Sign and Trade for Wilcox?
From the Sun-Times:
The 6-10 Wilcox thrived with the Sonics late last season after being traded from the Clippers, averaging 14.1 points and 8.2 rebounds in 29 games after the deal. He reportedly is seeking a five- or six-year contract paying him $10 million or more annually. That would be a money match for Chandler in a sign-and-trade deal with the Bulls, who impressed Wallace.
I would much rather have Chris Wilcox than P.J. Brown and J.R. Smith.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the BlogABull community, and are to be treated as the opinions and views of that particular user, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
sorry,
apology accepted. and deleted :-p
I'd be appalled with the addition of PJ Brown. What would our front court be after next season?
On the other hand, this is a Tyson trade that makes more sense to me. I don't know if Seattle would do it straight up, we'd probably have to throw in something to sweeten the pot. However, Wilcox still has something in the tank, can definitely score and would complete Pax's stated mission to add "length and atheleticism". At this point in his less than noteworthy career, PJ Brown would only bring one of those qualities to the table. ....and leave us in a frontcourt lurch after next season (seriously, who would we have up front? and what would our bench be like?).
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 5, 2006 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions
Missing the point.
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 9:51 AM CDT reply actions
Good point, but...
Flexibility
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Coolness
I'm just wary of trading for P.J. Brown. If J.R. Smith turns out to be a great wing player (M2GwcDAS), AND we get to dump Chandler's salary AND acquire the missing piece of M2GwcDAS, then I support the Hornets trade. I'm just scared that the Bulls are making the transition from "Young team with nothing to lose" to "Possible championship contender with A LOT to lose."
And when you get to that point, you have to be very careful.
I agree.
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Re: Coolness
However, P.J. Brown is a necessary piece here. He is a great locker room guy and at this point next year that $8 million coming off the cap will be important when extending some of our core guys contracts (Kirk, Noc, Ben, Luol). He can put up 9 points and 7 boards and play good defense for 30 minutes. Plus, by next year Pax is most likely hoping that Tyrus Thomas will be ready to step in for starters minutes. I don't think this trade will put them into a situation with a "Possible championship contender with A LOT to lose". I think this gives them even more flexibility in the future.
by cwolf2484 on Jul 5, 2006 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Ben Wallace and Tyrus Thomas
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 10:05 AM CDT reply actions
Wilcox
I'd rather have Tyrus than Wilcox
"Great" is an overstatement.
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
JR Smith for Collison, sign Jarron Collins
by CRG on Jul 5, 2006 11:19 AM CDT reply actions
PG
by Mike Aparicio on Jul 5, 2006 12:07 PM CDT reply actions
Pax mentioned...
by jamestkirk on Jul 5, 2006 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions
where did collisons name come up?
by awallenwong on Jul 5, 2006 12:13 PM CDT reply actions
I threw it out there
by CRG on Jul 5, 2006 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm from the same town
Trade for Shareef Abdur-Rahim
by davidmccauley on Jul 5, 2006 12:42 PM CDT reply actions
Sam Smith
SAR had a line of 12.3 PPG, 5.00 RPG
PJB had a line of 9 PPG , 7.30 RPG
SAR has 30.4/5 on his deal
PBJ has 8/1 on his deal
by LD9 on Jul 5, 2006 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions
SAR
I'd imagine the Kings would hold on to him at that price though (he only signed for the mid-level last season) and look to deal Kenny Thomas.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 5, 2006 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions
I was hoping..
by davidmccauley on Jul 5, 2006 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions
At least he 'IS' better than PJ
PJB played 32 mins/per game
SAR played 27 mins/per game
As a started you're looking at 15 ppg and 7 rpg. And he has a contract small enough (about $6 mil a year) that most people won't mind coming off the bench behind TY2.
by davidmccauley on Jul 5, 2006 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Collison rumors
by LD9 on Jul 5, 2006 12:45 PM CDT reply actions
i'm not suggesting
As for the clear-cap space argument, it's not that great. we're going to trade players that are relatively identical statiscally so that we can lose one of the players next year? at that time, we'll use the extra 8 million to resign four players that are starting caliber? How does that approach making sense? 8 million would barely make much of a dent for two players that are starting caliber. Plus, the point by Rodmaniac is more valid than many here want to admit: we will have no cap flexibility BY next summer regardless of what we do next point. We will be re-signing (hopefully) two players and re-upping (likely) two more. You don't have cap room after that. Finally, after all of this, we have to keep in mind that Reinsdorf himself personally lobbied for this trade as has been reported. If he wanted to spend that money he did so: A) because he wanted to contend; and B) knowing full well that he's going to be shelling for luxury tax after next summer.
