Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Sign and Trade for Wilcox?

From the Sun-Times:

The 6-10 Wilcox thrived with the Sonics late last season after being traded from the Clippers, averaging 14.1 points and 8.2 rebounds in 29 games after the deal. He reportedly is seeking a five- or six-year contract paying him $10 million or more annually. That would be a money match for Chandler in a sign-and-trade deal with the Bulls, who impressed Wallace.

I would much rather have Chris Wilcox than P.J. Brown and J.R. Smith.

FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.

Comment 43 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

sorry,
this diary wasn't up while i was adding my diary.

by CookDing on Jul 5, 2006 9:49 AM CDT reply actions  

apology accepted. and deleted :-p
[I'll copy/paste it here -Matt]

I'd be appalled with the addition of PJ Brown.  What would our front court be after next season?  

On the other hand, this is a Tyson trade that makes more sense to me.  I don't know if Seattle would do it straight up, we'd probably have to throw in something to sweeten the pot.  However, Wilcox still has something in the tank, can definitely score and would complete Pax's stated mission to add "length and atheleticism".  At this point in his less than noteworthy career, PJ Brown would only bring one of those qualities to the table.  ....and leave us in a frontcourt lurch after next season (seriously, who would we have up front? and what would our bench be like?).

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 5, 2006 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Missing the point.
Of course the Bulls would rather have Wilcox, but not at that money for that long.  P.J. only has one year left on his contract, that's the main reason the Bulls are trading for him.  Anyway, there's no way the Bulls would commit that much money to a power forward two weeks after taking Tyrus Thomas number 2 overall.

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 9:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Good point, but...
With the signing of Ben Wallace and the need to re-sign guys like Gordon, Deng, Hinrich, and Nocioni over the next couple years, Pax's window of salary cap room and adding pieces through free agency will close.  At that point, Pax has to ask himself questions like,"Are we willing to pay the luxury tax in order to contend for a championship?" or "Are we so far away from contending for a championship that we need to dump some big salaries to acquire players in the future?"  When the franchise gets to that point, I'd rather have Chris Wilcox on my roster than P.J. Brown's expired contract and lifeless NBA body.

by Rodmaniac on Jul 5, 2006 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Flexibility
I don't disagree with your point in general, obviously Paxson was willing to accept that the Bulls will be over the cap in '07 with the signing of Wallace.  For the right player it makes sense to go for it.  Chris Wilcox is not that player.  It makes a lot more sense to get that expiring contract and have the ability to get one more piece next summer when it will be more clear what the Bulls need to do to get to a championship level.

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Coolness
Now I think I have a better idea of where you're coming from, and I agree with it.  I think we both agree that Wilcox is better than P.J. Brown, but what you're saying is that if we take P.J. Brown NOW, we can get someone better than BOTH Brown AND Wilcox NEXT summer.  If we can do that, I agree with you 3000%.  

I'm just wary of trading for P.J. Brown.  If J.R. Smith turns out to be a great wing player (M2GwcDAS), AND we get to dump Chandler's salary AND acquire the missing piece of M2GwcDAS, then I support the Hornets trade.  I'm just scared that the Bulls are making the transition from "Young team with nothing to lose" to "Possible championship contender with A LOT to lose."  

And when you get to that point, you have to be very careful.  

by Rodmaniac on Jul 5, 2006 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree.
Every move is very important from here on out, and I think getting Wilcox for big money would be reckless.  

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re: Coolness
I agree with your point that J.R. Smith (not even 22 yet) is a great bonus because he could turn out to be a great wing player and he is coming at a low cost - small salary number and basically a throw-in.  

However, P.J. Brown is a necessary piece here.  He is a great locker room guy and at this point next year that $8 million coming off the cap will be important when extending some of our core guys contracts (Kirk, Noc, Ben, Luol).  He can put up 9 points and 7 boards and play good defense for 30 minutes.  Plus, by next year Pax is most likely hoping that Tyrus Thomas will be ready to step in for starters minutes.  I don't think this trade will put them into a situation with a "Possible championship contender with A LOT to lose".  I think this gives them even more flexibility in the future.

by cwolf2484 on Jul 5, 2006 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ben Wallace and Tyrus Thomas
Those are the frontcourt starters after this year.  Hopefully Noc is still around to play some minutes at the 4.  I don't think we really need to worry about the Bulls' backup big men for 2007-2008 yet.

