gordon).

Nocioni has thrived for us in the past.  Deng thrived for us only against the Heat (w/Walker) and the thing is that Deng has far more talent than Noc, and now has the hype and the experience, he needs to become that guy.

by majoyenrac on Nov 1, 2007 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's not fair
Nocioni climbed high into the Andes to visit a shaman who bestowed a vile of magic playoff juice (made with the bones of Bryce Drew), and the toenail clippings of John Havlicek for regular season clutchiness. It was a treacherous journey that Deng needs to make himself before being the 'guy'.

by hscs on Nov 1, 2007 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I watched the Bucks
Sigh.

Now that was a sad, sad, second half.

by KT on Oct 31, 2007 10:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

During the game, in pre-game interviews, and
in post-game interviews, the entire team seemed oddly lethargic and detached. Even Skiles appeared to be aloof and apathetic.

by 1958ChiTown on Oct 31, 2007 11:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe.
Although Skiles usually demonstrates some scintilla of intensity.

by 1958ChiTown on Nov 1, 2007 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought Deng...
Looked really good tonight. He was getting into the passing lanes, and seemed to make solid decisions with the ball. The difference between the fouls for Chicago and New Jersey was ridicoulos!

Nocioni on the other hand was the same old Noc. I don't hate the guy, but wish Skiles would use him less.

I see Skiles like the old Polaks in my family. They are completely stubborn, and will not change there minds for anything, no matter how compelling the agruement. It takes a sledge hammer over the head to make them just think about changing course.

by ScottSkilles Hair on Oct 31, 2007 11:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Please Calm Down
Ok Ok I'm just some of you out there might pissed or sad or.....after what has just happen.

Just let me know your honest after click this link

http://mundoalbiceleste.blogspot.com/2007/10/thirty-times-greatest.html

Please visit my blog @ http://mundoalbiceleste.blogspot.com/

by sivanjohn on Oct 31, 2007 11:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I figured out why Skiles did what he did...
(I'm trying to get away from the "He's tough, dammit!" idea).

The team was on fire while Thomas was in there. Thomas' typical break time came. Nocioni came in. The team went cold. Seeing this, Skiles wanted more offense so he left Nocioni in.

Skiles failed to see that in this case, it was not purely coincidental. From watching the game, what your typical box-score doesn't show:
--Thomas had to be accounted for on defensive and offensive glass so he was boxed out. Wallace and Thomas were left to one-on-one rebounding. Deng, too.
--Thomas and Wallace each had multiple tip-outs to open guards whose defender's had collapsed on a missed shot.
--After a missed shot, Nocioni was nowhere near the basket. He was often out around the 3 pt line. This meant that Wallace was typically be muscled by two guys around the basket, sometimes as three. Deng was taking a few of those late shots, too, so he wasn't often close to the basket.
--Nocioni was "guarding" Jefferson. This wasn't a huge deal, but it mattered. He did fine a few times (at least once, anyway), but was often out of position. Again, it meant only one rebounder on the defensive end. Thomas may have guarded Jefferson as well, but he could have given more slack, thus help-defending the paint and being in better position to rebound while still having the ability to recover.

It feels funny saying this, but "these are things that don't show up in a box score". But I'm confident the +/- accurately reflects it.

While unconventional, I believe the Wallace and Thomas pair is perfect for this team. The answer to a jump shooting team isn't a slow, post-scoring fool. It's getting rebounders who want to rebound and can rebound. A post-scorer is, almost by definition, going to already be boxed out, even on a kick out. Thomas and Wallace, however, will be looking towards the ball and the hoop, constantly looking for ways to get to the latter.

The fast/2ndary break stuff that sbulls mentioned (and I tried to elaborate on) made sense, but after only one game, Wallace and Thomas together makes even more sense. Allowing Hinrich/Duhon, Gordon and Deng to run around jacking up shots with two guys waiting down low to get it back out to them keeps around just as much "HOT" while reducing the "cold".

Kobe (because of what would have to be given up) is not the answer; more Tyrus Thomas and Ben Wallace together is. In a month or two, I'll gladly accept that I'm wrong if TT is getting 30 mins and they still suck, but I'm not seeing that happening. I think, this year, Thomas could be comparable to Wallace in production if given the minutes (not match, but come close). That's not normal. But neither is trying to win a championship without one or two exceptional players.

I'll finally admit, if Skiles gets out of his own way, this team can do that as currently built.