This summer is/was our summer to set our roster for probably the next 4-5 years. From now on, it's all MLE or rebuilding. So we better damn well make sure that we have a complete team. And I'm not sorry to say that Ben Wallace, Tyrus Thomas, Malik Allen and Sweets does not a front court make. Please don't bring up PJ Brown's name, he's filler that will produce little/no improvement over Tyson(look at the stats). ...plus, he'll only do so for a season.
The Bulls aren't winning a championship this year.
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions
next summer
The only thing I could possibly like about a PJ deal is the possibility of trading his expiring contract at the deadline, which is not something I'd bank on too much. Most the big names from next summer's class have re-upped already, so I doubt too many teams would deal a talented player solely for the purposes of cap relief.
It just seems more sensible to hold on to chandler for now and wait until a better deal comes along. If not, deal him at the deadline. I think we'd all be in agreement that his value can only go up.
Re: i'm not suggesting
I think that you need to consider flexibility and the future when you bring up a move for Wilcox. You have several core players (BG, KH, Luol, Noc) whose contracts are going to have to be extended in the near future. Whether or not you agree, that $8 million will be valuable to do this. By trading for PJ Brown you are doing several things for the team. (1) You are providing flexibility for next summer when his $8 million comes off the cap; (2) You are bringing in another "locker room guy"; (3) He is going to consistently put up 9 pts, 7 boards, 25+ minutes and tough post defense (three time 2nd all defensive team) every night; (4) Buying a year for T-Thomas to develop more of an offensive game and learn from a 13-year pro who has played in more than 60 playoff games.
I am not arguing the talent level - although compare the stats and it is debateable - but I am saying that if you consider the bigger picture, this trade is a positive and would be smarter than giving a large commitment and a great deal of money to a relatively unproven Chris Wilcox. Considering that we just committed 4 years to Ben Wallace (great D, limited O) and that Wilcox's realistic potential is a 10 and 10 guy and has a similar skill-set to Ben Wallace, I do not think that this would be a smart decision.
by cwolf2484 on Jul 5, 2006 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Collison
?Jarron Collins? might as well get one of the twins boys from Big Daddy. They will come cheaper and be just as effective.
next summer
I'm sure Nick's
Actually Nick was back here last month for our high school basketball camp.
I would
I doubt that will happen
by Colossus @ Blog a Bull on Jul 5, 2006 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Why not Wilcox AND P.J. Brown
Now if he does move to a BU, then what happens at the PF spot? This is where i feel wilcox will be the finishing piece of the puzzle. This man averaged 14 and 9 with guys like R. Allen and R. Lewis, who aren't known for their sharing of the ball. And in the games where Lewis sat out, he erupted for almost 25 and 20.
I would invest in him, because he will play a big role in Pax's vision of athleticism and scoring. not to mention if he get's in foul trouble tyrus is waiting in the wings. So now you have 2 solid frontcourt with Wilcox/Wallace, and bench in PJ/Tyrus. And yes PJ will be gone next season, but when we win a championship THIS year, no one will complain about him being here...and especially not when New York fails to make the playoffs and we swap picks for BIG Ben/PJ's replacement!
by Matador on Jul 5, 2006 3:44 PM CDT reply actions
If you trade for PJ Brown
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 5, 2006 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions
It just happened.
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Smith/Sweetney
by Matador on Jul 5, 2006 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions
It's not happening!
by Eddy Currys Broken Heart on Jul 5, 2006 10:26 PM CDT reply actions
I hate it when....
Funny that the article in the Sun Times mentions the exact same players that I did a couple days ago =)
As much as I would love to keep Smith(and his athleticism), I would love to have Wilcox more! He will be needed to guard Rasheed Wallace, Udonis Haslem, and Boris Diaw/Dirk Nowitzki on our way to an NBA Title. Besides we have Sefolosha to spell Ben Gordon (who WILL be an All-Star this season).
by Matador on Jul 7, 2006 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions