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 10:05 AM CDT reply actions  

Wilcox
would be nice, but that buries Tyrus too far down the bench.  He is going to be the primary big off the bench at the end of the year, or he was a bad draft choice.

by bullshooter on Jul 5, 2006 10:09 AM CDT reply actions  

I'd rather have Tyrus than Wilcox
I know it's not a choice, but Tyrus might never develop with so many guys in front of him, and we'd have more trouble signing and resigning.

by cubbybear on Jul 5, 2006 10:29 AM CDT reply actions  

"Great" is an overstatement.
And it's not happening anyway.  Paxson will make one last attempt to get Garnett, and if he can't he'll make the P.J. Brown trade.  I'm afraid that's it for this offseason.

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

JR Smith for Collison, sign Jarron Collins
That would be enough for a rotation at this point... C: Big Ben, Collison, Collins PF: PJ Brown, Collison, Allen, Noce, Thomas SF: Deng, Noce, Thomas SG: Gordon, Sefolosha PG: Hinrich, Duhon That's 12 men.

by CRG on Jul 5, 2006 11:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Krappy too
forgot about him!

by CRG on Jul 5, 2006 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

PG
I think we need a third PG, hopefully one with some playoff experience more than we need another forward. With Thomas and Wallace in the fold (and potentially PJ Brown), we don't really need to spend a bunch of money on Wilcox. Thomas should develop nicely behind Brown and Wallace this year and be ready to start next season. Plus we'll likely have a top 10 pick with the Knicks swap, and most of the top 10 prospects are 6-8 and taller.

by Mike Aparicio on Jul 5, 2006 12:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Pax mentioned...
...somewhere, I can't remember, that they took Sefolsha with the idea he'd be able to play some minutes with Ben.  He continued by saying Thabo's got the ball-handling skills to do it.  If that's true, there's your third point guard - sort of like how Sacramento use to squeeze a few minutes out of the Bobby Jackson/Doug Christy combo.  

by jamestkirk on Jul 5, 2006 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

where did collisons name come up?
where did collisons name come up?

by awallenwong on Jul 5, 2006 12:13 PM CDT reply actions  

I threw it out there
as a trade idea-- JR Smith for Collison.

by CRG on Jul 5, 2006 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm from the same town
as Nick Collison and some people here in town have mentioned the possibility of Nick going to the Bulls. Don't know if it's coming from his parents or what.

by sue369 on Jul 5, 2006 12:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Trade for Shareef Abdur-Rahim
If all we need from the PF spot is a scorer and a decent rebounder and if we HAVE to send Chandler packing to get a good guy, then just package Chandler up with a future draft pick (obviously not next years) for Shareef and Corliss Williamson's $6.5 mil expiring contract.

by davidmccauley on Jul 5, 2006 12:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Sam Smith
is that you keeping up for SAR love. That guy is not that much better than than PJB.

SAR had a line of 12.3 PPG, 5.00 RPG
PJB had a line of 9 PPG , 7.30 RPG

SAR has 30.4/5 on his deal
PBJ has 8/1 on his deal

by LD9 on Jul 5, 2006 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

SAR
Had an off year, he got his jaw broken mid-season which didn't help. He's twice the player PJ Brown is at this point.

I'd imagine the Kings would hold on to him at that price though (he only signed for the mid-level last season) and look to deal Kenny Thomas.

by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 5, 2006 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was hoping..
that the Kings would look at the additional $2mil saved this year, with htem still trying to get Bozi Wells back, and see a starting PF for starting PF and an expiring contract for a draft pick which seems like the NBA norm these days. I can't think of anything else to sweeten the pot except for Duhon and I think he is too valuable right now since we don't have another serviceable back-up

by davidmccauley on Jul 5, 2006 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Corrections
'them'
'Bonzi'

by davidmccauley on Jul 5, 2006 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

At least he 'IS' better than PJ
As oppossed to Collison who definatly is not.

PJB played 32 mins/per game
SAR played 27 mins/per game

As a started you're looking at 15 ppg and 7 rpg. And he has a contract small enough (about $6 mil a year) that most people won't mind coming off the bench behind TY2.

by davidmccauley on Jul 5, 2006 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Collison rumors
I think the Collison rumors are starting cause if the Sonics give Wilcox the money somewhere bewtten what he wants (68/6) and what they want (45/5) from what a Seattle paper was saying last week which would be roughly 55/5, Collision is also due for a contract extension which could be in the 7-9 mil range and I dont think they want to tie up that much $$$ on one position. I doubt both of them are on the Sonics roster in the fall. I hope one of them is on the Bulls.

by LD9 on Jul 5, 2006 12:45 PM CDT reply actions  

i'm not suggesting
that wilcox replace tyrus or even compete with him, necessarily.  I'm just looking at next summer's team and saying that, in the best case scenario, we have one player over 6'9''.  I'd say two, but Luke is probably not a part of the "best" case scenario, regardless of height.  Besides, there's plenty of room up front for three players to rotate, especially since one of those players is entering his mid-30's.  We all saw what running Ben at heavy minutes for a full season will do to him and it's not good.  
As for the clear-cap space argument, it's not that great.  we're going to trade players that are relatively identical statiscally so that we can lose one of the players next year?  at that time, we'll use the extra 8 million to resign four players that are starting caliber?  How does that approach making sense?  8 million would barely make much of a dent for two players that are starting caliber.  Plus, the point by Rodmaniac is more valid than many here want to admit: we will have no cap flexibility BY next summer regardless of what we do next point.  We will be re-signing (hopefully) two players and re-upping (likely) two more.  You don't have cap room after that.  Finally, after all of this, we have to keep in mind that Reinsdorf himself personally lobbied for this trade as has been reported.  If he wanted to spend that money he did so: A) because he wanted to contend; and B) knowing full well that he's going to be shelling for luxury tax after next summer.
This summer is/was our summer to set our roster for probably the next 4-5 years.  From now on, it's all MLE or rebuilding.  So we better damn well make sure that we have a complete team.  And I'm not sorry to say that Ben Wallace, Tyrus Thomas, Malik Allen and Sweets does not a front court make.  Please don't bring up PJ Brown's name, he's filler that will produce little/no improvement over Tyson(look at the stats). ...plus, he'll only do so for a season.

by CookDing on Jul 5, 2006 12:50 PM CDT reply actions  

The Bulls aren't winning a championship this year.
There's no need to bring in a player like Wilcox at the price he's going to command until the Bulls establish whether power forward is a need for them.   Between Tyrus Thomas, next year's draft pick, and the free agent class next year there are plenty of opportunities to find a starter at that position.  After Brown's contract expires next year, the Bulls will still have the ability to sign a player before  they offer extensions.  Wallace was their big move this year, it's time to let the team play for a year and then see what they need.

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

next summer
but hinrich will be a restricted FA next summer.  Won't noce be one too?  Are we really going to be shopping for another player while other teams are offering ours?  I mean, you can do that but I'm not sure it will happen.  Plus, there will be quite a few teams with money next summer.  I don't like the likelihood of us landing a quality player when we're not the big player on the market.  
The only thing I could possibly like about a PJ deal is the possibility of trading his expiring contract at the deadline, which is not something I'd bank on too much.  Most the big names from next summer's class have re-upped already, so I doubt too many teams would deal a talented player solely for the purposes of cap relief.  
It just seems more sensible to hold on to chandler for now and wait until a better deal comes along.  If not, deal him at the deadline.  I think we'd all be in agreement that his value can only go up.

by CookDing on Jul 5, 2006 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I read that
they can't offer Kirk anything until August. They won't let him get away.

by sue369 on Jul 5, 2006 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re: i'm not suggesting
CookDing:
I think that you need to consider flexibility and the future when you bring up a move for Wilcox. You have several core players (BG, KH, Luol, Noc) whose contracts are going to have to be extended in the near future.  Whether or not you agree, that $8 million will be valuable to do this.  By trading for PJ Brown you are doing several things for the team. (1) You are providing flexibility for next summer when his $8 million comes off the cap; (2) You are bringing in another "locker room guy"; (3) He is going to consistently put up 9 pts, 7 boards, 25+ minutes and tough post defense (three time 2nd all defensive team) every night; (4) Buying a year for T-Thomas to  develop more of an offensive game and learn from a 13-year pro who has played in more than 60 playoff games.

I am not arguing the talent level - although compare the stats and it is debateable - but I am saying that if you consider the bigger picture, this trade is a positive and would be smarter than giving a large commitment and a great deal of money to a relatively unproven Chris Wilcox.  Considering that we just committed 4 years to Ben Wallace (great D, limited O) and that Wilcox's realistic potential is a 10 and 10 guy and has a similar skill-set to Ben Wallace, I do not think that this would be a smart decision.

by cwolf2484 on Jul 5, 2006 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Collison
Wouldn't mind getting another Jayhawk in Collison.  I have always liked his game, but its a good point that it might push back the development of Tyrus.  

?Jarron Collins? might as well get one of the twins boys from Big Daddy.  They will come cheaper and be just as effective.  

by Jesse07 on Jul 5, 2006 12:53 PM CDT reply actions  

next summer
Next summer we will get an effective big man through the draft on top of Tyrus.  Josh McRoberts in 07'.

by Jesse07 on Jul 5, 2006 12:54 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm sure Nick's
family would love to him closer to home. Nick and his g/f had a baby girl in Feb.

Actually Nick was back here last month for our high school basketball camp.

by sue369 on Jul 5, 2006 12:55 PM CDT reply actions  

I would
somehow rather get Sene--not for this year, but further out--in Wallace's third/fourth year.

by hlac on Jul 5, 2006 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I doubt that will happen
You have a better chance of getting Petro than Sene.

by Colossus @ Blog a Bull on Jul 5, 2006 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why not Wilcox AND P.J. Brown
It appears like P.J. will be in a Bulls uniform in the next couple of days, replacing Chandler. I agree with most of you in the fact that while his numbers are the same as Tyson's, but I also think he brings more strength to the BACKUP spot for Ben Wallace (and for the record, I don't think ben's numbers dropped the last 3 years because of age as much as the arrival of Rasheed Wallace).
Now if he does move to a BU, then what happens at the PF spot? This is where i feel wilcox will be the finishing piece of the puzzle. This man averaged 14 and 9 with guys like R. Allen and R. Lewis, who aren't known for their sharing of the ball. And in the games where Lewis sat out, he erupted for almost 25 and 20.
I would invest in him, because he will play a big role in Pax's vision of athleticism and scoring. not to mention if he get's in foul trouble tyrus is waiting in the wings. So now you have 2 solid frontcourt with Wilcox/Wallace, and bench in PJ/Tyrus. And yes PJ will be gone next season, but when we win a championship THIS year, no one will complain about him being here...and especially not when New York fails to make the playoffs and we swap picks for BIG Ben/PJ's replacement!

by Matador on Jul 5, 2006 3:44 PM CDT reply actions  

It just happened.
Not that the Bulls had any interest anyway, but without Chandler to trade the Bulls aren't getting Wilcox.

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Smith/Sweetney
According  to a couple sources, we still have 3+ mil. remaining. In addition to this, we are going to be paying almost 5 mil. to Smith and Sweetney. Last I checked Seattle doesn't have a player to backup Ray Allen (Flip Murray) or Collison (Reggie Evans). So, if you take the cash and the two players, you now have enough to give Wilcox just about what he wanted. Also, there aren't many teams (besides Toronto) that can afford to pay him over their 5 mil. exception anyhow.

by Matador on Jul 5, 2006 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's not happening!
The only way the Sonics will sign and trade Wilcox is if his salary demands are too high (something like Nene money, $60 million for six years).  The Bulls at that point probably could get him but there's no way they should pay Wilcox that much money.  He doesn't make the Bulls a championship team right now and that contract would completely lock the Bulls into their current roster.  And I'll say this one more time, he plays the same position as the player the Bulls just drafted number two overall.  There's no way.

by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 10:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I hate it when....
I'm right!

Funny that the article in the Sun Times mentions the exact same players that I did a couple days ago =)

As much as I would love to keep Smith(and his athleticism), I would love to have Wilcox more! He will be needed to guard Rasheed Wallace, Udonis Haslem, and Boris Diaw/Dirk Nowitzki on our way to an NBA Title. Besides we have Sefolosha to spell Ben Gordon (who WILL be an All-Star this season).

by Matador on Jul 7, 2006 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago Bulls.

FanPosts

Links

"Best NBA Blogroll"
-- Dan Shanoff

The Essentials:
Bulls.com
NBA.com
HoopsHype
BallHype
ESPN.com NBA

Workin' the Beat:
KC Johnson - Tribune (blog)
John Jackson - Sun-Times (blog)
Mike McGraw - Daily Herald (blog)
Nick Friedell -  ESPNChicago.com
Sam Smith - Bulls.com
Aggrey Sam - CSNChicago.com


More Bulls Blogs/Forums:
Thank You Isiah
Chicago Bulls Podcasters
Bulls Confidential
By the Horns
Bullish Thoughts
Chicago Bulls KY
Pippen Ain't Easy
RealGM Bulls Forum
SportsTwo Bulls Forum

Blogging the Association:
(League Wide)
True Hoop
HoopsAnalyst
Give Me the Rock
The Basketball Jones
NBA Fanhouse
Hoops Addict
SBNation.com - NBA
ProBasketballTalk
ShamSports
Ball Don't Lie
The Painted Area


(Team-Centric)
Queen City Hoops

Bobcats Baseline
Knickerblogger.net    
Sixers' Shots
Forum Blue and Gold
SuperSonicSoul
Hornets247.com 
SonicsCentral.com 
ClipperBlog.com  
The Nugg Doctor
Loy's Place
Reds Army
Need4Sheed
THE WIZZNUTZZ
RaptorsForum.com
TWolvesBlog.com
Spurs Dynasty
David's Memphis Grizzlies Blog
The Bratwurst
Sixers Journal
Sixers 4 Guidos 
3 Shades of Blue  
CavsNews.com
RaptorTalk
Deceptively Quick
TheLakersNation.com
Utah Jazzer Blog
KnicksDefense.com
T. Jose Caldeford
Hoopinion
RaptorBlog.com
Suns @NBAWeblog.com
The Cowhide Globe
Stepien Rules
Project Spurs
Raptors Republic
Dino Nation Blog
Lake Show Life
Valley of the Suns
The KnicksBlog.com
Big Lakers Fan
Roundball Mining Company
Cavs: The Blog
48 Minutes of Hell
Daily Thunder
Piston Powered
The Two Man Game
PistonsNationBlog.com
Cowbell Kingdom.com
Hot Hot Hoops
NetsAreScorching
Celtics Hub
Orlando Magic Daily
Philadunkia
Truth About It
Always Miller Time
Slippery When Nets
Eight Points Nine Seconds
Howlin' T-Wolf
Red 94

MSM NBA blogs:

Ira Winderman (Heat)
Jason Quick (Blazers)
IndyStar.com (Pacers)
Michael Cunningham (Hawks) 
Full-Court Press (Pistons)
Jonathan Feigen (Rockets)
Rick Bonnell (Bobcats)
Jazz Notes
Chris Herrington (Grizzlies)
Orlando Sentinel
Michael Lee (Wizards)
Alan Hahn (Knicks)   
Doug Smith (Raptors)
Marc Berman (Knicks)
Al Iannazzone (Nets)

For the Statheads:
Basketball-Reference.com
APBR Discussion
Knickerblogger's Stat Page
82Games.com
Doug's Stats
Popcorn Machine
HoopData


Other Resources:

HoopsHype Salaries
SportsTwo Salaries
ESPN.com Trade Machine
RealGM: NBA Draftpicks Owed
ShamSports.com Salaries
DraftExpress

 


Guy who does everything

Blogabull_s_small your friendly BullsBlogger