Yes, of course.

by tyger1147 on Oct 31, 2007 11:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Jesus, sorry I wrote that much.
But it's the first Bulls game I've seen in its entirety in probably three years. And I'm really, really excited about it. It's flawed, but it can be a really, really good team, and those are my reasons why I think so.
Yes, of course.

by tyger1147 on Oct 31, 2007 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do also realize that this is a Nets team
w/ a bad front court. And that this isn't the formula for beating every team. But I think it's the best chance this team has without making huge changes. And by "comparable" to Wallace, I mean within roughly 20% in typical statistical categories, with a few more fuckups, but a few more exceptional plays. And I'm not talking four years ago Wallace, but this year's version.
Yes, of course.

by tyger1147 on Oct 31, 2007 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nocioni hatred
is completely and utterly unwarranted.  Talk about +- stats all you want, but whoever was on the floor when Ben Gordon went off is gonna have their +- stats helped when they didnt really have anything to do with it on the offensive end.

Nocioni not only hit the big shot to tie the game, but he was hitting in overtime unlike anyone else.  You say you want Thomas in there, fine, but how about you keep Nocioni in and let Deng sit when he was taking the kind of ill advised jumpers you'd hate from Nocioni, including one from the corner drifting out of bounds that led to a fast break basket on the other end.  If Deng is just gonna take jumpers and he's not gonna make them, I have no problem having Nocioni in there, who actually played good D in OT except for the Jefferson play when he left him open, but that was a pick your poison situation anyway.

I see too much on this board about how this team is only going to be great if they have Thomas and Deng in there but if Thomas and Deng can't actually do the things you want them to do, its not that simple.  Thomas did not have a great game, anyone who watched it would know that and we needed Nocioni's offense down the stretch and in OT and Thomas simply could not have provided that.

by JSlakov on Nov 1, 2007 12:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Noc does a lot of good at times
But I hate when any veteran does that half-assed double team (that led to the R Jeff dagger 3pter). Commit to a hard double that forces a TO or difficult pass, or stay home! But he's not the only one, and they weren't gonna win it in OT, in all likelihood.

by marionette on Nov 1, 2007 1:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just looked at the play-by-play
1:07 left in OT, only down 105-102 when they had Deng open, curling the lane, but refs blew whistle on a R Jeff reach. You could see Deng react like "why call that now? I had a pass and clear path for 2pts"! Then Wallace threw a pass off the back of Carter's(?) arm that became the dagger 3.

So I take it back, they could've been in it at the end of OT.

by marionette on Nov 1, 2007 2:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not a double team
it's a Hedge. Not Noc's fault, it is the fault of the individual who didn't rotate over fast enough
It's Go Time Pax!

by Knowledge32 on Nov 1, 2007 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and besides....
RJ's not a great 3pt shooter, I'd typically give him that shot and focus on help to avoid having Carter-Kidd get to the lane.

Antoinne Wright was the real reason the Nets won (well and of course JKidd) Wright was unbelievably clutch for them hitting big baskets at the end and in OT and in the 3rd quarter he and Natchbar helped counter some of the BG explosion--I just wish when the Nets got cold in the end of the 3rd, we weren't cold with them...

by majoyenrac on Nov 1, 2007 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the info
I've heard of it, the hedge. And it would be like the bunt in baseball for me. Or a prevent defense. I don't usually want to see it used.

Oh well, let's get after the Sixers.

by marionette on Nov 1, 2007 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate that
Nocioni double teams people, or does that half-hearted double team I should say, a LOT.  I don't understand why he would double unless he's actually going to trap the guy and somebody else is ready to rotate to his man.  It was totally unnecessary since Deng was the defender and left his man wide open.  

by bigballa10 on Nov 1, 2007 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree with you wholeheartedly
I think when Noc stays on his man, he's a good defender, but he is constantly following the ball and leaving his man for wide open looks.....

Yesterday was a slight excuse because RJ isn't very effective from the outside, but even that said after Jefferson started hitting some of his outside shots, Nocioni (and the Bulls coaching staff) should have reminded Noc to stay on him tonight.

by majoyenrac on Nov 1, 2007 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did anyone watch ESPN tonight??
A source talked to Deng who said the deal is being held up by Kobe because he wants a good team around him. The trade isn't dead.
''This whole parties out of control!''-Moose

by joejoeEnglish94bulls4ever on Nov 1, 2007 12:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Tyrus
+/- stats aside, am I the only one who thought Thomas played not so good???? Its not just the missed open shots, but the fact that he couldnt finish near the basket and that he was trying to rely on his athleticism on defense a couple of times and let up easy baskets. Im not saying nocioni was a better option, but I don't understand this Tyrus admiration.  I guess he is better because the bulls do better when he is on the court, but he doesnt look much better than last season and that extra weight hasnt helped him much. I still cringe when  he gets the ball and get excited when i see him leaping for blocks, but he isn't looking too good. Aldridge on the other hand....sorry i wont do that one again.

by Sambossanova on Nov 1, 2007 12:27 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think he played that well
but he's the better player overall, and he didn't play bad.

Only 1 TO in 22 minutes. So...if he keeps that up he's improved. I don't know why anyone would've expected him to be a drastically different player. His 'young mistakes' (or whatever everyone says he does) is that he blew a couple of layups that he normally makes. Took one jumpshot from what I remember.

I can't comment on your defensive evaluations, I didn't notice any overpursuing or leaving his feet too often, but I wasn't looking for it either.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

coming back a few hours later
and reading some of the crap I posted...WOW. I didnt know i got so carlos-zambrano-in-the-heat-of-the-momment-esque. If i do that again, please, somebody give me a virtual kick to the junk.
SAY NO TO THE CHICAGO LAKERS!

by hongydraw on Nov 1, 2007 1:32 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Gordon had a real good game
at BOTH ends, surprisingly. But he's not G Arenas, and Skiles is my choice for goat by calling a final (reg) play that had to degenerate into BG one on one vs Carter, when the screen man simply showed. I didn't see anyone for BG to pass to, and there was no time anyway. But didn't you (and all the Nets, probably) see that "play" coming.

Hinrich had a very rough game! Not just the PFs, but no one's mentioned he got Wright started, and helped keep him hot in 2nd half. Sometimes there's no figuring...dude was hardly on the court.

V Carter's lack of conscience makes Kobe look good. Whoever said the Nets are good and would be even better if he never took another jumper...Exactly!

Maybe I'm projecting, but they really did look more mature, more like veterans. Like the key players have outgrown their coach...

But not Tyrus or Thabo. It's crazy how TT's a + this game when he seems to have so far to go. (Maybe 'cause most min were w/starters?) His def pos was good, though. He just needs to relax/slow down when there's opportunity on offense. And let's hope Thabo stays outta the doghouse. All Bulls would've done well to keep an eye out for J Kidd steal attempts. Thabo wasn't alone, just most victimized.

Speaking of...Kidd ALWAYS plays this hard, I swear people! Do y'all realize his career numbers approach Oscar Robertson's??? We were lucky enough to have him in Phx a few years before his domestic "issue" spurred JC (Colangelo, not Christ...but it's close) to trade him away. Still can't shoot except the open 3 ball, but a COMPLETE player, not just passing PG, who gets more solid each year. Like Bobby Orr coming up ice from behind his own net, with a rebound he's a one man fastbreak.

Deng could do a better job of using his quickness on R Jeff. Noc can't. VC is defendable, if it's not a gross mis-match. I think the Bulls can get by the Nets if Skiles pays more att'n to matchups (Don't go to even smaller 3G lineup, when they go small especially!). The players look ready, even Thabo and TT to a lesser degree.

And call a final possession play that has more than, say, a 10% chance to work.

by marionette on Nov 1, 2007 1:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Modification
I see BG was 8 for 25, with 6 TOs, and it's tough to call that a good offensive game. Combined, he and Noc were 12 for 37. Which is rather Kobe-like.

by marionette on Nov 1, 2007 2:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Vince Carter kept the Bulls in it.
Considering the poor play from everyone but Deng, it should have been a blow-out for the Nets.  But Carter (6 for 21 shooting) kept firing blanks.  Jason Collins also did his best for the Bulls, doing almost nothing for the Nets in 26 minutes of playing time.

What really concerned me was the poor play of Ben Wallace.  The Bulls are in trouble if Wallace keeps getting only five rebounds in 38 minutes.  And he didn't contribute much else, either.  I hope it's just that his ankle was bothering him, but if that's the case why was he out there for 38 minutes?  Wallace can't just be okay, he has to be a star for the Bulls to succeed.

I'm amused but not surprised that in articles about the game Gordon gets credit for keeping the Bulls in it, despite 8 for 25 shooting and six turnovers.  Yes, he had a nice run in the third quarter, but the game is played for four quarters, and in this case in overtime as well.

If the big men keep playing like this, we may see Aaron Gray after all, but I agree that would be bad news for the Bulls, not because Aaron Gray is that bad, but because we shouldn't have to play our rookies.

by Tim S. on Nov 1, 2007 7:14 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

oh please
gimme a break with the Gordon getting undeserved credit comments...if he didn't do what he did, then they'd be looking at an even worse loss last night.

Playing for 4 quarters is all well and good, but you have to take what you can get.  He was the main reason they didn't lose by 15+ last night.

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with Tim...
...I couldn't watch the game, but after seeing the box score I was surprised to see that everyone on this forum thinks BG did ok. I think because he has scoring spurts, people tend to forget the earlier poor quarters.

by bullsfaninbigapple on Nov 1, 2007 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was
who we thought he was.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and because
he has poor quarters, people tend to forget all of the good things that he does do

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deng
Again Luol relatively disappeared in the second half.  It's so frustrating.  He looked dominant in the first half (though why he didn't match up defensively against Jefferson remains a mystery--if Deng is our much hyped franchise guy shouldn't he be matching up against his SF counterpart?).

I really liked what I saw from Luol in the first half, he seemed to be the only one ready to play.

Then he was so quiet in the second half and did little of anything (he hit a nice dunk in the mid of the 4th, but that was about it).

If he's our franchise guy I want to see him actually do some franchise guy things when the game is on the line....something he's never really done besides that Heat series last year.

Gordon again proved why he is our best player last night putting together a thrilling 3rd quarter.....I wish he could have kept it up in the 4th, but I'd still say his game was solid (and I agree with Matt about the foul discrepencies---Vince has a finger hit him and it's a foul, Tyrus and Ben get thrown all aroudn the court and its nothing).

While I hate focusing on the officials, I think they should try to call the game the same for both sides.  Jersey played pretty physical yesterday, which rather surprised me....

I actually was glad Nocioni was ont he court for us in the OT, he was the only guy willing to play clutch for us and he had a nice 4th and decent OT (but a rough Q1-Q3).

Finally, Kirk has to avoid foul trouble, I'm tired of him opening the season with foul issues (he'll have a rough stint for the first month of the season like he always does--if yesterday was any indication).

Overall, I like the way we bounced back after half time, made me think that the Bulls thought Kobe was coming in the first half, and the coaching staff/Paxson informed them otherwise at halftime.  Hopefully we can play better for all 48 on Friday (which I'm pumped about cuz I'll be there).

by majoyenrac on Nov 1, 2007 7:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's what PopcornMachine says about that.
Deng's stats in the second half and overtime:

FG 4-10
Reb 4
Ast 2
Stl 4
FT 1-1

Gordon's stats in the second half and overtime:

FG 6-17
FT 5-5
Reb 6
Ast 4
TO 4
St 1

Looking at more than just how much they scored, I would say Deng played better during the second half and overtime, as he did for the entire game.

by Tim S. on Nov 1, 2007 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Better than Gordon?
I don't think putting the two of them against eachother achieves much, but Deng needs to get more productivity than that. 1 FTA :(

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I agree.
I do wish Deng would get to the line more often.

And on second thought, Gordon's second half wasn't as bad as I first thought.  The free throws help make up for the poor shooting percentage, and he did get a number of rebounds.  But the four turnovers were costly, while Deng's four steals helped keep us in the game.  

But even if Gordon wasn't that bad, he also wasn't that good, and certainly not as good as he might seem if you only look at his 6 for 10 shooting in the third quarter, as most game reports would.

I'm still most concerned about Wallace.

by Tim S. on Nov 1, 2007 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

really? I thought Wallace was fine
Unless you're worried that he'll have a lingering injury or something.  

I don't even think about Wallace when he's out there, which is why I like him :)

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Five rebounds in 38 minutes?
And not much else in the way of blocks, steals, or assists?  I do want to think about Wallace when he is out there.  I want to think about what a great game he is having.

by Tim S. on Nov 1, 2007 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

give it time
Wallace seemed to get his hands on some other balls and tipped at least 1 out for open shot, which doesn't show up in rebounds

by NY Chicago Fan on Nov 1, 2007 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, I have high expectations for Wallace.
But maybe it was just that he hadn't practiced for a week.

by Tim S. on Nov 1, 2007 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm guessing
his ankle is still bothering and keeping him from giving 100%.
Racecar spelled backwards is racecar.

by sue369 on Nov 1, 2007 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Me too.
Racecar spelled backwards is racecar.

by sue369 on Nov 1, 2007 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also
Deng was afraid to do more, Gordon was forced to lead the team on offense....and with 2-3 guys on him when he gets hot like he did, his numbers suffered.

Deng was awesome in the first half, but he really could have done much more in the 2nd half.....maybe soon he'll notice that (hopefully the coaches point it out to him).

Gordon will improve if someone else takes the constant pressure to perform off of him...if we can make it Deng, Hinrich, Noc some nights and Gordon others then that works for me.

BG also after getting on his hot streak had plenty of shots that looked good but unfortunately just rimmed out.  Not his best game either, but he's the main reason why we took it to OT, so I give his shooting a break.

by majoyenrac on Nov 1, 2007 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gordon and Deng will both improve if Hinrich
manages to stay out of foul trouble.  But I don't see how Gordon can miss most of his shots in three out of four quarters and still be given the lion's share of the credit for taking the game to overtime.

by Tim S. on Nov 1, 2007 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because
If Gordon didn't get hot in the 3rd when he did, we would have always had that 15pt deficit...

The other guys just maintained the score, Gordon brought us back.....and then both teams got cold for a while.

by majoyenrac on Nov 2, 2007 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So just keep shooting.
Because no matter how badly you shoot, all anyone will remember is the quarter where you got hot.

Actually I don't think Gordon played much worse than anyone else, particularly because of his free throws and rebounds.  I just don't think he played much better than several of his teammates, especially when you look at his shooting percentage and turnovers.

by Tim S. on Nov 2, 2007 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last night
is over and I'm looking forward to tomorrow nights game.

GO BULLS!!!

Racecar spelled backwards is racecar.

by sue369 on Nov 1, 2007 8:19 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What if the problem REALLY IS Skiles?
Everything mentioned up top is true.
And although Kobe might be a bandaid, he may NOT be the answer, which may also be why the deal hasn't been done.

Even someone who is BLIND and cannot watch the game can HEAR the bad combinations, the 3g smalls, the over and under using, etc....

And in the end - MY pet peave: NO ONE willing to man up and take it to the hoop and get the 2+1...
Watching BG lolly-gag with the ball, then Wallace throwing up in the air instead of SLAMMING IT DOWN...(deep breath)

If Kobe were here, things would definately be different, that's for sure.
But what if what HE wanted to do didn't match what SKILES wanted to do?

Then what?

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 10:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I assume Wallace
didn't know how much time he had left, which is understandable.

I would've liked to see a drive to the basket by Gordon, but it would've likely just been him getting clobbered and no foul call.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

him getting clobbered and no foul call
That's what I meant by things being different if KB was here - not BETTER necessarily...(so don't get your panties in a wad, scottie)

However in that instance, KB would likely score AND get the foul...

 

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's not like
Kobe has NEVER messed up any plays before...so you can say "likely" all you want, but none of us knows what would've happened...sure we can expect and guess

Nothing against you, but open-ended predictions like that are the worst to me...none of us are mind readers

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not praising Kobe
and I'm not saying he doesn't mess up.

READ THE STATEMENT

All I said is that things would be different.

Get it?

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it's a known fact
that KB gets calls that BG does not.
Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agreed way up top
if we could trade Gordon straight up for Kobe, that's an upgrade.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how much
do you charge per minute?  You could make a killing with all of your "fact" finding.

This convo is over...it's become apparent that you have WAY too many "facts" for me to dispute.

See you after the next game...

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gordon last year did almost exactly
what Kobe has done the last 4 years.  Same FTs made and similar FG% and eFG%.  The idea that Bryant makes shots that Gordon doesn't in the clutch is largely a bunch of crap.  Which is why Mariotti and friends believe it.

by Scotter on Nov 1, 2007 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

what Kobe has done the last 4 years
For that last time: I am NOT saying Kobe is better.
And all it ever comes down to with you is stats.

But all it takes is simple observation and WATCHING THE GAMES (gee...there's a concept) and seeing that Kobe is a "superstar" (talent level questionable at times) in the NBA and will ALWAYS get more calls the BG until / if he becomes a "superstar" himself.

Regardless as to whether KB is actually better than BG is and will remain debatable.

And all I was stating is that Kobe would get more calls because of his status - deserved or not.
Plus Kobe is taller, heavier, STRONGER and has much more NBA experience than BG, which means he can muscle his way inside better, and draw more double teams and foul calls, if nothing else from the respect that players and refs have for him.

Why else would he emulate MJ his whole career?
Crap - the guy's even the SAME SIZE as MJ was and probably even chews Doublemint gum!
(BTW - I didn't get the gum info from reading any stat sheets - I got it from asking MJ.)

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm forced to use stats
beause I don't have my own unique source of universally known facts.  Yes, Bryant gets more superstar calls.  But those calls actually are rarely on last second calls.  It's on little stuff throughout the game.  The refs are going to let them play in that situation most of the time.  

by Scotter on Nov 1, 2007 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's on little stuff throughout the game
And that, my friend, was ALL I was saying.

'Cause if you translate and spread that "little stuff" thoughout the entire game - you end up with perhaps...oh...let's take a guess...10 extra points.

Which tranlsates to a W last night - and perhaps 7 to 10 more games in a season - and then of course the bottom line of playoff positioning.

Again - KB vs. BG in actual talent not being the argument.

Sometimes I SO wish for actual conversation over a stupid BLOG - these things get SO twisted up.

And then of course there's the folks who repeatedly resort to name calling....

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was trying to have
two conservations at one by also addressing the Kobe would have made the last shot crowd.

But, 7-10 more wins?  Get serious.  We're talking about 1 to maybe 4 superstar calls over the course of 200 possessions and what 40+ foul calls in a single game.  If Bryant is doing that then they're is something serious wrong with the Lakers win total.

by Scotter on Nov 1, 2007 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

serious wrong with the Lakers win total.
I do watch a lot of Laker games out here on the coast - and I've seen the "star" treatment KB gets enough to make me puke at time.
Because it IS at times, just that - star treatment.
And it COULD be argued that it does help their win total....I'm not going there.

As for the 7-10 wins?
I said it was a guess.

But even ONE game more in the W column would have changed the Bulls playoff position from 5th to 2nd last season....not that it would have made a difference because da Bulls swept the Heat anyway.

I'm just sayin'...

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think 7 games is that much of a stretch
Kobe takes that ball to the hole last night and probably draws a foul call.  Replacing BG with Kobe takes a 49 win team to 56 pretty easily.  Now if only we could replace BG with Kobe and not have to throw in a bunch of other talent/salaries.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

7-10 games
because of superstar calls?  If Bryant plays better than he ever has before, he can be 7 wins better than Gordon in terms of overall production.  But, he also uses more minutes and poss. to do that.

by Scotter on Nov 1, 2007 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he also uses more minutes and poss. to do that
What would be the problem with that?

I would assume that bringing KB to Chicago WOULD mean more plays running through his position, 'cuz that's what he does.

Is it spring training yet?

by Bluelou on Nov 1, 2007 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which is fine
if he taking possessions away from the right people.  Kobe's 1st game wasn't an example of that.  No one else on the team even got 10 FGA, and Kobe managed a glorious 51.3 TS%.  It looks like a great game because the Lakers barely lost, but the team would likely have been better off if somebody got to take a shot.  Even the Lakers have guys who could do better than a 51.3 TS% if given opportunities.

by Scotter on Nov 1, 2007 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know
Odom was out, wasn't he?  Who is going to take those shots from Kobe?  Luke Walton?  Kwame?  Whoever they're rotating in at pg?  I don't see anyone on that list for whom I'd automatically assume a high TS%
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think their definition is too broad
5 minutes is way too long to look at and most of that is still in the normal game flow.  Under 24 seconds is what I'd consider.  More specifically, coming out of a timeout with the game on the line.  
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know,
but you have to admit the numbers are pretty close.  Even the FTM are the same.  Would under 24 seconds really be any different?

by Scotter on Nov 1, 2007 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes it would
BG is now 1 for 9 in those situations this year and last.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know you'll bring this up forever
But should we set a floor as to when this is relevant? maybe...40 attempts?

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Nov 1, 2007 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

20 would be enough
and he's already got that many in his career.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how many
had Andres "I don't know what I'm doing" Nocioni involved?

by hscs on Nov 1, 2007 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that was definitely a confounding factor
and hopefully the first and last time Noc sets the pick.  But has BG ever passed on that play to a Kerr or Wennington?  BG doesn't even get double-teamed anymore at the end of the game.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

predictions
"If Kobe were here, things would definately be different, that's for sure."

Miss Cleo would be proud

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wallace didn't have time to shoot
he did the smart thing

by milesgmsu on Nov 1, 2007 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

End of regulation
I completely disagree with the way the Bulls handled that last possession of the game.  We constantly hear about how the Bulls are a team first, without stars.  Their offense relies on a lot of movement and passing to get open shots.

Why in Skiles' name did they abandon that offense in favor of a one-man play?  They had 19 seconds - that's plenty of time to actually "run" something within the offense.  Instead, Gordon stood still holding the ball for far too long and ended up firing an airball over 2 defenders.

I don't mean to pick on Gordon; if he ran what was called then that was a serious brain-cramp by the coaching staff.

Oh, and Mariotti's a blow-hole.  I don't read him, and I don't want to.  Most people disrespect him and know he's a complete moron.  Is there a reason to link to his drivel other than to make people more angry?  As Matt said "how predictable".

Wrecked 'em? Damn near killed 'em!

by mdmnd9294 on Nov 1, 2007 11:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not BG's fault., not Skiles' fault...
I just read in the paper that this was a "broken play" that left "Skiles screaming at... Nocioni".

I still think they should have run a normal set.  Standing-around offense is bad for this team.

Wrecked 'em? Damn near killed 'em!

by mdmnd9294 on Nov 1, 2007 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

more
predictable stuff

by ScottieCartwright on Nov 1, 2007 11:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He and Mariotti
are stealing for a living.

by KT on Nov 1, 2007 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really hope
he didn't waste money on a college education to write crap like that.
Racecar spelled backwards is racecar.

by sue369 on Nov 1, 2007 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

pissed the whole game
hey guys and girls- this is my first ever post on here so here it goes:
first, i despise the nets.  i can't stand teams that absolutely bring it one night, and then the next game they obviously don't care.  this happens every time against the bulls, and each time, i get more infuriated.  the nets just flat out know how to beat the bulls on their home court.  Maybe when they move to Brooklyn things will change, but i doubt it.  These nets games remind me of going to market square arena to play the pacers during the 90s(thinking of that place with Reggie still makes my blood boil)
Second, i am so sick of the refs not giving the bulls any calls.  EVER!!!!  they never, ever seem to get anything from the refs.  how often are we T'd up, hardly ever.  are we a dirty team??? hell no.  i swear, it just seems like NBA refs don't like us, as if it were payback from our championship run.  Anyone who watches the bulls knows what i am talking about, and it pisses me off.
third, i am getting sick of tryus not playing quality bball.  two quick fouls, missing easy shots, turnovers, etc.  i love his intensity and all that but man is he a limited player.  i know he is a work in progress, but the bulls do not have time for it.  that goes for thabo too, we do not have time to develop these two, they need to get it together quick, or else we will be watching our season end in May again instead of June.  Lamarcus alridge looked damn good on Tuesday, against tim duncan!  ummm.... tryus better pick it up quick or pax better trade him before the rest of the league figures it out: that he is always going to be a project
sorry for being negative, i know its a drag(believe me, i have faith in all our players, coaches and front office dudes)i just want to see these guys play to their true ability on a consistent basis, so its frustrating when they don't. sorry if i repeated a lot of things that were already said... GO BULLS!!!  see you Friday night

by Conor on Nov 1, 2007 1:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

llittle late but my post game thoughts
ben wallace wasn't bad...just wasn't as good as we need. When wallace isn't having a spectacular night, we need someone like deng, noch, or free money to step up on the boards. Wallace did have some nice post moves, but i dont want him taking those.

I have a serious problem with the final play call. I understand it may have been a broken play, but i like the idea of driving down with 3 or 5 seconds to go and goign for a layup or a foul with kirk or ben. the refs were claling it insanely tight early; force them to make a call, or go for the game winner. Holding the ball ont he permiter means someone can get doubled team.

Can't hate the loss. Bulls came back, and antoine wright is going to have maybe 5 games like that over his career....did we deserve to win...no...but considering this is a hump team, we're on the road, everything surrouding the team, and anotine wright went off, i'll understand the loss. we woulda lost 99/100 times. Mark of a good team is never giving up; which we didnt. I also agree that we looked mentally tougher, and more mature, than last year.

Kirk was having a good game, the fouls were crap. I don't often bitch about the refs, but the discrepency was unbelieveable. Carter is not a superstar...this isn't 2003 (see Richard Jefferson's Skills). While I'm no NBA coach, when the refs are calling discrepencies like that, I beleive you ahve to switch it up, and play run and gun and lose the defensive tenacity. Need a lineup with tyrus and ben and then swithcing out guards.

I loved Duh's style tonight. Granted it's the opening night.

Noch I was satisfied. He played terribly in the first half, but figured it out in the 2nd. Remember, this is his first legit (i'm not counting those godawful playoff games) since the injury.

I was disapointed with Tyrus and Thabo. Thabo looked to have matured and have the teancity; just not the skill. Tyrus looked calmer than last year, but not in a good way.

It is impossible to tell smith and freemoney apart on the telly.

Love Joe Smith. Well worth the $5M if he can play like that all year. I felt calmer with him on the court. I didn't want him to start, but I'm starting the bandwagon.

Gordon...what can you say. This is a microcosm of what you get with gordon. He's worth 10, maybe 11M in todays saturded NBA...but he is not more valuable to the team than kirk. You can just see it on the court. Also, Jizzle's defense looks alot better. Still maybe medicore at best, but you can see he's trying.

Still horrified by the reffing.

Deng I thought had a pretty bad game. His defense wasn't amazing, even though he had some nice plays, and i thought he looked stagnant on offense.

BUT PERHAPS we can attribute this to all the kobe non-sense. Given the prior conditions mentioend, and the kobe circus, it's understandable why you may ahve an off game.

In conclusion, if we play that way all 82 games, I  think we push 50 wins. Which i'm more than satisfied with given it was an 'off night'.

Pray to god we don't meet the nets in the playoffs.

by milesgmsu on Nov 1, 2007 2:47 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

a little late
but that's not going to ever stop you, is it.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still can't
get over this :-p
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 1, 2007 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i sincerely apologize
i don't remember ever making that comment...ever....

nor would i ever it...ever

i might draw the line at top 25, but top 75...there's now way i woulda said that...so that means i have scizophrenia, was in an alterded condition (neither of which are likley) or it was a terrible typo?

but i will apologize...forever

by milesgmsu on Nov 2, 2007 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

on behalf of blogabullers everywhere
apology accepted.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 2, 2007 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you'll look
i was there all game during the thread even though i was watching it less than legally

and i just got out of class and posted that...but to paraphrase matt 'i'm not going to respond to the haters' ;-)

by milesgmsu on Nov 1, 2007 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bulls
Without any swagger.  Not another year of Kirk, with no coaching, direction or correction, talking ill advised 3 point shots with no one under the basket and getting beat on defense by little known A.Wright. Can Kirk be better in clutch situations?  I don't know?  but it appears this 5 year vet and team captain is in need some mentoring and direction, which he does seem to get from Skiles?

Tyrus, who just doesn't seem to have an offensive game beside a dunk or two.  The Tyrus lovers will say because he's only 20, then they'll say.. he's only 21, 22, 23 and still not in his prime yet.    

Skiles, last play in regulation? just give the ball to Ben Gordon.  What a surprise to everyone?
Any H.S. coach could have instructed Collins to double Gordon using his 7 ft and long arms to force Gordon to alter his shot.

This is Skiles team, Skiles psycho reverse motivation techniques and Skiles character, the players seems to be in search of pleasing Big Daddy Skiles instead of winning basketball games. Who needs Kobe? the first priority should be to "Rex"  Skiles.

by exult463 on Nov 1, 2007 11:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

with analysis like that
you could write for the sun-times.
Nocioni-Khryapa in '08

by bullshooter on Nov 2, 2007 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ouch...
But that's not a bad idea.  It's certainly as insightful.  Anything that gets the lawn gnome out of print is fine with me.
Wrecked 'em? Damn near killed 'em!

by mdmnd9294 on Nov 2, 2007 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.
Start posting about the Bulls »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Bulls and Young Talent
Blogabull_s_small
Sign up for BlogABull game previews

Recent FanPosts

Small
Interesting Trade Idea: S-Jax & Anthony Randolph
Small
Kudos Bulls. You've surprised early.
Bolo_picture_small
What about Iverson?
Sports
I'm Happy to Have a Break From Tyrus. He's gone anyways.
Small
Game Preview # 6: Bulls vs Charlotte Bobcats
Small
Why isn't there more talk of LeBron...
Small
Contract/Cap Question for BAB
Jayhawk_small
Game Preview # 5: Bulls at Cleveland Cavaliers
Small
We've Got To Rescue D. Wade

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger